Modeling brittle crack propagation for varying critical load levels: a dynamic phase-field approach
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Brittle materials are known for their violent and unpredictable cracking behavior. A behavior which is dictated by a combination of microscopical material defects and the competition between the potential energy of the system and the surface energy of the material. In this study, we present the implementation of a dynamic fracture phase-field model with a new crack driving force into a commercial finite element (FE) solver and examine its behavior using three different tension-compression splits. After validating the implementation, we use the model to investigate its predictive capacity on quasi-statically loaded L-shaped soda-lime glass specimens with varying critical load levels. The dynamic fracture phase-field model predicted similar crack propagation to what was found in the literature for quasi-static and dynamic validation cases. By varying the critical load level for the L-shaped soda-lime glass specimens using the new crack driving force, the model predicted a positive correlation between the initial crack propagation speed and the critical load level, similar to what was seen in the experiments. However, the predicted crack propagation speed decreased quicker than the experimental crack propagation speed. The tension-compression splits had an impact on the predicted crack propagation paths. Overall, the proposed crack driving force used in the dynamic fracture phase-field model seems to capture the relation between critical load and initial crack propagation speed and thus enables crack predictions for specimens of varying strength.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Rock Mechanics and Modeling
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Ambati M, Gerasimov T, De Lorenzis L (2014) A review on phase-field models of brittle fracture and a new fast hybrid formulation. Comput Mech 55(2):383–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1109-y10.1007/s00466-014-1109-y ↗
2. Amor H, Marigo J-J, Maurini C (2009) Regularized formulation of the variational brittle fracture with unilateral contact: numerical experiments. J Mech Phys Solids 57(8):1209–1229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2009.04.01110.1016/j.jmps.2009.04.011 ↗
3. Balay S, Abhyankar S, Adams MF, Benson S, Brown J, Brune P, Buschelman K, Constantinescu EM, Dalcin L, Dener A, Eijkhout V, Faibussowitsch J, Gropp WD, Hapla V, Isaac T, Jolivet P, Karpeev D, Kaushik D, Knepley MG, Kong F, Kruger S, May DA, McInnes LC, Mills RT, Mitchell L, Munson T, Roman JE, Rupp K, Sanan P, Sarich J, Smith BF, Zampini S, Zhang H, Zhang H, Zhang J (2023) PETSc Web page. https://petsc.org/
4. Belytschko T, Tsay C-S (1983) A stabilization procedure for the quadrilateral plate element with one-point quadrature. Comput Methods Appl Mech 19(3):405–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.162019030810.1002/nme.1620190308 ↗
5. Belytschko T, Lin JI, Chen-Shyh T (1984) Explicit algorithms for the nonlinear dynamics of shells. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 42(2):225–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(84)90026-410.1016/0045-7825(84)90026-4 ↗
6. Bilgen C, Weinberg K (2019) On the crack-driving force of phase-field models in linearized and finite elasticity. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 353:348–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.05.00910.1016/j.cma.2019.05.009 ↗
7. Borden MJ, Verhoosel CV, Scott MA, Hughes TJR, Landis CM (2012) A phase-field description of dynamic brittle fracture. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 217–220:77–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2012.01.00810.1016/j.cma.2012.01.008 ↗
8. Bourdin B, Francfort GA, Marigo JJ (2000) Numerical experiments in revisited brittle fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 48(4):797–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00028-910.1016/S0022-5096(99)00028-9 ↗
9. Bourdin B, Francfort GA, Marigo J-J (2008) The variational approach to fracture. J Elasticity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10659-007-9107-310.1007/s10659-007-9107-3 ↗
10. Bourdin B, Larsen CJ, Richardson CL (2011) A time-discrete model for dynamic fracture based on crack regularization. Int J Fract 168(2):133–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-010-9562-x10.1007/s10704-010-9562-x ↗
