DataVXInternational Journal of FracturePaper
journal article·2025-05-15

A data-driven geometry-specific surrogate model for forecasting the load–displacement behavior until ductile fracture

Surajit Dey, Ravi Kiran

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 249· Issue 2
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (82)

Show source-provided references
1. Abadi M, Agarwal A, Barham P, et al (2016) TensorFlow: large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1603.0446710.48550/arXiv.1603.04467 ↗
2. Altché F, de La Fortelle A (2018) An LSTM network for highway trajectory prediction. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1801.0796210.48550/arXiv.1801.07962 ↗
3. Amooie MA, Wilson PJ, Mahmoudi A et al (2024) On the measurement of total entropy generation for determining fatigue fracture. Int J Fatigue 189:108578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.10857810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108578 ↗
4. Anto AD, Dey S, Kiran R (2024) Deciphering the fracture initiation mechanism in additive-manufactured 17–4 steel. J Mater Civ Eng 36:04024122. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-1744510.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-17445 ↗
5. Arasaratnam P, Sivakumaran KS, Tait MJ (2011) True stress-true strain models for structural steel elements. Int Schol Res Not 2011:e656401. https://doi.org/10.5402/2011/65640110.5402/2011/656401 ↗
6. Arumugam D, Kiran R (2022) Compact representation and identification of important regions of metal microstructures using complex-step convolutional autoencoders. Mater des 223:111236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11123610.1016/j.matdes.2022.111236 ↗
7. Arumugam D, Naik DL, Sajid HU, Kiran R (2022) Relationship between nano and macroscale properties of postfire ASTM A36 steels. J Mater Civ Eng 34:04022100. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000421810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004218 ↗
8. Athanasiou CE, Liu X, Zhang B et al (2023) Integrated simulation, machine learning, and experimental approach to characterizing fracture instability in indentation pillar-splitting of materials. J Mech Phys Solids 170:105092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2022.10509210.1016/j.jmps.2022.105092 ↗
9. Avilés-Cruz C, Aguilar-Sanchez M, Vargas-Arista B, Garfias-Garcia E (2024) A new machine learning-based evaluation of ductile fracture. Eng Fract Mech 302:110072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.11007210.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110072 ↗
10. Bahmani B, Sun W (2024) Physics-constrained symbolic model discovery for polyconvex incompressible hyperelastic materials. Int J Numer Methods Eng 125:e7473. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.747310.1002/nme.7473 ↗
11. Bai Y, Wierzbicki T (2009) Application of extended Mohr–Coulomb criterion to ductile fracture. Int J Fract 161:1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-009-9422-810.1007/s10704-009-9422-8 ↗
12. Benzerga AA, Leblond J-B (2010) Ductile fracture by void growth to coalescence. In: Advances in applied mechanics. Elsevier, pp 169–30510.1016/S0065-2156(10)44003-X ↗
13. Bjorhovde R (2004) Development and use of high performance steel. J Constr Steel Res 60:393–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(03)00118-410.1016/S0143-974X(03)00118-4 ↗
14. Bojarski M, Del Testa D, Dworakowski D, et al (2016) End to end learning for self-driving cars. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1604.0731610.48550/arXiv.1604.07316 ↗
15. Bomarito GF, Townsend TS, Stewart KM et al (2021) Development of interpretable, data-driven plasticity models with symbolic regression. Comput Struct 252:106557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2021.10655710.1016/j.compstruc.2021.106557 ↗
16. Chai T, Draxler RR (2014) Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)?—arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature. Geosci Model Dev 7:1247–1250. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1247-201410.5194/gmd-7-1247-2014 ↗
17. Chen D, Li Y, Yang X et al (2021) Efficient parameters identification of a modified GTN model of ductile fracture using machine learning. Eng Fract Mech 245:107535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.10753510.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107535 ↗
18. Chollet F (2015) Keras documentation. https://keras.io
19. Cichocki A, Lee N, Oseledets I et al (2016) Tensor networks for dimensionality reduction and large-scale optimization: part 1 low-rank tensor decompositions. MAL 9:249–429. https://doi.org/10.1561/220000005910.1561/2200000059 ↗
20. Dey S, Kiran R, Ulven C (2024) Experimental evaluation of microvoid characteristics and relationship with stress and strain for ductile fracture. J Mater Civ Eng 36:04023573. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-1669810.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-16698 ↗
