Study on coexistence of brittle and ductile fractures in nano reinforcement composites under different loading conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
Experimental study on high volume fraction of metallic matrix nano composites (MMNCs) was conducted, including uniaxial tension, uniaxial compression, and three-point bending. The example materials were two magnesium matrix composites reinforced with 10 and 15% vol. SiC particles (50 nm size). Brittle fracture mode was exhibited under uniaxial tension and three-point bending, while shear dominated ductile fracture mode (up to 12% fracture strain) was observed under uniaxial compression. The original Modified Mohr–Coulomb (MMC) fracture model (Bai and Wierzbicki in Int J Fract 161:1–20, 2010; in a mixed space of stress invariants and equivalent strain) was transferred into a stress based MMC (sMMC) model. This model was demonstrated to be capable of predicting the coexistence of brittle and ductile fracture modes under different loading conditions for MMNCs. A material post-failure softening model was postulated along the damage accumulation to capture the above two different failure modes. This model was implemented to the Abaqus/Explicit as a material subroutine. Numerical simulations using finite element method well duplicated the material strength, fracture initiation sites and crack propagation modes of the Mg/SiC nano composites with a good accuracy. The proposed model has a good potential to predict fracture for a wide range of material with strength asymmetry and coexistence of brittle and ductile fractures modes.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (86)
Show source-provided references
1. An L, Qu J, Luo J, Fan Y, Zhang L, Liu J, Xu C, Blau PJ (2011) Aluminum nanocomposites having wear resistance better than stainless steel. J Mater Res 26(19):2479–248310.1557/jmr.2011.263 ↗
2. Arsenault RJ, Shi N (1986) Dislocation generation due to differences between the coefficients of thermal expansion. Mater Sci Eng 81:175–18710.1016/0025-5416(86)90261-2 ↗
3. Arsenault RJ, Wang L, Feng CR (1991) Strengthening of composites due to microstructural changes in the matrix. Acta Mater 39:47–5710.1016/0956-7151(91)90327-W ↗
4. Ashby MF (1971) Strengthening methods in crystals. Elsevier, Amsterdam
5. Azizi R, Legarth BN, Niordson CF (2013) A new macroscopically anisotropic pressure dependent yield function for metal matrix composite based on strain gradient plasticity for the microstructure. J Mech Phys Solids 61(4):991–100910.1016/j.jmps.2012.12.004 ↗
6. Bai Y, Wierzbicki T (2008) A new model of metal plasticity and fracture with pressure and lode dependence. Int J Plast 24:1071–109610.1016/j.ijplas.2007.09.004 ↗
7. Bai Y, Wierzbicki T (2010) Application of extended Mohr–Coulomb criterion to ductile fracture. Int J Fract 161:1–2010.1007/s10704-009-9422-8 ↗
8. Barai P, Weng GJ (2011) A theory of plasticity for carbon nanotube reinforced composites. Int J Plast 27(4):539–55910.1016/j.ijplas.2010.08.006 ↗
9. Beese AM, Luo M, Li Y, Bai Y, Wierzbicki T (2010) Partially coupled anisotropic fracture model for aluminum sheets. Eng Fract Mech 77(7):1128–115210.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.02.024 ↗
10. Brown E, Bray J, Santarelli F (1989) Influence of stress-dependent elastic moduli on stresses and strains around axisymmetric boreholes. Rock Mech Rock Eng 22(3):189–20310.1007/BF01470986 ↗
11. Brünig M, Gerke S, Hagenbrock V (2013) Micro-mechanical studies on the effect of the stress triaxiality and the lode parameter on ductile damage. Int J Plast 50:49–6510.1016/j.ijplas.2013.03.012 ↗
