Analytical homogenization modeling and computational simulation of intergranular fracture in polycrystals
Source abstract
Abstract
Failure at grain boundaries has a critical effect on the overall fracture behaviour of polycrystalline aggregates, as is the case in many metals. In the case of dynamic embrittlement, segregation of impurities occurs at grain boundaries, lowering their cohesive strength. The material response is then dominantly determined by grain boundary properties. The self-consistent scheme is extended to account for grain boundary decohesion by using a cohesive law to represent crack initiation and propagation. After introducing the imperfect interface conditions into the Eshelby’s equivalent inclusion solution, the effective tensile response and brittle intergranular fracture of a Cu–Ni–Si alloy is predicted. The proposed analytical model allows for the identification of parameters for both crystal plasticity and cohesive constitutive laws, from a single macroscopic tensile curve. Afterwards, multiscale computations of artificial microstructures are done using the analytically calibrated values of material parameters. Comparison of the results with experimental data shows a satisfactory agreement.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Composite Material Mechanics · Numerical methods in engineering · Rock Mechanics and Modeling
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Achenbach JD, Zhu H (1989) Effect of interfacial zone on mechanical behavior and failure of fiber-reinforced composites. J Mech Phys Solids 37:381–39310.1016/0022-5096(89)90005-7 ↗
2. Benveniste Y (1985) The effective mechanical behaviour of composite materials with imperfect contact between the constituents. Mech Mater 4:197–20810.1016/0167-6636(85)90016-X ↗
3. Berveiller M, Zaoui A (1979) An extension of the self-consistent scheme to plastically flowing polycrystal. J Mech Phys Solids 26:325–34410.1016/0022-5096(78)90003-0 ↗
4. Cerrone AR, Heber G, Wawrzynek PA, Paulino GH, Ingraffea AR (2011) Modeling microstructurally small fatigue cracking processes in an aluminum alloy with the PPR cohesive zone model. In: Proceedings of EMI 2011, Boston
5. Cavalcante-Neto JB, Wawrzynek PA, Carvalho TM, Martha LF, Ingraffea AR (2001) An algorithm for three-dimensional mesh generation for arbitrary regions with cracks. Eng Comput 17:75–9110.1007/PL00007196 ↗
6. Cavalcante-Neto JB, Martha LF, Wawrzynek PA, Ingraffea AR (2005) A back-tracking procedure for optimization of simplex meshes. Commun Numer Meth En 21(12):711–72210.1002/cnm.786 ↗
7. Cuitino AM, Ortiz M (1993) Computational modelling of single crystals. Model Simul Mater Sci 1:225–26310.1088/0965-0393/1/3/001 ↗
8. Dugdale S (1960) Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J Mech Phys Solids 8:100–10410.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 ↗
9. Duvaut G, Lions JL (1972) Les inéquations en mécanique et en physique. Dunod, Paris
10. Eshelby JD (1957) The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion and related problems. Proc R Soc Lond A Math 241:376–39610.1098/rspa.1957.0133 ↗
11. Field DA (1988) Laplacian smoothing and Delaunay triangulations. Commun Appl Numer Methods 4(6):709–71210.1002/cnm.1630040603 ↗
12. Groeber M, Ghosh S, Uchic MD, Dimiduk DM (2008a) A framework for automated analysis and simulation of 3D polycrystalline microstructures. Part 1: statistical characterization. Acta Mater 56(6):1257–127310.1016/j.actamat.2007.11.041 ↗
13. Groeber M, Ghosh S, Uchic MD, Dimiduk DM (2008b) A framework for automated analysis and simulation of 3D polycrystalline microstructures. Part 2: synthetic structure generation. Acta Mater 56(6):1274–128710.1016/j.actamat.2007.11.040 ↗
14. Hashin Z (1991) The spherical inclusion with imperfect interface. J Appl Mech T ASME 58:444–44910.1115/1.2897205 ↗
15. Hill R (1965a) A self-consistent mechanics of composite materials. J Mech Phys Solids 13:213–22210.1016/0022-5096(65)90010-4 ↗
16. Hill R (1965b) Continuum micro-mechanisms of elastoplastic polycrystals. J Mech Phys Solids 13:89–10110.1016/0022-5096(65)90023-2 ↗
