journal article·2026-03

A cohesive phase-field method for seamlessly modelling intergranular and transgranular fracture in polycrystalline materials

M. Kumar, H. Hirshikesh, E. Rossi, E. Salvati

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 250· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Due to their microstructural inhomogeneity, predicting damage and fracture mechanisms in polycrystalline materials at the micron scale remains challenging. Therefore, accounting for microstructural features involved in damaging processes is of paramount importance in addressing this critical problem. This study proposes a novel cohesive phase-field approach to seamlessly simulate intergranular and transgranular failure within a realistic polycrystalline microstructure, capable of accounting for grain boundary cohesive properties. It relies on complete control of local material properties within the considered solid domain while exploiting the flexibility of the cohesive phase-field formulation. To exploit the model’s capabilities, an image segmentation technique was developed, enabling realistic microstructure modelling. This technique serves as input for Finite Element-based simulations in an open-source FEniCS library integrated into GPFniCS, a code previously proposed by the authors. Two case studies demonstrate the model’s capabilities: a one-dimensional problem with a cohesive interface and a two-dimensional cantilever bending scenario in polycrystalline material. The proposed approach is also validated with the commercial cohesive zone method (CZM). The proposed model opens new avenues for designing and optimising polycrystalline materials with unprecedented fracture toughness, while also revealing the failure mechanisms at this critical scale in currently available materials.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Composite Material Mechanics · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (69)

Show source-provided references
1. Alessi R, Vidoli S, De Lorenzis L (2018) A phenomenological approach to fatigue with a variational phase-field model: the one-dimensional case. Eng Fract Mech 190:53–7310.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.11.036 ↗
2. Ambati M, Gerasimov T, De Lorenzis L (2015) Phase-field modeling of ductile fracture. Comput Mech 55:1017–104010.1007/s00466-015-1151-4 ↗
3. Benedetti I, Aliabadi MH (2013a) A three-dimensional cohesive-frictional grain-boundary micromechanical model for intergranular degradation and failure in polycrystalline materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 265:36–6210.1016/j.cma.2013.05.023 ↗
4. Benedetti I, Aliabadi MH (2013b) A three-dimensional grain boundary formulation for microstructural modeling of polycrystalline materials. Comput Mater Sci 67:249–26010.1016/j.commatsci.2012.08.006 ↗
5. Borden MJ, Hughes TJR, Landis CM, Verhoosel CV (2014) A higher-order phase-field model for brittle fracture: formulation and analysis within the isogeometric analysis framework. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 273:100–11810.1016/j.cma.2014.01.016 ↗
6. Borden MJ, Verhoosel CV, Scott MA, Hughes TJR, Landis CM (2012) A phase-field description of dynamic brittle fracture. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 217:77–9510.1016/j.cma.2012.01.008 ↗
7. Bourdin B (2007) Numerical implementation of the variational formulation for quasi-static brittle fracture. Interfaces Free Bound 9(3):411–43010.4171/ifb/171 ↗
8. Bourdin B, Francfort GA, Marigo JJ (2008) The variational approach to fracture. J Elast 91:5–14810.1007/s10659-007-9107-3 ↗
9. Carrara P, Ambati M, Alessi R, De Lorenzis L (2020) A framework to model the fatigue behavior of brittle materials based on a variational phase-field approach. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 361:11273110.1016/j.cma.2019.112731 ↗
10. Chaboche JL, Feyel F, Monerie Y (2001) Interface debonding models: a viscous regularization with a limited rate dependency. Int J Solids Struct 38(18):3127–316010.1016/S0020-7683(00)00053-6 ↗
