journal article·2015-04

Crystallographic orientation analysis of cleavage facets adjacent to a fracture trigger in low carbon steel

Shungo Imamura, Hirokazu Muramoto, Yoshinori Murata, Yusuke Shimada, Yoichi Kayamori, Tetsuya Tagawa

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 192· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

The microstructure and crystallographic orientation under a cleavage crack trigger point, which was detected on a fracture toughness specimen of low carbon steel, were investigated. SEM fractographs of an etched cleavage facet reveal that a flat cleavage facet between facet ridges spreading from the trigger point is divided by a grain boundary between ferrite and pearlite. Even a different phase boundary does not occasionally create any steps and ridges on the cleavage facet: it suggests this phase boundary is not an obstacle to cleavage cracking. Electron diffraction analysis for the thin foil sample milled out from this phase boundary demonstrates that the crystallographic orientation of the ferrite grain is consistent with that of the ferrite in the adjacent pearlite block. It is strictly examined that the ferrite/pearlite boundary does not act as a local resistance to cleavage crack growth when the crystallographic orientation of the ferrite in the pearlite block is aligned with an adjacent ferrite grain.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms · High Temperature Alloys and Creep

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (10)

Show source-provided references
1. Alexander DJ, Bernstein IM (1982) The cleavage plane of pearlite. Metall Trans A 13:1865–186810.1007/BF02647843 ↗
2. Bhattacharjee D, Davis CL (2002) Influence of processing history on mesotexture and microstructure-toughness relationship in control-rolled and normalised steels. Scr Mater 47:825–83110.1016/S1359-6462(02)00324-X ↗
3. Chakrabarti D, Strangwood M, Davis C (2009) Effect of bimodal grain size distribution on scatter in toughness. Metall Trans A 40:780–79510.1007/s11661-009-9794-4 ↗
4. Ghosh A, Kundu S, Chakrabarti D (2014) Effect of crystallographic texture on the cleavage fracture mechanism and effective grain size of ferritic steel. Scr Mater 81:8–1110.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.02.007 ↗
5. Hahn GT (1984) The influence of microstructure on brittle fracture toughness. Metall Trans A 15:947–95910.1007/BF02644685 ↗
6. Hanamura T, Yin F, Nagai N (2004) Ductile-brittle transition temperature of ultrafine ferrite/cementite microstructure in a low carbon steel controlled by effective grain size. ISIJ Int 44:610–61710.2355/isijinternational.44.610 ↗
7. Kim MC, Oh YJ, Hong JH (2000) Characterization of boundaries and determination of effective grain size in Mn–Mo–Ni low alloy steel from the view of misorientation. Scr Mater 43:205–21110.1016/S1359-6462(00)00392-4 ↗
8. Lin T, Evans AG, Ritchie RO (1987) Stochastic modeling of the independent roles of particle size and grain size in transgranular cleavage fracture. Metall Trans A 18:641–65110.1007/BF02649480 ↗
9. Wallin K, Laukkanen A (2006) Aspects of cleavage fracture initiation—relative influence of stress and strain. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 29:788–79810.1111/j.1460-2695.2006.01005.x ↗
10. Zhao MC, Huang XF, Li JL, Zeng TY, Zhao YC, Atrens A (2011) Strength and toughness tradeoffs for an ultrafine-grain size ferrite/cementite steel produced by warm-rolling and annealing. Mater Sci Eng A 528:815710.1016/j.msea.2011.07.067 ↗