17. Kröner E (1958) Berechnung der elastischen konstanten des vielkristalls aus den konstanten des einskristalls. Zeitschrift fur Physik 151:504–51810.1007/BF01337948 ↗
18. Kröner E (1961) Zur plastischen verformung des Vielkristalls. Acta Metall 9:155–16110.1016/0001-6160(61)90060-8 ↗
19. Lee HK, Pyo SH (2007) Micromechanics-based elastic damage modeling of particulate composites with weakened interfaces. Int J Solids Struct 44:8390–840610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.06.019 ↗
20. Méric L, Cailletaud G (1991) Single crystal modeling for structural calculations: part 2-finite element implementation. J Eng Mater-T ASME 113:171–18210.1115/1.2903375 ↗
21. Misra RDK, Prasad VS, Rao PR (1996) Dynamic embrittlement in an age-hardenable copper-chromium. Scr Mater 35:129–13310.1016/1359-6462(96)00098-X ↗
22. Mori T, Tanaka K (1973) Average stress in matrix and average elastic energy of materials with misfitting inclusions. Acta Metall 21:571–57410.1016/0001-6160(73)90064-3 ↗
23. Mura T (1987) Micromechanics of defects in solids. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht10.1007/978-94-009-3489-4 ↗
24. Nathani H, Misra RDK (2004) Characteristics of intermediate temperature dynamic embrittlement of age hardenable copper-chromium alloys. Mater Sci Technol Ser 20:546–54910.1179/026708304225016617 ↗
25. Othmani Y, Delannay L, Doghri I (2011) Equivalent inclusion solution adapted to particle debonding with a non-linear cohesive law. Int J Solids Struct 48:3326–333510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.08.002 ↗
26. Priester L (2011) Joints de grains et plasticité cristalline. Hermes, Paris10.1002/9781118603031 ↗
27. Qu J (1993a) Eshelby tensor for an elastic inclusion with slightly weakened interface. J Appl Mech-T ASME 60:1048–105010.1115/1.2900974 ↗
28. Qu J (1993b) The effect of slightly weakened interfaces on the overall elastic properties of composite materials. Mech Mater 14:269–28110.1016/0167-6636(93)90082-3 ↗
29. Rose JH, Ferrante J, Smith JR (1981) Universal binding energy curves for metals and bimetallic interfaces. Phys Rev Lett 47:675–67810.1103/PhysRevLett.47.675 ↗
30. Simo JC, Kennedy JG, Govindjee S (1988) Non-smooth multisurface plasticity and viscoplasticity. Loading/unloading conditions and numerical algorithms. Int J Numer Methods Eng 26:2161–218510.1002/nme.1620261003 ↗
31. Sun Z (2008) Contribution à l’étude des propriétés mécaniques des alliages de cuivre à durcissement structural Cu–Ni–Si et Cu–Cr–Zr : influence de la microstructure et des conditions d’utilisation. PhD Thesis, Lyon
32. Sun Z, Laitem C, Vincent A (2008) Dynamic embrittlement at intermediate temperature in a Cu–Ni–Si alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 477:145–15210.1016/j.msea.2007.05.013 ↗
33. Tan H, Huang Y, Liu C, Geubelle PH (2005) The Mori-Tanaka method for composite materials with nonlinear interface debonding. Int J Plast 21:1890–191810.1016/j.ijplas.2004.10.001 ↗
34. Tan H, Huang Y, Liu C, Geubellle PH (2006) Effect of nonlinear interface debonding on the constitutive model of composite materials. Int J Multiscale Comput Eng 4:147–16710.1615/IntJMultCompEng.v4.i1.100 ↗
35. Tan H, Huang Y, Liu C, Ravichandran G, Paulino GH (2007) Constitutive behaviors of composites with interface debonding: the extended Mori-Tanaka method for uniaxial tension. Int J Fract 146:139–14810.1007/s10704-007-9155-5 ↗
36. Tvergaard V, Hutchinson JW (1992) The relation between crack growth resistance and fracture process parameters in elastic–plastic solids. J Mech Phys Solids 40:1377–139710.1016/0022-5096(92)90020-3 ↗
37. Van der Ven A, Ceder G (2003) Impurity-induced van der Waals transition during decohesion. Phys Rev B 67:06010110.1103/PhysRevB.67.060101 ↗
38. Wu Z, Sullivan JM (2003) Multiple material marching cubes algorithm. Int J Numer Methods Eng 58(2):189–20710.1002/nme.775 ↗
39. Zhong Z, Yu XB, Meguid SA (2004) 3D micromechanical modeling of particulate composite materials with imperfect interface. Int J Multiscale Comp Eng 2:172–18710.1615/IntJMultCompEng.v2.i1.60 ↗