journal article·2020-08Open access

Stress concentration and instabilities in the atomistic process of brittle failure initiation

Sabri Souguir, Laurent Brochard, Karam Sab

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 224· Issue 2

Abstract

A major challenge in the macroscopic modeling of brittle failure initiation is to reconcile stress-driven failure in absence of stress concentration and energy-driven failure under high stress concentration (crack). In this paper, we perform athermal molecular simulations to investigate the underlying physics behind stress- to energy-driven failures. In the athermal limit, the evolution of an atomic system is deterministic and is obtained by energy minimization. Failure is expected when the system suddenly bifurcates to a broken configuration which can be formally evaluated as an atomic instability characterized by a negative eigenvalue of the Hessian matrix. We applied this methodology to a 2D toy model and to pristine graphene. Both stress- and energy-driven failures are triggered by an instability at the atomic scale, but the two types of failure differ widely regarding the mechanisms of instability (eigenvectors) and their multiplicity (degeneracy). With respect to existing macroscopic theories of failure initiation, these results raise some issues. In particular, one should distinguish the initiation mechanisms and the physical cracking occurring after initiation, and the spatial extent of the initiation mechanism should depend on stress concentration with a minimum extent given by the ratio between toughness and strength. From an atomic scale perspective, a strain-based stability formulation seems the most appropriate. Finally, we show that the degeneracy of the modes of failure explains the size-scaling of strength and toughness at finite temperature.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Arroyo M, Belytschko T (2004) Finite crystal elasticity of carbon nanotubes based on the exponential Cauchy-Born rule. Phys Rev B 69(11):115415. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.69.11541510.1103/PhysRevB.69.115415 ↗
2. Ashby MF (2005) Mater Sel Mech Des, 3rd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
3. Bardenhagen S, Triantafyllidis N (1994) Derivation of higher order gradient continuum theories in 2,3-d non-linear elasticity from periodic lattice models. J Mech Phys Solids 42(1):111–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(94)90051-5, http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/002250969490051510.1016/0022-5096(94)90051-5 ↗
4. Belytschko T, Xiao SP, Schatz GC, Ruoff RS (2002) Atomistic simulations of nanotube fracture. Phys Rev B 65(23):235430. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.23543010.1103/PhysRevB.65.235430 ↗
5. Brenner DW (1990) Empirical potential for hydrocarbons for use in simulating the chemical vapor deposition of diamond films. Phys Rev B 42(15):9458–9471. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.42.945810.1103/PhysRevB.42.9458 ↗
6. Brenner DW, Shenderova OA, Harrison JA, Stuart SJ, Ni B, Sinnott SB (2002) A second-generation reactive empirical bond order (REBO) potential energy expression for hydrocarbons. J Phys 14(4):783–802. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/14/4/312, http://stacks.iop.org/0953-8984/14/i=4/a=312?key=crossref.563ba867ec801ce55fc736b3f896894210.1088/0953-8984/14/4/312 ↗
7. Brochard L, Tejada IG, Sab K (2016) From yield to fracture, failure initiation captured by molecular simulation. J Mech Phys Solids 95:632–646. 10.1016/j.jmps.2016.05.005, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022509616300424 http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S002250961630042410.1016/j.jmps.2016.05.005 ↗
8. Brochard L, Souguir S, Sab K (2018) Scaling of brittle failure: strength versus toughness. Int J Fract 210(1–2):153–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-018-0268-910.1007/s10704-018-0268-9 ↗
9. Dailidonis V, Ilyin V, Mishra P, Procaccia I (2015) Consequences of disorder on the stability of amorphous solids. Phys Rev B 92(9):094105. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.09410510.1103/PhysRevB.92.094105 ↗
10. Delph T, Zimmerman J, Rickman J, Kunz J (2009) A local instability criterion for solid-state defects. J Mech Phys Solids 57(1):67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2008.10.005, https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S002250960800174910.1016/j.jmps.2008.10.005 ↗
