journal article·2017-04Open access

Cohesive zone modelling of nucleation, growth and coalesce of cavities

A. Biel, U. Stigh

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 204· Issue 2

Abstract

The stress-deformation relation i.e. cohesive law representing the fracture process in an almost incompressible adhesive tape is measured using the double cantilever beam specimen. As in many ductile materials, the fracture process of the tape involves nucleation, growth and coalesce of cavities. This process is studied carefully by exploiting the transparency of the used materials and the inherent stability of the specimen configuration. Utilising the path independence of the J-integral, the cohesive law is measured. The law is compared to the results of butt-joint tests. The law contains two stress peaks—the first is associated with nucleation of cavities at a stress level conforming to predictions of void nucleation in rubber elasticity. The second stress peak is associated with fracture of stretched walls between fully-grown cavities. After this second peak, a macroscopic crack is formed. The tape suffers at this stage an engineering strain of about 800%. A numerical analysis with the determined cohesive law recreates the global specimen behaviour.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Elasticity and Material Modeling · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Andersson T, Biel A (2006) On the effective constitutive properties of a thin adhesive layer loaded in peel. Int J Fract 141(1–2):227–24610.1007/s10704-006-0075-6 ↗
2. Andersson T, Stigh U (2004) The stress–elongation relation for an adhesive layer loaded in peel using equilibrium of energetic forces. Int J Solids Struct 41(2):413–43410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.09.039 ↗
3. Ashby MF, Jones DRH (1980) Engineering materials: an introduction to their properties and applications. Pergamon Press, New York
4. Ball JM (1982) Discontinuous equilibrium solutions and cavitation in nonlinear elasticity. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A 306(1496):557–61110.1098/rsta.1982.0095 ↗
5. Biel A, Stigh U (2008) Effects of constitutive parameters on the accuracy of measured fracture energy using the DCB-specimen. Eng Fract Mech 75(10):2968–298310.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.01.002 ↗
6. Biel A, Stigh U (2010) Damage and plasticity in adhesive layer: an experimental study. Int J Fract 165(1):93–10310.1007/s10704-010-9508-3 ↗
7. Biel A, Alfredsson KS, Carlberger T (2014) Adhesive tapes; cohesive laws for a soft layer. Proc Mater Sci 3:1389–139310.1016/j.mspro.2014.06.224 ↗
8. Broberg KB (1999) Cracks and fracture. Academic Press, Edinburgh
9. Campilho RDSG, Banea MD, Neto JABP, da Silva LFM (2013) Modelling adhesive joints with cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive law shape of the adhesive layer. Int J Adhes Adhes 44:48–5610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.02.006 ↗
10. Carlberger T, Alfredsson KS, Stigh U (2008) FE-formulation of interphase elements for adhesive joints. Int J Comput Methods Eng Sci Mech 9(5):288–29910.1080/15502280802229590 ↗
11. Carlberger T, Biel A, Stigh U (2009) Influence of temperature and strain rate on cohesive properties of a structural epoxy adhesive. Int J Fract 155(2):155–16610.1007/s10704-009-9337-4 ↗
12. Carlberger T, Stigh U (2010) Influence of layer thickness on cohesive properties of an epoxy-based adhesive—an experimental study. J Adhes 86:814–83310.1080/00218464.2010.498718 ↗
13. Chiche A, Dollhofer J, Creton C (2005) Cavity growth in soft adhesives. Eur Phys J E 17(4):389–40110.1140/epje/i2004-10148-3 ↗