12. Cazacu O (1999) On the choice of stress-dependent elastic moduli for transversely isotropic solids. Mech Res Commun 26(1):45–5410.1016/S0093-6413(98)00098-6 ↗
13. Clyne TW, Withers PJ (1995) An introduction to metal matrix composites. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
14. Ferkel H, Mordike B (2001) Magnesium strengthened by SiC nanoparticles. Mater Sci Eng A 298(1):193–19910.1016/S0921-5093(00)01283-1 ↗
15. Fishman SG (1986) Interfaces in composites. J Miner Met Mat Soc 38(3):26–2710.1007/BF03257890 ↗
16. Flom Y, Arsenault RJ (1985) Deformation in Al–SiC composites due to thermal stresses. Mater Sci Eng 75:151–16710.1016/0025-5416(85)90186-7 ↗
17. Fritzen F, Forest S, Böhlke T, Kondo D, Kanit T (2012) Computational homogenization of elasto-plastic porous metals. Int J Plast 29:102–11910.1016/j.ijplas.2011.08.005 ↗
18. Gurson AL (1975) Plastic flow and fracture behavior of ductile materials incorporating void nucleation, growth and interaction. Doctoral dissertation, Brown University, Providence
19. Gurson AL (1977) Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth, part I—yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. J Eng Mater Technol 99:2–1510.1115/1.3443401 ↗
20. Gustafson TW, Panda PC, Song G, Raj R (1997) Influence of microstructural scale on plastic flow behavior of metal matrix composites. Acta Mater 45:1633–164310.1016/S1359-6454(96)00277-7 ↗
21. Habibi M, Hamouda A, Gupta M (2012) Enhancing tensile and compressive strength of magnesium using ball milled Al+ CNT reinforcement. Compos Sci Technol 72(2):290–29810.1016/j.compscitech.2011.11.015 ↗
22. Hamilton R, Efstathiou C, Sehitoglu H, Chumlyakov Y (2006) Thermal and stress-induced martensitic transformations in NiFeGa single crystals under tension and compression. Scr Mater 54(3):465–46910.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.10.003 ↗
23. Hancock JW, Mackenzie AC (1976) On the mechanisms of ductile failure in high-strength steels subjected to multi-axial stress-states. J Mech Phys Solids 24(2–3):147–16010.1016/0022-5096(76)90024-7 ↗
24. Hesabi ZR, Simchi A, Reihani SMS (2006) Structural evolution during mechanical milling of nanometric and micrometric Al $$2$$ 2 O $$3$$ 3 reinforced Al matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A 428:159–16810.1016/j.msea.2006.04.116 ↗
25. Hong SJ, Kim HM, Huh D, Suryanarayana C, Chun BS (2003) Effect of clustering on the mechanical properties of SiC particulate-reinforced aluminum alloy 2024 metal matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A 347:198–20410.1016/S0921-5093(02)00593-2 ↗
26. Ibrahim IA, Mohamed FA, Lavernia EJ (1991) Particle reinforced metal matrix composites—a review. J Mater Sci 26:1137–115610.1007/BF00544448 ↗
27. Jarausch K, Kiely J, Houston JE, Russell P (2000) Defect-dependent elasticity: nanoindentation as a probe of stress state. J Mater Res 15(08):1693–170110.1557/JMR.2000.0244 ↗
28. Johnson GR, Cook WH (1985) Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Eng Fract Mech 21(1):31–4810.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9 ↗
29. Jones RM (1977) Stress–strain relations for materials with different moduli in tension and compression. AIAA J 15(1):16–2310.2514/3.7297 ↗
30. Kamat SV, Rollett AD, Hirth JP (1991) Plastic-deformation in Al-alloy matrix-alumina particulate composites. Scr Metal Mater 25:27–3210.1016/0956-716X(91)90348-5 ↗
