Interfacial debonding of pipe joints under torsion loads: a model for arbitrary nonlinear cohesive laws
Source abstract
Abstract
Adhesively bonded pipe joints are extensively used in pipelines. In the present work, Cohesive Zone Model (CZM) based analytical solutions are obtained for the bonded pipe joints under torsion. An integral form based general expression is derived which is suitable for arbitrary type of nonlinear cohesive laws. The concept of the minimum interfacial cohesive shear slip δ m is introduced and used in the fundamental expression of the external torsion load. It is found that, when the bond length of the pipe joint is large enough, the torsion load capacity is indeed independent of the shape of cohesive laws and the bond length. It is interesting to note that the maximum torsion load capacity is achieved when the torsion stiffness of the pipe and coupler are identical. A good agreement with finite element analysis (FEA) result indicates that the current model works well. The formulation to develop a simple test method for determining the τ–δ constitutive relationship in pipe joints under torsional loads is suggested. Parametric studies of various cohesive laws are conducted. This model deepens the understanding of the interfacial debonding problem of bonded joints. The fracture energy based formulas of the torsion load capacity derived in the present work can be directly used in the design of adhesively bonded pipe joints.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Adams RD, Peppiatt NA (1977) Stress analysis of adhesive bonded tubular lap joint. J Adhes 9: 1–18. doi: 10.1080/0021846770807509510.1080/00218467708075095 ↗
2. Atkinson C (1979) Stress Singularities and fracture mechanics. Appl Mech Rev 32(2): 123–135
3. Barenblatt GI (1959) The formation of equilibrium cracks during brittle fracture general ideas and hypothesis. Axisymmetrical cracks. PMM 23: 434–444
4. Blackman BRK, Hadavinia H, Kinloch AJ, Williams JG (2003) The Use of a cohesive zone model to study the fracture of fibre composites and adhesively-bonded joints. Int J Fract 119: 25–46. doi: 10.1023/A:102399801325510.1023/A:1023998013255 ↗
5. Camacho GT, Ortiz M (1996) Computational modeling of impact damage in brittle materials. Int J Solids Struct 33: 2899–2938. doi: 10.1016/0020-7683(95)00255-310.1016/0020-7683(95)00255-3 ↗
6. Chen D, Cheng S (1992) Torsional stress in tubular lap joints. Int J Solids Struct 29(7): 845–853. doi: 10.1016/0020-7683(92)90020-T10.1016/0020-7683(92)90020-T ↗
7. Chon CT (1982) Analysis of tubular lap joint in torsion. J Compos Mater 16: 268–284. doi: 10.1177/00219983820160040210.1177/002199838201600402 ↗
8. Dugdale DS (1960) Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J Mech Phys Solids 8: 100–104. doi: 10.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-210.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 ↗
9. Graves SR, Adams RD (1981) Analysis of bonded joint in a composite tube subjected to torsion. J Compos Mater 15: 211–223. doi: 10.1177/00219983810150030210.1177/002199838101500302 ↗
10. Hilleborg A, Modeer M, Petersson PE (1976) Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements. Cement Concr Res 6: 773–782. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-710.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-7 ↗
11. Hosseinzadeh R, Cheraghi N, Taheri F (2006) An engineering approach for design and analysis of metallic pipe joints under torsion by the finite element method. J Strain Anal Eng Des 41(6): 443–452. doi: 10.1243/03093247JSA19610.1243/03093247JSA196 ↗
12. Hutchinson JW, Evans AG (2000) Mechanics of materials: topdown approaches to fracture. Acta Mater 48: 125–135. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00291-810.1016/S1359-6454(99)00291-8 ↗
13. Needleman A (1987) A continuum model for void nucleation by inclusion debonding. ASME J Appl Mech 54: 525–53110.1115/1.3173064 ↗
14. Ouyang Z, Li G (2008, accepted) Local damage evolution of DCB specimens during crack initiation process: a natural boundary condition based method. ASME J Appl Mech10.1115/1.3112742 ↗
15. Ouyang Z, Li G (2009, accepted) Nonlinear interface shear fracture of end notched flexure specimens. Int J Solids Struct10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.02.011 ↗
16. Pan J, Leung CKY (2007) Debonding along the FRP-concrete interface under combined pulling/peeling effects. Eng Fract Mech 74: 132–150. doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.01.02210.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.01.022 ↗
17. Rizzi E, Papa E, Corigliano A (2000) Mechanical behavior of a syntactic foam: experiments and modeling. Int J Solids Struct 37: 5773–5794. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7683(99)00264-410.1016/S0020-7683(99)00264-4 ↗
18. Rose JH, Smith JR, Ferrante J (1983) Universal features of bonding in metals. Phys Rev B 28: 1835–1845. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.28.183510.1103/PhysRevB.28.1835 ↗
19. Tvergaard V (1990) Effect of fibre debonding in a whisker-reinforced metal. Mater Sci Eng A 125: 203–213. doi: 10.1016/0921-5093(90)90170-810.1016/0921-5093(90)90170-8 ↗
20. Tvergaard V, Hutchinson JW (1992) The relation between crack growth resistance and fracture process parameters in elastic-plastic solids. J Mech Phys Solids 40: 1377–1397. doi: 10.1016/0022-5096(92)90020-310.1016/0022-5096(92)90020-3 ↗
21. Volkersen O (1965) Recherches sur la theorie des assemblages Colles. Constr Metall 4: 3–13
22. Williams JG, Hadavinia H (2002) Analytical solutions for cohesive zone models. J Mech Phys Solids 50: 809–825. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00095-310.1016/S0022-5096(01)00095-3 ↗
23. Wu ZS, Yuan H, Niu H (2002) Stress transfer and fracture propagation in different kinds of adhesive joints. J Eng Mech 128(5): 562–573. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:5(562)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:5(562) ↗
24. Xu XP, Needleman A (1993) Void nucleation by inclusion debonding in a crystal matrix. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 1: 111–132. doi: 10.1088/0965-0393/1/2/00110.1088/0965-0393/1/2/001 ↗
25. Zhao Y, Pang SS (1995) Stress–strain and failure analyses of pipe under torsion. J Press Vessel Technol 117: 273–278. doi: 10.1115/1.284212310.1115/1.2842123 ↗
26. Zou GP, Taheri F (2006) Stress analysis of adhesively bonded sandwich pipe joints subjected to torsional loading. Int J Solids Struct 43(20): 5953–5968. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.05.03510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.05.035 ↗