Cavitation and crack nucleation in thin hyperelastic adhesives
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The present study investigates in the failure of adhesive bondings with structural silicone sealants. Point connectors of two circular metal adherends bonded with DOWSIL™ TSSA are subjected to tensile loading. We formulate and use a constitutive law that captures volumetric softening owing to the formation of cavities. Therein, cavitation is considered a process of elastic instability which is homogenized with a pseudo-elastic approach. Ultimate failure initiating from the free edges is predicted employing the framework of finite fracture mechanics. The concept requires both a strength-of-materials condition and a fracture mechanics condition to be satisfied simultaneously for crack nucleation. For the former, we use a novel multiaxial equivalent strain criterion. For the latter, we employ literature values of the fracture toughness of DOWSIL™ TSSA . The predicted onset of cavitation and ultimate failure loads are in good agreement with our experiments. The proposed model provides initial crack lengths that allow for the derivation of simple engineering models for both initial designs and proof of structural integrity while simultaneously extending the range of usability of the structural silicone compared to standardized approaches.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Elasticity and Material Modeling · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Polymer Science and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (90)
Show source-provided references
1. Altenbach H, Rosendahl PL, Becker W, Kolupaev VA (2018) Isogonal and isotoxal hexagons as extremal yield figures. In Wisniewski W, Burczynski T (Eds.), Book of abstracts
2. Arruda EM, Boyce MC (1993) A three-dimensional constitutive model for the large stretch behavior of rubber elastic materials. J Mech Phys Solids 41(2):389–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(93)90013-610.1016/0022-5096(93)90013-6 ↗
3. Ayatollahi MR, Heydari-Meybodi M, Dehghany M, Berto F (2016) A new criterion for rupture assessment of rubber-like materials under mode-i crack loading: The effective stretch criterion. Adv Eng Mater 18(8):1364–1370. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20160004610.1002/adem.201600046 ↗
4. Ball JM (1982) Discontinuous equilibrium solutions and cavitation in nonlinear elasticity. Philosophical Trans R Soc London Ser A, Math Phys Sci 306(1496):557–611. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1982.009510.1098/rsta.1982.0095 ↗
5. Bažant ZP (1999) Size effect on structural strength: a review. Arch Appl Mech 69(9–10):703–725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419005025210.1007/s004190050252 ↗
6. Berto F (2015) A criterion based on the local strain energy density for the fracture assessment of cracked and v-notched components made of incompressible hyperelastic materials. Theor Appl Fract Mech 76:17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2014.12.00810.1016/j.tafmec.2014.12.008 ↗
7. Blatz PJ (1963) Application of finite elastic theory to the behavior of rubberlike materials. Rubber Chem Technol 36(5):1459–1496. https://doi.org/10.5254/1.353965110.5254/1.3539651 ↗
8. Busse WF (1938) Physics of rubber as related to the automobile. J Appl Phys 9(7):438–451. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.171043910.1063/1.1710439 ↗
9. Cornetti P, Muñoz-Reja M, Sapora A, Carpinteri A (2019) Finite fracture mechanics and cohesive crack model: Weight functions vs. cohesive laws. Int J Solids Struct 156–157:126–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.08.00310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.08.003 ↗
10. Dal H, Cansız B, Miehe C (2018) A three-scale compressible microsphere model for hyperelastic materials. Int J Numer Methods Eng 116(6):412–433. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.593010.1002/nme.5930 ↗
11. Dal H, Cansız B., Miehe C (2013) Finite element modelisation of multiaxial mechanical and fatigue behavior of a polychloroprene rubber, In Constitutive Models for Rubber VIII, eds. Gil-Negrete, N., A. Alonso, 189–194. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b14964-3510.1201/b14964-35 ↗
12. Danielsson M, Parks D, Boyce M (2004) Constitutive modeling of porous hyperelastic materials. Mech Mater 36(4):347–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6636(03)00064-410.1016/S0167-6636(03)00064-4 ↗
13. Dickie RA, Smith, TL (1969) Ultimate tensile properties of elastomers. vi. strength and extensibility of a styrene–butadiene rubber vulcanizate in equal biaxial tension. J Polymer Sci Part A-2: Polymer Phys 7(4): 687–707. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1969.16007040810.1002/pol.1969.160070408 ↗