31. Kang Y, Chan SLI (2004) Tensile properties of nanometric Al $$2$$ 2 O $$3$$ 3 particle-reinforced aluminum matrix composites. Mater Chem Phys 85:438–44310.1016/j.matchemphys.2004.02.002 ↗
32. Kim KT, Cha SI, Hong SH, Hong SH (2006) Microstructures and tensile behavior of carbon nanotube reinforced Cu matrix nanocomposites. Mater Sci Eng A 430(1–2):27–3310.1016/j.msea.2006.04.085 ↗
33. Kim KT, Eckert J, Menzel SB, Gemming T, Hong SH (2008) Grain refinement assisted strengthening of carbon nanotube reinforced copper matrix nanocomposites. Appl Phys Lett 92(12):121901–12190310.1063/1.2899939 ↗
34. Kim J-Y, Jang D, Greer JR (2012) Crystallographic orientation and size dependence of tension-compression asymmetry in molybdenum nano-pillars. Int J Plast 28(1):46–5210.1016/j.ijplas.2011.05.015 ↗
35. Kouzeli M, Mortensen A (2002) Size dependent strengthening in particle reinforced aluminum. Acta Mater 50:39–5110.1016/S1359-6454(01)00327-5 ↗
36. Kouzeli M, Weber L, Marchi CS, Mortensen A (2001) Quantification of microdamage phenomena during tensile straining of high volume fraction particle reinforced aluminum. Acta Mater 49:497–50510.1016/S1359-6454(00)00334-7 ↗
37. Lecarme L, Tekog C, Pardoen T (2011) Void growth and coalescence in ductile solids with stage III and stage IV strain hardening. Int J Plast 27(8):1203–122310.1016/j.ijplas.2011.01.004 ↗
38. Lei X, Lissenden CJ (2007) Pressure sensitive nonassociative plasticity model for DRA composites. J Eng Mater Technol 129(2):255–26410.1115/1.2400273 ↗
39. Li Y, Ramesh KT, Chin ESC (2000) The compressive viscoplastic response of an A359/SiCp metal-matrix composite and of the A359 aluminum alloy matrix. Int J Solids Struct 37(51):7547–756210.1016/S0020-7683(99)00304-2 ↗
40. Li Y, Ramesh KT, Chin ESC (2004) Comparison of the plastic deformation and failure of A359/SiC and 6061–T6/Al2O3 metal matrix composites under dynamic tension. Mater Sci Eng A 371(1–2):359–37010.1016/j.msea.2004.01.008 ↗
41. Li X, Yang Y, Weiss D (2008) Theoretical and experimental study on ultrasonic dispersion of nanoparticles for strengthening cast aluminum alloy A356. Metal Sci Technol 26(2):12–20
42. Li Y, Luo M, Gerlach J, Wierzbicki T (2010) Prediction of shear-induced fracture in sheet metal forming. J Mater Process Technol 210(14):1858–186910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.06.021 ↗
43. Li H, Fu M, Lu J, Yang H (2011a) Ductile fracture: experiments and computations. Int J Plast 27(2):147–18010.1016/j.ijplas.2010.04.001 ↗
44. Li Y, Wierzbicki T, Sutton M, Yan J, Deng X (2011b) Mixed mode stable tearing of thin sheet AI 6061–T6 specimens: experimental measurements and finite element simulations using a modified Mohr–Coulomb fracture criterion. Int J Fract 168:53–7110.1007/s10704-010-9554-x ↗
45. Lloyd DJ (1994) Particle reinforced aluminium and magnesium matrix composites. Int Mater Rev 39(1):1–2310.1179/imr.1994.39.1.1 ↗
46. Long X, Bai Y, Algarni M, Choi Y, Chen Q (2015) Study on the strengthening mechanisms of Cu/CNT nano-composites. Mater Sci Eng A 645:347–35610.1016/j.msea.2015.08.012 ↗
47. Lui J, Yu B, Weber K (1999) Coexisting brittle-ductile fracturing mechanisms in fault zones of the upper crust level. Chin Sci Bull 44(22):2107–211210.1007/BF02884932 ↗
48. Luo M, Wierzbicki T (2010) Numerical failure analysis of a stretch-bending test on dual-phase steel sheets using a phenomenological fracture model. Int J Solids Struct 47(22–23):3084–310210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.07.010 ↗