14. Christensen SF, Everland H, Hassager O, Almdal K (1998) Observations of peeling of a polyisobutylene-based pressure-sensitive adhesive. Int J Adhes Adhes 18:131–13710.1016/S0143-7496(97)00037-7 ↗
15. Creton C, Chiche A, Dollhofer J, Roos A, Hui CY, Muralidharan V (2005) Cavitation and fracture of soft adhesives. In: 11th international conference on fracture 2005, 7, pp 5468–5473
16. Gent AN, Lindley PB (1959) Internal rupture of bonded rubber cylinders in tension. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A 249:195–20510.1098/rspa.1959.0016 ↗
17. Gent AN, Park B (1984) Failure processes in elastomers at or near a rigid spherical inclusion. J Mater Sci 19:1947–195610.1007/BF00550265 ↗
18. Good RJ, Gupta RK (1988) Rheological, interfacial and thermal control of polymer adhesion. 1. Isothermal theory. J Adhes 26(1):13–3610.1080/00218468808071272 ↗
19. Hayashida S, Sugaya T, Kuramoto S, Sato C, Mihara A, Onuma T (2015) Impact strength of joints bonded with high-strength pressure-sensitive adhesive. Int J Adhes Adhes 56:61–7210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.09.005 ↗
20. Jousset P, Rachik M (2014) Implementation, identification and validation of an elasto-plastic-damage model for the finite element simulation of structural bonded joints. Int J Adhes Adhes 50:107–11810.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.01.020 ↗
21. Kaelble DH, Reylek RS (1969) Peel adhesion. Rate dependence of micro fracture processes. J Adhes 1:124–13510.1080/00218466908078883 ↗
22. Lefèvre V, Ravi-Chandar K, Lopez-Pamies O (2015) Cavitation in rubber: an elastic instability or a fracture phenomenon? Int J Fract 192(1):1–2310.1007/s10704-014-9982-0 ↗
23. Lopez-Pamies O, Idiart MI, Nakamura T (2011) Cavitation in elastomeric solids: I—a defect-growth theory. J Mech Phys Sol 59(7):1464–148710.1016/j.jmps.2011.04.015 ↗
24. McClintock FA (1968) A criterion for ductile fracture by the growth of holes. J Appl Mech 35:363–37110.1115/1.3601204 ↗
25. May M, Hesebeck O, Marzi S, Boehme W, Lienhard J, Kilchert S, Brede M, Hiermaier S (2015) Rate dependent behavior of crash-optimized adhesives–experimental characterization, model development, and simulation. Eng Fract Mech 133:112–13710.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.11.006 ↗
26. Marzi S, Biel A, Stigh U (2011) On experimental methods to investigate the effect of layer thickness on the fracture behavior of adhesively bonded joints. Int J Adhes Adhes 31(8):840–85010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.08.004 ↗
27. Mott PH, Dorgan JR, Roland CM (2008) The bulk modulus and poisson’s ratio of “incompressible” materials. J Sound Vib 312(4–5):572–57510.1016/j.jsv.2008.01.026 ↗
28. Nase J, Creton C, Ramos O, Sonnenberg L, Yamaguchi T, Lindner A (2010) Measurement of the receding contact angle at the interface between a viscoelastic material and a rigid surface. Soft Matter 6(12):2685–269110.1039/c001687j ↗
29. Niesiolowski F, Aubrey DW (1981) Stress distribution during peeling of adhesive tapes. J Adhes 13(1):87–9810.1080/00218468108073177 ↗
30. Nilsson F (2005) A tentative method for determination of cohesive zone properties in soft materials. Int J Fract 136:133–14210.1007/s10704-005-5125-y ↗
31. Oberth AE, Bruenner RS (1965) Tear phenomena around solid inclusions in castable elastomers. Trans Soc Rheol 9(2):165–18510.1122/1.548997 ↗
32. Olsson P, Stigh U (1989) On the determination of the constitutive properties of thin interphase layers—an exact inverse solution. Int J Fract 41(4):R71–7610.1007/BF00018870 ↗
33. Paris AJ, Paris PC (1988) Instantaneous evaluation of J and C*. Int J Fract 38(1):R19–R2110.1007/BF00034281 ↗
34. Plante J-S, Dubowsky S (2006) Large-scale failure modes of dielectric elastomer actuators. Int J Solids Struct 43(25–26):7727–775110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.03.026 ↗