11. Crocker AG, Flewitt PEJ, Smith GE (2005) Computational modelling of fracture in polycrystalline materials. Int Mater Rev 50(2):99–12510.1179/174328005X14285 ↗
12. Csati Z, Witz JF, Magnier V, El Bartali A, Limodin N, Najjar D (2021) Cristalx: facilitating simulations for experimentally obtained grain-based microstructures. SoftwareX 14:10066910.1016/j.softx.2021.100669 ↗
13. Espinosa HD, Zavattieri PD (2003a) A grain level model for the study of failure initiation and evolution in polycrystalline brittle materials. Part I: Theory and numerical implementation. Mech Mater 35(3–6):333–36410.1016/S0167-6636(02)00285-5 ↗
14. Espinosa HD, Zavattieri PD (2003b) A grain level model for the study of failure initiation and evolution in polycrystalline brittle materials. Part II: Numerical examples. Mech Mater 35(3–6):365–39410.1016/S0167-6636(02)00287-9 ↗
15. Francfort GA, Marigo JJ (1998) Revisiting brittle fracture as an energy minimization problem. J Mech Phys Solids 46(8):1319–134210.1016/S0022-5096(98)00034-9 ↗
16. Frodal BH, Thomesen S, Børvik T, Hopperstad OS (2021) On the coupling of damage and single crystal plasticity for ductile polycrystalline materials. Int J Plast 142:10299610.1016/j.ijplas.2021.102996 ↗
17. Gao Y, Bower A (2004) A simple technique for avoiding convergence problems in finite element simulations of crack nucleation and growth on cohesive interfaces. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 12(3):45310.1088/0965-0393/12/3/007 ↗
18. Griffith AA (1921) The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Eng Sci 221(582–593):163–198
19. Gulizzi V, Rycroft CH, Benedetti I (2018) Modelling intergranular and transgranular micro-cracking in polycrystalline materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 329:168–19410.1016/j.cma.2017.10.005 ↗
20. Hansen-Dörr AC, de Borst R, Hennig P, Kästner M (2019) Phase-field modelling of interface failure in brittle materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 346:25–4210.1016/j.cma.2018.11.020 ↗
21. Hirshikesh H, Alankar A (2022) On the interplay of elastic anisotropy and fracture toughness anisotropy in fracture of single and multiphase polycrystals. Eng Fract Mech 273:10869610.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108696 ↗
22. Kamaya M, Kawamura Y, Kitamura T (2007) Three-dimensional local stress analysis on grain boundaries in polycrystalline material. Int J Solids Struct 44(10):3267–327710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.09.020 ↗
23. Kristensen PK, Niordson CF, Martínez-Pañeda E (2020) A phase field model for elastic-gradient-plastic solids undergoing hydrogen embrittlement. J Mech Phys Solids 143:10409310.1016/j.jmps.2020.104093 ↗
24. Kuhn C, Müller R (2010) A continuum phase field model for fracture. Eng Fract Mech 77(18):3625–363410.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.08.009 ↗
25. Kumar M, Ahmad S, Singh IV, Rao AV, Kumar J, Kumar V (2018a) Experimental and numerical studies to estimate fatigue crack growth behavior of Ni-based super alloy. Theor Appl Fract Mech 96:604–61610.1016/j.tafmec.2018.07.002 ↗
26. Kumar M, Alessi R, Salvati E (2023) GPFnics: a generalised phase field method to model fracture. SoftwareX 24:10159410.1016/j.softx.2023.101594 ↗
27. Kumar M, Bhuwal AS, Singh IV, Mishra BK, Ahmad S, Rao AV, Kumar V (2017) Nonlinear fatigue crack growth simulations using J-integral decomposition and XFEM. Procedia Eng 173:1209–121410.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.126 ↗
28. Kumar M, Pandey VB, Singh IV, Mishra BK, Ahmad S, Rao AV, Kumar V (2019a) A numerical study of creep crack growth in an aero-engine turbine disc using XFEM. Procedia Struct Integr 14:839–84810.1016/j.prostr.2019.07.062 ↗
29. Kumar M, Salvati E (2023) Advanced numerical methods for fracture assessment. Compr Mech Mater 1:273–302
30. Kumar M, Singh IV (2020) Numerical investigation of creep crack growth in plastically graded materials using C (t) and XFEM. Eng Fract Mech 226:10682010.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106820 ↗
