Analogies between progressive collapse of structures and fracture of materials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Rock Mechanics and Modeling
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Bažant ZP (1984) Size effects in blunt fracture: concrete, rock, metal. J Eng Mech 110(4): 518–53510.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1984)110:4(518) ↗
2. Bažant ZP (2004) Probability distribution of energetic-statistical size effect in quasibrittle fracture. Probab Eng Mech 19:307–319. doi: 10.1016/j.probengmech.2003.09.00310.1016/j.probengmech.2003.09.003 ↗
3. Bažant ZP, Cedolin L (1991) Stability of structures: elastic, inelastic, fracture and damage theories. Oxford University Press, New York
4. Bažant ZP, Pang S-D (2007) Activation energy based extreme value statistics and size effect in brittle and quasibrittle fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 55:91–134. doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2006.05.00710.1016/j.jmps.2006.05.007 ↗
5. Bažant ZP, Verdure M (2007) Mechanics of progressive collapse: learning from World Trade Center and building demolitions. J Eng Mech 133(3):308–319. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:3(308)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:3(308) ↗
6. Bažant ZP, Xi Y, Reid SG (1992) Statistical size effect in quasi-brittle structures: I. Is Weibull theory applicable? J Eng Mech 117(11):2609–2622. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:11(2609)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:11(2609) ↗
7. Carpinteri A (1989) Decrease of apparent tensile and bending strength with specimen size: two different explanations based on fracture mechanics. Int J Solids Struct 25(4): 407–429. doi: 10.1016/0020-7683(89)90056-510.1016/0020-7683(89)90056-5 ↗
8. Carpinteri A (1997) Structural mechanics: a unified approach. Chapman & Hall, London10.4324/9780203474952 ↗
9. Carpinteri A, Chiaia BM (1995) Multifractal nature of concrete fracture surfaces and size effects on nominal fracture energy. Mater Struct 28(182):435–443. doi: 10.1007/BF0247316210.1007/BF02473162 ↗
10. Carpinteri A, Chiaia BM, Ferro G (1995) Size effects on nominal strength of concrete structures: multifractality of material ligaments and dimensional transitino from order to disorder. Mater Struct 28(180): 311–317. doi: 10.1007/BF0247314510.1007/BF02473145 ↗
11. Carpinteri A, Corrado M, Paggi M et al (2007) Cohesive versus overlapping crack model for a size effect analysis of RC elements in bending. In: Carpinteri A, Gambarova P, Ferro G, Plizzari G (eds) Fracture mechanics of concrete structures (Proceedings of the 6th International FraMCoS Conference, Catania, Italy 2007). Taylor & Francis, London, Vol II, pp 655–663
12. Chiaia BM, Masoero E (2007) Structural robustness: the role of geometry and complexity and the brittle fracture analogy. Paper presented at the 18th congress of the Italian Association of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics AIMETA, University of Brescia, 11–14 September 2007
13. Chiaia BM, Vervuurt A, Van Mier JGM (1997) Lattice model evaluation of progressive failure in disordered particle composites. Eng Fract Mech 57(2/3): 301–318. doi: 10.1016/S0013-7944(97)00011-810.1016/S0013-7944(97)00011-8 ↗
14. Fantilli AP, Iori I, Vallini P (2007) Size effects of compressed concrete in four point bending RC beams. Eng Fract Mech 74:97–108. doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.01.01310.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.01.013 ↗
15. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1997) Cellular solids. Structure and properties, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, UK10.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
16. Griffith AA (1921) The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Philos T R Soc A 221:163–198. doi: 10.1098/rsta.1921.000610.1098/rsta.1921.0006 ↗
17. Harlow DG, Phoenix SL (1978) The chain-of-bundles probability model for the strength of fibrous materials I: Analysis and Conjectures. J Compos Mater 12(2):195–214. doi: 10.1177/00219983780120020710.1177/002199837801200207 ↗
18. Herrmann, HJ, Roux, S (eds) (1990) Statistical models for the fracture of disordered media. North-Holland, Amsterdam
19. Herrmann HJ, Hansen A, Roux S (1989) Fracture of disordered, elastic lattices in two dimensions. Phys Rev B 39:637–648. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.39.63710.1103/PhysRevB.39.637 ↗
20. Hillerborg A, Modéer N et al (1976) Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements. Cement Concr Res 6: 773–782. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-710.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-7 ↗
21. Kim DY, Herrmann HJ, Landau DP (1987) Percolation on a random lattice. Phys Rev B 35:3661–3662. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.35.366110.1103/PhysRevB.35.3661 ↗
22. Levy M, Salvadori M (1994) Why buildings fall down: why structures fail. W.W. Norton & Company, New York, USA
23. Maes MA, Fritzsons K, et al (2006) Structural robustness in the light of risk and consequences analysis. Struct Eng Int 2:101–107. doi: 10.2749/10168660677796246810.2749/101686606777962468 ↗
24. Matuttis HG, Luding S, Herrmann HJ (2000) Discrete Elements simulations of dense packing and heaps made of spherical and non-spherical particles. Powder Technol 109:278–292. doi: 10.1016/S0032-5910(99)00243-010.1016/S0032-5910(99)00243-0 ↗
25. Pretlove AJ, Ramsden M, Atkins AG (1991) Dynamic effects in progressive failure of structures. Int J Impact Eng 11(4): 539–546. doi: 10.1016/0734-743X(91)90019-C10.1016/0734-743X(91)90019-C ↗
26. RILEM TC QFS (chaired by Bažant ZP) (2004) Quasibrittle fracture scaling and size effect—final report. Mater Struct 37(272), 547–58610.1617/14109 ↗
27. Schlangen E, Van Mier JGM (1993) Lattice model for simulating fracture of concrete. In: Wittmann FH(eds) Numerical models in fracture mechanics of concrete. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 195–205
28. Sih GC, Hartranft RJ (1980) The concept of fracture mechanics applied to the progressive failure of structural members. Comput Struc 12: 813–818. doi: 10.1016/0045-7949(80)90018-810.1016/0045-7949(80)90018-8 ↗
29. Smith JW (2006) Structural robustness analysis and the fast fracture analogy. Struct Eng Int 2:118–123. doi: 10.2749/10168660677796252110.2749/101686606777962521 ↗
30. Sorensen JD, Christensen HH (2006) Danish requirements for robustness of structures: background and implementation. Struct Eng Int 2:172–177. doi: 10.2749/10168660677796257610.2749/101686606777962576 ↗
31. Val DV, Val EG (2006) Robustness of frame structures. Struct Eng Int 2: 108–112. doi: 10.2749/10168660677796241310.2749/101686606777962413 ↗
32. Van Mier JGM, Chiaia BM, Vervuurt A (1997) Numerical simulation of chaotic and self-organized damage in brittle disordered materials. Comput Methods Appl M 142:189–201. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01128-010.1016/S0045-7825(96)01128-0 ↗
33. Vermeer PA, Diebels S, Ehlers W, Herrmann HJ, Luding S, Ramm E (2001) Continuous and discontinuous modeling of cohesive-frictional materials. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York10.1007/3-540-44424-6 ↗