journal article·2007-12

Cyclic loading and fracture mechanics of Ductal® concrete

Ehab Shaheen, Nigel G. Shrive

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 148· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Reactive Powder Concrete (RPC) is a special type of ultra high strength, superplasticized, silica fume concrete, often fibre-reinforced, with improved homogeneity because the traditional coarse and fine aggregate are replaced by fine sand with particle sizes in the range of 100–400 μm [4–16 thousandths of an inch]. RPC properties are attractive because compressive strengths up to 800 MPa [116 ksi] have been recorded, but more typically in excess of 200 MPa [29 ksi]. Flexural strengths up to 141 MPa [20.4 ksi] and fracture energy of 40 kJ/m2[kJ/in.2] have been reported—the latter achieved when steel or stainless steel fibres were included in the mix (Bache (1998) Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on superplasticizers in concrete, Ottawa, pp 35–41; Coppola et al. L’Industria Ital Cemento 707:112–125 (1996); Blais and Couture PCI J 44(5):60–71 (1999); Richard and Cheyrezy (1994) Proceedings of V. Mohan Malhotra symposium on concrete technology: past, present, and future (SP 144). American Concrete Institute, Detroit, pp 507–518; Richard and Cheyrezy Cement Concrete Res 25(7):1501–1511 (1995)). Ductal®, a commercial RPC, has a compressive strength of approximately 150 MPa [22 ksi] with metallic or organic fibres. All tests described here were performed on 40 × 40 × 160 mm [1.6 × 1.6 × 6.3 in.] (Width (b) × Depth (d) × length (L)) prisms with Poly Vinyl Alcohol (PVA) fibres. Ductal® is a family of RPC and micro-defect-free concretes containing micro silica, silica fume, cement, Quartz sand, superplasticizer, and PVA fibres. Mechanical and fracture parameters were investigated using four point bending. Low and high cyclic fatigue tests were conducted in three stages, starting from low to high strain cycles. Cracks generated by cyclic fatigue tests were monitored periodically in order to evaluate the rate of crack propagation. Cracks were also investigated using a high magnification microscope. Three pairs of specimens were tested, notched and un-notched to evaluate fracture parameters. Four point bending was used again because determination of the J-Integral (J IC ) requires the application of pure bending over a portion of the beam. Load was applied at the third points over a span (S) of 120 mm [4.7 in.], providing a span to depth ratio (S/d) of 3.0. Specimens were notched using a 1 mm [0.04 in.] thick diamond saw. The crack tip generated was circular and the crack length (s) was approximately 10 mm [0.4 in.]. Tests on the notched specimens included measurement of the crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD). Closed-loop testing was developed using a feed back signal from the (CMOD) clip gauge attached to the notched specimens and from strain gauges attached to the un-notched specimens. The weight (w) of each specimen was obtained prior to testing. Fracture parameters were calculated from the load–deflection curves obtained from the notched and un-notched specimens.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Adams RA (1995) Calculus; a complete course, 3rd edn. Addison Wesley Publishers Ltd, Ontario, Canada
2. Adeeb SM, Scholefield BWJ, Brown TG, Shrive NG, Kroman J, Perry VH, Tadros G (2005) Modelling, testing and construction of the first Ductal® canopy in the world. Can J Civil Eng 32(6): 1152–116510.1139/l05-065 ↗
3. Baalbaki W, Aitcin PC, Ballivy G (1992) On predicting modulus of elasticity in high-strength concrete. ACI Mater J 89(5): 517–520
4. Baché HH (1998) Densified cement/ultra fine particle based materials. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on superplasticizers in concrete, Ottawa, pp 35–41
