journal article·2019-01Open access

Validated simulations of dynamic crack propagation in single crystals using EFEM and XFEM

Q. Zeng, M. H. Motamedi, A. F. T. Leong, N. P. Daphalapurkar, T. C. Hufnagel, K. T. Ramesh

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 215· Issue 1-2

Abstract

Brittle and quasibrittle materials such as ceramics and geomaterials fail through dynamic crack propagation during impact events. Simulations of such events are important in a number of applications. This paper compares the effectiveness of the embedded finite element method (EFEM) and the extended finite element method (XFEM) in modeling dynamic crack propagation by validating each approach against an impact experiment performed on single crystal quartz together with in-situ imaging of the dynamic fracture using X-ray phase contrast imaging (XPCI). The experiment is conducted in a Kolsky bar (generating a strain rate on the order of $$10^3\,\text {s}-1$$ ) that is operated at the synchrotron facilities at the advanced photon source (APS). The in situ XPCI technique can record the dynamic crack propagation with micron-scale spatial resolution and sub-microsecond temporal resolution, and the corresponding images are used to extract the time-resolved crack propagation path and velocity. A unified framework is first presented for the dynamic discretization formulations of EFEM and XFEM. This framework clarifies the differences between the two methods in enrichment techniques and numerical solution schemes. In both cases, a cohesive law is used to describe the fracture process after crack initiation. The simulations of the dynamic fracture experiment using the two simulation approaches are compared with the in situ experimental observations and measurements. The performance of each method is discussed with respect to capturing the early crack propagation process.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geophysical Methods and Applications · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Numerical methods in engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (64)

Show source-provided references
1. Abedi R, Haber RB, Clarke PL (2017) Effect of random defects on dynamic fracture in quasi-brittle materials. Int J Fract 208(1):241–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-017-0243-x10.1007/s10704-017-0243-x ↗
2. Areias P, Belytschko T (2005) Non-linear analysis of shells with arbitrary evolving cracks using XFEM. Int J Numer Methods Eng 62(3):384–41510.1002/nme.1192 ↗
3. Armero F, Garikipati K (1996) An analysis of strong discontinuities in multiplicative finite strain plasticity and their relation with the numerical simulation of strain localization in solids. Int J Solids Struct 33(20):2863–2885. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(95)00257-X . http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/002076839500257X10.1016/0020-7683(95)00257-X ↗
4. Armero F, Linder C (2009) Numerical simulation of dynamic fracture using finite elements with embedded discontinuities. Int J Fract 160(2):119–14110.1007/s10704-009-9413-9 ↗
5. Bažant ZP (2002) Concrete fracture models: testing and practice. Eng Fract Mech 69(2):165–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00084-4 . http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001379440100084410.1016/S0013-7944(01)00084-4 ↗
6. Bechmann R (1958) Elastic and piezoelectric constants of alpha-quartz. Phys Rev 110:1060–1061. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.110.106010.1103/PhysRev.110.1060 ↗
7. Belytschko T, Black T (1999) Elastic crack growth in finite elements with minimal remeshing. Int J Numer Methods Eng 45(5):601–62010.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990620)45:5<601::AID-NME598>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
8. Belytschko T, Chen H, Xu J, Zi G (2003) Dynamic crack propagation based on loss of hyperbolicity and a new discontinuous enrichment. Int J Numer Methods Eng 58(12):1873–190510.1002/nme.941 ↗
9. Belytschko T, Liu WK, Moran B, Elkhodary K (2013) Nonlinear finite elements for continua and structures. Wiley, London
10. Benedetti I, Aliabadi M (2013) A three-dimensional cohesive–frictional grain-boundary micromechanical model for intergranular degradation and failure in polycrystalline materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 265:36–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2013.05.023 . http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004578251300150310.1016/j.cma.2013.05.023 ↗
