The effect of superimposed hydrostatic pressure on shear decohesion in round bar tensile specimens
Source abstract
Abstract
The modified Gurson–Tvergaard–Needleman model, that considers shear decohesion as an increment in the total void volume fraction, is used to investigate the effect of superimposed hydrostatic pressure on the ductility of a round bar specimen. Experiments indicate that the fracture mode is not uniform across the cross section of a round bar specimen–no shear damage exists at the center while it is pronounced at the edge. The damage mechanisms of shear decohesion and void growth are delayed by applying superimposed hydrostatic pressure, which leads to an increase in the fracture strain and ductility. However, the effect of pressure on ductility depends on the location within the cross section. Void growth at both the center and the edge becomes increasingly delayed with increasing pressure, but this effect is more significant at the edge because of the existence of shear stress. Shear decohesion at the edge becomes the dominant damage mechanism, rather than void growth, when pressure is increased. The numerical results presented herein are used to explain and discuss this phenomenon in depth.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Abaqus/CAE User’s Manual (2014) ABAQUS Inc., Waltham
2. Ashby MF, Embury JD, Cooksley SH, Teirlinck D (1985) Fracture maps with pressure as a variable. Scr Metall 19(4):385–39010.1016/0036-9748(85)90099-7 ↗
3. Barsoum I, Faleskog J (2007) Rupture mechanisms in combined tension and shear-Micromechanics. Int J Solids Struct 44:5481–549810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.01.010 ↗
4. Besson J, Steglich D, Brocks W (2001) Modeling of crack growth in round bars and plane strain specimens. Int J Solids Struct 38:8259–828410.1016/S0020-7683(01)00167-6 ↗
5. Bridgman PW (1952) Studies in large plastic flow and fracture. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
6. Brownrigg A, Spitzig WA, Richmond O, Teirlinck D, Embury JD (1983) The influence of hydrostatic pressure on the flow stress and ductility of a spherodized 1045 steel. Acta Metall 31(8):1141–115010.1016/0001-6160(83)90176-1 ↗
7. Brünig M, Gerke S, Hagenbrock V (2013) Micro-mechanical studies on the effect of the stress triaxiality and the Lode parameter on ductile damage. Int J Plasticity 50:49–6510.1016/j.ijplas.2013.03.012 ↗
8. Chen S, Osovski S (2020a) Damage evolution around an embedded pore in quasi-static shear dominant compression and tension specimens. Mech Mater 148:10351310.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103513 ↗
9. Chen S, Osovski S (2020b) Damage evolution around shear loaded intervoid ligaments in plane strain and plane stress. Eur J Mech A Solids 80:10390910.1016/j.euromechsol.2019.103909 ↗
10. Chen XX, Wu PD, Embury JD, Huang Y (2010) Enhanced ductility in round tensile bars produced by cladding a ductile ring. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 18(2):02500510.1088/0965-0393/18/2/025005 ↗
11. Chen D, Li Y, Yang X, Jiang W, Guan L (2021) Efficient parameters identification of a modified GTN model of ductile fracture using machine learning. Eng Fract Mech 245:10753510.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107535 ↗
12. Chu C, Needleman A (1980) Void nucleation effects in biaxially stretched sheets. J Eng Mater Technol 102(3):249–25610.1115/1.3224807 ↗
13. French IE, Weinrich PF (1975) The influence of hydrostatic pressure on the tensile deformation and fracture of copper. Metall Trans A 6(4):785–79010.1007/BF02672300 ↗
14. French IP, Weinrich PF, Weaver C (1973) Tensile fracture of free machining brass as a function of hydrostatic pressure. Acta Metall 21(8):1045–104910.1016/0001-6160(73)90020-5 ↗
15. Gurson AL (1977) Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth: part I—Yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. J Eng Mater Technol 99(1):2-15.S10.1115/1.3443401 ↗
16. Kao AS, Kuhn HA, Richmond O, Spitzig WA (1989) Workability of 1045 spheroidized steel under superimposed hydrostatic pressure. Metall Trans A 20(9):1735–174110.1007/BF02663205 ↗
17. Kao AS, Kuhn HA, Richmond O, Spitzig WA (1990) Tensile fracture and fractographic analysis of 1045 spheroidized steel under hydrostatic pressure. J Mater Res 5(1):83–9110.1557/JMR.1990.0089 ↗
18. Korbel A, Raghunathan VS, Teirlinck D, Spitzig WA, Richmond O, Embury JD (1984) A structural study of the influence of pressure on shear band formation. Acta Metall 32(4):511–51910.1016/0001-6160(84)90061-0 ↗
19. Li X, Chen Z, Dong C (2021) Size effect on the damage evolution of a modified GTN model under high/low stress triaxiality in meso-scaled plastic deformation. Mater Today Commun 26:10178210.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101782 ↗
20. Nahshon K, Hutchinson J (2008) Modification of the Gurson model for shear failure. Eur J Mech A Solids 27(1):1–1710.1016/j.euromechsol.2007.08.002 ↗
21. Peng J, Wu PD, Huang Y, Chen XX, Lloyd DJ, Embury JD, Neale KW (2009) Effects of superimposed hydrostatic pressure on fracture in round bars under tension. Int J Solids Struct 46(20):3741–374910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.07.001 ↗
22. Shahzamanian MM, Wu PD (2021) Study of forming limit diagram (FLD) prediction of anisotropic sheet metals using Gurson model in M-K method. IntJ Mater Form 14:1031–104110.1007/s12289-021-01619-7 ↗
23. Shahzamanian MM, Lloyd DJ, Wu PD, Xu Z (2021a) Study of influence of superimposed hydrostatic pressure on bendability of sheet metals. Eur J Mech A Solids 85:10413210.1016/j.euromechsol.2020.104132 ↗
24. Shahzamanian MM, Lloyd DJ, Partovi A, Wu PD (2021b) Study of influence of width to thickness ratio in sheet metals on bendability under ambient and superimposed hydrostatic pressure. Appl Mech 2:542–55810.3390/applmech2030030 ↗
25. Shahzamanian M, Thomsen C, Partovi A, Xu Z, Wu P (2021c) Numerical study about the influence of superimposed hydrostatic pressure on shear damage mechanism in sheet metals. Metals 11:119310.3390/met11081193 ↗
26. Tvergaard V (1981) Influence of voids on shear band instabilities under plane strain conditions. Int J Fract 17(4):389–40710.1007/BF00036191 ↗
27. Tvergaard V, Needleman A (1984) Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar. Acta Metall 32(1):157–16910.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X ↗
28. Wu PD, Chen XX, Lloyd DJ, Embury JD (2010) Effects of superimposed hydrostatic pressure on fracture in sheet metals under tension. Int J Mech Sci 52(2):236–24410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2009.09.014 ↗
29. Yang X, Li Y, Jiang W, Duan M, Chen D, Li B (2021) Ductile fracture prediction of additive manufactured Ti6Al4V alloy based on an extended GTN damage model. Eng Fract Mech 256:10798910.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107989 ↗