49. Luo M, Dunand M, Mohr D (2012) Experiments and modeling of anisotropic aluminum extrusions under multi-axial loading—part II: ductile fracture. Int J Plast 32–33:36–5810.1016/j.ijplas.2011.11.001 ↗
50. Malcher L, Pires FA, De Sá JC (2014) An extended GTN model for ductile fracture under high and low stress triaxiality. Int J Plast 54:193–22810.1016/j.ijplas.2013.08.015 ↗
51. Manoharan M, Lim S, Gupta M (2002) Application of a model for the work hardening behavior to Mg/SiC composites synthesized using a fluxless casting process. Mater Sci Eng A 333(1):243–24910.1016/S0921-5093(01)01845-7 ↗
52. McClintock FA (1968) A criterion of ductile fracture by the growth of holes. J Appl Mech 35:363–37110.1115/1.3601204 ↗
53. Miracle DB (2005) Metal matrix composites—from science to technological significance. Compos Sci Technol 65(15–16):2526–254010.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.027 ↗
54. Mortensen A, Llorca J (2010) Metal matrix composites. Ann Rev Mater Res 40:243–27010.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104511 ↗
55. Mula S, Padhi P, Panigrahi SC, Pabi SK, Ghosh S (2009) On structure and mechanical properties of ultrasonically cast Al-2%Al $$_2$$ 2 O $$_3$$ 3 nanocomposites. Mater Res Bull 44:1154–116010.1016/j.materresbull.2008.09.040 ↗
56. Mummery P, Derby B (1991) The Influence of microstructure on the fracture behavior of particulate metal matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A 135:221–22410.1016/0921-5093(91)90566-6 ↗
57. Nan CW, Clarke DR (1996) The influence of particle size and particle fracture on the elastic/plastic deformation of metal matrix composites. Acta Mater 44:3801–381110.1016/1359-6454(96)00008-0 ↗
58. Ohr SM, Chang SJ, Park CG, Thomson R (1985) Coexistence of ductile and brittle fracture in metals. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
59. Pozdnyakova I, Bruno G, Efremov AM, Clausen B, Hughes D (2009) Stress-dependent elastic properties of porous microcracked ceramics. Adv Eng Mater 11(12):1023–102910.1002/adem.200900192 ↗
60. Prabhu B, Suryanarayana C, An L, Vaidyanathan R (2006) Synthesis and characterization of high volume fraction Al–Al $$2$$ 2 O $$3$$ 3 nanocomposite powders by high-energy milling. Mater Sci Eng A Struct Mater Prop Microstruct Process 425:192–20010.1016/j.msea.2006.03.066 ↗
61. Prangnell PB, Downes T, Stobbs WM, Withers PJ (1994) The deformation of discontinuously reinforced MMCs-I. The initial yielding behavior. Acta Mater 10:3425–343610.1016/0956-7151(94)90475-8 ↗
62. Ran J, Fu M, Chan W (2013) The influence of size effect on the ductile fracture in micro-scaled plastic deformation. Int J Plas 41:65–8110.1016/j.ijplas.2012.09.002 ↗
63. Ravichandran KS (1994) A simple model of deformation behavior of two phase composites. Acta Metall Mater 42:1113–112310.1016/0956-7151(94)90128-7 ↗
64. Rice JR, Tracey DM (1969) On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields. J Mech Phys Solids 17:201–21710.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-7 ↗
65. Saravanan R, Surappa M (2000) Fabrication and characterisation of pure magnesium-30 vol.% SiC P particle composite. Materials Science and Engineering: A 276(1):108–11610.1016/S0921-5093(99)00498-0 ↗
66. Schleicher F (1926) Der spannonggszustand and der flieffgrenze plastizitatsbedingqung. Z Angew Math Mech 6:199–21610.1002/zamm.19260060303 ↗
67. Shao J, Xiao B, Wang Q, Ma Z, Yang K (2011) An enhanced FEM model for particle size dependent flow strengthening and interface damage in particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Compos Sci Technol 71(1):39–4510.1016/j.compscitech.2010.09.014 ↗
