In situ characterisation of dynamic fracture in $$Al_2O_3$$ using ultra-fast X-ray phase contrast radioscopy: effects of porosity and crack speed
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The dynamic fracture properties of porous ceramics were studied using single bunch synchrotron X-ray phase contrast imaging. The modified brazilian geometry was used to initiate and propagate a pure mode I crack. The specimen was compressed using the Split Hopkinson bars at strain rates of the order of $$10^2$$ s$$-1$$. Main cracks were isolated for four different grades of $$Al_2O_3$$, one dense alumina, and three porous grades with $$20~\%$$ to $$60~\%$$ porosity. The maximum measured crack velocities for three grades is of the order of $$0.6c_R$$ and $$0.4c_R$$ for the most porous. The fracture energy was estimated using a FE numerical simulation to quantify the influence of inertial effects induced by crack propagation. The results show that these inertial effects are far from negligible (up to $$80~\%$$ of the stored energy) and that the dynamic correction factors known from the literature tend to overestimate the fracture energy. The values obtained vary from 22 J/m$$^2$$ for the densest to 5 J/m$$^2$$ for the most porous.
Source: crossref · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geophysical Methods and Applications · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Rock Mechanics and Modeling
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. Anderson TL (2017) Fracture mechanics: fundamentals and applications. CRC Press, Baco Raton10.1201/9781315370293 ↗
2. Arthur Core J-B, Kopp JG, Viot P (2018) Study of the dynamic fracture of hollow spheres under compression using the discrete element method. Procedia Struct Integrity 13:1378–138310.1016/j.prostr.2018.12.288 ↗
3. Asadi P, Javad AM, Ali F (2022) Physical and numerical evaluation of effect of specimen size on dynamic tensile strength of rock. Comput Geotech 142:10453810.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104538 ↗
4. Beguelin PH, Fond C, Kausch HH (1998) The influence of inertial effects on the fracture of rapidly loaded compact tension specimens part a loading and fracture initiation. Int J Fract 89:85–10210.1023/A:1007457914776 ↗
5. Belenky A, Rittel D (2012) Static and dynamic flexural strength of 99.5% alumina. Mech Mater 48:43–5510.1016/j.mechmat.2012.01.006 ↗
6. Belrhiti Y, Dupre JC, Pop O, Germaneau A, Doumalin P, Huger M, Chotard T (2017) Combination of Brazilian test and digital image correlation for mechanical characterization of refractory materials. J Eur Ceram Soc 37(5):2285–229310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.12.032 ↗
7. Bouras S, Zerizer I, Gheldane F, Bouazza MT, Bouzabata B (2008) Study of the resistance to crack propagation in alumina by acoustic emission. Ceram Int 34(8):1857–186510.1016/j.ceramint.2007.06.015 ↗
8. Bratislav L, Maria B, Yannick D, Pascal F, Emilio E, Michael R, David C, Daniel E, Margie O, Alexander R (2021) Ultra-high speed X-ray imaging of dynamic fracturing in cementitious materials under impact. EPJ Web Conf 250:0101410.1051/epjconf/202125001014 ↗
9. Broberg KB (1960) The propagation of a brittle crack. Arkiv for Fysik
10. Carneiro FLLB (1943) A new method to determine the tensile strength of concrete. In Proceedings of the 5th meeting of the Brazilian Association for Technical Rules, vol 3, pp. 126–129
11. Casellas D, Nagl MM, Llanes L, Anglada M (2003) Fracture toughness of alumina and ZTA ceramics: microstructural coarsening effects. J Mater Process Technol 143:148–15210.1016/S0924-0136(03)00396-0 ↗
12. Chapman DJ, Strucka J, Yao Y, Mughal K, Maler D, Efimov S, Belozerov O, Krasik Y, Chittenden JP, Bland SN, Sollier A, Ganzenmuller GC, Cohen A, Levi-Hevroni D, Proud WG, Song P, Eakins DE, Rack A, Lukic B (2024) Dynamic loading platforms coupled to ultra-high speed X-ray imaging at beamline ID19 of the European synchrotron ESRF. High Pressure Res 44:40010.1080/08957959.2024.2370369 ↗
13. Chen Weinong W, Bo S (2010) Split Hopkinson (Kolsky) bar: design, testing and applications. Springer, Berlin
14. Chen R, Dai F, Qin J, Lu F (2013) Flattened Brazilian disc method for determining the dynamic tensile stress-strain curve of low strength brittle solids. Exp Mech 53:1153–115910.1007/s11340-013-9733-6 ↗
15. Chen JJ, Guo BQ, Liu HB, Liu H, Chen PW (2014) Dynamic Brazilian test of brittle materials using the split Hopkinson pressure bar and digital image correlation. Strain 50(6):563–57010.1111/str.12118 ↗
