journal article·2018-03Open access

Scaling of brittle failure: strength versus toughness

Laurent Brochard, Sabri Souguir, Karam Sab

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 210· Issue 1-2

Abstract

We study the scaling of strength and toughness in function of temperature, loading rate and system size, to investigate the difference between tensile failure and fracture failure. Molecular simulation is used to estimate the failure of intact and cracked bodies while varying temperature, strain rate and system size over many orders of magnitude, making it possible to identify scaling laws. Two materials are considered: an idealized toy model, for which a scaling law can be derived analytically, and a realistic molecular model of graphene. The results show that strength and toughness follow very similar scalings with temperature and loading rate, but differ markedly regarding the scaling with system size. Strength scales with the number of atoms whereas toughness scales with the number of cracks. It means that intermediate situations of moderate stress concentrations (e.g., notch) can exhibit not obvious size scaling, in-between those of strength and toughness. Following a theoretical analysis of failure as a thermally activated process, we could rationalize the observed scaling and formulate a general rate–temperature–size equivalence. The scaling law of the toy model can be derived rigorously but is not representative of real materials because of a force discontinuity in the potential. A more representative scaling law, valid for graphene, is proposed with a different exponent.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research · Ion-surface interactions and analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Allen MP, Tildesley DJ (1989) Computer simulation of liquids. Oxford University Press, Oxford
2. Anderson TL (2005) Fracture mechanics: fundamentals and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton10.1201/9781420058215 ↗
3. Argon A (1979) Plastic deformation in metallic glasses. Acta Metall 27(1):47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(79)90055-5 . http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/000161607990055510.1016/0001-6160(79)90055-5 ↗
4. Bazant ZP, Chen EP (1997) Scaling of structural failure. Appl Mech Rev 50(10):593. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3101672 . http://appliedmechanicsreviews.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/article.aspx?articleid=139600210.1115/1.3101672 ↗
5. Belytschko T, Xiao SP, Schatz GC, Ruoff RS (2002) Atomistic simulations of nanotube fracture. Phys Rev B 65(23):235430. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.23543010.1103/PhysRevB.65.235430 ↗
6. Brenner DW (1990) Empirical potential for hydrocarbons for use in simulating the chemical vapor deposition of diamond films. Phys Rev B 42(15):9458–9471. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.46.1948.2 . http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.42.945810.1103/PhysRevB.46.1948.2 ↗
7. Brochard L, Hantal G, Laubie H, Ulm FJ, Pellenq RJM (2015) Capturing material toughness by molecular simulation: accounting for large yielding effects and limits. Int J Fract 194(2):149–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-015-0045-y10.1007/s10704-015-0045-y ↗
8. Brochard L, Tejada IG, Sab K (2016) From yield to fracture, failure initiation captured by molecular simulation. J Mech Phys Solids 95:632–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2016.05.005 . http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022509616300424 . http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S002250961630042410.1016/j.jmps.2016.05.005 ↗
9. Carpinteri A (1994) Scaling laws and renormalization groups for strength and toughness of disordered materials. Int J Solids Struct 31(3):291–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(94)90107-4 . http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/002076839490107410.1016/0020-7683(94)90107-4 ↗
10. Carpinteri A, Pugno N (2005) Are scaling laws on strength of solids related to mechanics or to geometry? Nat Mater 4(6):421–423. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat140810.1038/nmat1408 ↗
11. Dewapriya MAN, Rajapakse RKND, Phani AS (2014) Atomistic and continuum modelling of temperature-dependent fracture of graphene. Int J Fract 187(2):199–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-014-9931-y10.1007/s10704-014-9931-y ↗
12. Dugdale D (1960) Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J Mech Phys Solids 8(2):100–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-210.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 ↗