31. Kumar M, Singh IV, Mishra BK (2019b) Fatigue crack growth simulations of plastically graded materials using XFEM and J-integral decomposition approach. Eng Fract Mech 216:10647010.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.05.002 ↗
32. Kumar M, Singh IV, Mishra BK, Ahmad S, Rao AV, Kumar V (2018b) Mixed mode crack growth in elasto-plastic-creeping solids using XFEM. Eng Fract Mech 199:489–51710.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.05.014 ↗
33. Li M, Xu T (2011) Topological and atomic scale characterization of grain boundary networks in polycrystalline and nanocrystalline materials. Prog Mater Sci 56(6):864–89910.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.01.011 ↗
34. Lorentz E, Andrieux S (1999) A variational formulation for nonlocal damage models. Int J Plast 15(2):119–13810.1016/S0749-6419(98)00057-6 ↗
35. Lynch S (2019) A review of underlying reasons for intergranular cracking for a variety of failure modes and materials and examples of case histories. Eng Fail Anal 100:329–35010.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.02.027 ↗
36. Marigo JJ (1989) Constitutive relations in plasticity, damage and fracture mechanics based on a work property. Nucl Eng des 114(3):249–27210.1016/0029-5493(89)90105-2 ↗
37. Marigo JJ, Maurini C, Pham K (2016) An overview of the modelling of fracture by gradient damage models. Meccanica 51:3107–312810.1007/s11012-016-0538-4 ↗
38. Martínez-Pañeda E, Golahmar A, Niordson CF (2018) A phase field formulation for hydrogen assisted cracking. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 342:742–76110.1016/j.cma.2018.07.021 ↗
39. Mesgarnejad A, Bourdin B, Khonsari MM (2013) A variational approach to the fracture of brittle thin films subject to out-of-plane loading. J Mech Phys Solids 61(11):2360–237910.1016/j.jmps.2013.05.001 ↗
40. Miehe C, Hofacker M, Welschinger F (2010a) A phase field model for rate-independent crack propagation: robust algorithmic implementation based on operator splits. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(45–48):2765–277810.1016/j.cma.2010.04.011 ↗
41. Miehe C, Mauthe S (2016) Phase field modeling of fracture in multi-physics problems. Part III. Crack driving forces in hydro-poro-elasticity and hydraulic fracturing of fluid-saturated porous media. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 304:619–65510.1016/j.cma.2015.09.021 ↗
42. Miehe C, Welschinger F, Hofacker M (2010b) Thermodynamically consistent phase-field models of fracture: variational principles and multi-field FE implementations. Int J Numer Methods Eng 83(10):1273–131110.1002/nme.2861 ↗
43. Msekh MA, Sargado JM, Jamshidian M, Areias PM, Rabczuk T (2015) Abaqus implementation of phase-field model for brittle fracture. Comput Mater Sci 96:472–48410.1016/j.commatsci.2014.05.071 ↗
44. Musienko A, Cailletaud G (2009) Simulation of inter-and transgranular crack propagation in polycrystalline aggregates due to stress corrosion cracking. Acta Mater 57(13):3840–385510.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.035 ↗
45. Nguyen TT, Réthoré J, Yvonnet J, Baietto MC (2017) Multi-phase-field modeling of anisotropic crack propagation for polycrystalline materials. Comput Mech 60:289–31410.1007/s00466-017-1409-0 ↗
46. Nguyen TT, Yvonnet J, Bornert M, Chateau C (2016) Initiation and propagation of complex 3D networks of cracks in heterogeneous quasi-brittle materials: direct comparison between in situ testing-microCT experiments and phase field simulations. J Mech Phys Solids 95:320–35010.1016/j.jmps.2016.06.004 ↗
47. Nguyen VP, Wu JY (2018) Modeling dynamic fracture of solids with a phase-field regularized cohesive zone model. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 340:1000–102210.1016/j.cma.2018.06.015 ↗
48. Paggi M, Reinoso J (2017) Revisiting the problem of a crack impinging on an interface: a modeling framework for the interaction between the phase field approach for brittle fracture and the interface cohesive zone model. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 321:145–17210.1016/j.cma.2017.04.004 ↗
49. Patil RU, Mishra BK, Singh IV (2018) An adaptive multiscale phase field method for brittle fracture. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 329:254–28810.1016/j.cma.2017.09.021 ↗
