journal article·2024-12

Enhanced solid element model with embedded strong discontinuity for representation of mesoscale quasi-brittle failure

Matej Šodan, Andjelka Stanić, Mijo Nikolić

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 248· Issue 1-3
Publisher page

Abstract

This article presents a novel two-dimensional quadrilateral solid finite element model, enhanced by incompatible modes and embedded strong discontinuity for simulation of localized failure in quasi-brittle heterogeneous multi-phase materials. The focus of interest lies in the development of discontinuities and cracks induced by both tensile and compressive loads, considering mesoscale material constituents and very complex meshes. Multiple cracks are initiated within elements using local Gauss-point criteria for crack initiation. Rankine and Maximum shear stress criteria control the crack initiation, location, and orientation depending solely on the stress state within the finite element. The model identifies distinct clusters of cracked elements and merges them into continuous cracks. A tracking algorithm ensures crack continuity, eliminating spurious cracks ahead of the crack tip to prevent crack arrest and stress locking. This approach ensures the formation of various types of cracks within the constituents of composite materials and their spontaneous coalescence forming the final failure mechanisms. The constitutive model for the crack representation is the damage softening model, which accounts for opening and sliding behavior. The efficacy of the proposed model is demonstrated through numerical simulations of heterogeneous 3-phase and 4-phase composites subjected to both tensile and compressive load cases.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Geophysical Methods and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Benkemoun N, Roubin E, Colliat J-B (2017) Fe design for the numerical modelling of failure induced by differential straining in meso-scale concrete: Algorithmic implementation based on operator split method. Finite Elem Anal Des 137:11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2017.08.00310.1016/j.finel.2017.08.003 ↗
2. Bindel D (2011) Matfeap: Matlab interfaces to the feap finite element code. MATFEAP manual. https://www.cs.cornell.edu/ bindel//blurbs/matfeap.html
3. Brancherie D, Ibrahimbegovic A (2009) Novel anisotropic continuum-discrete damage model capable of representing localized failure of massive structures: Part i: theoretical formulation and numerical implementation. Eng Comput 26:100–127. https://doi.org/10.1108/0264440091092482510.1108/02644400910924825 ↗
4. Carija J, Nikolic M, Ibrahimbegovic A, Nikolic Z (2020) Discrete softening-damage model for fracture process representation with embedded strong discontinuities. Eng Fract Mech 236:107211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.10721110.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107211 ↗
5. Cusatis G, Pelessone D, Mencarelli A (2011) Lattice discrete particle model (ldpm) for failure behavior of concrete i: Theory. Cement Concrete Compos 33(9):881–89010.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.02.011 ↗
6. da Costa DD, Alfaiate J, Sluys L, Areias P, Júlio E (2013) An embedded formulation with conforming finite elements to capture strong discontinuities. Int J Numer Methods Eng 93(2):224–244. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.439310.1002/nme.4393 ↗
7. Dias I, Oliver J, Lloberas-Valls O (2018) Strain-injection and crack-path field techniques for 3d crack-propagation modelling in quasi-brittle materials. Int J Fract 212:67–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-018-0293-810.1007/s10704-018-0293-8 ↗
8. Du C, Huang W, Ghaemian M, Jiang S, Zhao Z (2023) New nonlocal multiscale damage model for modelling damage and cracking in quasi-brittle materials. Eng Fract Mech 277:108927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.10892710.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108927 ↗
9. Dujc J, Brank B, Ibrahimbegovic A (2010) Quadrilateral finite element with embedded strong discontinuity for failure analysis of solids. Comput Model Eng Sci 69:223–260. https://doi.org/10.3970/cmes.2010.069.22310.3970/cmes.2010.069.223 ↗
10. Gimenes M, Rodrigues EA, Bitencourt LA, Manzoli OL (2023) 2d mesoscale modeling of compressive fracture in concrete using a mesh fragmentation technique. Int J Solids Struct 260–261:112031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.11203110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.112031 ↗
