Calibration of brittle fracture models by sharp indenters and inverse analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
In several engineering areas structural analyses concern also fracture processes of brittle materials and employ cohesive crack models. Calibrations of such models, i.e. identification of their parameters by tests, computer simulations of the tests and inverse analyses, have been investigated in the literature particularly with reference to non-destructive indentation tests at various scales. To this timely research, the following contributions are presented in this paper: a simple piecewise-linear cohesive crack model is considered for brittle materials (here glass, for example); for its calibration by “non-destructive” indentation tests novel shapes are attributed to instrumented indenters, in order to make fracture the dominant feature of the specimen response to the test; such shapes are comparatively examined and optimized by sensitivity analyses; a procedure for inverse analysis is developed and computationally tested, based on penetration versus increasing force only (no imprint measurements by profilometers) and is made “economical” (i.e. computationally fast, “in situ” by small computers) by model reduction through proper orthogonal decomposition in view of repeated industrial applications.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. ABAQUS/Standard (2010) Theory and user’s manuals, release 6.10, Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp., Providence, RI, USA
2. Abdul-Baqi A, Van der Giessen E (2002) Numerical analysis of indentation-induced cracking of brittle coatings on ductile substrates. Int J Solids Struct 39:1427–1442. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7683(01)00280-310.1016/S0020-7683(01)00280-3 ↗
3. Bocciarelli M, Bolzon G, Maier G (2005) Parameter identification in anisotropic elastoplasticity by indentation and imprint mapping. Mech Mater 37:855–868. doi: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2004.09.00110.1016/j.mechmat.2004.09.001 ↗
4. Bocciarelli M, Maier G (2007) Indentation and imprint mapping method for identification of residual stresses. Comput Mater Sci 39:381–392. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2006.07.00110.1016/j.commatsci.2006.07.001 ↗
5. Bolzon G, Fedele R, Maier G (2002) Parameter identification of a cohesive crack model by Kalman filter. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191:2847–2871. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7825(02)00223-210.1016/S0045-7825(02)00223-2 ↗
6. Bolzon G, Maier G, Panico M (2004) Material model calibration by indentation, imprint mapping and inverse analysis. Int J Solids Struct 41:2957–2975. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.01.02510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.01.025 ↗
7. Bolzon G, Maier G, Novati G (1994) Some aspects of quasi-brittle fracture analysis as a linear complementarity problem. In: Bažant ZP, Bittnar Z, Jirásek M, Mazars J (eds) Fracture and damage in quasi-brittle structures. E and FN Spon, London, pp 159–174
8. Broek D (1989) The practical use of fracture mechanics. Kluwer, London10.1007/978-94-009-2558-8 ↗
9. Buhmann MD (2003) Radial basis functions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9780511543241 ↗
10. Bui HD (1994) Inverse problems in the mechanics of materials: an introduction. CRC Press, Boca Raton
11. Buljak V (2012) Inverse analysis with model reduction— Proper Orthogonal Decomposition in structural mechanics. Springer, Berlin. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-22703-510.1007/978-3-642-22703-5 ↗
12. Buljak V, Maier G (2011) Proper orthogonal decomposition and radial basis functions in material characterization based on instrumented indentation. Eng Struct 33:492–501. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.11.00610.1016/j.engstruct.2010.11.006 ↗
13. Buljak V, Maier G (2012) Identification of residual stresses by instrumented elliptical indentation and inverse analysis. Mech Res Commun 41:21–29. doi: 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2012.02.002 . (Corrigendum in Mechanics Research Communications 46,p. 90, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2012.07.00510.1016/j.mechrescom.2012.02.002 ↗
14. Cao YP, Lu J (2004) A new method to extract the plastic properties of metal materials from an instrumented spherical indentation loading curve. Acta Materialia 52:4023–4032. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.01810.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.018 ↗
