journal article·2014-01

Crack growth simulation for arbitrarily shaped cracks based on the virtual crack closure technique

Yan-Ping Liu, Guo-Qing Li, Chuan-Yao Chen

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 185· Issue 1-2
Publisher page

Abstract

In this paper, crack growth simulation for arbitrarily shaped cracks was investigated based on the virtual crack closure technique. During simulations, the crack front was represented by an approximated zigzag line which had the same general shape as the given crack. For this approximated zigzag crack front, a modified approach was developed to determine the required nodal forces, virtually closed area and displacement opening. After the strain energy release rate G was calculated, crack growth was governed by the fracture criterion G/GC = 1 at all the crack tip nodes. The important features of the proposed approach are that (i) a simple stationary finite element mesh can be used for arbitrarily shaped cracks and (ii) adaptive re-meshing technique is avoided in studying crack growth. Three cases having different initial crack shapes are presented to assess the validity of this approach and to evaluate the ease of use in tracking crack growth. Reasonable agreement between the present study and other approaches are obtained. The shape changes during crack propagation can also be tracked with ease.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Boscolo M, Alilegri G, Zhang X (2009) Design and modeling of selective reinforcements for integral aircraft structures. AIAA J 46(9): 2323–233110.2514/1.35712 ↗
2. Bremberg D, Dhondt G (2009) Automatic 3-D crack propagation calculations: a pure hexahedral element approach versus a combined element approach. Int J Fract 157: 109–11810.1007/s10704-009-9313-z ↗
3. Crews JH, Shivakumar KN, Raju IS (1989) Effects of anticlastic curvature on G distributions for DCB specimens. In: AIAA 30th SDM conference, pp 1242–1249
4. Davidson BD (1990) An analytical investigation of delamination front curvature in double cantilever beam specimens. J Comp Mater 24: 1124–113710.1177/002199839002401101 ↗
5. Davidson BD, Krüger R, König M (1996) Effect of stacking sequence on energy release rate distributions in multidirectional DCB and ENF specimens. Eng Fract Mech 55(4): 557–56910.1016/S0013-7944(96)00037-9 ↗
6. Elices M, Guinea GV, Gomez J, Planas J (2002) The cohesive zone model: advantages, limitations and challenges. Eng Fract Mech 69: 137–16310.1016/S0013-7944(01)00083-2 ↗
7. Fawaz SA (1998) Application of the virtual crack closure technique to calculate stress intensity factors for through cracks with an elliptical crack front. Eng Fract Mech 59(3): 327–34210.1016/S0013-7944(97)00126-4 ↗
8. Fawaz SA (1999) Stress intensity factor solutions for part-elliptical through cracks. Eng Fract Mech 63: 209–22610.1016/S0013-7944(99)00003-X ↗
9. Ferrie CH, Rousseau CQ (2001) A method of applying VCCT to corner crack nodes. In: Proceedings of Am Soc for composites, 16th annual technical conference on composite materials, Blacksburg
10. Krueger R (2004) Virtual crack closure technique: history, approach, and applications. Appl Mech Rev 57(2): 109–11410.1115/1.1595677 ↗
11. Li SH, Ghosh S (2006) Multiple cohesive crack growth in brittle materials by the extended Voronoi cell finite element model. Int J Fract 141: 373–39310.1007/s10704-006-9000-2 ↗
12. Lin XB, Smith RA (1995) A numerical simulation of fatigue growth of multiple surface initially semicircular defects under tension. Int J Pres Ves Pip 62: 281–28910.1016/0308-0161(94)00021-A ↗
13. Lin XB, Smith RA (1997) Fatigue growth analysis of interacting and coalescing surface crack. Int J Fract 85: 283–29910.1023/A:1007476729339 ↗
14. Lin XB, Smith RA (1999a) Finite element modeling of fatigue crack growth of surface cracked plates Part I: the numerical technique. Eng Fract Mech 63: 503–52210.1016/S0013-7944(99)00040-5 ↗
15. Lin XB, Smith RA (1999b) Finite element modeling of fatigue crack growth of surface cracked plates Part II: crack shape change. Eng Fract Mech 63: 523–54010.1016/S0013-7944(99)00041-7 ↗
16. Liu YP, Chen CY, Li GQ (2011) A modified Zigzag approach to approximate moving crack front with arbitrary shape. Eng Fract Mech 78(2): 234–25110.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.08.007 ↗
17. Nairn JA (2011) Generalized crack closure analysis for elements with arbitrarily-placed side nodes and consistent nodal forces. Int J Fract 171: 11–2210.1007/s10704-011-9622-x ↗
18. Okada H, Endoh S, Kikuchi M (2005a) On fracture analysis using an element overlay technique. Eng Fract Mech 72: 773–78910.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.05.003 ↗
19. Okada H, Higashi M et al (2005b) Three dimensional virtual crack closure-integral method (VCCM) with skewed and non-symmetric mesh arrangement at the crack front. Eng Fract Mech 72: 1717–173710.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.12.005 ↗
20. Orifici AC, Krueger R (2010) Assessment of static delaminate on propagation capabilities in commercial finite element codes using benchmark analysis. NASA/CR-2010-216709, NIA report no. 2010-03
21. Smith SA, Raju IS (1999) Evaluation of stress-intensity factors using general finite-element modes. Fatigue Fract Mech. In: Panonti TL, Sheppard SD (eds) ASTM STP 1332, vol 29. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Canshohockem (PA), pp 176–200
22. Soboyejo WO, Kishimoto K, Smith RA, Knott JF (1989) A study of the interaction and coalescence of two coplanar fatigue cracks in bending. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 12: 167–17410.1111/j.1460-2695.1989.tb00524.x ↗
23. Sun CT, Zheng S (1996) Delamination characteristics of double-cantilever beam and end-notched flexure composite specimens. Compos Sci Technol 56: 451–45910.1016/0266-3538(96)00001-2 ↗
24. Xie D, Biggers SB (2006a) Progressive crack growth analysis using interface element based on the virtual crack closure technique. Finite Elem Anal Des 42: 977–98410.1016/j.finel.2006.03.007 ↗
25. Xie D, Biggers SB (2006b) Strain energy release rate calculation for a moving delamination front of arbitrary shape based on the virtual crack closure technique. Part I: formulation and validation. Eng Fract Mech 73: 771–78510.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.07.013 ↗
26. Xie D, Biggers SB (2006c) Strain energy release rate calculation for a moving delamination front of arbitrary shape based on the virtual crack closure technique. Part II: sensitivity study on modeling details. Eng Fract Mech 73: 786–80110.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.07.014 ↗
27. Xie D, Waas AM (2006) Discrete cohesive zone model for mixed-mode fracture using finite element analysis. Eng Fract Mech 73: 1783–179610.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.03.006 ↗
28. Xie D, Gary M, Huang DD, Abdi F (2008) Cohesive zone model for surface cracks using finite element analysis. AIAA-2008-106742, Chicago, IL10.2514/6.2008-1764 ↗