Continuum shape sensitivity and reliability analyses of nonlinear cracked structures
Source abstract
Abstract
A new method is proposed for shape sensitivity analysis of a crack in a homogeneous, isotropic, and nonlinearly elastic body subject to mode I loading conditions. The method involves the material derivative concept of continuum mechanics, domain integral representation of the J-integral, and direct differentiation. Unlike virtual crack extension techniques, no mesh perturbation is required in the proposed method. Since the governing variational equation is differentiated before the process of discretization, the resulting sensitivity equations are independent of any approximate numerical techniques. Based on the continuum sensitivities, the first-order reliability method was employed to perform probabilistic analysis. Numerical examples are presented to illustrate both the sensitivity and reliability analyses. The maximum difference between the sensitivity of stress-intensity factors calculated using the proposed method and the finite-difference method is less than four percent. Since all gradients are calculated analytically, the reliability analysis of cracks can be performed efficiently.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Numerical methods in engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 1986
2. M. Grigoriu · International Journal of Fracture · 1990 · 45 · 1910.1007/BF00012607 ↗
3. 1987
4. G.H. Besterfield · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · 1991 · 86 · 29710.1016/0045-7825(91)90225-U ↗
5. G.H. Besterfield · ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics · 1990 · 116 · 64210.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1990)116:3(642) ↗
6. S. Rahman · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · 1995 · 52 · 26510.1016/0013-7944(95)00018-Q ↗
7. S. Rahman · International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping · 2000 · 78 · 9
8. S. Rahman · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · 2001 · 68 · 10710.1016/S0013-7944(00)00092-8 ↗
9. S.C. Lin · International Journal of Fracture · 1988 · 38 · 21710.1007/BF00034286 ↗
10. H.G. deLorenzi · International Journal of Fracture · 1982 · 19 · 18310.1007/BF00017129 ↗
11. H.G. deLorenzi · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · 1985 · 21 · 12910.1016/0013-7944(85)90060-8 ↗
12. R.B. Haber · International Journal of Numerical Methods in Engineering · 1985 · 21 · 30110.1002/nme.1620210208 ↗
13. E.J. Barbero · Communications in Applied Numerical Methods · 1990 · 6 · 50710.1002/cnm.1630060703 ↗
14. X.Z. Suo · International Journal of Fracture · 1992 · 57 · 12710.1007/BF00035715 ↗
15. C.G. Hwang · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · 1998 · 59 · 52110.1016/S0013-7944(97)00103-3 ↗
16. D.J. Keum · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · 1992 · 41 · 83310.1016/0013-7944(92)90235-7 ↗
17. R.A. Feijóo · Computational Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · 2000 · 188 · 64910.1016/S0045-7825(99)00353-9 ↗
18. G. Chen · International Journal of Fracture · 2001b · 112 · 22310.1023/A:1013543913779 ↗
19. G. Chen · Computational Mechanics · 2001a · 27 · 28210.1007/s004660100238 ↗
20. G. Chen · ASME Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology · 2002 · 124 · 47610.1115/1.1486017 ↗
21. E. Taroco · Computational Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · 2000 · 188 · 69710.1016/S0045-7825(99)00356-4 ↗
22. 1965
23. 1979
24. 1986
25. 1975
26. ABAQUS (1999). User?s Guide and Theoretical Manual, Version 5.8, Hibbitt, Karlsson, and Sorenson, Inc., Pawtucket, RI.
27. 1988
28. 1995
29. 2001
30. J.R. Rice · Journal of Applied Mechanics · 1968 · 35 · 37910.1115/1.3601206 ↗
31. J.W. Hutchinson · ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics · 1983 · 50 · 104210.1115/1.3167187 ↗
32. P.L. Liu · Structural Safety · 1991 · 9 · 16110.1016/0167-4730(91)90041-7 ↗