11. Dewapriya MAN, Rajapakse RKND, Phani AS (2014) Atomistic and continuum modelling of temperature-dependent fracture of graphene. Int J Fract 187(2):199–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-014-9931-y10.1007/s10704-014-9931-y ↗
12. Dugdale D (1960) Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J Mech Phy Solids 8(2):100–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-210.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 ↗
13. Elliott RS, Shaw JA, Triantafyllidis N (2006) Stability of crystalline solids–II: Application to temperature-induced martensitic phase transformations in a bi-atomic crystal. J Mech Phys Solids 54(1):193–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2005.07.008, https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S002250960500147X10.1016/j.jmps.2005.07.008 ↗
14. Geim AK, Novoselov KS (2007) The rise of graphene. Nat Mater 6(3):183–191, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1849, http://www.nature.com/articles/nmat184910.1038/nmat1849 ↗
15. Han J, Sohn D, Woo W, Kim DK (2017) Molecular dynamics study of fracture toughness and trans-intergranular transition in bi-crystalline graphene. Comput Mater Sci 129:323–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.12.023, https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S092702561630646210.1016/j.commatsci.2016.12.023 ↗
16. Hsieh C, Thomson R (1973) Lattice theory of fracture and crack creep. J Appl Phys 44(5):2051–2063. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.166251210.1063/1.1662512 ↗
17. Jensen BD, Wise KE, Odegard GM (2015) Simulation of the elastic and ultimate tensile properties of diamond, graphene, carbon nanotubes, and amorphous carbon using a revised ReaxFF parametrization. J Phys Chem A 119(37):9710–9721. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5b0588910.1021/acs.jpca.5b05889 ↗
18. Kitamura T, Umeno Y, Tsuji N (2004) Analytical evaluation of unstable deformation criterion of atomic structure and its application to nanostructure. Comput Mater Sci 29(4):499–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2003.12.00410.1016/j.commatsci.2003.12.004 ↗
19. Lee C, Wei X, Kysar JW, Hone J (2008) Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 321(5887):385–388. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.115799610.1126/science.1157996 ↗
20. Leguillon D (2002) Strength or toughness? A criterion for crack onset at a notch. Eur J Mech A/Solids 21(1):61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0997-7538(01)01184-610.1016/S0997-7538(01)01184-6 ↗
21. Li X (2013) A bifurcation study of crack initiation and kinking. Eur Phys J B 86(6):258. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2013-40145-910.1140/epjb/e2013-40145-9 ↗
22. Liu F, Ming P, Li J (2007) Ab initio calculation of ideal strength and phonon instability of graphene under tension. Phys Rev B 76(6):064,120. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.06412010.1103/PhysRevB.76.064120 ↗
23. Lu Q, Huang R (2009) Nonlinear mechanics of single-atomic-layer graphene sheets. Int J Appl Mech 01(03):443–467. https://doi.org/10.1142/S175882510900022810.1142/S1758825109000228 ↗
24. Lu Q, Gao W, Huang R (2011) Atomistic simulation and continuum modeling of graphene nanoribbons under uniaxial tension. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 19(5):054,006, https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/19/5/054006, http://stacks.iop.org/0965-0393/19/i=5/a=054006?key=crossref.f60aadba1ef1fccbb3ff4992dbe1c69b10.1088/0965-0393/19/5/054006 ↗
25. Maloney CE, Lemaître A (2006) Amorphous systems in athermal, quasistatic shear. Phys Rev E 74(1):016118. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.74.01611810.1103/PhysRevE.74.016118 ↗
26. Marder M, Gross S (1994) Origin of crack tip instabilities. J Mech Phys Solids 43(1):1–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(94)00060-I arXiv:chao-dyn/9410009v110.1016/0022-5096(94)00060-I ↗
27. Miehe C, Welschinger F, Hofacker M (2010) Thermodynamically consistent phase-field models of fracture: variational principles and multi-field FE implementations. Int J Numer Methods Eng 83(10):1273–1311. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.286110.1002/nme.2861 ↗
28. Milstein F, Hill R (1979) Theoretical properties of cubic crystals at arbitrary pressure—III. Stability. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 27(3):255–279, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(79)90004-8, http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/002250967990004810.1016/0022-5096(79)90004-8 ↗
