journal article·2020-05

Vectorial stress-separation laws for cohesive cracking: in concrete and other quasibrittle materials

Jaime Planas, Beatriz Sanz, Jose M. Sancho

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 223· Issue 1-2
Publisher page

Abstract

In the past 25 years, a considerable number of works on fracture of quasibrittle materials or structures has been published. A large fraction of such works makes use of cohesive crack models and, therefore, deals with cohesive traction–separation laws. However, in most instances, this appears to be a secondary aspect in the publications, the principal one being the variant of the numerical algorithm presented in the research. This makes it difficult to compare the various available formulations for the, necessarily vectorial, traction–separation laws ($$\mathbf{t}$$–$$\mathbf{w}$$ laws). The present work aims at initiating a systematic comparison between the $$\mathbf{t}$$–$$\mathbf{w}$$ laws, and this is done by comparing a subset of the possible formulations using exactly the same numerical algorithms. A damage-based model is presented which includes as particular cases most of the already published laws and which allows an independent specification of: (a) the softening function; (b) the lack of coaxiality of $$\mathbf{t}$$ and $$\mathbf{w}$$; (c) the shape of the fracture criterion in the traction space; and (d) the ratio of fracture energies in pure modes I and II. The performance of the models is numerically investigated for a simple, but crucial, case to reveal possible spurious influences of the foregoing issues (b)–(d).
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Elasticity and Wave Propagation · Numerical methods in engineering · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (68)

Show source-provided references
1. ABAQUS (2013) Theory Guide. Dassault Systemes 6:13
2. Aduloju SC, Truster TJ (2019) A variational multiscale discontinuous galerkin formulation for both implicit and explicit dynamic modeling of interfacial fracture. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 343:602–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.08.02510.1016/j.cma.2018.08.025 ↗
3. Alberti MG, Enfedaque A, Gálvez JC, Agrawal V (2016) Reliability of polyolefin fibre reinforced concrete beyond laboratory sizes and construction procedures. Compos Struct 140:506–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.12.06810.1016/j.compstruct.2015.12.068 ↗
4. Alberti MG, Enfedaque A, Gálvez JC, Reyes E (2017) Numerical modelling of the fracture of polyolefin fibre reinforced concrete by using a cohesive fracture approach. Compos B Eng 111:200–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.05210.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.052 ↗
5. Alfaiate J, Sluys LJ (2017) On the modelling of mixed-mode discrete fracture: part i-damage models. Eng Fract Mech 182:157–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.07.01910.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.07.019 ↗
6. Alfaiate J, Wells GN, Sluys LJ (2002) On the use of embedded discontinuity elements with crack path continuity for mode-i and mixed-mode fracture. Eng Fract Mech 69(6):661–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00108-410.1016/S0013-7944(01)00108-4 ↗
7. Alfaiate J, Simone A, Sluys LJ (2003) Non-homogeneous displacement jumps in strong embedded discontinuities. Int J Solids Struct 40(21):5799–5817. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00372-X10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00372-X ↗
8. Barenblatt GI (1962) The mathematical theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture. Adv Appl Mech 7:55–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-210.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-2 ↗
9. Bažant ZP, Planas J (1998) Fracture and size effect in concrete and other quasibrittle materials. CRC Press, Boca Raton
10. Bordas S, Rabczuk T, Zi G (2008) Three-dimensional crack initiation, propagation, branching and junction in non-linear materials by an extended meshfree method without asymptotic enrichment. Eng Fract Mech 75(5):943–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.05.01010.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.05.010 ↗
11. Camacho GT, Ortiz M (1996) Computational modelling of impact damage in brittle materials. Int J Solids Struct 33(20):2899–2938. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(95)00255-310.1016/0020-7683(95)00255-3 ↗
12. Carol I, Prat PC, López CM (1997) Normal/shear cracking model: application to discrete crack analysis. J Eng Mech 123(8):765–773. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:8(765)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:8(765) ↗
