Utilization of nanoindentation to examine bond line integrity in adhesively bonded composite structures
Source abstract
Abstract
This study explores the probable correlation between degradation in bond line fracture toughness and the changes in the measurable mechanical properties of the adhesive layer due to environmental contamination in adhesively bonded composite structures. Nanoindentation technique is utilized to measure the adhesive Young’s modulus and hardness. The proposed framework utilizes the large scale bridging of interfacial fracture proposed by Tvergaard and Hutchinson (Philos Mag A 70(4):641–656, 1994), for considering the significant contribution of plasticity on the macroscopic bond line fracture toughness. A typical adhesive-adherend material system (EA9394/Hexcel IM7-G/8552) exposed to different contaminants at the same concentration is examined. Hardness measurements showed two distinct effects of contamination on the adhesive material; namely (1) softening and (2) hardening depending on the class of contaminants. In addition, macroscopic mode-I fracture toughness is independently measured by double cantilever beam test. Finite element method employing cohesive zone method is used to rationalize the experimental results and the prospective scaling-laws. The combined experimental results of macroscopic properties and the numerical results of the interfacial properties showed the role of contamination in reducing the plastic dissipation within the bond line and the macroscopic deterioration of the bond line effective fracture toughness. The results showed the existence of a correlation similar to Tvergaard and Hutchinson’s results. However, the results suggest a scaling between the interfacial cohesive fracture toughness and the measurable flow stress. The scaling correlation has the potential to be utilized in assessing the relative trend between different contaminants. While the proposed scaling is verified for a common adhesive-adherend system in aerospace industry, with additional examination of other systems, the proposed scaling law might facilitate the utilization of the perceived non-destructively evaluated indentation hardness to serve as an indicator for the bond line macroscopic fracture toughness.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Ashcroft IA, Abdel Wahab MM, Crocombe AD, Hughes DJ, Shaw SJ (2001) The effect of environment on the fatigue of bonded composite joints. Compos A 32:45–5810.1016/S1359-835X(00)00131-7 ↗
2. Al-Mandil MY, Khalil HS, Baluch MH, Azad AK (1990) Performance of epoxy repaired concrete under thermal cycling. Cement Concrete Compos 12:47–5210.1016/0958-9465(90)90035-V ↗
3. ASTM D5528-13 (2013) Standard test method for mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. doi: 10.1520/D552810.1520/D5528 ↗
4. ASTM D5573-99 (2012) Standard Practice for classifying failure modes in fiber-reinforced-plastic (FRP) joints. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. doi: 10.1520/D5573-99R1210.1520/D5573-99R12 ↗
5. ASTM D7264/D7264M-15 (2015) Standard test method for flexural properties of polymer matrix composite materials. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. doi: 10.1520/D7264_D7264M-1510.1520/D7264_D7264M-15 ↗
6. Bossi R, Carlsen R, Boerio FJ, Dillingham G (2005) Composite surface preparation QA for bonding. In: 50th International SAMPE Symposium, Long Beach, CA
7. Chai H (1986) On the correlation between the mode-I failure of adhesive joints and laminated composites. Eng Fract Mech 24(3):413–43110.1016/0013-7944(86)90071-8 ↗
8. Chai H (1993) Observation of deformation and damage at the tip of cracks in adhesive bonds loaded in shear and assessment of criterion for fracture. Int J Fract 60:311–32610.1007/BF00034739 ↗
9. da Silva LFM, Ochsner A, Adams RD (2011) Handbook of adhesion technology. Springer, Heidelberg10.1007/978-3-642-01169-6 ↗
10. da Silva LF, Campilho RD (2012) Advances in numerical modelling of adhesive joints. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–9310.1007/978-3-642-23608-2_1 ↗
