journal article·2016-03

Prediction of ductile failure in Ti–6Al–4V using a local strain-to-failure criterion

A. J. Gross, K. Ravi-Chandar

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 198· Issue 1-2
Publisher page

Abstract

In this article, we provide the details of the predictive simulations performed by the University of Texas team in response to the second Sandia Fracture Challenge (SFC2) (Boyce et al. in Int J Fract, 2016). The methods used are an adaptation of those used in the first SFC. Specifically, the material constitutive model was calibrated using tensile and shear test data through an inverse method. A strain-to-failure criterion was postulated using the loading history from the first point to fail in both a tension and shear test. These models are then embedded in a highly refined finite element simulation to perform a blind prediction of the failure behavior for the SFC2 geometry. These results are compared with experiments performed by Sandia National Laboratories and additional experiments that were performed at the University of Texas at Austin, in which full-field strain measurements and high speed videography were performed in order to further understand the deformation and failure of these specimens.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Metallurgy and Material Forming

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (10)

Show source-provided references
1. Boyce BL et al (2016) The second Sandia fracture challenge: predictions of ductile failure under quasi-static and moderate-rate dynamic loading. Int J Fract. doi: 10.1007/s10704-016-0089-710.1007/s10704-016-0089-7 ↗
2. Fukuhara M, Sanpei A (1993) Elastic moduli and internal frictions of Inconel 718 and Ti-6Al-4V as a function of temperature. J Mater Sci Lett 12:1122–112410.1007/BF00420541 ↗
3. Ghahremaninezhad A, Ravi-Chandar K (2012) Ductile failure behavior of polycrystalline Al 6061-T6. Int J Fract 174:177–20210.1007/s10704-012-9689-z ↗
4. Ghahremaninezhad A, Ravi-Chandar K (2013) Ductile failure behavior of polycrystalline Al 6061-T6 under shear dominant loading. Int J Fract 180:23–3910.1007/s10704-012-9793-0 ↗
5. Gross AJ, Ravi-Chandar K (2014) Prediction of ductile failure using a local strain-to-failure criterion. Int J Fract 186:69–9110.1007/s10704-013-9908-2 ↗
6. Gross AJ, Ravi-Chandar K (2015) On the extraction of elastic–plastic constitutive properties from three-dimensional deformation measurements. J Appl Mech 82:07101310.1115/1.4030322 ↗
7. Haltom SS, Kyriakides S, Ravi-Chandar K (2013) Ductile failure under combined shear and tension. Int J Fract 50:1507–152210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.12.009 ↗
8. Hill R (1948) A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci 193:281–29710.1098/rspa.1948.0045 ↗
9. McClintock FA (1968) A criterion for ductile fracture by the growth of holes. J Appl Mech 35:363–37110.1115/1.3601204 ↗
10. Zhang WJ, Reddy BV, Deevi SC (2001) Physical properties of TiAl-base alloys. Scr Mater 45:645–65110.1016/S1359-6462(01)01075-2 ↗