On the residual opening of hydraulic fractures
Source abstract
Abstract
Hydraulic stimulation technologies are widely applied across resource and power generation industries to increase the productivity of oil/gas or hot water reservoirs. These technologies utilise pressurised water, which is applied inside the well to initiate and drive fractures as well as to open a network of existing natural fractures. To prevent the opened fractures from complete closure during production stage, small particles (proppants) are normally injected with the pressurised fluid. These particles are subjected to confining stresses when the fluid pressure is removed, which leads to a partial closure of the stimulated fractures. The residual fracture openings are the main outcome of such hydraulic stimulations as these openings significantly affect the permeability of the reservoirs and, subsequently, the well productivity. Past research was largely focused on the assessment of conditions and characteristics of fluid driven fractures as well as proppant placement techniques. Surprisingly, not much work was devoted to the assessment of the residual fracture profiles. In this work we develop a simplified non-linear mathematical model of residual closure of a plane crack filled with deformable particles and subjected to a remote compressive stress. It is demonstrated that the closure profile is significantly influenced by the distribution and compressibility of the particles, which are often ignored in the current evaluations of well productivity.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis · Drilling and Well Engineering · Oil and Gas Production Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Adachi J, Siebritsb E, Peircec A, Desroches J (2007) Computer simulation of hydraulic fractures. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 44(5):739–75710.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.11.006 ↗
2. Barenblatt GI, Entov VM, Ryzhik V (1990) Theory of fluid flows through natural rocks, 1st edn. Springer, New York10.1007/978-94-015-7899-8 ↗
3. Bilby B, Eshelby J (1968) Chapter 2: dislocations and the theory of fracture. In: Liebowitz H (ed) Fracture: an advanced treatise. Academic Press, New York, pp 99–182
4. Bortolan Neto L, Kotousov A, Bedrikovetsky P (2011a) Application of contact theory to evaluation of elastic properties of low consolidated porous media. Int J Fract 168(2):267–27610.1007/s10704-010-9574-6 ↗
5. Bortolan Neto L, Kotousov A, Bedrikovetsky P (2011b) Elastic properties of porous media in the vicinity of the percolation limit. J Petroleum Sci Eng 78(2):328–33310.1016/j.petrol.2011.06.026 ↗
6. Clark PE, Güler N (1983) Prop transport in vertical fractures: settling velocity correlations. In: SPE/DOE low permeability gas reservoirs symposium. Denver, SPE 11636-MS, p 610.2118/11636-MS ↗
7. Clifton RJ, Wang J-J (1988) Multiple fluids, proppant transport, and thermal effects in three-dimensional simulation of hydraulic fracturing. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. Houston, SPE 18198-MS, p 1410.2118/18198-MS ↗
8. Cox BN, Rose LRF (1996) A self-consistent approximation for crack bridging by elastic/perfectly plastic ligaments. Mech Mater 22(4):249–26310.1016/0167-6636(95)00025-9 ↗
9. Cutler RA, Enniss DO, Jones AH, Swanson SR (1985) Fracture conductivity comparison of ceramic proppants. Soc Petroleum Eng J 25(2):157–17010.2118/11634-PA ↗
10. Dam DB, Pater CJ, Romijn R (2000) Analysis of hydraulic fracture closure in laboratory experiments. SPE Prod Facil 15(3):151–15810.2118/65066-PA ↗
11. Daneshy AA (1975) Numerical solution of sand transport in hydraulic fracturing. In: SPE 50th annual fall meeting. Dallas, SPE 5636
12. Daneshy AA (1978) Numerical solution of sand transport in hydraulic fracturing. J Petroleum Technol 30(1):132– 14010.2118/5636-PA ↗
13. Dyskin AV, Galybin AN (2001) Solutions for dilating shear cracks in elastic plane. Int J Fract 109(3):325–34410.1023/A:1011054309496 ↗
14. Economides MJ, Nolte KG (2000) Reservoir stimulation, 3rd edn. Wiley, Chichester
15. Entov VM, Murzenko VV (1994) Steady flow of homogeneous fluid in an oil reservoir recovery element with a hydrofracture. Fluid Dy 29(1):81–8710.1007/BF02330626 ↗
16. Gadde PB, Liu Y, Norman J, Bonnecaze R, Sharma MM (2004) Modeling proppant settling in water-fracs. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. Houston, SPE 89875-MS, p 1010.2118/89875-MS ↗
17. Hertz H (1896) Chapter 5—On the contact of elastic solids, pp 146–162; Chapter 6—On the contact of rigid elastic solids and on hardness, pp 163–183. In: Jones DE, Schott GA (eds) Miscellaneous papers. MacMillan, New York
