journal article·2021-09-23Open access

Engineering high-coherence superconducting qubits

Irfan Siddiqi

Nature Reviews Materials· Volume 6· Issue 10

Abstract

Advances in materials science and engineering have played a central role in the development of classical computers and will undoubtedly be critical in propelling the maturation of quantum information technologies. In approaches to quantum computation based on superconducting circuits, as one goes from bulk materials to functional devices, amorphous films and non-equilibrium excitations — electronic and phononic — are introduced, leading to dissipation and fluctuations that limit the computational power of state-of-the-art qubits and processors. In this Review, the major sources of decoherence in superconducting qubits are identified through an exploration of seminal qubit and resonator experiments. The proposed microscopic mechanisms associated with these imperfections are summarized, and directions for future research are discussed. The trade-offs between simple qubit primitives based on a single Josephson tunnel junction and more complex designs that use additional circuit elements, or new junction modalities, to reduce sensitivity to local noise sources are discussed, particularly in the context of materials optimization strategies for each architecture. Superconducting qubits hold great promise for quantum computing, and recently there have been dramatic improvements in both coherence times and the power of quantum processors. This Review explores how the path forward involves balancing circuit complexity and materials perfection, eliminating defects while designing qubits with engineered noise resilience.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information 10th anniversary edn (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010).
2. Hidary, J. D. Quantum Computing: An Applied Approach (Springer, 2019).10.1007/978-3-030-23922-0 ↗
3. Bell, J. S. & Aspect, A. Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2008).
4. Zurek, W. H. Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical. Phys. Today 44, 36–44 (1991).10.1063/1.881293 ↗
5. Terhal, B. M. Quantum error correction for quantum memories. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 307–346 (2015).10.1103/RevModPhys.87.307 ↗
6. Arute, F. et al. Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature 574, 505–510 (2019).10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5 ↗
7. Devoret, M. H. & Schoelkopf, R. J. Superconducting circuits for quantum information: an outlook. Science 339, 1169–1174 (2013).10.1126/science.1231930 ↗
8. Nakamura, Y., Pashkin, Y. A. & Tsai, J. S. Coherent control of macroscopic quantum states in a single-Cooper-pair box. Nature 398, 786–788 (1999).10.1038/19718 ↗
9. Tinkham, M. Introduction to Superconductivity 2nd edn (Dover, 2004).
10. Martinis, J. M., Devoret, M. H. & Clarke, J. Energy-level quantization in the zero-voltage state of a current-biased Josephson junction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1543–1546 (1985).10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.1543 ↗
11. Martinis, J. M., Devoret, M. H. & Clarke, J. Quantum Josephson junction circuits and the dawn of artificial atoms. Nat. Phys. 16, 234–237 (2020).10.1038/s41567-020-0829-5 ↗
12. Koch, J. et al. Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box. Phys. Rev. A 76, 042319 (2007).10.1103/PhysRevA.76.042319 ↗
13. You, J. Q., Hu, X., Ashhab, S. & Nori, F. Low-decoherence flux qubit. Phys. Rev. B 75, 140515 (2007).10.1103/PhysRevB.75.140515 ↗
14. Duzer, T. V. Principles of Superconductive Devices and Circuits 2nd edn (Prentice Hall, 1998).
15. Golubov, A. A., Kupriyanov, M. Y. & Il’ichev, E. The current-phase relation in Josephson junctions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 411–469 (2004).10.1103/RevModPhys.76.411 ↗
16. Makhlin, Y., Schön, G. & Shnirman, A. Quantum-state engineering with Josephson-junction devices. Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 357–400 (2001).10.1103/RevModPhys.73.357 ↗
17. Wendin, G. & Shumeiko, V. S. Quantum bits with Josephson junctions (review article). Low Temp. Phys. 33, 724–744 (2007).10.1063/1.2780165 ↗