14. Doitrand A, Leguillon D (2018) 3d application of the coupled criterion to crack initiation prediction in epoxy/aluminum specimens under four point bending. Int J Solids Struct 143:175–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.03.00510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.03.005 ↗
15. Drass M, Kolupaev VA, Schneider J, Kolling S (2018a) On cavitation in transparent structural silicone adhesive: Tssa. Glass Struct Eng 3(2):237–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40940-018-0061-110.1007/s40940-018-0061-1 ↗
16. Drass M, Schneider J, Kolling S (2018b) Novel volumetric helmholtz free energy function accounting for isotropic cavitation at finite strains. Mater Design 138:71–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.05910.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.059 ↗
17. Drass M, Schwind G, Schneider J, Kolling S (2018c) Adhesive connections in glass structures-part i: experiments and analytics on thin structural silicone. Glass Struct Eng 3(1):39–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40940-017-0046-510.1007/s40940-017-0046-5 ↗
18. Drass M, Muth J, Louter C, Schneider J (2019) Stress whitening effects in transparent structural silicone adhesives. Glass Struct Eng 4(3):433–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40940-019-00102-910.1007/s40940-019-00102-9 ↗
19. Drass M, Bartels N, Schneider J, Klein D (2020) Pseudo-elastic cavitation model-part ii: extension to cyclic behavior of transparent silicone adhesives. Glass Struct Eng 5(1):67–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40940-019-00103-810.1007/s40940-019-00103-8 ↗
20. Drass M, Du Bois PA, Schneider J, Kolling S (2020) Pseudo-elastic cavitation model: part i-finite element analyses on thin silicone adhesives in façades. Glass Struct Eng 5(1):41–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40940-019-00115-410.1007/s40940-019-00115-4 ↗
21. Drass M, Schneider J (2016) On the mechanical behavior of transparent structural silicone adhesive (tssa), In Zingoni A (ed.). Insights and Innovations in Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Computation. 446–451. Taylor & Francis Group, 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300, Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315641645-7410.1201/9781315641645-74 ↗
22. Ehlers W, Eipper G (1998) The simple tension problem at large volumetric strains computed from finite hyperelastic material laws. Acta Mech 130(1–2):17–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0118704010.1007/bf01187040 ↗
23. Felger J, Stein N, Becker W (2017) Asymptotic finite fracture mechanics solution for crack onset at elliptical holes in composite plates of finite-width. Eng Fract Mechan 182:621–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.05.04810.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.05.048 ↗
24. Felger J, Stein N, Becker W (2017) Mixed-mode fracture in open-hole composite plates of finite-width: An asymptotic coupled stress and energy approach. Int J Solids Struct 122–123:14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.05.03910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.05.039 ↗
25. Felger J, Stein N, Frey C, Becker W (2019) Scaling laws for the adhesive composite butt joint strength derived by finite fracture mechanics. Composite Struct 208:546–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.10010.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.100 ↗
26. Flory PJ (1961) Thermodynamic relations for high elastic materials. Trans Faraday Soc 57:829. https://doi.org/10.1039/TF961570082910.1039/TF9615700829 ↗
27. Frey C, Dölling S, Becker W (2021) Closed-form analysis of interlaminar crack initiation in angle-ply laminates. Composite Struct 257:113060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11306010.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113060 ↗
28. García IG, Mantič V, Blázquez A (2018) The effect of residual thermal stresses on transverse cracking in cross-ply laminates: an application of the coupled criterion of the finite fracture mechanics. Int J Fract Mech 211(1–2):61–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-018-0276-910.1007/s10704-018-0276-9 ↗
29. García IG, Justo J, Simon A, Mantič V (2019) Experimental study of the size effect on transverse cracking in cross-ply laminates and comparison with the main theoretical models. Mech Mater 128:24–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2018.09.00610.1016/j.mechmat.2018.09.006 ↗
30. Gent AN, Lindley PB (1959). Internal rupture of bonded rubber cylinders in tension. Proc R Soc London Ser A Math Phys Sci 249(1257): 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1959.001610.1098/rspa.1959.0016 ↗
31. Griffith AA (1921) Vi. the phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Philos Trans R Soc London Ser A Math Phys Sci 221(582-593): 163–198. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1921.000610.1098/rsta.1921.0006 ↗