15. Chen X, Ogasawara N, Zhao M, Chiba N (2007) On the uniqueness of measuring elastoplastic properties from indentation: the indistinguishable mystical materials. J Mech Phys Solids 55:1618–1660. doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2007.01.01010.1016/j.jmps.2007.01.010 ↗
16. Cocchetti G, Maier G, Shen X (2002) Piecewise-linear models for interfaces and mixed mode cohesive cracks. Comput Methods Eng Sci 3:279–298. doi: 10.3970/cmes.2002.003.279
17. Conn AR, Gould NIM, Toint PL (2000) Trust-region methods. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia10.1137/1.9780898719857 ↗
18. Cottle RW, Pang JS, Stone RE (1992) The linear complementarity problem. Academic Press, Boston
19. Facchinei F, Pang JS (2003) Finite-dimensional variational inequalities and complementarity problems, vol II. Springer Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering, Berlin10.1007/b97543 ↗
20. Jirasek M, Bažant ZP (2001) Inelastic analysis of structures. Wiley, New York
21. Kaliszky S (1989) Plasticity—theory and engineering applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam
22. Kleiber M, Antunez H, Hien TD, Kowalczyk P (1997) Parameter sensitivity in nonlinear mechanics. Theory and finite element computations. Wiley, New York
23. Le Bourhis E (2007) Glass structure. In: Mechanics and technology, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany. doi: 10.1002/9783527617029.ch510.1002/9783527617029.ch5 ↗
24. Luo ZQ, Pang JS, Ralph D (1996) Mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9780511983658 ↗
25. Maier G (1970) A matrix structural theory of piecewise-linear plasticity with interacting yield planes. Meccanica 5:55–66. doi: /10.1007/BF0213352410.1007/BF02145660 ↗
26. Maier G, Bocciarelli M, Bolzon G, Fedele R (2006) Inverse analyses in fracture mechanics. Int J Fract 138:47–73. doi: 10.1007/s10704-006-7153-710.1007/s10704-006-7153-7 ↗
27. Maier G, Bolzon G, Buljak V, Miller B (2011) Comparative assessment of three different approaches in material parameter characterization based on instrumented indentation, using only the indentation curve, only the residual imprint, and both experimental data. Inverse Probl Sci Eng 19:815–837. doi: 10.1080/17415977.2011.55193110.1080/17415977.2011.551931 ↗
28. Matlab (2009). Matlab user’s guide, The Math Works Inc., Natick, MA. www.mathworks.it
29. McGee T (2006) Glass manufacturing engineering. Wiley, New York
30. McKay MD, Beckman RJ, Conover WJ (1979) A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables from a computer code. Technometrics 21:239–245. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1979.10489755
31. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (2004) Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumental indentation: advances in understanding and refinements to methodology. J Mater Res 19:3–20. doi: 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.310.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
32. Ostrowski Z, Bialecki RA, Kassab AJ (2008) Solving inverse heat conduction problems using trained POD-RBF network. Inverse Probl Sci Eng 16:39–54. doi: 10.1080/1741597070119829010.1080/17415970701198290 ↗
33. Stavroulakis GE (2000) Inverse and crack identification problems in engineering mechanics. Kluwer, Dordrecht
34. Suresh S, Giannakopoulos AE (1998) A new method for estimating residual stresses by instrumented sharp indentation. Acta Materialia 46:5755–5767. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00226-210.1016/S1359-6454(98)00226-2 ↗
35. Tin-Loi F, Que NS (2001) Parameter identification of quasi-brittle materials as a mathematical program with equilibrium constraints. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:5819–5836. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7825(01)00199-210.1016/S0045-7825(01)00199-2 ↗
36. Tin-Loi F, Que NS (2002) Nonlinear programming approaches for an inverse problem in quasi-brittle fracture. Int J Mech Sci 44:843–858. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7403(02)00035-810.1016/S0020-7403(02)00035-8 ↗
37. Xu XP, Needleman A (1994) Numerical simulation of fast crack growth in brittle solids. J Mech Phys Solids 42:1397–1434. doi: 10.1016/0022-5096(94)90003-510.1016/0022-5096(94)90003-5 ↗
38. Zhi-He J, Glaucio H, Paulino RH, Dodds J (2003) Cohesive fracture modeling of elastic-plastic crack growth in functionally graded materials. Eng Fract Mech 70:1885–1912. doi: 10.1016/S0013-7944(03)00130-910.1016/S0013-7944(03)00130-9 ↗