16. Croquelois B, Girardot J, Kopp J-B, Cazautets C, Tchoreloff P, Mazel V (2017) Breaking pharmaceutical tablets with a hole: reevaluation of the stress concentration factor and influence of the hole size. Powder Technol 317:126–13210.1016/j.powtec.2017.04.033 ↗
17. Croquelois B, Kopp JB, Girardot J, Tchoreloff P, Mazel V (2021) Dynamic fracture analysis in Brazilian test: application to pharmaceutical tablets. Int J Fract 229(1):113–12410.1007/s10704-021-00544-9 ↗
18. De Aza AH, Chevalier J, Fantozzi G, Schehl M, Torrecillas R (2002) Crack growth resistance of alumina, zirconia and zirconia toughened alumina ceramics for joint prostheses. Biomaterials 23(3):937–94510.1016/S0142-9612(01)00206-X ↗
19. Deng Z-Y, Fukasawa T, Ando M, Zhang G-J, Ohji T (2001) Microstructure and mechanical properties of porous alumina ceramics fabricated by the decomposition of aluminum hydroxide. J Am Ceram Soc 84(11):2638–264410.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb01065.x ↗
20. Denoual C, Hild F (2000) A damage model for the dynamic fragmentation of brittle solids. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 183(3–4):247–25810.1016/S0045-7825(99)00221-2 ↗
21. Doitrand A, Molnár G, Leguillon D, Martin E, Carrère N (2022) Dynamic crack initiation assessment with the coupled criterion. Eur J Mech-A/Solids 93:10448310.1016/j.euromechsol.2021.104483 ↗
22. Duplan Y (2020) Caractérisation expérimentale et modélisation des propriétés de rupture et de fragmentation dynamiques d’un noyau de munition et de céramiques à blindage. PhD thesis, Université Grenoble Alpes [2020-....]
23. Fairhurst C (1964) On the validity of the ‘Brazilian’test for brittle materials. In International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences & geomechanics abstracts, vol 1, pp 535–546. Elsevier10.1016/0148-9062(64)90060-9 ↗
24. Freund LB (1998) Dynamic fracture mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
25. García VJ, Márquez CO, Zúñiga-Suárez AR, Zuñiga-Torres BC, Villalta-Granda LJ (2017) Brazilian test of concrete specimens subjected to different loading geometries. Int J Concrete Struct Mater 11:343–36310.1007/s40069-017-0194-7 ↗
26. Gaüzère L, Besnard C, Pontoreau M, Carlotti S, Couillaud S, Heintz J-M (2023) Influence of the acrylamide-based monomer on the sintering of ceramics shaped by gelcasting. Open Ceram 16:100447
27. Griffith Alan Arnold (1921) IV. The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Philos Trans Royal Soc London Ser A 221(582–593):163–19810.1098/rsta.1921.0006 ↗
28. Hans J, Schneider Gerold A (2019) Fracture toughness of porous materials-experimental methods and data. Data Brief 23:103709
29. Herbert K (1949) An investigation of the mechanical properties of materials at very high rates of loading. Proc Phys Soc Sect B 62(11):67610.1088/0370-1301/62/11/302 ↗
30. Hiestand EN, Wells JE, Peot CB, Ochs JF (1977) Physical processes of tableting. J Pharm Sci 66(4):510–51910.1002/jps.2600660413 ↗
31. Hobbs DW (1965) An assessment of a technique for determining the tensile strength of rock. Br J Appl Phys 16(2):25910.1088/0508-3443/16/2/319 ↗
32. Hong C, Zhang X, Han J, Wang B (2006) Fabrication and mechanical properties of porous TIB 2 ceramic. J Mater Sci 41:4790–479410.1007/s10853-006-0040-9 ↗
33. Jelitto H, Schneider GA (2020) Extended cubic fracture model for porous materials and the dependence of the fracture toughness on the pore size. Materialia 12:10076110.1016/j.mtla.2020.100761 ↗
34. Ji M, Li H, Zheng J, Yang S, Zaiemyekeh Z, Hogan JD (2022) An experimental study on the strain-rate-dependent compressive and tensile response of an alumina ceramic. Ceram Int 48(19):28121–2813410.1016/j.ceramint.2022.06.117 ↗
35. Kopp J-B (2013) Etude de la rupture dynamique de tuyaux polymères utilisés pour le transport du gaz sous moyenne pression. PhD thesis, Strasbourg
36. Kopp J-B, Schmittbuhl J, Noel O, Lin J, Fond C (2014) Fluctuations of the dynamic fracture energy values related to the amount of created fracture surface. Eng Fract Mech 126:178–18910.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.05.014 ↗
37. Kopp J-B, Lin J, Schmittbuhl J, Fond C (2014) Longitudinal dynamic fracture of polymer pipes. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 18(10):1097–1105
38. Li X, Qiuhong W, Tao M, Weng L, Dong L, Zou Y (2016) Dynamic Brazilian splitting test of ring-shaped specimens with different hole diameters. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:4143–415110.1007/s00603-016-0995-z ↗