35. Pharr M, Sun J-Y, Suo Z (2012) Rupture of a highly stretchable acrylic dielectric elastomer. J Appl Phys 111:10411410.1063/1.4721777 ↗
36. Rice JR (1968) A path independent integral and the approximate analysis of strain concentration by Notches and Cracks. J Appl Mech 35(2):379–38610.1115/1.3601206 ↗
37. Salomonsson K, Stigh U (2009) Influence of root curvature on the fracture energy of adhesive layers. Eng Fract Mech 76(13):2025–203810.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.05.010 ↗
38. Suo Z, Bao G, Fan B (1992) Delamination R-curve phenomena due to damage. J Mech Phys Sol 40(1):1–1610.1016/0022-5096(92)90198-B ↗
39. Steenbrink AC, van der Giessen E, Wu PD (1997) Void growth in glassy polymers. J Mech Phys Sol 45(3):405–43710.1016/S0022-5096(96)00093-2 ↗
40. Stigh U, Andersson T (2000) An experimental method to determine the complete stress-elongatioin relation for a structural adhesive layer loaded in peel. Fracture of Polymers, Composites and Adhesives, ESIS publication 27, pp 297–306
41. Stigh U, Alfredsson KS, Andersson T, Biel A, Carlberger T, Salomonsson K (2010) Some aspects of cohesive models and modelling with special application to strength of adhesive layers. Int J Fract 165(2):149–16210.1007/s10704-010-9458-9 ↗
42. Stigh U, Biel A, Svensson D (2016) Cohesive zone modelling and the fracture process of a structural tape. Proc Struct Integr 2:235–24410.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.031 ↗
43. Stringfellow R, Abeyaratne R (1989) Cavitation in an elastomer: comparison of theory with experiment. Mater Sci Eng A112:127–13110.1016/0921-5093(89)90351-1 ↗
44. Sørensen BF (2010) Cohesive laws for assessment of materials failure: theory, experimental methods and application. Doctor of Technices thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Risø-R-1736
45. Timoshenko SP, Goodier JN (1970) Theory of elasticity. McGraw-Hill, New York
46. Toftegaard H, Rask M, Rasmussen S, Sørensen BF (2013) DCB fracture specimens with side notches. In: 6th International conference on composites testing and model identification, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Aalborg University, Denmark, 2013, pp 75–76
47. Townsend BW, Ohanehi DC, Dillard DA, Austin SR, Salmon F, Gagnon DR (2011a) Characterizing acrylic foam pressure sensitive adhesive tapes for structural glazing applications—Part I: DMA and ramp-to-fail results. Int J Adhes Adhes 31(7):639–64910.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.06.017 ↗
48. Townsend BW, Ohanehi DC, Dillard DA, Austin SR, Salmon F, Gagnon DR (2011b) Characterizing acrylic foam pressure sensitive adhesive tapes for structural glazing applications—Part II: Creep rupture results. Int J Adhes Adhes 31(7):650–65910.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.06.018 ↗
49. Walander T, Biel A, Stigh U (2013) Temperature dependence of cohesive laws for an epoxy adhesive in Mode I and Mode II loading. Int J Fract 183(2):203–22110.1007/s10704-013-9887-3 ↗
50. Walander T, Eklind A, Carlberger T, Stigh U, Rietz A (2016) Prediction of mixed-mode cohesive fatigue strength of adhesively bonded structure using Mode I data. Int J Adhes Adhes 66:15–2510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.12.003 ↗
51. Yang QD, Thouless MD (2001) Mixed-mode fracture analyses of plastically-deforming adhesive joints. Int J Fract 110:175–18710.1023/A:1010869706996 ↗
52. Zhao X, Suo Z (2008) Electrostriction in elastic dielectrics undergoing large deformation. J Appl Phys 104(12):12353010.1063/1.3031483 ↗
53. Zosel A (1998) The effect of fibrilation on the tack of pressure sensitive adhesives. Int J Adhes Adhes 18(4):265–27110.1016/S0143-7496(98)80060-2 ↗