journal article·2018-05Open access

Analysis of the failure at notches and cavities in quasi-brittle media using the Thick Level Set damage model and comparison with the coupled criterion

J. Zghal, K. Moreau, N. Moës, D. Leguillon, C. Stolz

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 211· Issue 1-2

Abstract

The failure of quasi-brittle specimen weakened by sharp or blunted notches and cavities is analyzed under quasi-static loading. The load at failure is obtained with the Thick Level Set (TLS) damage modeling. In this model, the damage gradient is bounded implying that the minimal distance between a point where damage 0 (sound material) to 1 (fully damaged) is an imposed characteristic length in the model. This length plays an important role on the damage evolution and on the failure load. The paper shows that the TLS predictions are relevant. A comparison with the coupled criterion (CC) of Leguillon (2002) is given. A good agreement is obtained for cavities and V-notches provided that the characteristic length of Irwin is small compared to the notch depth (condition for the applicability of the CC criterion). A comparison with failure loads obtained experimentally is also given. In the numerical simulations, uniform stresses are imposed at infinity using a new finite element mapping technique (Cloirec 2005).
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Numerical methods in engineering · Rock Mechanics and Modeling

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Bazant ZP, Belytschko TB, Chang TP (1984) Continuum theory for strain-softening. J Eng Mech ASCE 110(12):1666–169210.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1984)110:12(1666) ↗
2. Bernard P-E, Moës N, Chevaugeon N (2012) Damage growth modeling using the Thick Level Set (TLS) approach: efficient discretization for quasi-static loadings. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 233–236:11–2710.1016/j.cma.2012.02.020 ↗
3. Carpinteri A, Cornetti P, Pugno N, Sapora A, Taylor D (2008) A finite fracture mechanics approach to structures with sharp V-notches. Eng Fract Mech 75(7):1736–175210.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.04.010 ↗
4. Cloirec M (2005) Application of X-FEM for multi-scale problems and parallel computations. Theses, Ecole Centrale de Nantes (ECN); Université de Nantes
5. Dunn ML, Suwito W, Cunningham S, May CW (1997) Fracture initiation at sharp notches under mode I, mode II, and mild mixed mode loading. Int J Fract 84(4):367–38110.1023/A:1007346203407 ↗
6. Frémond M, Stolz C (2017) On alternative approaches for graded damage modelling. In: Frémond M, Maceri F, Vairo G (eds) Models, simulation and experimental issues in structural mechanics, vol 8. Solids and structural mechanics. Springer, Cham, pp 87–10410.1007/978-3-319-48884-4_4 ↗
7. Gómez AP (2015) Coupled numerical and analytical analysis of a graduated damage model. Theses, Ecole Centrale de Nantes (ECN)/Université Nantes Angers Le Mans
8. Gómez FJ, Elices M (2003) A fracture criterion for sharp V-notched samples. Int J Fract 123(3):163–17510.1023/B:FRAC.0000007374.80996.a2 ↗
9. Gómez FJ, Elices M (2004) A fracture criterion for blunted V-notched samples. Int J Fract 127(3):239–26410.1023/B:FRAC.0000036832.29429.21 ↗
10. Gómez A-P, Moës N, Stolz C (2015) Comparison between thick level set (TLS) and cohesive zone models. Adv Model Simul Eng Sci 2(18):1–22
11. Irwin GR (1968) Linear fracture mechanics, fracture transition, and fracture control. Eng Fract Mech 1(2):241–25710.1016/0013-7944(68)90001-5 ↗
12. Leguillon D (2002) Strength or toughness? A criterion for crack onset at a notch. Eur J Mech A Solids 21(1):61–7210.1016/S0997-7538(01)01184-6 ↗
13. Lions P-L (1982) Generalized solutions of Hamilton–Jacobi equations. Pitman Advanced Publishing Program, Boston
14. Leguillon D, Quesada D, Putot C, Martin E (2007) Prediction of crack initiation at blunt notches and cavities? Size effects. Eng Fract Mech 74:2420–243610.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.11.008 ↗
15. Leguillon D, Yosibash Z (2003) Crack onset at a v-notch. Influence of the notch tip radius. Int J Fract 122(1/2):1–2110.1023/B:FRAC.0000005372.68959.1d ↗
16. Li J, Zhang XB (2006) A criterion study for non-singular stress concentrations in brittle or quasi-brittle materials. Eng Fract Mech 73(4):505–52310.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.09.001 ↗
17. Moreau K, Moës N, Chevaugeon N, Salzman A (2017) Concurrent development of local and non-local damage with the thick level set approach: implementation aspects and application to quasi-brittle failure. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 327:306–32610.1016/j.cma.2017.08.045 ↗
18. Moës N, Stolz C, Bernard P-E, Chevaugeon N (2011) A level set based model for damage growth: the thick level set approach. Int J Numer Methods Eng 86:358–38010.1002/nme.3069 ↗
19. Moës N, Stolz C, Chevaugeon N (2014) Coupling local and non-local damage evolution with the Thick Level Set model. Adv Model Simul Eng Sci 2(16):21
20. Picard D, Leguillon D, Putot C (2006) A method to estimate the influence of the notch-root radius on the fracture toughness measurement of ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc 26(8):1421–142710.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2005.02.016 ↗
21. Sethian JA (1999) Level set methods and fast marching methods: evolving interfaces in computational geometry, fluid mechanics, computer vision and material science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
22. Stolz C (2016) On moving thick layer approach for graded damage modelling. Int J Fract 202(2):195–20510.1007/s10704-016-0154-2 ↗
23. Tada H, Paris PC, Irwin GR (2000) The stress analysis of cracks handbook, 3rd edn. ASME Press, New York10.1115/1.801535 ↗
24. Williams ML (1952) Stress singularities resulting from various boundary conditions in angular corners of plates in extension. J Appl Mech Trans ASME 19:526–52810.1115/1.4010553 ↗