11. Borja RI (2000) A finite element model for strain localization analysis of strongly discontinuous fields based on standard Galerkin approximation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190(11):1529–1549. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(00)00176-6 . http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004578250000176610.1016/S0045-7825(00)00176-6 ↗
12. Borja RI (2008) Assumed enhanced strain and the extended finite element methods: a unification of concepts. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197(33–40):2789–2803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2008.01.019 . http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004578250800031510.1016/j.cma.2008.01.019 ↗
13. Camacho G, Ortiz M (1996) Computational modelling of impact damage in brittle materials. Int J Solids Struct 33(20–22):2899–2938. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(95)00255-3 . http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/002076839500255310.1016/0020-7683(95)00255-3 ↗
14. Carol I, Prat P, López C (1997) Normal/shear cracking model: application to discrete crack analysis. J Eng Mech 123(8):765–773. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997) 123:8(765)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997) ↗
15. de Borst R, Remmers JJ, Needleman A (2006) Mesh-independent discrete numerical representations of cohesive-zone models. Eng Fract Mech 73(2):160–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.05.007 . http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001379440500185210.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.05.007 ↗
16. Dias-da Costa D, Alfaiate J, Sluys LJ, Júlio E (2009) A comparative study on the modelling of discontinuous fracture by means of enriched nodal and element techniques and interface elements. Int J Fract 161(1):97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-009-9432-610.1007/s10704-009-9432-6 ↗
17. Dolbow J, Moës N, Belytschko T (2001) An extended finite element method for modeling crack growth with frictional contact. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190(51):6825–684610.1016/S0045-7825(01)00260-2 ↗
18. Espinosa HD, Zavattieri PD (2003) A grain level model for the study of failure initiation and evolution in polycrystalline brittle materials. Part I: Theory and numerical implementation. Mech Mater 35(3–6):333–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6636(02)00285-510.1016/S0167-6636(02)00285-5 ↗
19. Fineberg J, Gross SP, Marder M, Swinney HL (1991) Instability in dynamic fracture. Phys Rev Lett 67(4):45710.1103/PhysRevLett.67.457 ↗
20. Follansbee P, Frantz C (1983) Wave propagation in the split Hopkinson pressure bar. J Eng Mater Technol 105(1):61–6610.1115/1.3225620 ↗
21. Gálvez J, Cervenka J, Cendon D, Saouma V (2002) A discrete crack approach to normal/shear cracking of concrete. Cem Concr Res 32(10):1567–1585. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00825-6 . http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000888460200825610.1016/S0008-8846(02)00825-6 ↗
22. Hansbo A, Hansbo P (2004) A finite element method for the simulation of strong and weak discontinuities in solid mechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193(33):3523–3540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2003.12.041 . http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004578250400050710.1016/j.cma.2003.12.041 ↗
23. Huespe A, Oliver J, Sanchez P, Blanco S, Sonzogni V (2006) Strong discontinuity approach in dynamic fracture simulations. Mecán Comput 25:1997–2018
24. Hughes TJR (1987) The finite element method: linear static and dynamic finite element analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
25. Ida Y (1972) Cohesive force across the tip of a longitudinal-shear crack and Griffith’s specific surface energy. J Geophys Res 77(20):3796–3805. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB077i020p0379610.1029/JB077i020p03796 ↗
26. IEEE (1988) IEEE standard on piezoelectricity. ANSI/IEEE Std 176-1987. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.1988.7963810.1109/IEEESTD.1988.79638 ↗
27. Iwasa M, Bradt R (1987) Cleavage of natural and synthetic single crystal quartz. Mater Res Bull 22(9):1241–1248. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5408(87)90134-6 . http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/002554088790134610.1016/0025-5408(87)90134-6 ↗
28. Iwasa M, Ueno T, Bradt RC (1981) Fracture toughness of quartz and sapphire single crystals at room temperature. J Soc Mater Sci Jpn 30(337):1001–1004. https://doi.org/10.2472/jsms.30.100110.2472/jsms.30.1001 ↗
