Modeling of structural failure of Zircaloy claddings induced by multiple hydride cracks
Source abstract
Abstract
Zirconium alloys have been serving as primary structural materials for nuclear fuel claddings. Structural failure analysis under extreme conditions is critical to the assessment of the performance and safety of nuclear fuel claddings. This work focuses on simulating structural failure of Zircaloy tubes with multiple hydride defects through modeling explicit crack propagation in ductile media. First, we developed an integrated cladding failure model by taking into account both crack initiation induced by hydride/matrix interface separation and ligament tearing-off between activated hydride cracks. Second, to accommodate the initiation, propagation, and coalescence of multiple cracks in finite plastic media we incorporated this structural failure model into a coupled continuous/discontinuous Galerkin (DG) based finite element code, a traditionally preferred implicit numerical framework. Third, to improve the adaptive placement of DG interface elements for crack propagation and to identify potential coalescence of cracks due to the interaction between adjacent hydride cracks, we defined a special failure index for the assessment of potential failure zones using both true plastic strain developed and predicted failure strain based on the Johnson–Cook material failure criterion. Finally, by calibrating the proposed material failure model using a cluster of Zircaloy material experimental tests, we successfully simulated a complete failure process of a fuel cladding tube with multiple hydride cracks.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Metallurgy and Material Forming
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. Adamson R, Coleman K, Mahmood T, Rudling P (2013) ZIRAT-18 special topics report. In: Mechanical testing of zirconium alloys, volume I. ANT International, Sweden, December, 2013
2. Allen T, Busby J, Meyer M, Petti D (2010) Materials challenges for nuclear systems. Mater Today 13:14–2310.1016/S1369-7021(10)70220-0 ↗
3. Argon AS, Im J, Safoglu R (1975) Cavity formation from inclusions in ductile fracture. Metall Trans A 6(4):825–83710.1007/BF02672306 ↗
4. Arias D, Palacios T, Turrillo C (1987) Composition of precipitates presente in zircaloy-2 and 4. J Nucl Mater 148:227–22910.1016/0022-3115(87)90118-8 ↗
5. Bai Y, Wierzbicki T (2008) A new model of metal plasticity and fracture with pressure and Lode dependence. Int J Plast 24:1071–109610.1016/j.ijplas.2007.09.004 ↗
6. Bai JB, Prioul C, Francois D (1994) Hydride embrittlement in Zircaloy-4 plate: Part I Influence of microstructure on the hydride embrittlement in ZIRCALOY-4 at 20 C and 350 C. Metall Mater Trans A 25:118510.1007/BF02652293 ↗
7. Benzerga A, Leblond J-B, Needleman A, Tvergaard V (2016) Ductile failure modeling. Int J Fract 201:29–8010.1007/s10704-016-0142-6 ↗
8. Beremin FM (1981) Cavity formation from inclusions in ductile fracture of A508 steel. Metall Trans A 12(5):723–73110.1007/BF02648336 ↗
9. Bertolino G, Meyer G, Ipina JP (2002) Degradation of the mechanical properties of Zircaloy-4 due to hydrogen embrittlement. J Alloys Compd 330:408–41310.1016/S0925-8388(01)01576-6 ↗
10. Bertolino G, Meyer G, Ipina JP (2002) Effects of hydrogen content and temperature on fracture toughness of Zircaloy-4. J Nucl Mater 320:272–27910.1016/S0022-3115(03)00193-4 ↗
11. Bertolino G, Meyer G, Ipina JP (2003) Effects of hydrogen content and temperature on fracture toughness of Zircaloy-4. J Nucl Mater 322:57–6510.1016/S0022-3115(03)00305-2 ↗
12. Bertsch J, Hoffelner W (2006) Crack resistance curves determination of tube cladding material. J Nucl Mater 352:116–12510.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.02.045 ↗
13. Billone MC, Burtseva TA, Einziger R (2013) Ductile-to-brittle transition temperature for high burnup cladding alloys exposed to simulated drying-storage conditions. J Nucl Mater 433:431–44810.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.10.002 ↗
14. Boyce BL (2014) The sandia fracture challenge: blind round robin predictions of ductile tearing. Int J Fract 186:5–6810.1007/s10704-013-9904-6 ↗
15. Chan KS (1995) A fracture model for hydride-induced embrittlement. Acta Metall Mater 43:4325–433510.1016/0956-7151(95)00133-G ↗
16. Chan KS (1996) A micromechanical model for predicting hydride embrittlement in nuclear fuel cladding material. J Nucl Mater 227:220–23610.1016/0022-3115(95)00160-3 ↗
