Deformation and failure modelling of high strength adhesives for crash simulation
Source abstract
Abstract
The deformation and failure mechanisms of toughened high strength adhesives used in the automotive industry are very complex and require advanced numerical models for crashworthiness simulation. The theoretical background of two new modelling approaches for thin adhesive layers is presented: firstly, a simplified elastic damaging node-to-element tied interface model approach for convenient and efficient modelling, and secondly a detailed modelling approach for improved accuracy using an elasto-viscoplastic solid element representation of the adhesive layer. The material model parameters required for both approaches are determined by a comprehensive set of experiments, including quasi-static and dynamic adhesive coupon testing, fracture toughness testing, and quasi-static tension/shear (and combined) testing of thin adhesive layers. A more complex adhesively joined assembly of two aluminium extrusions subjected to quasi-static (QS) and dynamic loading serves as the final validation example for both modelling approaches. Good agreement of experiments and numerical predictions was observed for both modelling approaches.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Cellular and Composite Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. ABAQUSTM User Manual, http://abaqus.com
2. ASTM draft standard D30.06. (1993) Protocol for inter-laminar fracture testing, End-Notched Flexure (ENF)
3. Audi TT (2006) Automobil Industries, special issue
4. Blackman BRK, Kinloch AJ, Paraschi M, Teo WS (2003). Measuring the mode I adhesive fracture energy, GIC, of structural adhesive joints: the results of an international round-robin. Int J Adhesion Adhesives 23(4):293–30510.1016/S0143-7496(03)00047-2 ↗
5. BetamateTM 1496: Technical data sheet http://automotive.dow.com/materials/products/betamate/bmate96.htm
6. Camanho PP, Davila CG, Ambur DR (2001) Numerical Simulation of Delamination Growth in Composite Materials. NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton Virginia, NASA TP-2001-211041
7. Camanho PP, Matthews FL (1999). Delamination onset prediction in mechanically fastened joints in composite laminates. J Compos Mater 33:906–92710.1177/002199839903301002 ↗
8. Deshpande VS, Fleck NA (2000). Isotropic constitutive models for metallic foams. J Mech Phys Solids 48:1253–128310.1016/S0022-5096(99)00082-4 ↗
9. Disse T (2004) Untersuchungen zum geschwindigkeitsabhängigen Festigkeits- und Verformungsverhalten von Klebverbindungen. Dissertation, Universität Paderborn, Shaker Verlag
10. Drucker DC, Prager W (1952) Soil mechanics and plastic analysis in limit design. Quarterly Appl Math 10(2):157–16510.1090/qam/48291 ↗
11. FOSTA P477 (2000–2002) Untersuchungen zum Crashverhalten geklebter und hybridgefügter Stahlblechverbindungen.
12. FOSTA project P593 (2002–2004) Methodenentwicklung zur Berechnung und Auslegung geklebter Stahlbauteile für den Fahrzeugbau.
13. FOSTA project P676 (2005–2007) Methodenentwicklung zur Berechnung von höherfesten Stahlklebverbindungen des Fahrzeugbaus unter Crashbelastung
14. Greve L, Pickett AK (2005). Delamination testing and modelling for composite crash simulation, Composite Science and Technology 66(6) : 816–826
15. Hillerborg A, Modeer M, Petersson PE (1976). Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements. Cement Concrete Res 6:773–78210.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-7 ↗
16. ISO international Standard DIS15024. Fibre-reinforced plastic composites—Determination of Mode I inter-laminar fracture toughness, GIC, for unidirectionally reinforced materials.
17. Johnson AF, Pickett AK, Rozycki P (2001). Computational methods for predicting impact damage in composite structures. Compos Sci Tech 61(15):2183–219210.1016/S0266-3538(01)00111-7 ↗
18. Johnson GR, Cook WH (1985) Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strain, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Eng Fract Mech 21(1):31–4810.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9 ↗
19. Mahnken R, Schlimmer M (2005) Simulation of strength difference in elasto-plasticity for adhesive materials. Int J Numer Method Eng 63(10):1461–147710.1002/nme.1315 ↗
20. Memhard D, Andrieux F, Sun D-Z, Feucht M, Frank T, Kolling S (2005) Entwicklung und Anwendung von Ersatzmodellen für die Anwendung von Klebverbindungen unter Crashbelastung. 4. LS-DYNAAnwenderforum, Bamberg 2005
21. PAM-CRASHTM PAM-SAFETM Version 2005 Manuals, Engineering System International, www.esi-group.com
22. Sato C, Ikegami K (1999) Strength of adhesively-bonded butt joints of tubes subjected to combined high-rate loads. J Adhesion 70:57–7310.1080/00218469908010487 ↗
23. Schlimmer M (1974) Fließverhalten plastisch kompressibler Werkstoffe. Dissertation, Technische Hochschule Aachen
24. Steinbrecher G, Buchman A, Sidess A, Sherman D. (2006) Characterization of the mode I fracture energy of adhesive joints”, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives 26(8): 644–650
25. von Mises R (1928). Mechanik der plastischen Formanderung von Kristallen. ZAMM 8:161–18510.1002/zamm.19280080302 ↗