29. Jirásek M (2000) Comparative study on finite elements with embedded discontinuities. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 188(1):307–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00154-1 . http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004578259900154110.1016/S0045-7825(99)00154-1 ↗
30. Kalthoff J, Winkler S (1988) Failure mode transition at high rates of shear loading. Int Conf Impact Load Dyn Behav Mater 1:185–195
31. Leon S, Spring D, Paulino G (2014) Reduction in mesh bias for dynamic fracture using adaptive splitting of polygonal finite elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 100(8):555–57610.1002/nme.4744 ↗
32. Leong AFT, Robinson AK, Fezzaa K, Sun T, Sinclair N, Casem DT, Lambert PK, Hustedt CJ, Daphalapurkar NP, Ramesh KT, Hufnagel TC (2018) Quantitative in situ studies of dynamic fracture in brittle solids using dynamic X-ray phase contrast imaging. Exp Mech https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-018-0414-310.1007/s11340-018-0414-3 ↗
33. Melenk J, Babus̆ka I, (1996) The partition of unity finite element method: basic theory and applications. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 139(1):289–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01087-0 . http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004578259601087010.1016/S0045-7825(96)01087-0 ↗
34. Menouillard T, Réthoré J, Combescure A, Bung H (2006) Efficient explicit time stepping for the extended finite element method (X-FEM). Int J Numer Methods Eng 68(9):911–93910.1002/nme.1718 ↗
35. Moës N, Dolbow J, Belytschko T (1999) A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing. Int J Numer Methods Eng 46(1):131–150. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990910)46:1 $$<$$ < 131::AID-NME726 $$>$$ > 3.0.CO;2-J10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990910)46:1<131::AID-NME726>3.3.CO;2-A ↗
36. Motamedi M, Weed D, Foster C (2016) Numerical simulation of mixed mode (I and II) fracture behavior of pre-cracked rock using the strong discontinuity approach. Int J Solids Struct 85–86:44–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.02.002 . http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002076831600049410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.02.002 ↗
37. Oliver J (1996) Modelling strong discontinuities in solid mechanics via strain softening constitutive equations. Part 1: fundamentals. Int J Numer Methods Eng 39(21):3575–3600. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19961115)39:21 $$<$$ < 3575:: AID-NME65 $$>$$ > 3.0.CO;2-E10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19961115)39:21<3575::AID-NME65>3.0.CO;2-E ↗
38. Oliver J, Huespe A, Pulido M, Chaves E (2002) From continuum mechanics to fracture mechanics: the strong discontinuity approach. Eng Fract Mech 69(2):113–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00060-1 . http://HrBwww.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S00137944010HrB0060110.1016/S0013-7944(01)00060-1 ↗
39. Oliver J, Huespe A, Sánchez P (2006) A comparative study on finite elements for capturing strong discontinuities: E-FEM vs. X-FEM. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195(37–40):4732–4752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2005.09.020 . http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004578250500504910.1016/j.cma.2005.09.020 ↗
40. Ortiz M, Pandolfi A (1999) Finite-deformation irreversible cohesive elements for three-dimensional crack-propagation analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 44(9):1267–1282. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990330)44:9 $$<$$ < 1267::AID-NME486 $$>$$ > 3.0.CO;2-710.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990330)44:9<1267::AID-NME486>3.0.CO;2-7 ↗
41. Rabczuk T (2013) Computational methods for fracture in brittle and quasi-brittle solids: state-of-the-art review and future perspectives. ISRN Appl Math 2013:3810.1155/2013/849231 ↗
42. Ramulu M, Kobayashi AS (1985) Mechanics of crack curving and branching—a dynamic fracture analysis. Int J Fract 27(3):187–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0001796710.1007/BF00017967 ↗
43. Rangarajan R, Chiaramonte MM, Hunsweck MJ, Shen Y, Lew AJ (2015) Simulating curvilinear crack propagation in two dimensions with universal meshes. Int J Numer Methods Eng 102(3–4):632–67010.1002/nme.4731 ↗
44. Rinehart AJ, Bishop JE, Dewers T (2015) Fracture propagation in Indiana limestone interpreted via linear softening cohesive fracture model. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 120(4):2292–2308. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011624 . https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/2014JB01162410.1002/2014JB011624 ↗
