journal article·2017-09

Role of Poisson’s ratio mismatch on the crack path in glass matrix particulate composites

Tanguy Lacondemine, Clément Roux-Langlois, Tanguy Rouxel

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 207· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

The improvement of the mechanical properties of glass matrix particulate composites has been extensively studied in the past 40 years. Emphasis has mostly been placed on the influence of mismatches of the elastic moduli and coefficient of thermal expansion. However, little attention was paid to Poisson's ratio so far, although we show by means of analytical analysis and finite element method (FEM) that it has a major influence on the stress field distribution, the stress intensity factor and thus on the crack path in the vicinity of the inclusion. Due to local stress changes, crack front pinning and bridging phenomena are predicted in the case of adhesive particles with smaller than the one of the matrix. Nevertheless, when located close to the surface, such particles might play the role of stress concentrators. Glass offers a unique opportunity to vary composition and properties in a continuous manner, hence opening a new realm of possibilities for tuning Poisson's ratio to improve the resistance the glass composite opposes to crack extension.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Composite Material Mechanics · Numerical methods in engineering · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Bansal PP, Ardell AJ (1972) Average nearest-neighbor distances between uniformly distributed finite particles. Metallography 5(2):97–11110.1016/0026-0800(72)90048-1 ↗
2. Beall GH, Pinckney LR (1999) Nanophase glass-ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 82(1):5–1610.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb01716.x ↗
3. Bourdin B, Francfort GA, Marigo J-J (2008) The variational approach to fracture. J Elast 91(1):5–14810.1007/s10659-007-9107-3 ↗
4. Bower AF, Ortiz M (1991) A three-dimensional analysis of crack trapping and bridging by tough particles. J Mech Phys Solids 39(6):815–85810.1016/0022-5096(91)90026-K ↗
5. Chen M, Zhu S, Wang F (2013) Strengthening mechanisms and fracture surface characteristics of silicate glass matrix composites with inclusion of alumina particles of different particle sizes. Phys B Condens Matter 413:15–2010.1016/j.physb.2013.01.006 ↗
6. Eshelby JD (1957) The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion, and related problems. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci 241(1226):376–39610.1098/rspa.1957.0133 ↗
7. Evans AG (1974) The role of inclusions in the fracture of ceramic materials. J Mater Sci 9(7):1145–115210.1007/BF00552831 ↗
8. Evans AG, McMeeking RM (1986) On the toughening of ceramics by strong reinforcements. Acta Metall 34(12):2435–244110.1016/0001-6160(86)90146-X ↗
9. Faber KT, Evans AG (1983) Crack deflection processes–I. Theory. Acta Metall 31(4):565–57610.1016/0001-6160(83)90046-9 ↗
10. Gao H, Rice JR (1989) A first-order perturbation analysis of crack trapping by arrays of obstacles. J Appl Mech 56(4):828–83610.1115/1.3176178 ↗
11. González-Albuixech VF, Giner E, Tarancón JE, Fuenmayor FJ, Gravouil A (2013) Domain integral formulation for 3-D curved and non-planar cracks with the extended finite element method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 264:129–14410.1016/j.cma.2013.05.016 ↗
12. Goodier JN (1933) Concentration of stress arround spherical and cylindrical inclusions and flaws. J Appl Mech 55:39–4410.1115/1.4012173 ↗
13. Höland W, Beall GH (2012) Composition systems for glass-ceramics. Glass-ceramic technology. Wiley, London
14. Koike A, Akiba S, Sakagami T, Hayashi K, Ito S (2012) Difference of cracking behavior due to Vickers indentation between physically and chemically tempered glasses. J Non-Cryst Solids 358(24):3438–344410.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.02.020 ↗
15. Krstic V, Khaund A (1981) Conditions for toughening of particulate brittle composites. In: ICF5, Cannes (France) 1981
16. Krstic VV, Nicholson PS, Hoagland RG (1981) Toughening of glasses by metallic particles. J Am Ceram Soc 64(9):499–50410.1111/j.1151-2916.1981.tb10313.x ↗
17. Moës N, Stolz C, Bernard PE, Chevaugeon N (2011) A level set based model for damage growth: the thick level set approach. Int J Numer Methods Eng 86(3):358–38010.1002/nme.3069 ↗
18. Ortiz M, Pandolfi A (1999) Finite-deformation irreversible cohesive elements for three-dimensional crack-propagation analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 44(9):1267–128210.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990330)44:9<1267::AID-NME486>3.0.CO;2-7 ↗
19. Pezzotti G (1993) On the actual contribution of crack deflection in toughening platelet-reinforced brittle-matrix composites. Acta Metall Mater 41(6):1825–183910.1016/0956-7151(93)90203-5 ↗
20. Pijaudier-Cabot G, Bažant ZP (1987) Nonlocal damage theory. J Eng Mech 113(10):1512–153310.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1987)113:10(1512) ↗
21. Rouxel T (2007) Elastic properties and short-to medium-range order in glasses. J Am Ceram Soc 90(10):3019–303910.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01945.x ↗
22. Rouxel T, Laurent Y (1998) Fracture characteristics of SiC particle reinforced oxynitride glass using chevron-notch three-point bend specimens. Int J Fract 91(1):83–10110.1023/A:1007474415485 ↗
23. Spanoudakis J, Young RJ (1984) Crack propagation in a glass particle-filled epoxy resin. J Mater Sci 19(2):473–48610.1007/BF02403234 ↗
24. Yau JF, Wang SS, Corten HT (1980) A mixed-mode crack analysis of isotropic solids using conservation laws of elasticity. J Appl Mech 47(2):335–34110.1115/1.3153665 ↗
25. Zanotto ED (2010) A bright future for glass-ceramics. Am Ceram Soc Bull 89:19