39. Longchamps V (2024) Modélisation du comportement de céramiques projetées plasma sous choc par simulation discrète à l’échelle de la microstructure. PhD thesis, HESAM université
40. Mazel V, Guerard S, Croquelois B, Kopp J-B, Girardot J, Diarra H, Busignies V, Tchoreloff P (2016) Reevaluation of the diametral compression test for tablets using the flattened disc geometry. Int J Pharm 513(1–2):669–67710.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.09.088 ↗
41. Nilsson F (1972) Dynamic stress-intensity factors for finite strip problems. Int J Fract Mech 8:403–41110.1007/BF00191102 ↗
42. Nishioka T (1997) Computational dynamic fracture mechanics. Int J Fract 86:127–15910.1023/A:1007376924191 ↗
43. Olbinado MP, Just X, Gelet J-L, Lhuissier P, Scheel M, Vagovic P, Sato T, Graceffa R, Schulz J, Mancuso A et al (2017) MHZ frame rate hard X-ray phase-contrast imaging using synchrotron radiation. Opt Express 25(12):13857–1387110.1364/OE.25.013857 ↗
44. Paliwal B, Ramesh KT (2008) An interacting micro-crack damage model for failure of brittle materials under compression. J Mech Phys Solids 56(3):896–92310.1016/j.jmps.2007.06.012 ↗
45. Popelar CH, Atkinson C (1980) Dynamic crack propagation in a viscoelastic strip. J Mech Phys Solids 28(2):79–9310.1016/0022-5096(80)90015-0 ↗
46. Quentin H, Philippe V, Louise LB, Antonio C, Kopp J-B (2024) Influence of the microstructure on the compressive behaviour of porous aluminas: from microstructural characterisation to fracture mechanisms. J Eur Ceram Soc 44:417010.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2024.01.045 ↗
47. Ravi-Chandar K, Knauss WG (1984) An experimental investigation into dynamic fracture: Iii. On steady-state crack propagation and crack branching. Int J Fract 26:141–15410.1007/BF01157550 ↗
48. Robinson P, Song DQ (1992) A modified DCB specimen for mode I testing of multidirectional laminates. J Compos Mater 26(11):1554–157710.1177/002199839202601101 ↗
49. Rubio Ruiz RA, Pournoori N, Isakov M, Saksala T, Bjørge R, Rack A, Lukic B, Cohen A, Levi-Hevroni D, Kane PA, Hokka M (2024) Progressive weakening of granite by piezoelectric excitation of quartz with alternating current. Rock Mech Rock Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-024-03948-w10.1007/s00603-024-03948-w ↗
50. Sawaki Y, Nagase Y, Yoshida H, Inoue A, Fujiwara T (1993) Crack propagation behavior in alumina ceramic under static and cyclic loading. JSME Int J Ser A Mech Mater Eng 36(4):354–360
51. Scapin M, Peroni L, Avalle M (2017) Dynamic Brazilian test for mechanical characterization of ceramic ballistic protection. Shock Vib 2017:7485856
52. Singh D, Shetty DK (1989) Fracture toughness of polycrystalline ceramics in combined mode I and mode II loading. J Am Ceram Soc 72(1):78–8410.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb05957.x ↗
53. Thiercelin M, Roegiers J-C (1988) Fracture toughness determination with the modified ring test. In Proceedings of the international symposium on engineering in complex rock formations, pp 284–290. Elsevier,10.1016/B978-0-08-035894-9.50041-X ↗
54. Tomaszewski H, Boniecki M, Weglarz H (2000) Effect of grain size on r-curve behaviour of alumina ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc 20(14–15):2569–257410.1016/S0955-2219(00)00137-0 ↗
55. Tutluoglu L, Keles C (2012) Effects of geometric factors on mode I fracture toughness for modified ring tests. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 51:149–16110.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.02.004 ↗
56. Vekinis G, Ashby MF, Beaumont PWR (1990) R-curve behaviour of Al$$_2$$O$$_3$$ ceramics. Acta Metall Mater 38(6):1151–116210.1016/0956-7151(90)90188-M ↗
57. Wang QZ, Jia XM, Kou SQ, Zhang ZX, Lindqvist P-A (2004) The flattened Brazilian disc specimen used for testing elastic modulus, tensile strength and fracture toughness of brittle rocks: analytical and numerical results. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(2):245–25310.1016/S1365-1609(03)00093-5 ↗
58. Wilson E, Bathe K-J (1976) Numerical methods in finite element analysis. Prentice-Hall, Hoboken
59. Yoffe EH (1951) The moving griffith crack. London Edinburgh Dublin Philos Mag J Sci 42(330):739–75010.1080/14786445108561302 ↗
60. Zheng J, Li H, Hogan JD (2023) Strain-rate-dependent tensile response of an alumina ceramic: experiments and modeling. Int J Impact Eng 173:10448710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104487 ↗