journal article·2015-03

Mixed mode fracture of glued-in rods in timber structures

Julie Lartigau, Jean-Luc Coureau, Stéphane Morel, Philippe Galimard, Emmanuel Maurin

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 192· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Glued-in-rods in timber structures lead to overcome the use of traditional bolted connections, preserve a large part of the original timber and offeraesthetic benefits. Several research programs were achieved to improve the mechanical knowledge of this technique, exhibiting experimentally the influence of materials and the effect of the geometric configuration. From these experimental results, some design rules predicting the axial strength are available, but a common criterion is still lacking. This paper relates to experimental investigations and finite element computations on glued-in rods, with the aim of providing a better knowledge about their mechanical behavior until failure. An experimental campaign is carried out on single glued-in rod connections. The finite element modeling reproduces the experimental configuration: it exhibits significant normal stress (to the interface)at the onset of the bonding, in comparison with shear stress. Within the framework of equivalent linear elastic fracture mechanics, resistance curves in mode I and mode II are established for each specimen. Finally, a mixed mode fracture criterion (I/II) is used to describe the fracture process zone development at the woodadhesive interface (failure zone). An analytical formulation is then proposed allowing the evaluation of peak load of each specimen, which highlights a new approach for the design of such connections.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Wood Treatment and Properties · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. AFNOR (1999) Filetages mtriques ISO pour usages gnraux - Slection de dimensions pour la boulonnerie. NF ISO 262
2. AFNOR (2005) Eurocode 5: Design of timber structures—Part 1–1 : General–Common rules and rules for buidings. EN 1995-1-1
3. Bažant Z (1997) Scaling of quasibrittle fracture: hypotheses of invasive and lacunar fractility, their critique and Weibull connection. Int J Fract 83:41–6510.1023/A:1007335506684 ↗
4. Bažant Z (2002) Concrete fracture models: testing and practice. Eng Fract Mech 69:165–20510.1016/S0013-7944(01)00084-4 ↗
5. Bažant Z, Kazemi M (1990) Size effect in fracture of ceramic and its use to determine fracture energy and effective process zone. J Am Ceram Soc 73(7):1841–185310.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb05233.x ↗
6. Bengtsson C, Johansson CJ (2001) Girod–glued in rods for timber structures. In: Proceedings of the 34th conference of CIB-W18. International council for research and innovation in building and construction—timber structures, Venice, Italy. Paper 34-7-8
7. Borri A, Corradi M (2011) Strengthening of timber beams with high strength steel cords. Compos Part B Eng 42:1480–149110.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.051 ↗
8. Broek D (1991) Elementary engineering fracture mechanics. Kluwer, Dordrecht
9. Broughton JG, Hutchinson AR (2001) Pull-out behavior of steel rods bonded into timber. Mater Struct 34(2):100–10910.1007/BF02481558 ↗
10. Buchanan AH, Moss PJ (1999) Design of epoxied steel rods in glulam timber. In: Walford GB, Gaunt DJ (eds) Proceedings of Pacific timber engineering conference. Rotorua, New Zealand
11. Buchholz F, Grebner H, Dreyer K, Krome H (1988) 2D- and 3D-applications of the improved and generalized modified crack closure integral method. In: Computational mechanics ’8810.1007/978-3-642-61381-4_94 ↗
12. Caumes P (1987) Rupture d’un matériau anisotrope en conditions polymodales (le bois). Ph.D. thesis, Université de Bordeaux, France
13. Coureau JL, Morel S, Dourado N (2013) Cohesive zone model and quasibrittle failure of wood: a new light on the adapted specimen geometries for fracture tests. Eng Fract Mech 109:328–34010.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.02.025 ↗
14. De Moura MFSF, Oliveira J, Morais J, Xavier J (2010) Mixed-mode I/II wood fracture characterization using the mixed-mode bending test. Eng Fract Mech 77:144–15210.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.09.014 ↗
15. Dourado N, Morel S, De Moura M, Valentin G, Morais J (2008) Comparison of fracture properties of two wood species through cohesive crack simulations. Compos Part A 39(2):415–42710.1016/j.compositesa.2007.08.025 ↗
16. Ferreira L, Bittencourt T, Sousa J, Gettu R (2002) R-curve behavior in notched beam tests of rocks. Eng Fract Mech 69:1845–185210.1016/S0013-7944(02)00064-4 ↗
17. Fett T, Munz D, Geraghty R, White K (2000) Influence of specimen geometry and relative crack size on the R-curve. Eng Fract Mech 66:375–38610.1016/S0013-7944(00)00026-6 ↗
18. Franke B, Quenneville P (2014) Analysis of the fracture behavior of Radiata Pine timber and Laminated Veener Lumber. Eng Fract Mech 116:1–1210.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.12.004 ↗