50. Pham K, Marigo JJ, Maurini C (2011) The issues of the uniqueness and the stability of the homogeneous response in uniaxial tests with gradient damage models. J Mech Phys Solids 59(6):1163–119010.1016/j.jmps.2011.03.010 ↗
51. Reid ACE, Langer SA, Lua RC, Coffman VR, Haan SI, García RE (2008) Image-based finite element mesh construction for material microstructures. Comput Mater Sci 43(4):989–99910.1016/j.commatsci.2008.02.016 ↗
52. Salvati E (2021) Residual stress as a fracture toughening mechanism: a Phase-Field study on a brittle material. Theor Appl Fract Mech 114:10302110.1016/j.tafmec.2021.103021 ↗
53. Salvati E, Menegatti F, Kumar M, Pelegatti M, Tognan A (2021) On the significance of diffuse crack width self-evolution in the phase-field model for residually stressed brittle materials. Mater Des Process Commun 3(5):e261
54. Sénac C (2024) Mechanisms and micromechanics of intergranular ductile fracture. Int J Solids Struct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2024.11295110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2024.112951 ↗
55. Sepasdar R, Shakiba M (2020) Overcoming the convergence difficulty of cohesive zone models through a Newton-Raphson modification technique. Eng Fract Mech 233:10704610.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107046 ↗
56. Simonovski I, Cizelj L (2015) Cohesive zone modeling of intergranular cracking in polycrystalline aggregates. Nucl Eng des 283:139–14710.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.09.041 ↗
57. Soille P (1999) Morphological image analysis: principles and applications, vol 2. Springer, New York10.1007/978-3-662-03939-7 ↗
58. Tanné E, Li T, Bourdin B, Marigo JJ, Maurini C (2018) Crack nucleation in variational phase-field models of brittle fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 110:80–9910.1016/j.jmps.2017.09.006 ↗
59. Tomar V, Zhai J, Zhou M (2004) Bounds for element size in a variable stiffness cohesive finite element model. Int J Numer Methods Eng 61(11):1894–192010.1002/nme.1138 ↗
60. Trémeau A, Colantoni P (2000) Regions adjacency graph applied to color image segmentation. IEEE Trans Image Process 9(4):735–74410.1109/83.841950 ↗
61. Vedaldi A, Soatto S (2008) Quick shift and kernel methods for mode seeking. Paper presented at the Computer Vision–ECCV 2008: 10th European Conference on Computer Vision, Marseille, France, October 12–18, 2008, Proceedings, Part IV 1010.1007/978-3-540-88693-8_52 ↗
62. Vicentini F, Carrara P, De Lorenzis L (2023) Phase-field modeling of brittle fracture in heterogeneous bars. Eur J Mech A Solids 97:10482610.1016/j.euromechsol.2022.104826 ↗
63. Wick T (2017) Modified Newton methods for solving fully monolithic phase-field quasi-static brittle fracture propagation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 325:577–61110.1016/j.cma.2017.07.026 ↗
64. Wu JY (2017) A unified phase-field theory for the mechanics of damage and quasi-brittle failure. J Mech Phys Solids 103:72–9910.1016/j.jmps.2017.03.015 ↗
65. Wu JY (2018) A geometrically regularized gradient-damage model with energetic equivalence. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 328:612–63710.1016/j.cma.2017.09.027 ↗
66. Xiao SP, Belytschko T (2004) A bridging domain method for coupling continua with molecular dynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193(17–20):1645–166910.1016/j.cma.2003.12.053 ↗
67. You T, Zhu QZ, Li PF, Shao JF (2020) Incorporation of tension-compression asymmetry into plastic damage phase-field modeling of quasi brittle geomaterials. Int J Plast 124:71–9510.1016/j.ijplas.2019.08.003 ↗
68. Zhou S, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T (2019) Phase-field modeling of fluid-driven dynamic cracking in porous media. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 350:169–19810.1016/j.cma.2019.03.001 ↗
69. Zolesi C, Maurini C (2024) Stability and crack nucleation in variational phase-field models of fracture: effects of length-scales and stress multi-axiality. J Mech Phys Solids 192:10580210.1016/j.jmps.2024.105802 ↗