68. Shen J, Yin W, Wei Q, Li Y, Liu J, An L (2013) Effect of ceramic nanoparticle reinforcements on the quasistatic and dynamic mechanical properties of magnesium-based metal matrix composites. J Mater Res 28(13):1835–185210.1557/jmr.2013.16 ↗
69. Shi N, Arsenault RJ (1994) Plastic-flow In SiC/Al composites-strengthening and ductility. Ann Rev Mater Sci 24:321–35710.1146/annurev.ms.24.080194.001541 ↗
70. Tang F, Hagiwara M, Schoenung JM (2005) Microstructure and tensile properties of bulk nanostructured Al-5083/SiCp composites prepared by cryomilling. Mater Sci Eng 407:306–31410.1016/j.msea.2005.07.056 ↗
71. Tvergaard V (1989) Material failure by void growth to coalescence. Adv Appl Mech 27:83–15110.1016/S0065-2156(08)70195-9 ↗
72. Tvergaard V, Hutchinson JW (2002) Two mechanisms of ductile fracture: void by void growth versus multiple void interaction. Int J Solids Struct 39(13–14):3581–359710.1016/S0020-7683(02)00168-3 ↗
73. Tvergaard V, Needleman A (1984) Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar. Acta Mater 32:157–16910.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X ↗
74. Vasudevan AK, Richmond O, Zok F, Embury JD (1989) The influence of hydrostatic pressure on the ductility of Al–SiC composites. Mater Sci Eng A 107:63–6910.1016/0921-5093(89)90375-4 ↗
75. von Mises R (1913) Gottinger Nachrichten Math. Phys Klasse 582
76. Wu JM, Li ZZ (2000) Nanostructured composites obtained by mechanically driven reduction reaction of CuO and Al powder mixture. J Alloys Compd 299:9–1610.1016/S0925-8388(99)00643-X ↗
77. Xu Q, Qu S (2015) Irreversible deformation of metal matrix composites: a study via the mechanism-based cohesive zone model. Mech Mater 89:72–8410.1016/j.mechmat.2015.06.003 ↗
78. Yang Y, Li X (2007) Ultrasonic cavitation-based nanomanufacturing of bulk aluminum matrix nanocomposites. Trans ASME 129:252–25510.1115/1.2712214 ↗
79. Yang Y, Lan J, Li X (2004) Study on bulk aluminum matrix nanocomposite fabricated by ultrasonic dispersion of nano-sized SiC particles in molten aluminum alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 380:378–38310.1016/j.msea.2004.03.073 ↗
80. Yar AA, Montazerian M, Abdizadeh H, Baharvandi HR (2009) Microstructure and mechanical properties of aluminum alloy matrix composite reinforced with nano-particle MgO. J Alloys Compd 484:400–40410.1016/j.jallcom.2009.04.117 ↗
81. Yokobori T, Ichikawa M (1994) An interpretation of the scatter in brittle-ductile transition region as a statistical event as a result of the two different populations. ASTM Int Fract Mech 2410.1520/STP13715S ↗
82. Yuan M, Yang Y, Li C, Heng P, Li L (2012) Numerical analysis of the stress–strain distributions in the particle reinforced metal matrix composite SiC/6064Al. Mater Des 38:1–610.1016/j.matdes.2011.12.043 ↗
83. Yu S, Dakoulas P (1993) General stress-dependent elastic moduli for cross-anisotropic soils. J Geotech Eng 119(10):1568–158610.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1993)119:10(1568) ↗
84. Zhang H, Maljkovic N, Mitchell BS (2002) Structure and interfacial properties of nanocrystalline aluminum/mullite composites. Mater Sci Eng A 326:317–32310.1016/S0921-5093(01)01500-3 ↗
85. Zhang H, Ramesh KT, Chin ESC (2005) Effects of interfacial debonding on the rate-dependent response of metal matrix composites. Acta Mater 53(17):4687–470010.1016/j.actamat.2005.07.004 ↗
86. Zhang H, Ramesh KT, Chin ESC (2008) A multi-axial constitutive model for metal matrix composites. J Mech Phys Solids 56(10):2972–298310.1016/j.jmps.2008.07.001 ↗