18. Kjaergaard, M. et al. Superconducting qubits: current state of play. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 11, 369–395 (2020).10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031119-050605 ↗
19. Krantz, P. et al. A quantum engineers guide to superconducting qubits. Appl. Phys. Rev. 6, 021318 (2019).10.1063/1.5089550 ↗
20. Wendin, G. Quantum information processing with superconducting circuits: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 106001 (2017).10.1088/1361-6633/aa7e1a ↗
21. Kockum, A. F. & Nori, F. in Fundamentals and Frontiers of the Josephson Effect (ed. Tafuri, F.) 703–741 (Springer, 2019).10.1007/978-3-030-20726-7_17 ↗
22. Wang, C. et al. Surface participation and dielectric loss in superconducting qubits. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 162601 (2015).10.1063/1.4934486 ↗
23. Córcoles, A. D. et al. Protecting superconducting qubits from radiation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 181906 (2011).10.1063/1.3658630 ↗
24. Gambetta, J. M. et al. Investigating surface loss effects in superconducting transmon qubits. IEEE Trans. Appl. Superconductivity 27, 1–5 (2017).10.1109/TASC.2016.2629670 ↗
25. Douçot, B. & Ioffe, L. B. Physical implementation of protected qubits. Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 072001 (2012).10.1088/0034-4885/75/7/072001 ↗
26. Esteve, D., Devoret, M. H. & Martinis, J. M. Effect of an arbitrary dissipative circuit on the quantum energy levels and tunneling of a Josephson junction. Phys. Rev. B 34, 158–163 (1986).10.1103/PhysRevB.34.158 ↗
27. Oliver, W. D. & Welander, P. B. Materials in superconducting quantum bits. MRS Bull. 38, 816–825 (2013).10.1557/mrs.2013.229 ↗
28. Müller, C., Cole, J. H. & Lisenfeld, J. Towards understanding two-level-systems in amorphous solids: insights from quantum circuits. Rep. Prog. Phys. 82, 124501 (2019).10.1088/1361-6633/ab3a7e ↗
29. Arutyunov, K. Y. et al. Relaxation of nonequilibrium quasiparticles in mesoscopic size superconductors. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 30, 343001 (2018).10.1088/1361-648X/aad3ea ↗
30. Glazman, L. I. & Catelani, G. Bogoliubov quasiparticles in superconducting qubits. SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.31 (2021).10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.31 ↗
31. Devoret, M., Huard, B., Schoelkopf, R. & Cugliandolo, L. F. (eds) Quantum Machines: Measurement and Control of Engineered Quantum Systems Vol. 96 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2014).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199681181.001.0001 ↗
32. Gokhale, P. et al. Extending the frontier of quantum computers with qutrits. IEEE Micro 40, 64–72 (2020).10.1109/MM.2020.2985976 ↗
33. Morvan, A. et al. Qutrit randomized benchmarking. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 210504 (2021).10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.210504 ↗
34. Kreikebaum, J. M., O’Brien, K. P., Morvan, A. & Siddiqi, I. Improving wafer-scale Josephson junction resistance variation in superconducting quantum coherent circuits. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 33, 06LT02 (2020).10.1088/1361-6668/ab8617 ↗
35. Martinis, J. M., Nam, S., Aumentado, J. & Urbina, C. Rabi oscillations in a large Josephson-junction qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 117901 (2002).10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.117901 ↗
36. Steffen, M. et al. State tomography of capacitively shunted phase qubits with high fidelity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 050502 (2006).10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.050502 ↗
37. Paik, H. et al. Observation of high coherence in Josephson junction qubits measured in a three-dimensional circuit QED architecture. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 240501 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.240501 ↗
38. Mooij, J. E. et al. Josephson persistent-current qubit. Science 285, 1036–1039 (1999).10.1126/science.285.5430.1036 ↗
39. Manucharyan, V. E., Koch, J., Glazman, L. I. & Devoret, M. H. Fluxonium: single Cooper-pair circuit free of charge offsets. Science 326, 113–116 (2009).10.1126/science.1175552 ↗
40. Pop, I. M. et al. Coherent suppression of electromagnetic dissipation due to superconducting quasiparticles. Nature 508, 369–372 (2014).10.1038/nature13017 ↗
