Near the static fatigue limit in glass
Source abstract
Abstract
Fracture surfaces formed near the crack growth threshold in soda-lime-silicate glass are examined by atomic force microscopy. Cracks held below the apparent crack growth threshold for 16 h alter their mode of growth. The fracture plane changes from a flat surface to one that exhibits substantial out of plane growth. The direction of crack growth changes from 3° to 5° to the original growth direction. However, the change in growth direction is not uniform along the crack front; some portions of the front propagate at +3° to +5°, while adjacent portions propagating at -3° to -5° to the original growth direction. Thus, the crack is no longer flat, but becomes wavy after the 16 h hold period. This out of plane growth may be partially explained in terms of a crack growth model developed by Chuang and Fuller, which predicts an enhancement in the corrosion rate on the flank of a crack at stresses below the stress corrosion threshold. Alternatively, the unevenness of the crack plane after the hold period may be a consequence of a modification of the fracture toughness of the glass as a consequence of leaching.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Glass properties and applications · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials · Building materials and conservation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (9)
Show source-provided references
1. Charles, R.J. and Hollig, W.B. (1962). in Symposium on Mechanical Strength of Glass and Ways of Improving It, pp. 25-29. Union Scientifique Continentale du Verre, Charleroi, Belgium.
2. Chuan, T.-J. and Fuller, E.R., Jr. (1992). J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 75, 540.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1992.tb07839.x ↗
3. Gehrke, E. and Ullner, Ch. (1988). Application of Fractography of Glass to the Study of Environmental Effects on Crack Growth. pp. 77-87 in Advances in Ceramics, V. 22, Fractography of Glasses and Ceramics, Edited by V.D. Fréchette and J.R. Varner), The Americal Ceramic Society, Inc. Westerville OH.
4. Gehrke, E. Ullner, Ch., and Hähnert, M. (1991). J. Mater. Sci. 26, 5445.10.1007/BF02403942 ↗
5. Guin, J.-P. and Wiederhorn, S.M. (2003). J. Non-Crystalline Solids 316, 12.10.1016/S0022-3093(02)01932-4 ↗
6. Hénaux, S. and Cruezet, F. (1997). J. Am. Sci. Let. 16, 1008.10.1023/A:1018502002972 ↗
7. Kocer, J. and Collins R.E. (2001). J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 84, 2585.10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb01058.x ↗
8. Michalske, T.A. (1977) in Fracture Mechanics of Ceramics, Vol. 5, Surface Flaws, Statistics, and Microcracking, pp. 277-289, (Edited by Bradt, R.C., Evans, A.G., Hasselman, D.P.H. and Lange, F.F.) Plenum Press, New York.
9. Wiederhorn, S.M. and Bolz, L.H. (1970). J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 53, 543.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1970.tb15962.x ↗