13. Dumitrica T, Hua M, Yakobson BI (2006) Symmetry-, time-, and temperature-dependent strength of carbon nanotubes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103(16):6105–6109. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.060094510310.1073/pnas.0600945103 ↗
14. Flores KM, Dauskardt RH (1999) Enhanced toughness due to stable crack tip damage zones in bulk metallic glass. Scr Mater 41(9):937–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6462(99)00243-2 . http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S135964629900243210.1016/S1359-6462(99)00243-2 ↗
15. Frenkel D, Smit B (2002) Undestanding molecular simulation: from algorithms to applications, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York
16. Johnson WL, Samwer K (2005) A universal criterion for plastic yielding of metallic glasses with a (T/Tg) $$\wedge $$ ∧ (2/3) temperature dependence. Phys Rev Lett 95(19):195501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.19550110.1103/PhysRevLett.95.195501 ↗
17. Karihaloo BL, Wang J, Grzybowski M (1996) Doubly periodic arrays of bridged cracks and short fibre-reinforced cementitious composites. J Mech Phys Solids 44(10):1565–1586. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(96)00053-1 . http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/002250969600053110.1016/0022-5096(96)00053-1 ↗
18. Khare R, Mielke SL, Paci JT, Zhang S, Ballarini R, Schatz GC, Belytschko T (2007) Coupled quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical modeling of the fracture of defective carbon nanotubes and graphene sheets. Phys Rev B 75(7):075412. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.75.07541210.1103/PhysRevB.75.075412 ↗
19. Lee C, Wei X, Kysar JW, Hone J (2008) Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 321(5887):385–388. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1157996 . http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18635798 . http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/doi/10.1126/science.1157996,4774915062810.1126/science.1157996 ↗
20. Legoll F, Luskin M, Moeckel R (2007) Non-ergodicity of the NoséHoover thermostatted harmonic oscillator. Arch Ration Mech Anal 184(3):449–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-006-0029-110.1007/s00205-006-0029-1 ↗
21. Leguillon D (2002) Strength or toughness? A criterion for crack onset at a notch. Eur J Mech A/Solids 21(1):61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0997-7538(01)01184-610.1016/S0997-7538(01)01184-6 ↗
22. Liu F, Ming P, Li J (2007) Ab initio calculation of ideal strength and phonon instability of graphene under tension. Phys Rev B 76(6):064120. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.06412010.1103/PhysRevB.76.064120 ↗
23. Marder M, Gross S (1994) Origin of crack tip instabilities. J Mech Phys Solids 43(1):1–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(94)00060-I . http://arxiv.org/abs/chao-dyn/9410009,941000910.1016/0022-5096(94)00060-I ↗
24. Moura MJB, Marder M (2013) Tearing of free-standing graphene. Phys Rev E 88(3):032405. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.88.03240510.1103/PhysRevE.88.032405 ↗
25. Novozhilov V (1969) On a necessary and sufficient criterion for brittle strength. J Appl Math Mech 33(2):201–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8928(69)90025-2 . http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/002189286990025210.1016/0021-8928(69)90025-2 ↗
26. Omeltchenko A, Yu J, Kalia RK, Vashishta P (1997) Crack front propagation and fracture in a graphite sheet: a molecular-dynamics study on parallel computers. Phys Rev Lett 78(11):2148–2151. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.214810.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2148 ↗
27. Pechenik L, Levine H, Da Kessler (2002) Steady-state mode I cracks in a viscoelastic triangular lattice. J Mech Phys Solids 50(3):583–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00061-8 . http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0002314 . http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022509601000618,000231410.1016/S0022-5096(01)00061-8 ↗
28. Petrov VA, Orlov AN (1975) Contribution of thermal fluctuations to the scattering and the gauge effect of longevity. Int J Fract 11(5):881–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0001290410.1007/BF00012904 ↗
29. Petrov VA, Orlov AN (1976) Statistical kinetics of thermally activated fracture. Int J Fract 12(2):231–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0003698010.1007/BF00036980 ↗
30. Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 117(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 . http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S002199918571039X10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
31. Ponson L, Bonamy D, Barbier L (2006) Cleaved surface ofiAlPdMn quasicrystals: influence of the local temperature elevation at. Phys Rev B 74(18):184205 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.18420510.1103/PhysRevB.74.184205 ↗
32. Regel’ VR, Slutsker AI, Tomashevski ÉE (1972) The kinetic nature of the strength of solids. Sov Phys Uspekhi 15(1):45–65. https://doi.org/10.1070/PU1972v015n01ABEH004945 . http://stacks.iop.org/0038-5670/15/i=1/a=R03?key=crossref.123f17f2adf8d374f849d4f9578b0ef410.1070/PU1972v015n01ABEH004945 ↗
33. Rice JR, Levy N (1969) Local heating by plastic deformation at a crack tip. In: Argon AS (ed) Physics of strength and plasticity. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 277–293
34. Schuh C, Hufnagel T, Ramamurty U (2007) Mechanical behavior of amorphous alloys. Acta Mater 55(12):4067–4109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.052 . http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S135964540700122X10.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.052 ↗
35. Shenderova OA, Brenner DW, Omeltchenko A, Su X, Yang LH (2000) Atomistic modeling of the fracture of polycrystalline diamond. Phys Rev B 61(6):3877–3888. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.61.3877 . http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.61.3877 . http://prb.aps.org/abstract/PRB/v61/i6/p3877_110.1103/PhysRevB.61.3877 ↗
36. Slepyan LI (2002) Models and phenomena in fracture mechanics. Foundations of engineering mechanics. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48010-510.1007/978-3-540-48010-5 ↗
37. Slutsker AI (2005) Atomic-level fluctuation mechanism of the fracture of solids (computer simulation studies). Phys Solid State 47(5):801. https://doi.org/10.1134/1.192483610.1134/1.1924836 ↗
38. Thomson R (1986) Physics of fracture. In: Ehrenreich H, Turnbull D (eds) Solid state physics, vol 39. Academic Press, pp 1–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0081-1947(08)60368-9 . http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S008119470860368910.1016/S0081-1947(08)60368-9 ↗
39. Thomson R, Zhou SJ, Carlsson AE, Tewary VK (1992) Lattice imperfections studied by use of lattice Greens functions. Phys Rev B 46(17):10613–10622. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.46.1061310.1103/PhysRevB.46.10613 ↗
40. Wang G, Chan K, Xu X, Wang W (2008) Instability of crack propagation in brittle bulk metallic glass. Acta Mater 56(19):5845–5860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2008.08.005 . http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S135964540800563610.1016/j.actamat.2008.08.005 ↗
41. Wei C, Cho K, Srivastava D (2003) Tensile strength of carbon nanotubes under realistic temperature and strain rate. Phys Rev B 67(11):115407. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.67.115407 . http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/020251310.1103/PhysRevB.67.115407 ↗
42. Yazdani H, Hatami K (2015) Failure criterion for graphene in biaxial loading a molecular dynamics study. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 23(6):065004 https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/23/6/065004 . http://stacks.iop.org/0965-0393/23/i=6/a=065004?key=crossref.66817f771850338a194c2b8253b568c910.1088/0965-0393/23/6/065004 ↗
43. Zehnder AT, Rosakis AJ (1991) On the temperature distribution at the vicinity of dynamically propagating cracks in 4340 steel. J Mech Phys Solids 39(3):385–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(91)90019-K . http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/002250969190019K10.1016/0022-5096(91)90019-K ↗
44. Zhang T, Li X, Kadkhodaei S, Gao H (2012) Flaw insensitive fracture in nanocrystalline graphene. Nano Lett 12(9):4605–4610. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl301908b10.1021/nl301908b ↗
45. Zhang T, Li X, Gao H (2015) Fracture of graphene: a review. Int J Fract 196(1–2):1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-015-0039-910.1007/s10704-015-0039-9 ↗
46. Zhu T, Li J, Samanta A, Leach A, Gall K (2008) Temperature and strain-rate dependence of surface dislocation nucleation. Phys Rev Lett 100(2):025502. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.02550210.1103/PhysRevLett.100.025502 ↗
47. Zhurkov SN (1984) Kinetic concept of the strength of solids. Int J Fract 26(4):295–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0096296110.1007/BF00962961 ↗