41. Nguyen, L. B. et al. High-coherence fluxonium qubit. Phys. Rev. X 9, 041041 (2019).
42. Earnest, N. et al. Realization of a Λ system with metastable states of a capacitively shunted fluxonium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 150504 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.150504 ↗
43. Wallraff, A. et al. Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics. Nature 431, 162–167 (2004).10.1038/nature02851 ↗
44. Göppl, M. et al. Coplanar waveguide resonators for circuit quantum electrodynamics. J. Appl. Phys. 104, 113904 (2008).10.1063/1.3010859 ↗
45. Blais, A., Huang, R.-S., Wallraff, A., Girvin, S. M. & Schoelkopf, R. J. Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: an architecture for quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 69, 062320 (2004).10.1103/PhysRevA.69.062320 ↗
46. Mirrahimi, M. et al. Dynamically protected cat-qubits: a new paradigm for universal quantum computation. N. J. Phys. 16, 045014 (2014).10.1088/1367-2630/16/4/045014 ↗
47. Rosenberg, D. et al. 3D integrated superconducting qubits. npj Quantum Inf. 3, 42 (2017).10.1038/s41534-017-0044-0 ↗
48. Brecht, T. et al. Demonstration of superconducting micromachined cavities. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 192603 (2015).10.1063/1.4935541 ↗
49. Minev, Z. K. et al. Planar multilayer circuit quantum electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. Appl. 5, 044021 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevApplied.5.044021 ↗
50. O’Connell, A. D. et al. Microwave dielectric loss at single photon energies and millikelvin temperatures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 112903 (2008).10.1063/1.2898887 ↗
51. Kaiser, C. et al. Measurement of dielectric losses in amorphous thin films at gigahertz frequencies using superconducting resonators. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 23, 075008 (2010).10.1088/0953-2048/23/7/075008 ↗
52. Sarabi, B., Ramanayaka, A. N., Burin, A. L., Wellstood, F. C. & Osborn, K. D. Projected dipole moments of individual two-level defects extracted using circuit quantum electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 167002 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.167002 ↗
53. Pappas, D. P., Vissers, M. R., Wisbey, D. S., Kline, J. S. & Gao, J. Two level system loss in superconducting microwave resonators. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 21, 871–874 (2011).10.1109/TASC.2010.2097578 ↗
54. Faoro, L. & Ioffe, L. B. Internal loss of superconducting resonators induced by interacting two-level systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 157005 (2012).10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.157005 ↗
55. Faoro, L. & Ioffe, L. B. Interacting tunneling model for two-level systems in amorphous materials and its predictions for their dephasing and noise in superconducting microresonators. Phys. Rev. B 91, 014201 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.91.014201 ↗
56. Barends, R. et al. Minimizing quasiparticle generation from stray infrared light in superconducting quantum circuits. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 113507 (2011).10.1063/1.3638063 ↗
57. Vepsäläinen, A. P. et al. Impact of ionizing radiation on superconducting qubit coherence. Nature 584, 551–556 (2020).10.1038/s41586-020-2619-8 ↗
58. Cohen-Tannoudji, C., Dupont-Roc, J. & Grynberg, G. Atom–Photon Interactions: Basic Processes and Applications (Wiley, 1992).10.1063/1.2809840 ↗
59. Anderson, P. W., Halperin, B. I. & Varma, C. M. Anomalous low-temperature thermal properties of glasses and spin glasses. Phil. Mag. 25, 1–9 (1972).10.1080/14786437208229210 ↗
60. Phillips, W. A. Two-level states in glasses. Rep. Prog. Phys. 50, 1657–1708 (1987).10.1088/0034-4885/50/12/003 ↗
61. Phillips, W. A. Tunneling states in amorphous solids. J. Low Temp. Phys. 7, 351–360 (1972).10.1007/BF00660072 ↗
62. Dekker, H. Quantum mechanical barrier problems: III. Dissipative tunnelling at finite temperatures for the weakly biased oscillator. Phys. A 146, 396–403 (1987).10.1016/0378-4371(87)90276-7 ↗
63. Halataei, S. M. H. & Leggett, A. J. Tunnel splitting in asymmetric double well potentials: an improved WKB calculation (Univ. Illinois, 2017).
64. Ku, L.-C. & Yu, C. C. Decoherence of a Josephson qubit due to coupling to two-level systems. Phys. Rev. B 72, 024526 (2005).10.1103/PhysRevB.72.024526 ↗
65. Steffen, M., Sandberg, M. & Srinivasan, S. Recent research trends for high coherence quantum circuits. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 30, 030301 (2017).10.1088/1361-6668/aa55a2 ↗
66. Burnett, J. J. et al. Decoherence benchmarking of superconducting qubits. npj Quantum Inf. 5, 54 (2019).10.1038/s41534-019-0168-5 ↗
67. Shnirman, A., Schön, G., Martin, I. & Makhlin, Y. Low- and high-frequency noise from coherent two-level systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 127002 (2005).10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.127002 ↗
68. Simmonds, R. W. et al. Decoherence in Josephson phase qubits from junction resonators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 077003 (2004).10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.077003 ↗
69. Martinis, J. M. et al. Decoherence in Josephson qubits from dielectric loss. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 210503 (2005).10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.210503 ↗
70. Simmonds, R. W. et al. Coherent interactions between phase qubits, cavities, and TLS defects. Quantum Inf. Process. 8, 117–131 (2009).10.1007/s11128-009-0095-z ↗
71. Gunnarsson, D. et al. Dielectric losses in multi-layer Josephson junction qubits. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 26, 085010 (2013).10.1088/0953-2048/26/8/085010 ↗