18. Hills DA, Kelly PA, Dai DN, Korsunsky AM (1996) Solution of crack problems: the distributed dislocation technique. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London10.1007/978-94-015-8648-1 ↗
19. Johnson KL (1982) One hundred years of hertz contact. In: ARCHIVE: Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers 1847–1982 (vols 1–196), 196(1982):363–37810.1243/PIME_PROC_1982_196_039_02 ↗
20. Johnson KL (1985) Contact mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9781139171731 ↗
21. Kanevskaya RD, Kats RM (1996) Exact solutions of problems of fluid inflow into a well with a vertical hydrofracture and their use in numerical models of flow through porous media. Fluid Dyn 31(6):854–86410.1007/BF02030104 ↗
22. Kern LR, Perkins TK, Wyant RE (1959) The mechanics of sand movement in fracturing. J Petroleum Technol 11(7):55–5710.2118/1108-G ↗
23. Khanna A, Kotousov A, Sobey J, Weller P (2012) Conductivity of narrow fractures filled with a proppant monolayer. J Petroleum Sci Eng 100:9–1310.1016/j.petrol.2012.11.016 ↗
24. Kotousov A (2011) Rigid circular inclusion squeezed by semi-infinite elastic planes. Int J Fract 171:201–20710.1007/s10704-011-9632-8 ↗
25. Kotousov A, Bortolan Neto L (2011) Theoretical model for roughness induced opening of cracks subjected to compression and shear loading. Int J Fract 172(1):9–1810.1007/s10704-011-9642-6 ↗
26. Kotousov A, Codrington JD (2010) Chapter 5: application of refined plate theory to fracture and fatigue. In: Ho SY (ed) Structural failure analysis and prediction methods for aerospace vehicles and structures. Bentham Science Publishers, Sharjah, pp 90–103
27. Mahrer KD (1999) A review and perspective on far-field hydraulic fracture geometry studies. J Petroleum Sci Eng 24(1):13–2810.1016/S0920-4105(99)00020-0 ↗
28. Montgomery CT, Steanson RE (1985) Proppant selection: the key to successful fracture stimulation. J Petroleum Technol 37(12):2163–217210.2118/12616-PA ↗
29. Murzenko VV (1994) Exact solutions of problems of steady fluid flow in reservoirs with hydrofractures. Fluid Dyn 29(2):214–22010.1007/BF02324310 ↗
30. Nguyen P, Jaripatke O (2009) Controlling solids flowback to maintain production of hydrocarbons: a review of successful chemical technologies in the last decade. In: International petroleum technology conference. Doha, SPE 13725-MS, p 1810.2523/IPTC-13725-MS ↗
31. Novotny EJ (1977) Proppant transport. In: SPE annual fall technical conference and exhibition. Denver, SPE 6813-MS, p 1210.2118/6813-MS ↗
32. Panayiotopoulos KP (1989) Packing of sands—a review. Soil Tillage Res 13(2):101–12110.1016/0167-1987(89)90085-8 ↗
33. Papanastasiou P (2000) Hydraulic fracture closure in a pressure-sensitive elastoplastic medium. Int J Fract 103(2):149–16110.1023/A:1007634723191 ↗
34. Pyrak-Nolte LJ, Myer LR, Cook NGW, Witherspoon PA (1987) Hydraulic and mechanical properties of natural fractures in Low permeability rock. In: 6th ISRM congress. Int Society for Rock Mechanics, Montreal, Canada, p 7
35. Rahman MM, Rahman MK (2010) A review of hydraulic fracture models and development of an improved pseudo-3D model for stimulating tight oil/gas sand. Energ Sour Part A Recover Util Environ Eff 32(15):1416–143610.1080/15567030903060523 ↗
36. Secchi S, Schrefler BA (2012) A method for 3-D hydraulic fracturing simulation. Int J Fract 178:245–25810.1007/s10704-012-9742-y ↗
37. Smith MB, Klein HH (1995) Practical applications of coupling fully numerical 2-D transport calculation with a PC-based fracture geometry simulator. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. Dallas, Texas, SPE 30505
38. Unwin AT, Hammond PS (1995) Computer simulations of proppant transport in a hydraulic fracture. In: SPE western regional meeting. Bakersfield, SPE 29649-MS, p 16
39. van Golf-Racht TD (1982) Fundamentals of fractured reservoir engineering. Elsevier, Amsterdam
40. Vincent MC (2002) Proving it—a review of 80 published field studies demonstrating the importance of increased fracture conductivity. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. San Antonio, Society of Petroleum Engineers, p 2110.2118/77675-MS ↗
41. Wahl H, Campbell J (1963) Sand movement in horizontal fractures. J Petroleum Technol 15(11):1239–124610.2118/564-PA ↗
42. Walsh JB (1981) Effect of pore pressure and confining pressure on fracture permeability. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 18(5):429–43510.1016/0148-9062(81)90006-1 ↗
43. Warpinski NR, Moschovidis ZA, Parker CD, Abou-Sayed IS (1994) Comparison study of hydraulic fracturing models—test case: GRI staged field experiment no. 3. SPE Prod Facil 9(1):7–1610.2118/25890-PA ↗
44. Zazovskii AF, Todua GT (1991) Steady inflow into a well with a long vertical fracture. Fluid Dyn 25(4):584–59310.1007/BF01049867 ↗