21. El Said B (2023) Predicting the non-linear response of composite materials using deep recurrent convolutional neural networks. Int J Solids Struct 276:112334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2023.11233410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2023.112334 ↗
22. Fernández-Fdz D, Zaera R (2008) A new tool based on artificial neural networks for the design of lightweight ceramic–metal armour against high-velocity impact of solids. Int J Solids Struct 45:6369–6383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.08.00910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.08.009 ↗
23. Fernández-Godino MG, Panda N, O’Malley D et al (2021) Accelerating high-strain continuum-scale brittle fracture simulations with machine learning. Comput Mater Sci 186:109959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.10995910.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109959 ↗
24. Fernández-Godino MG (2023) Review of multi-fidelity models. https://doi.org/10.3934/acse.202301510.3934/acse.2023015 ↗
25. Fonseca DJ, Navaresse DO, Moynihan GP (2003) Simulation metamodeling through artificial neural networks. Eng Appl Artif Intell 16:177–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-1976(03)00043-510.1016/S0952-1976(03)00043-5 ↗
26. Garrison WM, Moody NR (1987) Ductile fracture. J Phys Chem Solids 48:1035–1074. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3697(87)90118-110.1016/0022-3697(87)90118-1 ↗
27. Gurson AL (1977) Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth: part I—yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. J Eng Mater Technol 99:2–15. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.344340110.1115/1.3443401 ↗
28. Han X, Xiao Q, Cui K et al (2021) Predicting the fracture behavior of concrete using artificial intelligence approaches and closed-form solution. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 112:102892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.10289210.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102892 ↗
29. Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J (1997) Long short-term memory. Neural Comput 9:1735–1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.173510.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
30. Hodson TO (2022) Root-mean-square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE): when to use them or not. Geosci Model Dev 15:5481–5487. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5481-202210.5194/gmd-15-5481-2022 ↗
31. Hsu Y-C, Yu C-H, Buehler MJ (2020) Using deep learning to predict fracture patterns in crystalline solids. Matter 3:197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2020.04.01910.1016/j.matt.2020.04.019 ↗
32. Hsu W-N, Zhang Y, Lee A, Glass J (2016) Exploiting depth and highway connections in convolutional recurrent deep neural networks for speech recognition. Cell 50(1):395–399
33. Huang J-C, Ko K-M, Shu M-H, Hsu B-M (2020) Application and comparison of several machine learning algorithms and their integration models in regression problems. Neural Comput Appl 32:5461–5469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04644-510.1007/s00521-019-04644-5 ↗
34. Hunter A, Moore BA, Mudunuru M et al (2019) Reduced-order modeling through machine learning and graph-theoretic approaches for brittle fracture applications. Comput Mater Sci 157:87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.10.03610.1016/j.commatsci.2018.10.036 ↗
35. Jain LC, Medsker LR (1999) Recurrent neural networks: design and applications, 1st edn. CRC Press Inc, USA
36. Kanvinde AM, Deierlein GG (2006) The void growth model and the stress modified critical strain model to predict ductile fracture in structural steels. J Struct Eng 132:1907–1918. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:12(1907)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:12(1907) ↗
37. Kiran R, Khandelwal K (2013) A micromechanical model for ductile fracture prediction in ASTM A992 steels. Eng Fract Mech 102:101–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.02.02110.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.02.021 ↗
38. Kiran R, Khandelwal K (2014a) Gurson model parameters for ductile fracture simulation in ASTM A992 steels. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 37:171–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.1209710.1111/ffe.12097 ↗
39. Kiran R, Khandelwal K (2014b) Experimental studies and models for ductile fracture in ASTM A992 steels at high triaxiality. J Struct Eng 140:04013044. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000082810.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000828 ↗
40. Kiran R, Li L, Khandelwal K (2015) Performance of cubic convergent methods for implementing nonlinear constitutive models. Comput Struct 156:83–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.04.01110.1016/j.compstruc.2015.04.011 ↗