11. Grassl P (2023) 3d lattice meso-scale modelling of the effect of lateral compression on tensile fracture processes in concrete. Int J Solids Struct 262–263:112086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.11208610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.112086 ↗
12. Hai L, Li J (2022) Modeling tensile damage and fracture of quasi-brittle materials using stochastic phase-field model. Theor Appl Fract Mech 118:103283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2022.10328310.1016/j.tafmec.2022.103283 ↗
13. Ibrahimbegovic A (2009) Nonlinear solid mechanics. Solid Mechanics and its Applications, 16010.1007/978-90-481-2331-5 ↗
14. Ibrahimbegovic A, Wilson EL (1991) A modified method of incompatible modes. Commun Appl Numer Methods 7:187–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.163007030310.1002/cnm.1630070303 ↗
15. Jirásek M (2000) Comparative study on finite elements with embedded discontinuities. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 188(1):307–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00154-110.1016/S0045-7825(99)00154-1 ↗
16. Karavelić E, Nikolić M, Ibrahimbegovic A, Kurtović A (2019) Concrete meso-scale model with full set of 3d failure modes with random distribution of aggregate and cement phase. part i: Formulation and numerical implementation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 344:1051–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.09.01310.1016/j.cma.2017.09.013 ↗
17. Kim S-M, Abu Al-Rub RK (2011) Meso-scale computational modeling of the plastic-damage response of cementitious composites. Cement Concrete Res 41:339–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.12.00210.1016/j.cemconres.2010.12.002 ↗
18. Linder C, Armero F (2007) Finite elements with embedded strong discontinuities for the modeling of failure in solids. Int J Numer Methods Eng 72:1391–1433. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.204210.1002/nme.2042 ↗
19. Moës N, Belytschko T (2002) Extended finite element method for cohesive crack growth. Eng Fract Mech 69:813–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00128-X10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00128-X ↗
20. Nikolic M, Ibrahimbegovic A, Miscevic P (2015) Brittle and ductile failure of rocks: Embedded discontinuity approach for representing mode i and mode ii failure mechanisms. Int J Numer Methods Eng 102:1507–1526. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.486610.1002/nme.4866 ↗
21. Nikolic M, Karavelić E, Ibrahimbegovic A, Miščević P (2018) Lattice element models and their peculiarities. Arch Comput Methods Eng 25:753–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-017-9210-y10.1007/s11831-017-9210-y ↗
22. Nikolić M, Do XN, Ibrahimbegovic A, Nikolić Z (2018) Crack propagation in dynamics by embedded strong discontinuity approach: Enhanced solid versus discrete lattice model. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 340:480–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.06.01210.1016/j.cma.2018.06.012 ↗
23. Oliver J (1996) Modelling strong discontinuities in solid mechanics via strain softening constitutive equations part 1: Fundamentals. Int J Numer Methods Eng 39(21):3575–360010.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19961115)39:21<3575::AID-NME65>3.0.CO;2-E ↗
24. Oliver J, Huespe A, Sanchez P (2006) A comparative study on finite elements for capturing strong discontinuities: E-fem vs xfem. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:4732–4752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2005.09.02010.1016/j.cma.2005.09.020 ↗
25. Oliver J, Dias I, Huespe A (2014) Crackpath field and strain-injection techniques in computational modeling of propagating material failure. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 274:289–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2014.01.00810.1016/j.cma.2014.01.008 ↗
26. Ortega A, Roubin E, Malecot Y, Daudeville L (2022) A mixed-mode e-fem approach for the study of local fracture processes in heterogeneous quasi-brittle materials. Mater Struct 55:222. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-022-02055-y10.1617/s11527-022-02055-y ↗
27. Pijaudier-Cabot G, Bazant Z (1987) Nonlocal damage theory. J Eng Mech. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1987)113:10(151)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1987)113:10(151) ↗
28. Puccia M, Spada A, Giambanco G (2023) Finite elements with embedded interphases for strain localization in quasi-brittle materials. Eng Fract Mech 277:108956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.10895610.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108956 ↗