32. Hagl A, Wolf A, Sitte S (2012) Investigation of stress-whitening in transparent structural silicone adhesive. In: Bos F, Louter C, Nijsse R, Veer F (eds) Challenging glass 3. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 249–258
33. Hagl A, Dietrich O, Wolf A, Sitte S (2012) Tensile loading of silicone point supports – revisited, In Bos F, Louter C, Nijsse R, Veer F (eds.) Challenging glass 3, Volume 0, 235–247. Amsterdam: IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-061-1-23510.3233/978-1-61499-061-1-235 ↗
34. Hamdi A, Mahjoubi H (2015) Design criterion for rubbery parts under biaxial loading. Theor Appl Fract Mech 78:51–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2015.04.00110.1016/j.tafmec.2015.04.001 ↗
35. Hamdi A, Naït Abdelaziz M, Aït Hocine N, Heuillet P, Benseddiq N (2006) A fracture criterion of rubber-like materials under plane stress conditions. Polymer Test 25(8):994–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.06.00510.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.06.005 ↗
36. Hamdi A, Naït Abdelaziz M, Aït Hocine N, Heuillet P, Benseddiq N (2007) A new generalized fracture criterion of elastomers under quasi-static plane stress loadings. Polymer Test 26(7):896–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.06.01410.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.06.014 ↗
37. Hashin Z (1996) Finite thermoelastic fracture criterion with application to laminate cracking analysis. J Mech Phys Solids 44(7):1129–1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(95)00080-110.1016/0022-5096(95)00080-1 ↗
38. Heydari-Meybodi M, Ayatollahi MR, Dehghany M, Berto F (2017) Mixed-mode (i/ii) failure assessment of rubber materials using the effective stretch criterion. Theo Appl Fract Mech 91:126–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2017.05.00110.1016/j.tafmec.2017.05.001 ↗
39. Heydari-Meybodi M, Ayatollahi MR, Berto F (2018) Rupture analysis of rubber in the presence of a sharp v-shape notch under pure mode-i loading. Int J Mech Sci 146–147:405–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.08.00810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.08.008 ↗
40. Horgan CO, Abeyaratne R (1986) A bifurcation problem for a compressible nonlinearly elastic medium: growth of a micro-void. J Elast 16(2):189–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0004358510.1007/BF00043585 ↗
41. Hou HS, Abeyaratne R (1992) Cavitation in elastic and elastic-plastic solids. J Mech Phys Solids 40(3):571–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(92)80004-A10.1016/0022-5096(92)80004-A ↗
42. Jones TM, Kruse RB (1966) Failure behavior of composite hydrocarbon fuel binder propellants. J Spacecraft Rockets 3(2):265–267. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.2843110.2514/3.28431 ↗
43. Kawabata S (1973) Fracture and mechanical behavior of rubber-like polymers under finite deformation in biaxial stress field. J Macromol Sci Part B 8(3–4):605–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022234730820163910.1080/00222347308201639 ↗
44. Knauss WG (1967) An upper bound of failure in viscoelastic materials subjected to multiaxial stress states. Int J Fract Mech 3(4):267–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0018289210.1007/BF00182892 ↗
45. Kolupaev VA (2018) Equivalent stress concept for limit state analysis, Volume 86 of Advanced Structured Materials. Cham: Springer International Publishing10.1007/978-3-319-73049-3 ↗
46. Lake GJ, Thomas AG (1967) The strength of highly elastic materials. Proc R Soc London Ser A Math Phys Sci 300(1460):108–119. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1967.016010.1098/rspa.1967.0160 ↗
47. Lake GJ (1995) Fatigue and fracture of elastomers. Rubber Chem Technol 68(3):435–460. https://doi.org/10.5254/1.353875010.5254/1.3538750 ↗
48. Lazopoulos KA, Ogden RW (1998) Nonlinear elasticity theory with discontinuous internal variables. Math Mech Solids 3(1):29–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/10812865980030010310.1177/108128659800300103 ↗
49. Leguillon D (2002) Strength or toughness? a criterion for crack onset at a notch. Eur J Mech A/Solids 21(1):61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0997-7538(01)01184-610.1016/S0997-7538(01)01184-6 ↗
50. Leguillon D, Martin E, Ševeček O, Bermejo R (2015) Application of the coupled stress-energy criterion to predict the fracture behaviour of layered ceramics designed with internal compressive stresses. Eur J Mech A/Solids 54:94–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2015.06.00810.1016/j.euromechsol.2015.06.008 ↗
51. Leguillon D, Martin E, Ševeček O, Bermejo R (2018) What is the tensile strength of a ceramic to be used in numerical models for predicting crack initiation? Int J Fract Mech 212(1):89–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-018-0294-710.1007/s10704-018-0294-7 ↗