13. Cazes F, Meschke G, Zhou MM (2016) Strong discontinuity approaches: an algorithm for robust performance and comparative assessment of accuracy. Int J Solids Struct 96:355–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.05.01610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.05.016 ↗
14. Červenka J, Kishen JMC, Saouma VE (1998) Mixed mode fracture of cementitious bimaterial interfaces: part ii: numerical simulation. Eng Fract Mech 60(1):95–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(97)00094-510.1016/S0013-7944(97)00094-5 ↗
15. Costanzo F (1998) A continuum theory of cohesive zone models: deformation and constitutive equations. Int J Eng Sci 36(15):1763–1792. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7225(98)00025-110.1016/S0020-7225(98)00025-1 ↗
16. Dias-da Costa D, Alfaiate J, Sluys LJ, Júlio E (2009) A discrete strong discontinuity approach. Eng Fract Mech 76(9):1176–1201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.01.01110.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.01.011 ↗
17. Dugdale DS (1960) Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J Mech Phys Solids 8(2):100–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-210.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 ↗
18. Elices M, Planas J (1989) Material models, chapter 3. In: Elfgren L (ed) Fracture mechanics of concrete structures. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 16–66
19. Elices M, Guinea GV, Gómez J, Planas J (2002) The cohesive zone model: advantages, limitations and challenges. Eng Fract Mech 69(2):137–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00083-210.1016/S0013-7944(01)00083-2 ↗
20. Gálvez JC, Červenka J, Cendón DA, Saouma V (2002) A discrete crack approach to normal/shear cracking of concrete. Cement Concr Res 32(10):1567–1585. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00825-610.1016/S0008-8846(02)00825-6 ↗
21. Gasser TC, Holzapfel GA (2003) Geometrically non-linear and consistently linearized embedded strong discontinuity models for 3d problems with an application to the dissection analysis of soft biological tissues. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 192(47):5059–5098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2003.06.00110.1016/j.cma.2003.06.001 ↗
22. Gasser TC, Holzapfel GA (2005) Modeling 3d crack propagation in unreinforced concrete using pufem. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194(25):2859–2896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2004.07.02510.1016/j.cma.2004.07.025 ↗
23. Gasser TC, Holzapfel GA (2006) 3d crack propagation in unreinforced concrete: a two-step algorithm for tracking 3d crack paths. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195(37):5198–5219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2005.10.02310.1016/j.cma.2005.10.023 ↗
24. Geuzaine C, Remacle JF (2009) Gmsh: A 3-d finite element mesh generator with built-in pre- and post-processing facilities. Int J Numer Methods Eng 79(11):1309–1331. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.257910.1002/nme.2579 ↗
25. Guzmán S, Gálvez JC (2017) Modelling of concrete cover cracking due to non-uniform corrosion of reinforcing steel. Constr Build Mater 155:1063–1071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.08210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.082 ↗
26. Heitbreder T, Ottosen NS, Ristinmaa M, Mosler J (2017) Consistent elastoplastic cohesive zone model at finite deformations-variational formulation. Int J Solids Struct 106–107:284–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.10.02710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.10.027 ↗
27. Heitbreder T, Ottosen NS, Ristinmaa M, Mosler J (2018) On damage modeling of material interfaces: numerical implementation and computational homogenization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 337:1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.03.02310.1016/j.cma.2018.03.023 ↗
28. Hillerborg A, Modéer M, Petersson PE (1976) Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements. Cement Concr Res 6(6):773–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-710.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-7 ↗
29. Jirásek M (2000) Conditions of uniqueness for finite elements with embedded cracks. In: European congress on computational methods in applied sciences and engineering ECCOMAS Barcelona, pp 1–19
30. Jirásek M, Zimmermann T (2001) Embedded crack model: I: basic formulation. Int J Numer Methods Eng 50(6):1269–129010.1002/1097-0207(20010228)50:6<1269::AID-NME11>3.0.CO;2-U ↗
31. Lemaitre J, Chaboche JL (1985) Mécanique des Matériaux Solides. Dunod, Paris