29. Qiu W, Ueda T, Fu S, Han Y, Wang J, Ye J (2023) Meso-scale computational modeling of the fracture of concrete with complex shaped aggregates under the self-restraint stress. Compos Struct 303:116267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11626710.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116267 ↗
30. Rizvi Z, Nikolic M, Wuttke F (2019) Lattice element method for simulations of failure in bio-cemented sands. Granular Matter. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-019-0878-610.1007/s10035-019-0878-6 ↗
31. Saloustros S, Pel‘a, L., Cervera, M., & Roca, P. (2017) Finite element modelling of internal and multiple localized cracks. Comput Mech 59:299–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-016-1351-610.1007/s00466-016-1351-6 ↗
32. Schubert E, Sander J, Ester M, Kriegel HP, Xu X (2017) Dbscan revisited, revisited: Why and how you should (still) use dbscan. ACM Trans Database Syst 42(3):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/306833510.1145/3068335 ↗
33. Simo J, Rifai M (1990) A class of mixed assumed strain methods and the method of incompatible modes. Int J Numer Methods Eng 29(8):1595–1638. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.162029080210.1002/nme.1620290802 ↗
34. Simo J, Oliver J, Armero F (1993) An analysis of strong discontinuities induced by strainsoftening in rate-independent inelastic solids. Computational Mechanics 12:277–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0037217310.1007/BF00372173 ↗
35. Smoljanović H, Nikolić Z, Živaljić N (2015) A combined finite-discrete numerical model for analysis of masonry structures. Eng Fract Mech 136:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.02.00610.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.02.006 ↗
36. Smoljanović H, Živaljić N, Nikolić Z, Munjiza A (2018) Numerical analysis of 3d drystone masonry structures by combined finitediscrete element method. Int J Solids Struct 136–137:150–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.12.01210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.12.012 ↗
37. Stanić A, Brank B, Brancherie D (2020) Fracture of quasi-brittle solids by continuum and discrete-crack damage models and embedded discontinuity formulation. Eng Fract Mech 227:106924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.10692410.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.106924 ↗
38. Stanić A, Brank B, Ibrahimbegovic A, Matthies H (2021) Crack propagation simulation without crack tracking algorithm: Embedded discontinuity formulation with incompatible modes. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 386:114090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.11409010.1016/j.cma.2021.114090 ↗
39. Taylor RL (2020) Feap - finite element analysis program. http://projects.ce.berkeley.edu/feap/.
40. Thilakarathna P, Kristombu Baduge K, Mendis P, Vimonsatit V, Lee H (2020) Mesoscale modelling of concrete-a review of geometry generation, placing algorithms, constitutive relations and applications. Eng Fract Mech 231:106974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.10697410.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.106974 ↗
41. Thongraksa A, Jongpradist P, Nanakorn P, Tunsakul J (2023) Shear fracture propagation in quasi-brittle materials by an elementfree galerkin method. Theor Appl Fract Mech 123:103713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2022.10371310.1016/j.tafmec.2022.103713 ↗
42. Zhang Y, Mang HA (2020) Global cracking elements: A novel tool for galerkinbased approaches simulating quasi-brittle fracture. Int J Numer Methods Eng 121(11):2462–2480. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.631510.1002/nme.6315 ↗
43. Zhang Y, Zhuang X (2018) Cracking elements: A self-propagating strong discontinuity embedded approach for quasi-brittle fracture. Finite Elements Anal Design 144:84–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2017.10.00710.1016/j.finel.2017.10.007 ↗
44. Zhang Y, Lackner R, Zeiml M, Mang HA (2015) Strong discontinuity embedded approach with standard sos formulation: Element formulation, energy-based crack-tracking strategy, and validations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 287:335–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2015.02.00110.1016/j.cma.2015.02.001 ↗
45. Zhou R, Song Z, Lu Y (2017) 3d mesoscale finite element modelling of concrete. Comput Struct 192:96–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2017.07.00910.1016/j.compstruc.2017.07.009 ↗