Influence of Loading Condition and Size–Effect on the K R –Curve Based on the Cohesive Stress in Concrete
Source abstract
Abstract
Studies of the influence of specimen geometry and size–effect on the K R –curves and the related fracture parameters were carried out by the authors (Kumar and Barai 2008b). The present paper is a supplementary contribution and reports interesting results related to the effect of the loading condition and size–effect studies on the K R –curves associated with the cohesive stress distribution for complete fracture process, the double–K fracture parameters, the CTOD–curves and the process zone length using two different loading conditions (i.e., three–point bending test and four–point bending test). The laboratory size specimen with initial–notch length/depth ratios 0.3 and 0.5 are considered in the work. The load–crack opening displacement curves for these loading conditions are obtained using well known version of fictitious crack model.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Numerical methods in engineering · Rock Mechanics and Modeling
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Barenblatt G.I. (1962) The mathematical theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture. Advances in Applied Mechanics 7(1): 55–12910.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-2 ↗
2. Carpinteri A. (1989) Decrease of apparent tensile and bending strength with specimen size: two different explanations based on fracture mechanics. International Journal of Solids and Structures 25: 407–42910.1016/0020-7683(89)90056-5 ↗
3. Dugdale D.S. (1960) Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. Journal of Mechanics and Physics of Solids 8: 100–10410.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 ↗
4. Hillerborg A., Modeer M., Petersson P.E. (1976) Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements. Cement and Concrete Research 6: 773–78210.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-7 ↗
5. Issa M.A., Hammad A.M., Chudnovsky A. (1993) Correlation between crack tortuosity and fracture toughness in cementitious material. International Journal of Fracture 69: 97–10510.1007/BF00012438 ↗
6. Issa M.A., Issa M.A., Islam M.S., Chudnovsky A. (2000) Size effects in concrete fracture: Part I, experimental setup and observations. International Journal of Fracture 102: 1–2410.1023/A:1007533218153 ↗
7. Issa M.A., Issa M.A., Islam M.S., Chudnovsky A. (2000) Size effects in concrete fracture–Part II: Analysis of test results. International Journal of Fracture 102: 25–4210.1023/A:1007677705861 ↗
8. Kumar S., Barai S.V. (2008) Influence of specimen geometry on determination of double–K fracture parameters of concrete: a comparative study. International Journal of Fracture 149: 47–6610.1007/s10704-008-9227-1 ↗
9. Kumar S., Barai S.V. (2008) Influence of specimen geometry and size–effect on the K R –curve based on the cohesive stress in concrete. International Journal of Fracture 152: 127–14810.1007/s10704-008-9275-6 ↗
10. MATLAB, Version 7, The Math Works, Inc., Copyright 1984–2004.
11. Murakami, Y. (1987). Stress Intensity Factors Hand Book (Committee on Fracture Mechanics, The Society of Materials Science, Japan) Vol–1, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
12. Petersson, P.E. (1981). Crack growth and development of fracture zone in plain concrete and similar materials, Report No. TVBM–100, Lund Institute of Technology.
13. Planas J., Elices M. (1991) Nonlinear fracture of cohesive material. International Journal of Fracture 51: 139–15710.1007/BF00033975 ↗
14. Reinhardt H.W., Cornelissen H.A.W., Hordijk D.A. (1986) Tensile tests and failure analysis of concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 112(11): 2462–247710.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:11(2462) ↗
15. Reinhardt H.W., Xu S. (1999) Crack extension resistance based on the cohesive force in concrete. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 64: 563–58710.1016/S0013-7944(99)00080-6 ↗
16. Tada, H., Paris, P.C., Irwin, G. (1985). The Stress Analysis of Cracks Handbook, Paris Productions Incorporated, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
17. Xu S., Reinhardt H.W. (1998) Crack extension resistance and fracture properties of quasi–brittle materials like concrete based on the complete process of fracture. International Journal of Fracture 92: 71–9910.1023/A:1007553012684 ↗
18. Xu S., Reinhardt H.W. (1999) Determination of double–K criterion for crack propagation in quasi–brittle materials, part II: analytical evaluating and practical measuring methods for three–point bending notched beams. International Journal of Fracture 98: 151–7710.1023/A:1018740728458 ↗
19. Zi G., Bažant Z.P. (2003) Eignvalue method for computing size effect of cohesive cracks with residual stress, with application to kink–bands in composites. International Journal of Engineering Science 41: 1519–153410.1016/S0020-7225(03)00033-8 ↗