11. Francfort GA, Marigo JJ (1998) Revisiting brittle fracture as an energy minimization problem. J Mech Phys Solids 46(8):1319–1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(98)00034-910.1016/S0022-5096(98)00034-9 ↗
12. Hofacker M, Miehe C (2012) Continuum phase field modeling of dynamic fracture: variational principles and staggered FE implementation. Int J Fract 178(1):113–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-012-9753-810.1007/s10704-012-9753-8 ↗
13. Hofacker M, Miehe C (2013) A phase field model of dynamic fracture: robust field updates for the analysis of complex crack patterns. Int J Numer Methods Eng 93(3):276–301. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.438710.1002/nme.4387 ↗
14. Kalthoff JF (2000) Modes of dynamic shear failure in solids. Int J Fract 101(1–2):1–3110.1023/A:1007647800529 ↗
15. Kalthoff J, Winkler S (1988) Failure mode transition at high rates of shear loading. In: International conference on impact loading and dynamic behavior of materials, vol 1, pp 185–195
16. Kuhn C, Müller R (2008) A phase field model for fracture. PAMM 8(1):10223–10224. https://doi.org/10.1002/pamm.20081022310.1002/pamm.200810223 ↗
17. Kuhn C, Müller R (2010) A continuum phase field model for fracture. Eng Fract Mech 77(18):3625–3634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.08.00910.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.08.009 ↗
18. Livermore Software Technology (LST) An ANSYS Company: LS-DYNA R12. Accessed on 9 May 2023. https://www.ansys.com/products/structures/ansys-ls-dyna
19. Miehe C, Hofacker M, Welschinger F (2010a) A phase field model for rate-independent crack propagation: robust algorithmic implementation based on operator splits. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(45):2765–2778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2010.04.01110.1016/j.cma.2010.04.011 ↗
20. Miehe C, Welschinger F, Hofacker M (2010b) Thermodynamically consistent phase-field models of fracture: variational principles and multi-field FE implementations. Int J Numer Methods Eng 83(10):1273–1311. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.286110.1002/nme.2861 ↗
21. Miehe C, Schänzel LM, Ulmer H (2015) Phase field modeling of fracture in multi-physics problems. part i. balance of crack surface and failure criteria for brittle crack propagation in thermo-elastic solids. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 294:449–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2014.11.01610.1016/j.cma.2014.11.016 ↗
22. Pandolfi A, Ortiz M (2012) An eigenerosion approach to brittle fracture. Int J Numer Methods Eng 92(8):694–714. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.435210.1002/nme.4352 ↗
23. Pandolfi A, Weinberg K, Ortiz M (2021) A comparative accuracy and convergence study of eigenerosion and phase-field models of fracture. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 386:114078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.11407810.1016/j.cma.2021.114078 ↗
24. Qinami A, Bryant EC, Sun W, Kaliske M (2019) Circumventing mesh bias by r- and h-adaptive techniques for variational eigenfracture. Int J Fract 220(2):129–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-019-00349-x10.1007/s10704-019-00349-x ↗
25. Ren HL, Zhuang XY, Anitescu C, Rabczuk T (2019) An explicit phase field method for brittle dynamic fracture. Comput Struct 217:45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2019.03.00510.1016/j.compstruc.2019.03.005 ↗
26. Rudshaug J, Hopperstad OS (2023) Effect of load level on cracking of L-shaped soda-lime glass specimens. Glass Struct Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40940-023-00239-8. Accessed 9 May 202310.1007/s40940-023-00239-8 ↗
27. Schmidt B, Fraternali F, Ortiz M (2009) Eigenfracture: an eigendeformation approach to variational fracture. Multiscale Model Simul 7(3):1237–1266. https://doi.org/10.1137/08071256810.1137/080712568 ↗
28. Simo JC, Hughes TJR (1986) On the variational foundations of assumed strain methods. J Appl Mech 53(1):51–54. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.317173710.1115/1.3171737 ↗
29. Stochino F, Qinami A, Kaliske M (2017) Eigenerosion for static and dynamic brittle fracture . Eng Fract Mech 182:537–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.05.02510.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.05.025 ↗