Study of Mode I Fracture of Graphene Sheets Using Atomistic Based Finite Element Modeling and Virtual Crack Closure Technique
Source abstract
Abstract
In this letter a finite element based atomistic model is proposed. This model was employed to study the mode I fracture characteristics of graphene monolayers. The proposed model was found to be less numerically intensive with fewer degrees of freedom in comparison to other numerical techniques, such as Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics modeling. An approach based on the virtual crack closure technique was employed to develop the atomistic formulation for estimating strain energy release rates for graphene sheets under opening mode.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies · Thermal properties of materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. Anderson T.L. (1995) Fracture mechanics: fundamentals and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA
2. Duplock, E.J., Scheffler, M., Lindan, P.J.D. (2004). Hallmark of perfect graphene.Physical Review Letters 92, 225502 1–4.10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.225502 ↗
3. Gillis P.P. (1984) Calculating the elastic constants of graphite. Carbon 22: 387–39110.1016/0008-6223(84)90010-1 ↗
4. Jin Y., Yuan F.G. (2005) Nanoscopic modeling of fracture of 2D graphene systems. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 10: 1–8
5. Katsnelson M.I., Novoselov K.S. (2007) Graphene: New bridge between condensed matter physics and quantum electrodynamics. Solid State Communications 143: 3–1310.1016/j.ssc.2007.02.043 ↗
6. Li C., Chou T.W. (2003) A structural mechanics approach for the analysis of carbon nanotubes. International Journal of Solids and Structures 40: 2484–2499
7. Lier G.V., Alsenoy C.V., Doren V.V., Geerlings P. (2000) Ab initio study of the elastic properties of single–walled carbon nanotubes and graphene. Chemical Physics Letters 326: 181–18510.1016/S0009-2614(00)00764-8 ↗
8. Miller R., Tadmor E.B., Phillips R., Ortiz M. (1998) Quasicontinuum simulation of fracture at the atomic scale. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering 6: 607–63810.1088/0965-0393/6/5/008 ↗
9. Nicholson A.P.P., Bacon D.J. (1977) A new force constant model for graphite. Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 10: 295–30610.1088/0022-3719/10/2/013 ↗
10. Omeltchenko, A., Yu, J., Kalia, R.K., Vashishta, P. (1997). Crack front propagation and fracture in a graphite sheet: A molecular-dynamics study on parallel computers. Physical Review Letters 78, 2148-2151.10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2148 ↗
11. Raju I.S. (1987) Calculation of strain energy release rates with higher order and singular finite elements. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 28: 251–27410.1016/0013-7944(87)90220-7 ↗
12. Rybicki E.F., Kanninen M.F. (1977) A finite element calculation of stress intensity factors by a modified crack closure integral. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 9: 931–93810.1016/0013-7944(77)90013-3 ↗
13. Stankovich S., Dmitriy A., Dikin D.A., Dommett G., Kohlhaas K., Zimney E., Stach E., Piner R., Nguyen S., Ruoff R. (2006) Graphene based composite materials. Nature 442: 282–28610.1038/nature04969 ↗
14. Tsai J.L., Tzeng S.H., Tzou Y.J. (2010) Characterizing the fracture parameters of a graphene sheet using atomistic simulation and continuum mechanics. International Journal of Solids and Structures 47: 503–50910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.10.017 ↗
15. Tserpes K.I., Papanikos P. (2005) Finite element modeling of single–walled carbon nanotubes. Composites Part B: Engineering 36: 468–47710.1016/j.compositesb.2004.10.003 ↗