41. Krokos V, Bordas SPA, Kerfriden P (2024) A graph-based probabilistic geometric deep learning framework with online enforcement of physical constraints to predict the criticality of defects in porous materials. Int J Solids Struct 286–287:112545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2023.11254510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2023.112545 ↗
42. Lemaitre J (1985) A continuous damage mechanics model for ductile fracture. J Eng Mater Technol 107:83–89. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.322577510.1115/1.3225775 ↗
43. Lemaitre J (1996) A course on damage mechanics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg10.1007/978-3-642-18255-6 ↗
44. Li S, Gong B, Dai L et al (2024) Data-driven probabilistic failure assessment curve based on similitude principle. Int J Solids Struct 295:112819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2024.11281910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2024.112819 ↗
45. Liu X, Athanasiou CE, Padture NP et al (2020) A machine learning approach to fracture mechanics problems. Acta Mater 190:105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2020.03.01610.1016/j.actamat.2020.03.016 ↗
46. Liu X, Athanasiou CE, Padture NP et al (2021) Knowledge extraction and transfer in data-driven fracture mechanics. Proc Natl Acad Sci 118:e2104765118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.210476511810.1073/pnas.2104765118 ↗
47. Mandic DP, Chambers JA (2001) Recurrent neural networks architectures. In: Recurrent neural networks for prediction. Wiley, pp 69–8910.1002/047084535X.ch5 ↗
48. Marques AE, Parreira TG, Pereira AFG et al (2024) Machine learning applications in sheet metal constitutive modelling: a review. Int J Solids Struct 303:113024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2024.11302410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2024.113024 ↗
49. Moghar A, Hamiche M (2020) Stock market prediction using LSTM recurrent neural network. Procedia Comput Sci 170:1168–1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.04910.1016/j.procs.2020.03.049 ↗
50. Moore BA, Rougier E, O’Malley D et al (2018) Predictive modeling of dynamic fracture growth in brittle materials with machine learning. Comput Mater Sci 148:46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.01.05610.1016/j.commatsci.2018.01.056 ↗
51. Mudunuru MK, Panda N, Karra S et al (2019) Surrogate models for estimating failure in brittle and quasi-brittle materials. Appl Sci 9:2706. https://doi.org/10.3390/app913270610.3390/app9132706 ↗
52. Mulukutla M, Person AN, Voigt S et al (2024) Illustrating an effective workflow for accelerated materials discovery. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 13:453–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-024-00357-310.1007/s40192-024-00357-3 ↗
53. Nahshon K, Hutchinson JW (2008) Modification of the Gurson Model for shear failure. Eur J Mech A Solids 27:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2007.08.00210.1016/j.euromechsol.2007.08.002 ↗
54. Naik DL, Kiran R (2019) Identification and characterization of fracture in metals using machine learning based texture recognition algorithms. Eng Fract Mech 219:106618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.10661810.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106618 ↗
55. Pardoen T, Doghri I, Delannay F (1998) Experimental and numerical comparison of void growth models and void coalescence criteria for the prediction of ductile fracture in copper bars. Acta Mater 46:541–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00247-410.1016/S1359-6454(97)00247-4 ↗
56. Qu Z, Haghani P, Weinstein E, Moreno P (2017) Syllable-based acoustic modeling with CTC-SMBR-LSTM. In: 2017 IEEE automatic speech recognition and understanding workshop (ASRU), pp 173–17710.1109/ASRU.2017.8268932 ↗
57. Queipo NV, Haftka RT, Shyy W et al (2005) Surrogate-based analysis and optimization. Prog Aerosp Sci 41:1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.00110.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.001 ↗
58. Rice JR, Tracey DM (1969) On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields∗. J Mech Phys Solids 17:201–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-710.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-7 ↗
59. Schmidt J, Marques MRG, Botti S, Marques MAL (2019) Recent advances and applications of machine learning in solid-state materials science. NPJ Comput Mater 5:1–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-019-0221-010.1038/s41524-019-0221-0 ↗
60. Schowtjak A, Gerlach J, Muhammad W et al (2022) Prediction of ductile damage evolution based on experimental data using artificial neural networks. Int J Solids Struct 257:111950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.11195010.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.111950 ↗
61. Schuster M, Paliwal KK (1997) Bidirectional recurrent neural networks. IEEE Trans Signal Process 45:2673–2681. https://doi.org/10.1109/78.65009310.1109/78.650093 ↗
62. Silver D, Huang A, Maddison CJ et al (2016) Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature 529:484–489. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature1696110.1038/nature16961 ↗