52. Li J, Mayau D, Song F (2007) A constitutive model for cavitation and cavity growth in rubber-like materials under arbitrary tri-axial loading. Int J Solids Struct 44(18–19):6080–6100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.02.01610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.02.016 ↗
53. Li J, Mayau D, Lagarrigue V (2008) A constitutive model dealing with damage due to cavity growth and the mullins effect in rubber-like materials under triaxial loading. J Mech Phys Solids 56(3):953–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2007.06.00910.1016/j.jmps.2007.06.009 ↗
54. Lindsey GH (1967) Triaxial fracture studies. J Appl Phys 38(12):4843–4852. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.170923210.1063/1.1709232 ↗
55. Lopez-Pamies O, Idiart MI, Nakamura T (2011a) Cavitation in elastomeric solids: I-a defect-growth theory. J Mech Phys Solids 59(8):1464–1487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2011.04.01510.1016/j.jmps.2011.04.015 ↗
56. Lopez-Pamies O, Nakamura T, Idiart MI (2011b) Cavitation in elastomeric solids: Ii-onset-of-cavitation surfaces for neo-hookean materials. J Mech Phys Solids 59(8):1488–1505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2011.04.01610.1016/j.jmps.2011.04.016 ↗
57. Miehe C, Schänzel LM (2014) Phase field modeling of fracture in rubbery polymers. part i: Finite elasticity coupled with brittle failure. J Mech Phys Solids 65:93–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2013.06.00710.1016/j.jmps.2013.06.007 ↗
58. Mooney M (1940) A theory of large elastic deformation. J Appl Phys 11(9):582–592. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.171283610.1063/1.1712836 ↗
59. Nelder JA (1966) Inverse polynomials, a useful group of multi-factor response functions. Biometrics 22(1):128. https://doi.org/10.2307/252822010.2307/2528220 ↗
60. Ogden RW (1972) Large deformation isotropic elasticity – on the correlation of theory and experiment for incompressible rubberlike solids. Proc R Soc London Ser A Math Phys Sci 326(1567): 565–584. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1972.002610.1098/rspa.1972.0026 ↗
61. Pipes RB, Wetherhold RC, Gillespie JW (1979) Notched strength of composite materials. J Comp Mater 13(2):148–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219983790130020610.1177/002199837901300206 ↗
62. Podgórski J (1985) General failure criterion for isotropic media. J Eng Mech 111(2):188–201. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1985)111:2(188)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1985)111:2(188) ↗
63. Rheinschmidt F, Schneider J, Rosendahl PL (2023) Identification of mode i and iii fracture toughness of hyperelastic adhesives. J Adhes Adhes (under review)10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.103881 ↗
64. Rivlin RS (1948) Large elastic deformations of isotropic materials iv. further developments of the general theory. Philos Trans R Soc London Ser A Math Phys Sci 241(835): 379–397. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1948.002410.1098/rsta.1948.0024 ↗
65. Rivlin RS, Thomas, AG (1953) Rupture of rubber. i. characteristic energy for tearing. J Polymer Sci 10(3): 291–318. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1953.12010030310.1002/pol.1953.120100303 ↗
66. Rosendahl PL, Drass M, Schneider J, Becker, W (2018) Crack nucleation in hyperelastic adhesive bonds. ce/papers 2(5-6):409–425. https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.94110.1002/cepa.941 ↗
67. Rosendahl PL, Weißgraeber P (2020) Modeling snow slab avalanches caused by weak-layer failure - part 1: Slabs on compliant and collapsible weak layers. Cryosphere 14(1):115–130. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-115-202010.5194/tc-14-115-2020 ↗
68. Rosendahl PL, Weißgraeber P (2020) Modeling snow slab avalanches caused by weak-layer failure - part 2: Coupled mixed-mode criterion for skier-triggered anticracks. Cryosphere 14(1):131–145. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-131-202010.5194/tc-14-131-2020 ↗
69. Rosendahl PL, Weißgraeber P, Stein N, Becker W (2017) Asymmetric crack onset at open-holes under tensile and in-plane bending loading. Int J Solids Struct 113–114:10–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.09.01110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.09.011 ↗
70. Rosendahl PL, Drass M, Felger J, Schneider J, Becker W (2019) Equivalent strain failure criterion for multiaxially loaded incompressible hyperelastic elastomers. Int J Solids Struct 166:32–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.01.03010.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.01.030 ↗