45. Saksala T, Brancherie D, Harari I, Ibrahimbegovic A (2015) Combined continuum damage-embedded discontinuity model for explicit dynamic fracture analyses of quasi-brittle materials. Int J Numer Methods Eng 101(3):230–25010.1002/nme.4814 ↗
46. Sancho JM, Planas J, Galves JC, Reyes E, Cendon DA (2006) An embedded cohesive crack model for finite element analysis of mixed mode fracture of concrete*. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 29(12):1056–1065. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.2006.01076.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2006.01076.x ↗
47. Scheider I, Brocks W (2003) Simulation of cup-cone fracture using the cohesive model. Eng Fract Mech 70(14):1943–1961. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(03)00133-4 . http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S00137HrB94403001334HrB10.1016/S0013-7944(03)00133-4 ↗
48. Sharon E, Fineberg J (1996) Microbranching instability and the dynamic fracture of brittle materials. Phys Rev B 54:7128–7139. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.712810.1103/PhysRevB.54.7128 ↗
49. Simo JC, Rifai MS (1990) A class of mixed assumed strain methods and the method of incompatible modes. Int J Numer Methods Eng 29(8):1595–1638. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.162029080210.1002/nme.1620290802 ↗
50. Simo JC, Oliver J, Armero F (1993) An analysis of strong discontinuities induced by strain-softening in rate-independent inelastic solids. Comput Mech 12(5):277–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0037217310.1007/BF00372173 ↗
51. Simulia (2014) Abaqus analysis user’s guide, version 6.14. Simulia
52. Song JH, Belytschko T (2009) Dynamic fracture of shells subjected to impulsive loads. J Appl Mech 76(5):05130110.1115/1.3129711 ↗
53. Song JH, Areias P, Belytschko T (2006) A method for dynamic crack and shear band propagation with phantom nodes. Int J Numer Methods Eng 67(6):868–89310.1002/nme.1652 ↗
54. Song JH, Wang H, Belytschko T (2008) A comparative study on finite element methods for dynamic fracture. Comput Mech 42(2):239–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-007-0210-x10.1007/s00466-007-0210-x ↗
55. Sukumar N, Chopp D, Moës N, Belytschko T (2001) Modeling holes and inclusions by level sets in the extended finite-element method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190(46):6183–6200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(01)00215-8 . http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004578250100215810.1016/S0045-7825(01)00215-8 ↗
56. Ward RW (1984) The constants of alpha quartz. In: 38th annual symposium on frequency control, pp 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1109/FREQ.1984.20073210.1109/FREQ.1984.200732 ↗
57. Weed DA, Foster CD, Motamedi MH (2017) A robust numerical framework for simulating localized failure and fracture propagation in frictional materials. Acta Geotech 12(2):253–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-016-0474-410.1007/s11440-016-0474-4 ↗
58. Wells G, Sluys L (2000) Application of embedded discontinuities for softening solids. Eng Fract Mech 65(2–3):263–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(99)00120-4 . http://HrBwww.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S00137944990HrB0120410.1016/S0013-7944(99)00120-4 ↗
59. Wells GN, Sluys L (2001) A new method for modelling cohesive cracks using finite elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 50(12):2667–268210.1002/nme.143 ↗
60. Xu D, Liu Z, Liu X, Zeng Q, Zhuang Z (2014) Modeling of dynamic crack branching by enhanced extended finite element method. Comput Mech 54(2):489–50210.1007/s00466-014-1001-9 ↗
61. Yoffe EH (1951) The moving Griffith crack. Lond Edinb Dublin Philos Mag J Sci 42(330):739–750. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478644510856130210.1080/14786445108561302 ↗
62. Zeng Q, Liu Z, Wang T, Gao Y, Zhuang Z (2018) Fully coupled simulation of multiple hydraulic fractures to propagate simultaneously from a perforated horizontal wellbore. Comput Mech 61(1):137–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-017-1412-510.1007/s00466-017-1412-5 ↗
63. Zhang ZJ, Paulino GH, Celes W (2007) Extrinsic cohesive modelling of dynamic fracture and microbranching instability in brittle materials. Int J Numer Methods Eng 72(8):893–923. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.203010.1002/nme.2030 ↗
64. Zhou F, Molinari JF, Ramesh KT (2006) Effects of material properties on the fragmentation of brittle materials. Int J Fract 139(2):169–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-006-7135-910.1007/s10704-006-7135-9 ↗