32. Mergheim J, Steinmann P (2006) A geometrically nonlinear fe approach for the simulation of strong and weak discontinuities. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195(37):5037–5052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2005.05.05710.1016/j.cma.2005.05.057 ↗
33. Mergheim J, Kuhl E, Steinmann P (2005) A finite element method for the computational modelling of cohesive cracks. Int J Numer Methods Eng 63(2):276–289. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.128610.1002/nme.1286 ↗
34. Meschke G, Dumstorff P (2007) Energy-based modeling of cohesive and cohesionless cracks via x-fem. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196(21):2338–2357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2006.11.01610.1016/j.cma.2006.11.016 ↗
35. Ohlsson U, Olofsson T (1997) Mixed-mode fracture and anchor bolts in concrete analysis with inner softening bands. J Eng Mech 123(10):1027–1033. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:10(1027)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:10(1027) ↗
36. Ortiz M, Pandolfi A (1999) Finite-deformation irreversible cohesive elements for three-dimensional crack-propagation analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 44(9):1267–1282. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990330)44:9<1267::AID-NME486>3.0.CO;2-710.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990330)44:9<1267::AID-NME486>3.0.CO;2-7 ↗
37. Ottosen NS, Ristinmaa M, Mosler J (2015) Fundamental physical principles and cohesive zone models at finite displacements–limitations and possibilities. Int J Solids Struct 53:70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.10.02010.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.10.020 ↗
38. Ottosen NS, Ristinmaa M, Mosler J (2016) Framework for non-coherent interface models at finite displacement jumps and finite strains. J Mech Phys Solids 90:124–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2016.02.03410.1016/j.jmps.2016.02.034 ↗
39. Pandolfi A, Krysl P, Ortiz M (1999) Finite element simulation of ring expansion and fragmentation: the capturing of length and time scales through cohesive models of fracture. Int J Fract 95(1):279–297. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101867292273410.1023/A:1018672922734 ↗
40. Pandolfi A, Conti S, Ortiz M (2006) A recursive-faulting model of distributed damage in confined brittle materials. J Mech Phys Solids 54(9):1972–2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2006.02.00310.1016/j.jmps.2006.02.003 ↗
41. Papoulia KD, Sam CH, Vavasis SA (2003) Time continuity in cohesive finite element modeling. Int J Numer Methods Eng 58(5):679–701. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.77810.1002/nme.778 ↗
42. Park K, Paulino GH (2013) Cohesive zone models: a critical review of traction–separation relationships across fracture surfaces. Appl Mech Rev 64(6):06080210.1115/1.4023110 ↗
43. Planas J, Elices M, Guinea GV, Gomez FJ, Cendon DA, Arbilla I (2003) Generalizations and specializations of cohesive crack models. Eng Fract Mech 70(14):1759–1776. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0013-7944(03)00123-110.1016/s0013-7944(03)00123-1 ↗
44. Planas J, Sanz B, Sancho J (2016) Transition from smeared to localized cracking in macro-defect-free quasibrittle structures. Procedia Struct Integrity 2:3676–3683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.45710.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.457 ↗
45. Planas J, Sancho JM, Sanz B (2018) Unified approach to damage-based, traction–separation laws for cohesive cracks in quasibrittle materials. Tech. Rep. CG-2018-03, Dep. de Ciencia de Materiales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid
46. Planas J, Sanz B, Sancho JM (2019) A first approach to comparing cohesive traction-separation laws for concrete. In: Pijaudier-Cabot G, Grassl P, La Borderie C (Eds). 10th international conference on fracture mechanics of concrete and concrete structures (FraMCoS-X), https://doi.org/10.21012/FC10:23558610.21012/FC10:235586 ↗
47. Ponnusami SA, Krishnasamy J, Turteltaub S, van der Zwaag S (2018) A cohesive-zone crack healing model for self-healing materials. Int J Solids Struct 134:249–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.11.00410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.11.004 ↗
48. Rabczuk T, Bordas S, Zi G (2010) On three-dimensional modelling of crack growth using partition of unity methods. Comput Struct 88(23):1391–1411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.08.01010.1016/j.compstruc.2008.08.010 ↗
49. Radulovic R, Bruhns OT, Mosler J (2011) Effective 3d failure simulations by combining the advantages of embedded strong discontinuity approaches and classical interface elements. Eng Fract Mech 78(12):2470–2485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.06.00710.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.06.007 ↗