19. Fruhmann K, Reiterer A, Tschegg E, Stanzl-Tschegg S (2002) Fracture characteristics of wood under mode I, mode II and mode III loading. Philos mag A 82:3289–329810.1080/01418610208240441 ↗
20. Goland M, Reissner E (1944) The stresses in cemented joints. J Appl Mech 66(11):A17–A2710.1115/1.4009336 ↗
21. Guitard D (1987) Mécanique du matériau bois et composites. Cépaduès
22. Gustafsson PJ, Serrano E, Aicher S, Johansson CJ (2001) A strength design equation for glued-in rods. In: International RILEM symposium on joints in timber structures
23. Hart-Smith LJ (1973) Adhesive-bonded single-lap joints. Tech. rep. Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia
24. Irabois (1999) Guide professionnel - Assemblages bois: tiges ou goujons collés de grande dimension, Les Cahiers, d’Irabois, vol 11, pp 1–29
25. Irwin G (1958) Fracture I. Handb der Phys VI, pp 558–590
26. Kossakowski P (2009) Mixed-mode I/II fracture toughness of pine wood. Arch Civ Eng 55(2):199–227
27. Lartigau J (2013) Caractérisation du comportement des assemblages par goujons collés dans les structures bois. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Bordeaux
28. Lartigau J, Coureau JL, Morel S, Galimard P, Maurin E (2012) Bonded-in rods connections: modeling of mechanical behavior. In: COST action FP1004
29. Lawn B (1993) Fracture of brittle solids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9780511623127 ↗
30. Lespine I (2007) Influence de la géométrie des structures sur les propriétés de rupture dans les milieux quasi-fragiles. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Bordeaux, France
31. Mall S, Murphy J, Shottafer JE (1983) Criterion for mixed mode fracture in wood. J Eng Mech 109(3):680–69010.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1983)109:3(680) ↗
32. Martín E, Estevéz J, Otero D (2013) Influence of geometric and mechanical parameters on stress states caused by threaded steel rods glued in wood. Eur J Wood Prod 71:259–26610.1007/s00107-013-0678-3 ↗
33. Micelli F, Scialpi V, La Tegola A (2005) Flexural reinforcement of glulam timber beams and joints with carbon fiber-reinforced polymer rods. J Compos Constr 9(4):337–34710.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:4(337) ↗
34. Morel S (2008) Size effect in quasibrittle fracture: derivation of the size effect law from equivalent LEFM and asymptotic analysis. Int J Fract 154:15–2610.1007/s10704-008-9291-6 ↗
35. Morel S, Dourado N (2011) Size effect in quasibrittle failure: analytical model and numerical simulations using cohensive zone model. Int J Solid Struct 48:1403–141210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.01.014 ↗
36. Morel S, Dourado N, Valentin G, Morais J (2005) Wood: a quasibrittle material. R-curve behavior and peak load evaluation. Int J Fract 131:385–40010.1007/s10704-004-7513-0 ↗
37. Otero Chans D, Cimadevila JE, Gutiérrez EM (2008) Glued joints in hardwood timber. Int J Adhes Adhes 28(8):457–46310.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.04.008 ↗
38. Qiu LP, Zhu EC, Van de Kuilen JWG (2014) Modeling crack propagation in wood by extended finite element method. Eur J Wood Prod 72:273–28310.1007/s00107-013-0773-5 ↗
39. Raftery GM, Whelan C (2014) Low-grade glued laminated timber beams reinforced using improved arrangements of bonded-in GFRP rods. Constr Build Mater 52:209–22010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.044 ↗
40. Riberholt H (1988) Glued bolts in glulam—proposals for CIB code. In: Proceedings of the 21st conference of CIB-W18. International council for research and innovation in building and construction—Timber structures, Parksville, Vancouver Island, Canada. Paper 21-7-2
41. Rybicki E, Kanninen M (1977) A finite element calculation of stress intensity factors by a modified crack closure integral. Eng Fract Mech 9:931–93810.1016/0013-7944(77)90013-3 ↗
42. Serrano E (2001) Glued in rods for timber structures: a 3D model and finite element parameter studies. Int J Adhes Adhes 21:115–12710.1016/S0143-7496(00)00043-9 ↗
43. Smith I, Landis E, Gong M (2003) Fracture and fatigue in wood. Wiley, New York
44. Steiger R, Gehri E, Widmann R (2007) Pull-out strength of axially loaded steel rods bonded in glulam parallel to the grain. Mater Struct 40(1):69–7810.1617/s11527-006-9111-2 ↗
45. Taupin JL (1980) Restauration à la résine époxyde de planchers et charpentes au monastère de la grande chartreuse. Bulletin d’informations tech 92:34–43
46. Vasic S, Smith I (2002) Bridging crack model for fracture of spruce. Eng Fract Mech 69:745–76010.1016/S0013-7944(01)00091-1 ↗
47. Xavier J, Morais J, Dourado N, de Moura M (2011) Measurement of mode I and mode II fracture properties of wood-bonded joints. J Adhes Sci Technol 25:2881–289510.1163/016942411X576563 ↗
48. Yoshihara H (2013) Initiation and propagation fracture toughness of solid wood under the mixed-mode I/II condition examined by mixed-mode bending test. Eng Fract Mech 104:1–1510.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.03.023 ↗