Determination of interface properties between micron-thick metal film and ceramic substrate using peel test
Source abstract
Abstract
Peel test measurements have been performed to estimate both the interface toughness and the separation strength between copper thin film and Al2O3 substrate with film thicknesses ranging between 1 and 15 μm. An inverse analysis based on the artificial neural network method is adopted to determine the interface parameters. The interface parameters are characterized by the cohesive zone (CZ) model. The results of finite element simulations based on the strain gradient plasticity theory are used to train the artificial neural network. Using both the trained neural network and the experimental measurements for one test result, both the interface toughness and the separation strength are determined. Finally, the finite element predictions adopting the determined interface parameters are performed for the other film thickness cases, and are in agreement with the experimental results.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures · Numerical methods in engineering · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. ABAQUS Inc (2004) ABAQUS Version 6.5 Documentation
2. Asai H, Iwase N and Suga T (2001). Influence of ceramic surface treatment on peel-off strength between aluminum nitride and epoxy-modified polyaminobismaleimide adhesive. IEEE Trans Adv Pack 24: 104–11210.1109/6040.909633 ↗
3. Bundy K, Schlegel U and Rahn B (2000). Improved peel test method for measurement of adhesion to biomaterials. J Mater Sci: Mater in Med 11: 517–521
4. Cotterell B, Hbaieb K and Williams JG (2006). The root rotation in double cantilever beam and peel tests. Mech Mater 38: 571–58410.1016/j.mechmat.2005.11.001 ↗
5. Cui J, Wang R and Sinclair AN (2003). A calibrated finite element model of adhesive peeling. Int J Adhes Adhesives 23: 199–20610.1016/S0143-7496(03)00012-5 ↗
6. Dillard DA, Pocius AV (eds) (2002) The mechanics of adhesion. Elsevier press10.1002/0471238961.0104080516150309.a02 ↗
7. Evans AG, Hutchinson JW and Wei Y (1999). Interface adhesion: effects of plasticity and segregation. Acta Mater 47: 4093–411310.1016/S1359-6454(99)00269-4 ↗
8. Ferracin T, Landis CM and Delannay F (2003). On the determination of the cohesive zone properties of an adhesive layer from the analysis of the wedge-peel test. Int J Solids Struct 40: 2889–290410.1016/S0020-7683(03)00076-3 ↗
9. Fleck NA and Hutchinson JW (1993). A phenomenological theory for strain gradient effects in plasticity. J Mech Phys Solids 41: 1825–185710.1016/0022-5096(93)90072-N ↗
10. Fleck NA and Hutchinson JW (1997). Strain gradient plasticity. Adv Appl Mech 33: 295–36110.1016/S0065-2156(08)70388-0 ↗
11. Fleck NA and Hutchinson JW (2001). A reformulation of strain gradient plasticity. J Mech Phys Solids 49: 2245–227110.1016/S0022-5096(01)00049-7 ↗
12. Hadavinia H, Kawashita L and Kinloch AJ (2006). A numerical analysis of the elastic-plastic peel test. Eng Fract Mech 73: 2324–233510.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.04.022 ↗
13. Huang Y, Qu S and Hwang KC (2004). A conventional theory of mechanism-based strain gradient plasticity. Int J Plast 20: 753–78210.1016/j.ijplas.2003.08.002 ↗
14. Kim KS and Aravas N (1988). Elasto–plastic analysis of the peel test. Int J Solids Struct 24: 417–43510.1016/0020-7683(88)90071-6 ↗
15. Kim J, Kim KS and Kim YH (1989). Mechanical effects of peel adhesion test. J Adhes Sci Tech 3: 175–18710.1163/156856189X00146 ↗