72. Palomaki, T. A. et al. Multilevel spectroscopy of two-level systems coupled to a dc SQUID phase qubit. Phys. Rev. B 81, 144503 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevB.81.144503 ↗
73. Barends, R. et al. Coherent Josephson qubit suitable for scalable quantum integrated circuits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 080502 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.080502 ↗
74. Paladino, E., Galperin, Y. M., Falci, G. & Altshuler, B. L. 1/f noise: implications for solid-state quantum information. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 361–418 (2014).10.1103/RevModPhys.86.361 ↗
75. Müller, C., Lisenfeld, J., Shnirman, A. & Poletto, S. Interacting two-level defects as sources of fluctuating high-frequency noise in superconducting circuits. Phys. Rev. B 92, 035442 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.92.035442 ↗
76. Schlör, S. et al. Correlating decoherence in transmon qubits: low frequency noise by single fluctuators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 190502 (2019).10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.190502 ↗
77. Klimov, P. V. et al. Fluctuations of energy-relaxation times in superconducting qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 090502 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.090502 ↗
78. Grabovskij, G. J., Peichl, T., Lisenfeld, J., Weiss, G. & Ustinov, A. V. Strain tuning of individual atomic tunneling systems detected by a superconducting qubit. Science 338, 232–234 (2012).10.1126/science.1226487 ↗
79. Lisenfeld, J. et al. Electric field spectroscopy of material defects in transmon qubits. npj Quantum Inf. 5, 105 (2019).10.1038/s41534-019-0224-1 ↗
80. Lisenfeld, J. et al. Observation of directly interacting coherent two-level systems in an amorphous material. Nat. Commun. 6, 6182 (2015).10.1038/ncomms7182 ↗
81. Zmuidzinas, J. Superconducting microresonators: physics and applications. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 3, 169–214 (2012).10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-020911-125022 ↗
82. McRae, C. R. H. et al. Materials loss measurements using superconducting microwave resonators. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 91, 91101 (2020).10.1063/5.0017378 ↗
83. Day, P. K., LeDuc, H. G., Mazin, B. A., Vayonakis, A. & Zmuidzinas, J. A broadband superconducting detector suitable for use in large arrays. Nature 425, 817–821 (2003).10.1038/nature02037 ↗
84. Gao, J. The Physics of Superconducting Microwave Resonators. Thesis, Calif. Inst. Technol. (2008).
85. Burnett, J., Bengtsson, A., Niepce, D. & Bylander, J. Noise and loss of superconducting aluminium resonators at single photon energies. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 969, 012131 (2018).10.1088/1742-6596/969/1/012131 ↗
86. Wang, H. et al. Improving the coherence time of superconducting coplanar resonators. Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 233508 (2009).10.1063/1.3273372 ↗
87. Khalil, M. S. et al. Landau–Zener population control and dipole measurement of a two-level-system bath. Phys. Rev. B 90, 100201 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevB.90.100201 ↗
88. Paik, H. & Osborn, K. D. Reducing quantum-regime dielectric loss of silicon nitride for superconducting quantum circuits. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 072505 (2010).10.1063/1.3309703 ↗
89. Altoé, M. V. P. et al. Localization and reduction of superconducting quantum coherent circuit losses. Preprint at arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.07604 (2020).
90. Verjauw, J. et al. Investigation of microwave loss induced by oxide regrowth in high-Q niobium resonators. Phys. Rev. Appl. 16, 014018 (2021).10.1103/PhysRevApplied.16.014018 ↗
91. Noroozian, O. et al. Two-level system noise reduction for microwave kinetic inductance detectors. AIP Conf. Proc. 1185, 148–151 (2009).10.1063/1.3292302 ↗
92. Gao, J. et al. Power dependence of phase noise in microwave kinetic inductance detectors. Proc. SPIE 6275, 64–71 (2006).10.1117/12.672590 ↗
93. de Graaf, S. E. et al. Two-level systems in superconducting quantum devices due to trapped quasiparticles. Sci. Adv. 6, eabc5055 (2020).10.1126/sciadv.abc5055 ↗
94. Place, A. P. M. et al. New material platform for superconducting transmon qubits with coherence times exceeding 0.3 milliseconds. Nat. Commun. 12, 1779 (2020).10.1038/s41467-021-22030-5 ↗
95. Romanenko, A. et al. Three-dimensional superconducting resonators at T < 20 mK with photon lifetimes up to τ = 2 s. Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 034032 (2020).10.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.034032 ↗
96. de Visser, P. J. et al. Number fluctuations of sparse quasiparticles in a superconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 167004 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.167004 ↗
97. Martinis, J. M. Saving superconducting quantum processors from decay and correlated errors generated by gamma and cosmic rays. npj Quantum Inf. 7, 90 (2021).10.1038/s41534-021-00431-0 ↗
98. Mattis, D. C. & Bardeen, J. Theory of the anomalous skin effect in normal and superconducting metals. Phys. Rev. 111, 412–417 (1958).10.1103/PhysRev.111.412 ↗
99. Annett, J. F. & Kruchinin, S. (eds) New Trends in Superconductivity (Kluwer, 2002).10.1007/978-94-010-0544-9 ↗
100. Martinis, J. M., Ansmann, M. & Aumentado, J. Energy decay in superconducting Josephson-junction qubits from nonequilibrium quasiparticle excitations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 097002 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.097002 ↗