29. Novoselov KS (2011) Nobel lecture: graphene: materials in the Flatland. Rev Mod Phys 83(3):837–849. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.83.83710.1103/RevModPhys.83.837 ↗
30. Novozhilov V (1969) On a necessary and sufficient criterion for brittle strength. J Appl Math Mech 33(2):201–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8928(69)90025-2, http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/002189286990025210.1016/0021-8928(69)90025-2 ↗
31. Plimpton S (1995) Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short-Range Molecular Dynamics. J Comput Phys 117(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1995.1039, http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S002199918571039X10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
32. Pratapa PP, Suryanarayana P (2016) On numerically predicting the onset and mode of instability in atomistic systems. Mech Res Commun 78:27–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2016.05.001, https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S009364131630026X10.1016/j.mechrescom.2016.05.001 ↗
33. Rajasekaran G, Kumar R, Parashar A (2016) Tersoff potential with improved accuracy for simulating graphene in molecular dynamics environment. Materials Research Express 3(3):035,011, https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/3/3/035011, http://stacks.iop.org/2053-1591/3/i=3/a=035011?key=crossref.d71622bf411b1381210d856e04853f6310.1088/2053-1591/3/3/035011 ↗
34. Rice JR (1968) A path independent integral and the approximate analysis of strain concentration by notches and cracks. J Appl Mech 35(2):379. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.360120610.1115/1.3601206 ↗
35. Shenderova O, Brenner DW, Omeltchenko A, Su X, Yang LH (2000) Atomisticmodeling of the fracture of polycrystalline diamond. Phys Rev B 61(6):3877–3888. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.61.387710.1103/PhysRevB.61.3877 ↗
36. Thomson R (1986) Physics of Fracture. In: Ehrenreich H, Turnbull D (eds) Solid state physics, vol 39, Academic Press, pp 1–129, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0081-1947(08)60368-9, http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S008119470860368910.1016/S0081-1947(08)60368-9 ↗
37. Thomson R, Hsieh C, Rana V (1971) Lattice trapping of fracture cracks. J App Phys 42(8):3154–3160. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.166069910.1063/1.1660699 ↗
38. Triantafyllidis N, Bardenhagen S (1993) On higher order gradient continuum theories in 1-D nonlinear elasticity. Derivation from and comparison to the corresponding discrete models. J Elast 33(3):259–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0004325110.1007/BF00043251 ↗
39. Williams M (1952) Stress singularities resulting from various boundary conditions in angular corners of plates in extension. J Appl Mech 19(4):526–52810.1115/1.4010553 ↗
40. Xu M, Tabarraei A, Paci JT, Oswald J, Belytschko T (2012) A coupled quantum/continuum mechanics study of graphene fracture. Int J Fract 173(2):163–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-011-9675-x10.1007/s10704-011-9675-x ↗
41. Yazdani H, Hatami K (2015) Failure criterion for graphene in biaxial loading—a molecular dynamics study. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 23(6):065004, https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/23/6/065004, http://stacks.iop.org/0965-0393/23/i=6/a=065004?key=crossref.66817f771850338a194c2b8253b568c910.1088/0965-0393/23/6/065004 ↗
42. Zhang B, Mei L, Xiao H (2012) Nanofracture in graphene under complex mechanical stresses. Appl Phys Lett 101(12):121915. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.475411510.1063/1.4754115 ↗
43. Zhang P, Ma L, Fan F, Zeng Z, Peng C, Loya PE, Liu Z, Gong Y, Zhang J, Zhang X,Ajayan PM, Zhu T, Lou J (2014) Fracture toughness of graphene. Nat Commun 5(1):3782, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4782,http://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms478210.1038/ncomms4782 ↗
44. Zhao H, Min K, Aluru NR (2009) Size and chirality dependent elastic properties of graphene nanoribbons under uniaxial tension. Nano Lett 9(8):3012–3015. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl901448z10.1021/nl901448z ↗
45. Zhurkov SN (1984) Kinetic concept of the strength of solids. Int J Fract 26(4):295–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0096296110.1007/BF00962961 ↗