On Influence of Non-Singular Stress States on Brittle Fracture
Source abstract
Abstract
In the case of sufficiently brittle material the use of stress intensity factor as a fracture parameter alone is well justified within the Linear-Elastic Fracture Mechanics. This is because the singular stress field associated with the stress intensity factor is dominant near the crack tip. However, there are numerous experimental evidences that the critical stress intensity factor to cause fracture initiation (or fracture toughness) can be affected by the specimen geometry as well as loading conditions. To address this issue a number of twoparameter criteria have been proposed in the past, which often utilise non-singular terms of the classical asymptotic expansion of the stress field near the crack tip. Therefore, there is a problem of the selection of an appropriate parameter in addition to the stress intensity factor, which could account for various effects induced by the specimen geometry and loading on initiation of brittle fracture. This short paper demonstrates that brittle fracture conditions can be successfully predicted with various two-parameter criteria, and there are no clear advantages in the use of T-stress as the additional parameter in fracture criterion, in comparison with the next non-singular term, A1, of the asymptotic expansion.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Berto F., Kotousov A., Lazzarin P., Pook L.P. (2013) On scale effect in plates weakened by rounded V-notches and subjected to in-plane shear loading. International Journal of Fracture 180: 111–11810.1007/s10704-012-9796-x ↗
2. Berto F., Lazzarin P., Kotousov A. (2011) On presence of the out-of-plane singular mode induced by plane loading with KII = KI = 0. International Journal of Fracture 167: 119–12610.1007/s10704-010-9530-5 ↗
3. Branco R., Antunes F.V., Ricardo L.C.H., Costa J.D. (2012) Extent of surface regions near corner points of notched cracked bodies subjected to mode-I loading. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 50: 147–16010.1016/j.finel.2011.09.006 ↗
4. Cheng C.Z., Recho N., Niu Z.R. (2012) Influence of the non-singular stress on the crack extension and fatigue life. Nuclear Engineering and Design 248: 293–30010.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.03.017 ↗
5. Garcia-Manrique J., Camas D., Lopez-Crespo P., Gonzalez-Herrera A. (2013) Stress intensity factor analysis of through thickness effects. International Journal of Fatigue 46: 58–6610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.12.012 ↗
6. Hello G., Tahar M.B., Roelandt J.-M. (2012) Analytical determination of coefficients in crack-tip stress expansion for a finite crack in an infinite plane medium. International Journal of Solids and Structures 49: 556–56610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.10.024 ↗
7. Kim J.K., Cho S.B. (2009) Effect of second non-singular term of mode I near the tip of a V-notched crack. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures 32: 346–35610.1111/j.1460-2695.2009.01336.x ↗
8. Kotousov A., Lazzarin P., Berto F., Pook L.P. (2013) Three-dimensional stress states at crack tip induced by shear and antiplane loading. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 108: 65–7410.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.04.010 ↗
9. Kumar B., Chitsiriphanit S., Sun C.T. (2011) Significance of K-dominance zone size and nonsingular stress field in brittle fracture. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 78: 2042–205110.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.03.015 ↗
10. Larsson S.G., Carlsson A.J. (1973) Influence of non-singular stress terms and specimen geometry on small-scale yielding at crack tips in elastic-plastic materials. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 21: 263–27710.1016/0022-5096(73)90024-0 ↗
11. Lazzarin P., Berto F., Radaj D. (2009) Fatigue-relevant stress field parameters of welded lap joints: pointed slit tip compared with keyhole notch. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures 32: 713–73510.1111/j.1460-2695.2009.01379.x ↗
12. Li J., Zhang X.B. (2006) A criterion study for non-singular stress concentrations in brittle or quasi-brittle materials. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 76: 505–52310.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.09.001 ↗
13. Matvienko Y.G., Pochinkov R.A. (2013) Effect of nonsingular T-stress components on the plastic-deformation zones near the tip of a mode I crack. Russian Metallurgy (Metally) 4: 262–27110.1134/S0036029513040095 ↗
14. Meshii T., Lu K., Takamura R. (2013) A failure criterion to explain the test specimen thickness effect on fracture toughness in the transition temperature region. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 104: 184–19710.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.03.025 ↗
15. Nakamura, T. Parks, D.M. (1992). Determination of elastic T-stress along three-dimensional crack fronts using an interaction integral. International Journal of Solids and Structures 29 N.13, 1597-1611.
16. Pook, L.P. (2013). A fifty year retrospective review of three dimensional effects at cracks and sharp notches. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures 36 N.8, 699–723.10.1111/ffe.12074 ↗
17. Rice J.R. (1974) Limitations to the small scale yielding approximation for crack tip plasticity. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 22: 17–2610.1016/0022-5096(74)90010-6 ↗
18. Sanford, R.J., 2003. Principles of Fracture Mechanics. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
19. Seitl S., Hutar P., Garcia T.E., Fernandez-Canteli A. (2013) Experimental and numerical analysis of in- and out- of plane constraint effects on fracture parameters: Aluminium alloy 2024. Applied and Computational Mechanics 7: 53–64
20. Sinclair, G.B. Chambers, A.E. (1987). Strength size effects and fracture mechanics: What does the physical evidence say?. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 26 N.2, 279 – 310.10.1016/0013-7944(87)90204-9 ↗
21. Szekrényes A. (2012) Interlaminar stresses and energy release rates in delaminated orthotropic composite plates. International Journal of Solids and Structures 49: 2460–247910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.05.010 ↗