Analysing the onset of multiple site damage at mechanical joints
Source abstract
Abstract
A detailed analysis has been performed on the onset of multiple site damage at mechanical joints. The crack initiation is analysed based on non-linear stress analyses and the crack closure model. It has been found that the stress-strain response at the joint can have a stabilised linear relation under fatigue loading even if considerable plastic yield has occurred. This makes it possible to analyse the post yield multiple crack initiation based on fracture mechanics solutions for the crack growth in a residual stress field. Weight function method has been used to solve stress intensity factors and Green's functions for the crack growth analyses according to a strip yield crack closure solution. In this analysis, the small crack behaviour as well as the post yield effect have been accounted for. Intrinsic material parameters have been extensively used so that the method is not limited to the specified problems. Together with the crack growth analyses, a probabilistic model has been developed to account for uncertainties in initial flaw, stochastic crack propagation, geometrical inconsistency, as well as variation in the fatigue load. According to the probabilistic solution, important information about the onset of multiple site damage, e.g. the probability of crack occurrence, and the probability of crack break-through etc., are predicted as a function of the stress and the construction of joint. One example is provided to illustrate the procedure and to highlight problems in dealing with the onset of multiple site damages at mechanical joints.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Engineering Structural Analysis Methods · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Blom, A.F., Wang, G.S. and Chermahini, R.G. (1990). Comparison of crack closure results obtained by 3D elasticplastic FEM and modified Dugdale model In: ‘Localised Damage: Computer-Aided Assessment and Control’ (edited by Aliabadi, M.H., Brebia, C.A. and Cartwright, D.J.) Vol. 2. Computational Mechanics Publications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 57–68.
2. Carpinteri A. Ed. (1994). Handbook of Fatigue Crack Propagation in Metallic Structures, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
3. Dill, H.D. and Saff, C.R. (1976), Spectrum crack growth prediction method based on crack surface displacement and contact analyses. American Society of Testing and Materials ASTM STP 595, 306–319.
4. Doecker, H. and Bachmann, V. (1988). Determination of crack opening load by use of threshold behaviour. American Society of Testing and Material ASTM STP 982, 247–259.
5. Dugdale, D.S. (1960). Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. Journal of Mechanics and Physicals of Solids 8, 100–104.10.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 ↗
6. Elber, W. (1970). Fatigue crack closure under cyclic tension. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 2, 37–45.10.1016/0013-7944(70)90028-7 ↗
7. Gatttaneo, G., Gavallini, G., and Galatolo, R.,(1998). Doc. No. SMAAC-TR3.2-07-1.3/AEM, BRITE-EURAM, Proj. No. BE95-1053, Contract No. BRPR-CT 95-0079.
8. Jacoby, G.H. and Nowack, H. (1972). Comparison of scatter under program and random loading and influencing factors. American Society of Testing and Material ASTM STP 511, 61–72.
9. Laz, P.J. and Hillberry, B.M. (1998). Fatigue life prediction from inclusion initiated cracks. International Journal of Fatigue 20, 263–270.10.1016/S0142-1123(97)00136-9 ↗
10. Liaw, P.K. Leax, T.R. and Logsdon, W.A. (1983). Near threshold fatigue crack growth behavior in metals. Acta Metallurgy 31, 1531–1587.
11. Manning, S.D., and Yang, J.N. (1984). USAF durability design handbook. Guidelines for the Analysis and Design of Durable Aircraft Structures. AFWAL-TR-83-3027, Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH.
12. Miner, M.A. (1945). Journal of Applied Mechanics 12, A159.10.1115/1.4009458 ↗
13. Newman, J.C., Jr., and Edwards, P.R. (1988). Short-crack growth behaviour in an aluminium alloy- an AGARD Cooperative Test Programme. AGARD-R-732.
14. Papoulis, A. (1984). Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
15. Rice, J.R. (1972). Some remarks on elastic crack tip stress fields. International Journal of Solids and Structures 8, 751.10.1016/0020-7683(72)90040-6 ↗
16. Ritchie, R.O. (1984). Near-threshold fatigue: an overview of the role of microstructure and environment. Conference Fatigue 84 III, 1833–1863.
17. Wang, G.S. (1995). Intrinsic statistical characteristics of fatigue crack growth rate. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 51, 787–803.10.1016/0013-7944(94)00322-9 ↗
18. Wang, G.S. (1993a). The plasticity aspect of fatigue crack growth. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 46, 909–930.10.1016/0013-7944(93)90144-H ↗
19. Wang, G.S. (1993b). A generalised WF solution for mode I 2D part-elliptical cracks. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 45, 177–208.10.1016/0013-7944(93)90186-V ↗
20. Wang, G.S. (1996a). To analyse fatigue crack growth in residual stress field at welded joints In: Proceedings of the 6th International Fatigue Congress II. Fatigue 96, (edited by Lütjering, G. and Nowack, H.), 1219–1224.10.1016/B978-008042268-8/50076-9 ↗
21. Wang, G.S. (1996b). Analysing the fatigue crack growth in structural details. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 53, 345–361.10.1016/0013-7944(95)00149-2 ↗
22. Wang, G.S. and Blom, A.F. (1991). A strip model for fatigue crack growth predictions under general load conditions. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 40, 507–533.10.1016/0013-7944(91)90148-T ↗
23. Virkler, D.A., Hillberry, B.M., and Goel, P.K. (1979). The statistical nature of fatigue crack propagation, Trans. of the ASME. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technologies 101, 148–153.10.1115/1.3443666 ↗
24. Yang, J.N. and Manning, S.D. (1990). Stochastic crack growth analysis methodologies for metallic structures. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 37, 1105–1124.10.1016/0013-7944(90)90032-C ↗