17. Choubey R, Puls MP (1994) Crack initiation at long radial hydrides in Zr-2.5nb pressure tube material at elevated temperatures. Met Trans 25A:993–100410.1007/BF02652274 ↗
18. Cinbiz MN, Edmondson PD, Terrani K (2017) Hydride microstructure at the metal-oxide interface of a Zircaloy-4 fuel clad from the H. B. Robinson nuclear reactor. Trans Am Nucl Soc 116:354–356
19. Cockburn B, Shu C (1998) The local discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for convection-diffusion systems. SIAM J Numer Anal 35:2440–246310.1137/S0036142997316712 ↗
20. Cockeram BV, Chan KS (2009) Modeling the tension-compression asymmetric yield behavior of beta-treated Zircaloy-4. J Nucl Mater 393:387–40810.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.06.033 ↗
21. Cockeram BV, Chan KS (2013) In situ studies and modeling of the deformation and fracture mechanism for wrought Zircaloy-4 and Zircaloy-2 as a function of stress-state. J Nucl Mater 434:97–12310.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.11.005 ↗
22. Cockeram BV, Hollenbeck JL (2015) The role of stress-state on the deformation and fracture mechanism of hydrided and non-hydrided Zircaloy-4. J Nucl Mater 467:9–3110.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.09.012 ↗
23. Coleman CE (2012) Comprehensive nuclear materials, Chap 6.03. In: Cracking of hydride-forming metals and alloys. Elsevier, Amsterdam10.1016/B0-08-043749-4/06104-8 ↗
24. Fitoussi J, Guo G, Baptiste D (1996) Determination of a tridimensional failure criterion at the fibre/matrix interface of an organic-matrix/discontinuous-reinforcement composite. Compos Sci Technol 56:755–76010.1016/0266-3538(96)00017-6 ↗
25. Gao X, Kim J (2006) Modeling of ductile fracture: significance of void coalescence. Int J Solids Struct 43:6277–629310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.08.008 ↗
26. Grange M, Besson J (2000) Anisotropic behavior and rupture of hydrided Zircaloy-4 sheets. Metall Mater Trans 31A:679–69010.1007/s11661-000-0010-9 ↗
27. Gross AJ, Ravi-Chandar K (2014) Prediction of ductile failure using a local strain-to-failure criterion. Int J Fract 186:69–9110.1007/s10704-013-9908-2 ↗
28. Gross AJ, Ravi-Chandar K (2016) Prediction of ductile failure in Ti–6Al–4V using a local strain-to-failure criterion. Int J Fract 198(2016):221–24510.1007/s10704-016-0076-z ↗
29. Hansbo P, Larson MG (2002) Discontinuous Galerkin method for incompressible and nearly incompressible elasticity by Nitche’s methods. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191:1895–190810.1016/S0045-7825(01)00358-9 ↗
30. Huang FH (1993) Brittle-fracture potential of irradiated Zircaloy-2 pressure tubes. J Nucl Mater 207:103–11510.1016/0022-3115(93)90252-T ↗
31. Johnson GR, Cook WH (1985) Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Eng Fract Mech 21:31–4810.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9 ↗
32. Kerr M, Daymond MR, Holt RA, Almer JD (2008) Strain evolution of zirconium hydride embedded in a Zircaloy-2 matrix. J Nucl Mater 380:70–7510.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.07.004 ↗
33. Kikuchi M, Wada Y, Suga K, Ohdama C (2011) Numerical simulation of coalescence behavior of multiple surface cracks. In: American society of mechanical engineers, pressure vessels and piping division10.1115/PVP2011-57155 ↗
34. Le Saux M, Besson J, Carassou S, Poussard C, Averty X (2010) Behavior and failure of uniformly hydrided Zircaloy-4 fuel claddings under various stress states, including RIA loading conditions. Eng Fail Anal 17:683–70010.1016/j.engfailanal.2009.07.001 ↗
35. Lee BJ, Mear M (1999) Stress concentration induced by an elastic spheroidal particle in a plastically deforming solid. J Mech Phys Solids 47:1301–133610.1016/S0022-5096(98)00104-5 ↗
36. Lew A, Neff P, Sulsky D, Ortiz M (2004) Optimal BV estimates for a discontinuous Galerkin method for linear elasticity. Appl Math Res Express 3:73–10610.1155/S1687120004020052 ↗
37. Liu R, Wheeler MF, Yotov I (2012) On the spatial formulation of discontinuous Galerkin methods for finite elastoplasticity. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 253:219–23610.1016/j.cma.2012.07.015 ↗
38. Liu Z, Moore JA, Liu WK (2016) An extended micromechanics method for probing interphase properties in polymer nanocomposites. J Mech Phys Solids 95:663–68010.1016/j.jmps.2016.05.002 ↗
39. Liu R, Liu Z (2018) An implicit discontinuous Galerkin finite element framework for modeling fracture failure of ductile materials undergoing finite plastic deformation. Int J Numer Methods Eng 115:1383–140910.1002/nme.5849 ↗