71. Rosendahl PL, Staudt Y, Schneider AP, Schneider J, Becker W (2019) Nonlinear elastic finite fracture mechanics: Modeling mixed-mode crack nucleation in structural glazing silicone sealants. Mater Design 182:108057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10805710.1016/j.matdes.2019.108057 ↗
72. Santarsiero M, Louter C, Nussbaumer A (2017) Laminated connections under tensile load at different temperatures and strain rates. Int J Adhes Adhes 79:23–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.09.00210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.09.002 ↗
73. Sharma MG (1966) Failure of polymeric materials under biaxial stress fields. Polymer Eng Sci 6(1):30–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.76006010610.1002/pen.760060106 ↗
74. Sharma MG, Lim CK (1965) Experimental investigations on fracture of polymers. Polymer Eng Sci 5(4):254–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.76005040810.1002/pen.760050408 ↗
75. Sitte S, Brasseur MJ, Carbary LD, Wolf AT, Wolf A, Dean SW (2011) Preliminary evaluation of the mechanical properties and durability of transparent structural silicone adhesive (tssa) for point fixing in glazing. J ASTM Int 8(10):104084. https://doi.org/10.1520/JAI10408410.1520/JAI104084 ↗
76. Smith TL, Rinde JA (1969) Ultimate tensile properties of elastomers. v. rupture in constrained biaxial tensions. J Polymer Sci Part A-2: Polymer Phys 7(4):675–685. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1969.16007040710.1002/pol.1969.160070407 ↗
77. Souguir S, Brochard L, Sab K (2020) Stress concentration and instabilities in the atomistic process of brittle failure initiation. Int J Fract Mech 224(2):235–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-020-00459-x10.1007/s10704-020-00459-x ↗
78. Staudt Y, Odenbreit C, Schneider J (2018) Failure behaviour of silicone adhesive in bonded connections with simple geometry. Int J Adhes Adhes 82:126–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.12.01510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.12.015 ↗
79. Stein N, Weißgraeber P, Becker W (2015) A model for brittle failure in adhesive lap joints of arbitrary joint configuration. Composite Struct 133:707–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.10010.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.100 ↗
80. Stuart CA (1985) Radially symmetric cavitation for hyperelastic materials. Ann Inst Henri Poincaré C, Anal Non Linéaire 2(1):33–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0294-1449(16)30411-510.1016/S0294-1449(16)30411-5 ↗
81. Talmon l’Armée A, Becker W (2020) Coupled stress and energy criterion for composite failure: Pointwise versus averaged evaluation of the stress criterion. Mechan Adv Mater Struct 27(18):1571–1582. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2018.151961810.1080/15376494.2018.1519618 ↗
82. Talmon A, Hell S, Rosendahl PL, Felger J, Becker W (2017) Nonlinear crack opening integral: Mode mixity for finite cracks. Eng Fract Mechan 186:283–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.10.00610.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.10.006 ↗
83. Taylor D (2008) The theory of critical distances. Eng Fract Mech 75(7):1696–1705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.04.00710.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.04.007 ↗
84. Thomas AG (1955) Rupture of rubber. ii. the strain concentration at an incision. J Polymer Sci 18(88):177–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1955.12018880210.1002/pol.1955.120188802 ↗
85. Thomas AG (1958) Rupture of rubber. v. cut growth in natural rubber vulcanizates. J Polymer Sci 31(123): 467–480. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1958.120311232410.1002/pol.1958.1203112324 ↗
86. Timmel M, Kaliske M, Kolling S, Mueller R (2007) A micromechanical approach to simulate rubberlike materials with damage. Comput Mater Continua 5(3):161–172. https://doi.org/10.3970/cmc.2007.005.16110.3970/cmc.2007.005.161 ↗
87. Tschoegl NW (1971) Failure surfaces in principal stress space. J Polymer Sci Part C: Polymer Symp 32(1):239–267. https://doi.org/10.1002/polc.507032011310.1002/polc.5070320113 ↗
88. Weißgraeber P, Felger J, Geipel D, Becker W (2016) Cracks at elliptical holes: Stress intensity factor and finite fracture mechanics solution. Eur J Mech A/Solids 55:192–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2015.09.00210.1016/j.euromechsol.2015.09.002 ↗
89. Weißgraeber P, Leguillon D, Becker W (2016) A review of finite fracture mechanics: crack initiation at singular and non-singular stress raisers. Arch Appl Mech 86(1–2):375–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-015-1091-710.1007/s00419-015-1091-7 ↗
90. Yerzley FL (1939) Adhesion of neoprene to metal. Indust Eng Chem 31(8):950–956. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50356a00710.1021/ie50356a007 ↗