16. Kinloch AJ, Lau CC and Williams JG (1994). The peeling of flexible laminates. Int J Fract 66: 45–7010.1007/BF00012635 ↗
17. MATLAB Inc (2004) MATLAB Version 7.0 Documentation
18. Moidu AK, Sinclair AN and Spelt JK (1995). Analysis of the peel test: prediction of adherend plastic dissipation and extraction of fracture energy in metal-to-metal adhesive joints. J Test Evaluat 23: 241–25310.1520/JTE10421J ↗
19. Moidu AK, Sinclair AN and Spelt JK (1998). On the determination of fracture energy using the peel test. J Test Evaluat 26: 247–25410.1520/JTE11998J ↗
20. Pardoen T, Ferracin T and Landis CM (2005). Constraints effects in adhesive joint fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 53: 1951–198310.1016/j.jmps.2005.04.009 ↗
21. Park IS and Yu J (1998). An X-ray study on the mechanical effects of the peel test in a Cu/Cr/polyimide system. Acta mater 46: 2947–295310.1016/S1359-6454(97)00208-5 ↗
22. Park YB, Park IS and Yu J (1999). Interfacial fracture energy measurement in the Cu/Cr/polyimide system. Mater Sci Eng A 266: 261–26610.1016/S0921-5093(98)01117-4 ↗
23. Shi M, Huang Y and Jiang H (2001). The boundary-layer effect on the crack tip field in mechanism-based strain gradient plasticity. Int J Fract 112: 23–4110.1023/A:1013548131004 ↗
24. Song JY and Yu J (2002). Analysis of the T-peel strength in a Cu/Cr/Polyimide system. Acta Mater 50: 3985–399410.1016/S1359-6454(02)00197-0 ↗
25. Tvergaard V and Hutchinson JW (1993). The influence of plasticity on mixed mode interface fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 41: 1119–113510.1016/0022-5096(93)90057-M ↗
26. Wei Y (2002). Thin layer splitting along the elastic–plastic solid surface. Int J Fract 113: 233–25210.1023/A:1014230227262 ↗
27. Wei Y (2004). Modeling nonlinear peeling of ductile thin films—critical assessment of analytical bending models using FE simulations. Int J Solids Struct 41: 5087–510410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.04.026 ↗
28. Wei Y (2006). A new finite element method for strain gradient theories and applications to fracture analyses. Eur J Mech A/Solids 25: 897–91310.1016/j.euromechsol.2006.03.001 ↗
29. Wei Y and Hutchinson JW (1997). Steady-state crack growth and work of fracture for solids characterized by strain gradient plasticity. J Mech Phys Solids 45: 1253–127310.1016/S0022-5096(97)00018-5 ↗
30. Wei Y and Hutchinson JW (1998). Interface strength, work of adhesion and plasticity in the peel test. Int J Fract 93: 315–33310.1023/A:1007545200315 ↗
31. Wei Y and Xu G (2005). A multiscale model for the ductile fracture of crystalline materials. Int J Plast 21: 2123–214910.1016/j.ijplas.2005.04.003 ↗
32. Wei Y, Qiu X and Hwang KC (2004). Steady-state crack growth and fracture work based on the theory of mechanism-based strain gradient plasticity. Eng Fract Mech 71: 107–12510.1016/S0013-7944(03)00065-1 ↗
33. Wei Y, Zhao H, Cao A (2006) Modeling and measurement of plastic dissipation in micron-thickness thin film peeling, The 12th International Symposium on Plasticity, Halifax, Canada, July 17–22
34. Yang QD and Thouless MD (2001). Mixed-mode fracture analyses of plastically-deforming adhesive joints. Int J Fract 110: 175–18710.1023/A:1010869706996 ↗
35. Yang QD, Thouless MD and Ward SM (1999). Numerical simulations of adhesively-bonded beams failing with extensive plastic deformation. J Mech Phys Solids 47: 1337–135310.1016/S0022-5096(98)00101-X ↗
36. Yang QD, Thouless MD and Ward SM (2001). Elastic–plastic mode-II fracture of adhesive joints. Int J Solids Struct 38: 3251–326210.1016/S0020-7683(00)00221-3 ↗