50. Repetto EA, Radovitzky R, Ortiz M (2000) Finite element simulation of dynamic fracture and fragmentation of glass rods. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 183(1):3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00208-X10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00208-X ↗
51. Roth SN, Léger P, Soulaïmani A (2015) A combined xfem-damage mechanics approach for concrete crack propagation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 283:923–955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2014.10.04310.1016/j.cma.2014.10.043 ↗
52. Rots JG (1988) Computational modeling of concrete fracture. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology
53. Rots JG, Blaauwendraad J (1989) Crack models for concrete: discrete or smeared? fixed, multi-directional or rotating? Heron 34(1):1–59
54. Rots J, Nauta P, Kuster G, Blaauwendraad J (1985) Smeared crack approach and fracture localization in concrete. HERON 30(1):1–48
55. Sancho JM, Planas J, Cendon DA, Reyes E, Galvez JC (2007a) An embedded crack model for finite element analysis of concrete fracture. Eng Fract Mech 74(1–2):75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.01.01510.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.01.015 ↗
56. Sancho JM, Planas J, Fathy AM, Galvez JC, Cendon DA (2007b) Three-dimensional simulation of concrete fracture using embedded crack elements without enforcing crack path continuity. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 31(2):173–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.54010.1002/nag.540 ↗
57. Sanz B, Planas J, Sancho JM (2013) An experimental and numerical study of the pattern of cracking of concrete due to steel reinforcement corrosion. Eng Fract Mech 114:26–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.10.01310.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.10.013 ↗
58. Sanz B, Planas J, Sancho JM (2015) A closer look to the mechanical behavior of the oxide layer in concrete reinforcement corrosion. Int J Solids Struct 62:256–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.02.04010.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.02.040 ↗
59. Sanz B, Planas J, Sancho J (2016) Study of the influence of the oxide and concrete parameters on the results of accelerated corrosion tests. Procedia Struct Integrity 2:2849–2856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.35610.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.356 ↗
60. Sanz B, Planas J, Sancho J (2017) A method to determine the constitutive parameters of oxide in accelerated corrosion tests of reinforced concrete specimens. Cement Concr Res 101:68–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.08.02310.1016/j.cemconres.2017.08.023 ↗
61. Tijssens MGA, Sluys BLJ, van der Giessen E (2000) Numerical simulation of quasi-brittle fracture using damaging cohesive surfaces. Eur J Mech A/Solids 19(5):761–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0997-7538(00)00190-X10.1016/S0997-7538(00)00190-X ↗
62. Vossen BG, Schreurs PJG, van der Sluis O, Geers MGD (2013) On the lack of rotational equilibrium in cohesive zone elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 254:146–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2012.10.00410.1016/j.cma.2012.10.004 ↗
63. Wells GN (2001) Discontinuous modelling of strain localisation and failure. PhD thesis
64. Wells GN, Sluys LJ (2001a) A new method for modelling cohesive cracks using finite elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 50(12):2667–2682. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.14310.1002/nme.143 ↗
65. Wells GN, Sluys LJ (2001b) Three-dimensional embedded discontinuity model for brittle fracture. Int J Solids Struct 38(5):897–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00029-910.1016/S0020-7683(00)00029-9 ↗
66. Wu JY, Li FB (2015) An improved stable xfem (is-xfem) with a novel enrichment function for the computational modeling of cohesive cracks. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 295:77–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2015.06.01810.1016/j.cma.2015.06.018 ↗
67. Wu JY, Li FB, Xu SL (2015) Extended embedded finite elements with continuous displacement jumps for the modeling of localized failure in solids. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 285:346–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2014.11.01310.1016/j.cma.2014.11.013 ↗
68. Zhan Y, Meschke G (2017) Adaptive crack modeling with interface solid elements for plain and fiber reinforced concrete structures. Materials 10(7):771. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1007077110.3390/ma10070771 ↗