11. Geubelle PH, Baylor JS (1998) Impact-induced delamination of composites: a 2D simulation. Compos B 29B:589–60210.1016/S1359-8368(98)00013-4 ↗
12. Guess TR, Reedy ED, Stavig ME (1995) Mechanical properties of Hysol EA-9394 structural adhesive. Sandia report, Sand95-0229, UC-704, February 199510.2172/32591 ↗
13. Kalarikkal SG, Sankar BV, Lfju PG (2006) Effect of cryogenic temperature on the fracture toughness of graphite/epoxy composites. J Eng Mater Technol 128:151–15710.1115/1.2172274 ↗
14. Katnam KB, Sargent JP, Crocombe AD, Khoramishad H, Ashcroft IA (2010) Characterization of moisture-dependent cohesive zone properties for adhesively bonded joints. Eng Fract Mech 77:3105–311910.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.08.023 ↗
15. Khoramishad H, Crocombe AD, Katnam KB, Ashcroft IA (2011) Fatigue damage modeling of adhesively bonded joints under variable amplitude loading using a cohesive zone model. Eng Fract Mech 78:3212–322510.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.09.008 ↗
16. Lam DC, Chong AC (1999) Indentation model and strain gradient plasticity law for glassy polymers. J. Mater Res 14(09):3784–378810.1557/JMR.1999.0512 ↗
17. Lee BL, Holl MW (1996) Effect of moisture and thermal cycling on in-plane shear properties of graphite fiber-reinforced cyanate ester resin composite. Compos A 27A:1015–102210.1016/1359-835X(96)00027-9 ↗
18. Li S, Thouless MD, Waas AM, Schroeder JA, Zavattieri PD (2005) Use of mode-I cohesive-zone models to describe the fracture of an adhesively-bonded polymer-matrix composite. Compos Sci Technol 65:281–29310.1016/j.compscitech.2004.07.009 ↗
19. McDaniel D, Pribanic T, Musaramthota V (2011) Effect of surface contamination on composite bond integrity and durability, Advanced Materials in Transport Aircraft Structures Autumn 2011 Meeting
20. MIL-STD-1246C (1994) Product cleanliness levels and contamination control program, 11 April 1994
21. Mubashar A, Ashcroft IA, Critchlow GW, Crocombe AD (2009) Moisture absorption-desorption effects on adhesive joints. Int J Adhes Adhes 29:751–76010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.05.001 ↗
22. NAVAIR 01–1A-21 (2005) Organizational and intermediate maintenance, general composite repair. Naval Air Technical Data and Engineering Service Command, San Diego, CA
23. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res 7(6):1564–158310.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
24. Pardoen T, Ferracin T, Landis CM, Delannay F (2005) Constraint effects in steady-state fracture of adhesively bonded joints. J Mech Phys Solids 53:1951–198310.1016/j.jmps.2005.04.009 ↗
25. Paulauskas FL, Warren CD, Meek TT (1996) Adhesive bonding via exposure to microwave radiation and resulting mechanical evaluation. Materials Research Society Meeting10.1557/PROC-430-193 ↗
26. Ramberg W, Osgood WR (1943) Description of stress-strain curves bythree parameters. NACA Technical, Report 902
27. Shang X (2013) Role of contamination on the bondline integrity of composite structures. Dissertation, Iowa State University10.2172/1342569 ↗
28. Tabor D (1951) Hardness of metals. Oxford University Press, Oxford
29. Tabor D (1986) Indentation hardness and its measurement: some cautionary comments. In: Blau PJ, Lawn BR (eds) Microindentation techniques in materials science and engineering ASTM STP 889. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, pp 129–159
30. Turon A, Dávila CG, Camanho PP, Costa J (2007) An engineering solution for mesh size effects in the simulation of delamination using cohesive zone models. Eng Fract Mech 74:1665–168210.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.08.025 ↗
31. Tvergaard V, Hutchinson JW (1994) Toughness of an interface along a thin ductile layer joining elastic solids. Philos Mag A 70(4):641–65610.1080/01418619408242253 ↗
32. William JG (1989) The fracture mechanics of delamination tests. J Strain Anal 24(4):207–21410.1243/03093247V244207 ↗
33. Yang C, Lo CT, Bastawros AF, Narasimhan B (2009) Measurements of diffusion thickness at polymer interfaces by nanoindentation: a numerically calibrated experimental approach. J Mater Res 24(03):985–99210.1557/jmr.2009.0105 ↗