journal article·2021-02-20Open access

On the dependence of crack surface morphology and energy dissipation on microstructure in ductile plate tearing

Ş. Çelik, R. G. Andersen, C. Tekoğlu, K. L. Nielsen

Abstract

The two distinct tearing mechanisms observed in ductile metal plates are the void-by-void advance of the crack tip, and the simultaneous interaction of multiple voids on the plane ahead of the crack tip. Void-by-void crack advance, which leads to a cup-cup crack surface morphology, is the dominant mechanism if the plate contains a low number of small void nucleation sites (i.e., second phase particles). Conversely, a large number and/or size of nucleation sites trigger the simultaneous interaction of multiple voids resulting in a slanted crack. The present work aims to provide further insight into the parameters controlling the mechanisms and energy dissipation of plate tearing by focusing on the shape and, thereby, the orientation of the nucleation sites. The study uses a two-dimensional plane strain finite element domain to model the cross section of a plate, subject to mode I tearing, with discretely modeled, randomly distributed, finite-sized elliptic void nucleation sites. The developed finite element setup can capture the dependence of the crack surface morphology on the microstructure of the plate. The simulation results confirm that cup-cup crack propagation develops by intense plastic straining throughout the thinning region of the plate. Conversely, slanted and cup-cone cracks propagate in thin localized shear deformation bands. The energy dissipation is, therefore, greater for cup-cup cracks. The study demonstrates that the damage-related microstructure has a significant role in determining the overall hardening capacity of a plate, which in turn dictates the tearing mode and energy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Andersen R, Felter CL, Nielsen KL (2019) Micro-mechanics based cohesive zone modeling of full scale ductile plate tearing: from initiation to steady-state. Int J Solids Struct 160:265–27510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.10.027 ↗
2. Andersen R, Tekoğlu C, Nielsen K (2020) Cohesive traction-separation relations for tearing of ductile plates with randomly distributed void nucleation sites. Int J Fract 224(2):1–1210.1007/s10704-020-00454-2 ↗
3. Asserin-Lebert A, Besson J, Gourgues AF (2005) Fracture of 6056 aluminum sheet materials: effect of specimen thickness and hardening behavior on strain localization and toughness. Mater Sci Eng A 395:186–19410.1016/j.msea.2004.12.018 ↗
4. Bron F, Besson J, Pineau A (2004) Ductile rupture in thin sheets of two grades of 2024 aluminum alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 380(1):356–36410.1016/j.msea.2004.04.008 ↗
5. Chu C, Needleman A (1980) Void nucleation effects in biaxially stretched sheets. J Eng Mater Technol 102:249–25610.1115/1.3224807 ↗
6. Cox TB, Low JR (1974) An investigation of the plastic fracture of AISI 4340 and 18 Nickel-200 grade maraging steels. Metall Trans 5(6):1457–147010.1007/BF02646633 ↗
7. Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp (2016) ABAQUS version 2016 documentation
8. Dighe MD, Gokhale AM, Horstemeyer MF (2002) Second phase cracking and debonding observations in the fatigue damage evolution of a cast Al–Si–Mg alloy. Metall Mater Trans 33A:1–8
9. Gurland J (1972) Observations on the fracture of cementite particles in a spheroidized 1.05% C steel deformed at room temperature. Acta Metall 20:735–74110.1016/0001-6160(72)90102-2 ↗
10. Gurson A (1977) Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth—part I: yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. ASME J Eng Mater Technol 99:2–1510.1115/1.3443401 ↗
11. Hickey W, Ravi-Chandar K (2015) Transition from flat to slant fracture in ductile materials. In: Recent trends in fracture and damage mechanics. Springer, Cham, pp 215–235
12. Lassance D, Fabrègue D, Delannay F, Pardoen T (2007) Micromechanics of room and high temperature fracture in 6xxx al alloys. Prog Mater Sci 52(1):62–12910.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.06.001 ↗
13. Lewandowski JJ, Liu C, Hunt WH (1989) Effects of matrix microstructure and particle distribution on fracture of an aluminum metal matrix composite. Mater Sci Eng A 107:241–25510.1016/0921-5093(89)90392-4 ↗
14. Marino B, Mudry F, Pineau A (1985) Experimental study of cavity growth in ductile rupture. Eng. Fract Mech 22:989–99610.1016/0013-7944(85)90038-4 ↗
15. Nielsen K, Hutchinson J (2012) Cohesive traction-separation laws for tearing of ductile metal plates. Int J Imp Eng 48:15–2310.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.02.009 ↗
16. Pardoen T, Hachez F, Marchioni B, Blyth P, Atkins A (2004) Mode I fracture of sheet metal. J Mech Phys Solids 52:423–45210.1016/S0022-5096(03)00087-5 ↗
17. Pineau A, Benzerga A, Pardoen T (2016) Failure of metals I: brittle and ductile fracture. Acta Mater 107:424–48310.1016/j.actamat.2015.12.034 ↗
18. Srivastava A, Ponson L, Osovski S, Bouchaud E, Tvergaard V, Needleman A (2014) Effect of inclusion density on ductile fracture toughness and roughness. J Mech Phys Solids 63:62–7910.1016/j.jmps.2013.10.003 ↗
19. Srivastava A, Osovski S, Needleman A (2017) Engineering the crack path by controlling the microstructure. J Mech Phys Solids 100:1–2010.1016/j.jmps.2016.12.006 ↗
20. Tekoğlu C, Pardoen T (2010) A micromechanics based damage model for composite materials. Int J Plasticity 26(4):549–56910.1016/j.ijplas.2009.09.002 ↗
21. Tekoğlu C, Hutchinson J, Pardoen T (2015) On localization and void coalescence as a precursor to ductile fracture. Philos Trans R Soc A 373:2014012110.1098/rsta.2014.0121 ↗
22. Tekoğlu C, Nielsen K (2019) Effect of damage-related microstructural parameters on plate tearing at steady state. Eur J Mech A Solids 77:10381810.1016/j.euromechsol.2019.103818 ↗
23. Tvergaard V (1981) Influence of voids on shear band instabilities under plane strain condition. Int J Fract Mech 17:389–40710.1007/BF00036191 ↗
24. Tvergaard V, Hutchinson J (2002) Two mechanisms of ductile fracture: void by void growth versus multiple void interaction. Int J Solid Struct 39:3581–359710.1016/S0020-7683(02)00168-3 ↗
25. Tvergaard V, Needleman A (1984) Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar. Acta Metall 32(1):157–16910.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X ↗