63. Sola J, Sevilla J (1997) Importance of input data normalization for the application of neural networks to complex industrial problems. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 44:1464–1468. https://doi.org/10.1109/23.58953210.1109/23.589532 ↗
64. Soutner D, Müller L (2013) Application of LSTM neural networks in language modelling. In: Habernal I, Matoušek V (eds) Text, speech, and dialogue. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 105–11210.1007/978-3-642-40585-3_14 ↗
65. Srinivasan G, Hyman JD, Osthus DA et al (2018) Quantifying topological uncertainty in fractured systems using graph theory and machine learning. Sci Rep 8:11665. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30117-110.1038/s41598-018-30117-1 ↗
66. Srivastava A, Ghassemi-Armaki H, Sung H et al (2015) Micromechanics of plastic deformation and phase transformation in a three-phase TRIP-assisted advanced high strength steel: experiments and modeling. J Mech Phys Solids 78:46–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2015.01.01410.1016/j.jmps.2015.01.014 ↗
67. Suthaharan S (2014) Big data classification: problems and challenges in network intrusion prediction with machine learning. SIGMETRICS Perform Eval Rev 41:70–73. https://doi.org/10.1145/2627534.262755710.1145/2627534.2627557 ↗
68. Dassault Systemes (2019) ABAQUS/standard analysis user’s manual. https://www.3ds.com/support/documentation/user-guides
69. Trung CV, Ngoc Dinh M, Dimla E (2020) Predicting Phase-field Behavior of Brittle Fracture Model based on LSTM Time Series Forecasting Model. In: 2020 RIVF international conference on computing and communication technologies (RIVF), pp 1–610.1109/RIVF48685.2020.9140790 ↗
70. Tvergaard V (1982) On localization in ductile materials containing spherical voids. Int J Fract 18:237–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0001568610.1007/BF00015686 ↗
71. Tvergaard V, Needleman A (1984) Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar. Acta Metall 32:157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X10.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X ↗
72. Wang Y, Oyen D, Guo W (Grace), et al (2021) StressNet - Deep learning to predict stress with fracture propagation in brittle materials. NPJ Mater Degrad 5:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41529-021-00151-y10.1038/s41529-021-00151-y ↗
73. Weck A, Wilkinson DS, Toda H, Maire E (2006) 2D and 3D visualization of ductile fracture. Adv Eng Mater 8:469–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20060003410.1002/adem.200600034 ↗
74. Wen H, Mahmoud H (2016) New model for ductile fracture of metal alloys. I: monotonic loading. J Eng Mech 142:04015088. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.000100910.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001009 ↗
75. Wilson PJ, Azizian-Farsani E, Paul M et al (2024) On the damping and fatigue characterization of additively manufactured Ti–6Al–4V. Addit Manuf Lett 11:100260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addlet.2024.10026010.1016/j.addlet.2024.100260 ↗
76. Xu W, Wu H, Ma H, Shan D (2018) Damage evolution and ductile fracture prediction during tube spinning of titanium alloy. Int J Mech Sci 135:226–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.11.02410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.11.024 ↗
77. Yao D, Pu S, Li M et al (2022) Parameter identification method of the semi-coupled fracture model for 6061 aluminium alloy sheet based on machine learning assistance. Int J Solids Struct 254–255:111823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.11182310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.111823 ↗
78. Yatkın MA, Kõrgesaar M (2024) Machine learning enabled identification of sheet metal localization. Int J Solids Struct 288:112592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2023.11259210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2023.112592 ↗
79. Yi R, Georgiou D, Liu X, Athanasiou CE (2025) Mechanics-informed, model-free symbolic regression framework for solving fracture problems. J Mech Phys Solids 194:105916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2024.10591610.1016/j.jmps.2024.105916 ↗
80. Yu Y, Si X, Hu C, Zhang J (2019) A review of recurrent neural networks: LSTM cells and network architectures. Neural Comput 31:1235–1270. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco_a_0119910.1162/neco_a_01199 ↗
81. Zhang R, Liu Y, Sun H (2020) Physics-informed multi-LSTM networks for metamodeling of nonlinear structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 369:113226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.11322610.1016/j.cma.2020.113226 ↗
82. Zheng X, Battalgazy B, Molkeri A et al (2023) Role of length-scale in machine learning based image analysis of ductile fracture surfaces. Mech Mater 181:104661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2023.10466110.1016/j.mechmat.2023.104661 ↗