Feasibility study on Hartman–Schijve data analysis for mode II fatigue fracture of adhesively bonded wood joints
Source abstract
Abstract
The feasibility of using the modified Hartman–Schijve (HS) equation to analyze the fatigue fracture performance of adhesively bonded wood specimens under cyclic mode II loading was investigated in comparison with the Paris crack growth equation. Wood joints prepared with three different adhesives have been subject to cyclic Mode II testing at room-temperature ($$23\,\circ \hbox {C}$$ and 50% relative humidity) in a four-point End-Notched-Flexure configuration, determining the crack length from specimen compliance. It was shown, that the HS-equation can be successfully applied to adhesively bonded wood and that it successfully estimates threshold and maximum energy release rate (ERR) values for three different adhesive systems. Since a limited number of tests were performed for investigating the feasibility, scatter sources and possible scatter reduction methods are analyzed and discussed in detail. Also, a new, automated data reduction method was developed for estimating the maximum and the threshold ERR ($$\hbox {G}_{\mathrm{thr}})$$ values. The main advantage of the HS-equation appears to be the application in design standards. However, before the maximum ERR and $$\hbox {G}_{\mathrm{thr}}$$ values derived here can be used in design applications or for drafting a design guideline, additional testing is required for understanding how the number of cycles, the related measurement resolution; the corresponding ERR value influence the threshold value $$\hbox {G}_{\mathrm{thr}}$$ and how and to what extent its scatter can be reduced; and to further explore the link between cyclic ERR and the critical ERR value measured during quasi-static fracture tests.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Wood Treatment and Properties · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Aicher S, Christian Z (2015) Fatigue behavior of wood and glued wood components. 21. Internationales Holzbau-Forum IHF
2. Alderliesten RC, Brunner AJ, Pascoe JA (2018) Cyclic fatigue fracture of composites: what has testing revealed about the physics of the processes so far? Eng Fract Mech 203:186–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.06.02310.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.06.023 ↗
3. Bachtiar EV, Clerc G, Brunner AJ, Kaliske M, Niemz P (2017) Static and dynamic tensile shear test of glued lap wooden joint with four different types of adhesives. Holzforschung 71:2751. https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2016-015410.1515/hf-2016-0154 ↗
4. Clerc G, Brunner AJ, Josset S, Niemz P, Pichelin F, van de Kuilen JWG (2019a) Adhesive wood joints under quasi-static and cyclic fatigue fracture Mode II loads. Int l Fatigue 123:40–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.02.00810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.02.008 ↗
5. Clerc G, Sause MGR, Brunner AJ, Niemz P, van de Kuilen JWG (2019b) Fractography combined with unsupervised pattern recognition of acoustic emission signals for a better understanding of crack propagation in adhesively bonded wood. Wood Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-019-01136-610.1007/s00226-019-01136-6 ↗
6. Gatto F (1956) New statistical methods applied to the analysis of fatigue data. In: Weibull W, Odqvist FKG (eds) IUTAM Colloquium on Fatigue, pp 66–7710.1007/978-3-642-99854-6_8 ↗
7. Hartman A, Schijve J (1970) The effects of environment and load frequency on the crack propagation law for macro fatigue crack growth in aluminium alloys. Eng Fract Mech 1:615–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(70)90003-210.1016/0013-7944(70)90003-2 ↗
8. Jones R, Pitt S, Bunner AJ, Hui D (2012) Application of the Hartman–Schijve equation to represent Mode I and Mode II fatigue delamination growth in composites. Compos Struct 94:1343–1351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.11.03010.1016/j.compstruct.2011.11.030 ↗
9. Jones R, Stelzer S, Brunner AJ (2014) Mode I, II and mixed Mode I/II delamination growth in composites. Compos Struct 110:317–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.12.00910.1016/j.compstruct.2013.12.009 ↗
10. Jones R, Hu W, Kinloch AJ (2015) A convenient way to represent fatigue crack growth in structural adhesives. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 38:379–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.1224110.1111/ffe.12241 ↗
11. Jones R, Kinloch AJ, Michopoulos JG, Brunner AJ, Phan N (2017) Delamination growth in polymer-matrix fibre composites and the use of fracture mechanics data for material characterisation and life prediction. Compos Struct 180:316–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.07.09710.1016/j.compstruct.2017.07.097 ↗
12. Kyanka GH (1980) Fatigue properties of wood and wood composites. Int J Fract 16:609–61610.1007/BF02265220 ↗
13. Lewis WC (1960) Design consideration of fatigue in timber structures. Am Soc Civ Eng 86:15–23
14. Paris P, Erdogan F (1963) A critical analysis of crack propagation laws. J Basic Eng 85:528–533. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.365690010.1115/1.3656900 ↗
15. Schijve J (1994) Fatigue predictions and scatter. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 17:381–39610.1111/j.1460-2695.1994.tb00239.x ↗
16. Simon I, Banks-Sills L, Fourman V (2017) Mode I delamination propagation and R-ratio effects in woven composite DCB specimens for a multi-directional layup. Int J Fatigue 96:237–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.12.00510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.12.005 ↗
17. Smith I, Landis E, Gong M (2003) Fracture and fatigue in wood. Wiley, Winchester
18. Stelzer S, Brunner AJ, Argüelles A, Murphy N, Cano GM, Pinter G (2014) Mode I delamination fatigue crack growth in unidirectional fiber reinforced composites: results from ESIS TC4 round-robins. Eng Fract Mech 116:92–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.12.00210.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.12.002 ↗
19. Yao L, Alderliesten RC, Jones R, Kinloch AJ (2018) Delamination fatigue growth in polymer-matrix fibre composites: a methodology for determining the design and lifing allowables. Compos Struct 196:8–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.06910.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.069 ↗