5. Blais PY, Couture M (1999) Precast, prestressed pedestrian bridge-world’s first reactive powder concrete structure.. PCI J 44(5): 60–7110.15554/pcij.09011999.60.71 ↗
6. Broek D (1982) Elementary fracture mechanics. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Netherlands, p 429 pp10.1007/978-94-011-9055-8 ↗
7. Coppola L, Troli R, Collepardi S, Borsoi A, Cerulli T, Collepardi M (1996) Innovative cementitious materials from HPC to RPC. Part II. The effect of cement and silica fume type on the compressive strength of reactive powder concrete. L’Industria Ital Cemento 707: 112–125
8. Cox BN, Marshall DB (1994) Concepts for bridged cracks in fracture and fatigue. Acta Metall J 42(2): 341–36310.1016/0956-7151(94)90492-8 ↗
9. Dubey A, Banthia N (1998) Influence of high-reactivity metakaolin and silica fume on the flexural toughness of high-performance steel fibre reinforced concrete. ACI Mater J 95(3): 284–292
10. Dugat J, Roux N, Bernier G (1996) Mechanical properties of reactive powder concretes. Mater Struct 29(188): 233–24010.1007/BF02485945 ↗
11. Farhat FA, Nicolaides D, Kanellopoulos A, Karihaloo BL (2007) High performance fibre-reinforced cementitoius composite (CARDIFRC)—performance and application to retrofitting. Eng Fract Mech 74(1–2): 151–16710.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.01.023 ↗
12. Giaccio G, Rocco C, Zerbino R (1993) The fracture energy (G F ) of high-strength concretes. Mater Struct 26(7): 381–38610.1007/BF02472938 ↗
13. Gopalaratnam VS, Shah SP (1987) Failure mechanisms and fracture of fibre reinforced concrete. In: Shah SP, Batson GB (eds) ACI SP-105. Fiber reinforced concrete properties and applications.. Norway, Oslo, pp 1–25
14. Johnston CD (1982) Definition and measurement of flexural toughness parameters for fibre reinforced concrete. Cement Concrete Aggregates 4(2): 53–6010.1520/CCA10228J ↗
15. JSCE-SF4 (1994) Standard for flexural strength and flexural toughness, method of tests for steel fiber reinforced concrete. Concrete Library of JSCE, No. 3, June Japan Concrete Institute (JCI), pp 58–66
16. Karihaloo BL, Nallathambi P (1989) An improved effective crack model for the determination of fracture toughness in concrete. Cement Concrete Res 19: 603–61010.1016/0008-8846(89)90012-4 ↗
17. Mindess S, Lawrence FV, Kesler CE (1977) The J-integral as a fracture criterion for fibre reinforced concrete. Cement Concrete Res 7(6): 731–74210.1016/0008-8846(77)90057-6 ↗
18. Reda Taha MM, Xiao X, Yi J, Shrive NG (2002) Evaluation of flexural fracture toughness for quasi-brittle structural materials using a simple test method. Can J Civil Eng 29: 567–57510.1139/l02-044 ↗
19. Rice JR, Paris PS, Merhle JG (1973) Some further results of J-integral analysis and estimates. Progr Flow Growth Fract Toughness 536: 231–24510.1520/STP49643S ↗
20. Richard P, Cheyrezy MH (1994) Reactive powder concretes with high ductility and 200–800 MPa compressive strength. In: Mehta PK (eds) Proceedings of V. Mohan Malhotra symposium on concrete technology: past, present, and future (SP 144). American Concrete Institute, Detroit, pp 507–518
21. Richard P, Cheyrezy MH (1995) Composition of reactive powder concretes. Cement Concrete Res 25(7): 1501–151110.1016/0008-8846(95)00144-2 ↗
22. Shah SP, Suartz SE, Ouyang C (1995) Fracture mechanics of concrete: applications of fracture mechanics to concrete, rock and other quasi-brittle materials. Wiley, 588 pp
23. Shaheen E, Shrive NG (2006) Optimisation of mechanical properties and durability of reactive powder concrete. ACI Mater J 103(6): 444–451
24. Shrive NG, El-Rahaman M (1985) Understanding the cause of cracking in concrete: a diagnostic aid. Concrete Int 7(5): 39–44