40. Martin Rengel MA (2012) A micromechanical model for predicting hydride embrittlement in nuclear fuel cladding material. J Nucl Mater 429:276–28310.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.06.003 ↗
41. Nilsson K-F, Jaksil N, Vokal V (2010) An elastic–plastic fracture mechanics based model assessment of hydride embrittlement in zircaloy cladding tubes. J Nucl Mater 396:71–8510.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.10.056 ↗
42. Nitsche J (1970) Über ein Variationsprinzip zur Lösung von Dirichlet bei Verwendung von Teilräumen, die keinen Randbedingungen unterworfen sind. Abh Math Univ Hamburg 36:9–1510.1007/BF02995904 ↗
43. Noels L, Radovitzky R (2006) A general discontinuous Galerkin method for finite hyperelasticity. Formulation and numerical applications. Int J Numer Methods Eng 68:64–9710.1002/nme.1699 ↗
44. Northwood DO, Kosasih U (1983) Hydrides and delayed hydrogen cracking in zirconium and its alloys. Int Met Rev 28:92–12110.1179/imr.1983.28.1.92 ↗
45. Pardoen T, Hutchinson JW (2000) An extended model for void growth and coalescence. J Mech Phys Solids 48:2467–251210.1016/S0022-5096(00)00019-3 ↗
46. Pardoen T, Hutchinson JW (2003) Micromechanics-based model for trends in toughness of ductile metals. Acta Mater 51:133–14810.1016/S1359-6454(02)00386-5 ↗
47. Puls MP (1988) The influence of hydride size and matrix strength on fracture initiation at hydrides in zirconium alloys. Metall Trans A 19(1988):1507–152210.1007/BF02674025 ↗
48. Puls MP (1991) Fracture initiation at hydrides in zirconium. Metall Trans A 22:2327–233710.1007/BF02664999 ↗
49. Puls MP (2012) The effect of hydrogen and hydrides on the integrity of zirconium alloy components: delayed hydride cracking engineering materials, vol 13. Springer, Berlin, pp 978–144710.1007/978-1-4471-4195-2 ↗
50. Qin W, Szpunar JA, Kiran Kumar NAP, Kozinsk J (2014) Microstructural criteria for abrupt ductile-to-brittle transition induced by hydrides in zirconium alloys. Acta Meter 81:219–22910.1016/j.actamat.2014.08.010 ↗
51. Riviere B, Shaw S, Wheeler MF, Whiteman JR (2003) Discontinuous Galerkin finite element methods for linear elasticity and quasistatic linear viscoelasticity. Numer Math 95:347–37610.1007/s002110200394 ↗
52. Roux E, Shakoor M, Bernacki M, Bouchard P-O (2014) A new finite element approach for modelling ductile damage void nucleation and growth—analysis of loading path effect on damage mechanisms. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 22:07500110.1088/0965-0393/22/7/075001 ↗
53. Sakamoto K, Nakatsuka M (2006) Stress reorientation of hydrides in recrystallized Zircaloy-2 sheet. J Nucl Sci Technol 43:1136–114110.1080/18811248.2006.9711205 ↗
54. Thomason PF (1985) Three-dimensional models for the plastic limit-loads at incipient failure of the intervoid matrix in ductile porous solids. Acta Metall 33:1079–108510.1016/0001-6160(85)90201-9 ↗
55. Truster TJ, Masud A (2013) A discontinuous/continuous Galerkin method for modeling of interphase damage in fibrous composite systems. Comput Mech 52:499–51410.1007/s00466-012-0827-2 ↗
56. Tvergaard V, Hutchinson JW (2002) Two mechanisms of ductile fracture: void by void growth versus multiple void interaction. Int J Solids Struct 39:3581–359710.1016/S0020-7683(02)00168-3 ↗
57. Walker TJ, Kass JN (1974) Zirconium in the nuclear applications. In: ASTM STP 551. American Society for Testing and Materials, pp 328–354
58. WARP3D (2016) WARP3D-release 17.7.0. 3-D dynamic nonlinear fracture analysis of solids using parallel computers and workstations. In: University of Illinois report UILU-ENG-95-2012. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois
59. Wells GN, Garikipati K, Molari L (2004) A discontinuous Galerkin formulation for a strain gradient-dependent damage model. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193:3633–364510.1016/j.cma.2004.01.020 ↗
60. Xue L (2008) Constitutive modeling of void shearing effect in ductile fracture of porous materials and pressures. Eng Fract Mech 75:3343–336610.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.07.022 ↗
61. Zhai J, Gao X, Sobotka JC, Webler BA, Cockeram BV (2014) Modeling the tension-compression asymmetric yield behavior of beta-treated Zircaloy-4. J Nucl Mater 451:292–29910.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.04.017 ↗
62. Zhou J, Gao X, Sobotka JC, Webler BA, Cockeram BV (2014) On the extension of the Gurson-type porous plasticity models for prediction of ductile fracture under shear-dominated conditions. J Solid Struct 51:3273–329110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.05.028 ↗