Comparison of cohesive zone parameters and crack tip stress states between two different specimen types
Source abstract
Abstract
The cohesive zone parameters (separation energy and cohesive strength) and the crack tip triaxialities are compared between a compact tension (CT) and a double edge notched tension (DENT) specimen with smooth side-surfaces. The material is a pressure vessel steel 20MnMoNi55. The cohesive zone parameters are determined by fitting the simulated crack extensions near the midsection to the experimental data. The purpose of the study is to understand the relationship between the cohesive zone parameters and the crack tip stress triaxiality. The results show that for the same cohesive zone parameters the crack tip triaxiality near the midsection is lower in DENT specimens than in CT specimens. When the separation energy is set constant for CT and DENT specimens, the cohesive strength for the DENT specimens should be significantly lower than that for the CT specimens in order to make the simulated crack extensions near the midsection fit to the experimental data. Near the midsection, the cohesive strength and crack tip triaxiality influence each other: the specimen with a higher stress triaxiality has a higher cohesive strength; an increase of cohesive strength results in an increase of the crack tip triaxiality.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. G.I. Barenblatt · Advances of Applied Mechanics · 1962 · 7 · 5510.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-2 ↗
2. W. Brocks · ASTM STP · 1995 · 1244 · 209
3. C.R. Chen · International Journal of Fracture · 2003 · 120 · 51710.1023/A:1025426121928 ↗
4. Chen, C.R., Kolednik, O., Heerens, J. and Fischer, F.D. (2005). Three-dimensional modeling of ductile crack growth: cohesive zone parameters and crack tip triaxiality Engineering Fracture Mechanics. (In press).10.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.01.008 ↗
5. A. Cornec · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · 2003 · 70 · 196310.1016/S0013-7944(03)00134-6 ↗
6. D.C. Dugdale · Journal Mechanics Physics Solids · 1960 · 8 · 10010.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 ↗
7. A.L. Gurson · ASME Journal of Engineering Materials Technology · 1977 · 99 · 210.1115/1.3443401 ↗
8. J.W. Hutchinson · Acta Materialia · 2000 · 47 · 12510.1016/S1359-6454(99)00291-8 ↗
9. A. Needleman · Journal of Applied Mechanics · 1987 · 54 · 52510.1115/1.3173064 ↗
10. A. Needleman · International Journal of Fracture · 1990 · 42 · 2110.1007/BF00018611 ↗
11. Y.A. Roy · International Journal of Fracture · 2001 · 110 · 2110.1023/A:1010816201891 ↗
12. S. Roychowdhury · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · 2002 · 69 · 98310.1016/S0013-7944(01)00113-8 ↗
13. T. Siegmund · International Journal of Fracture · 1999 · 99 · 11610.1023/A:1018300226682 ↗
14. T. Siegmund · ASTM STP · 2000a · 1360 · 139
15. T. Siegmund · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · 2000b · 67 · 13910.1016/S0013-7944(00)00054-0 ↗
16. V. Tvergaard · Journal of Mechanics and Physics Solids · 1992 · 40 · 137710.1016/0022-5096(92)90020-3 ↗
17. V. Tvergaard · International Journal of Solids and Structures · 1996 · 33 · 329710.1016/0020-7683(95)00261-8 ↗
18. V. Tvergaard · International Journal of Solids and Structures · 2004 · 52 · 925
19. L.L. Xia · Journal and Mechanics and Physics Solids · 1995a · 43 · 23310.1016/0022-5096(94)00064-C ↗
20. L. Xia · Journal and Mechanics and Physics Solids · 1995b · 43 · 195310.1016/0022-5096(95)00063-O ↗
21. H. Yuan · ASME Journal of Engineering Materials Technology · 1996 · 118 · 19210.1115/1.2804886 ↗