Morphology of fracture profiles and toughness: competition between inter and transgranular fracture in two dimensional brittle solids
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Two dimensional intergranular brittle cracks propagating through a microstructured material produce fracture profiles which, at scales larger than the microstructural length scale, are anti-persistent and close to directed random walks with Hurst exponent ∼ 0.5. The extent of intergranularity is controlled by the ratio of the toughness of the grain boundaries to that of the grain interior. However, experiments suggest that even when transgranular crack propagation is possible, the fracture profile is still close to a random walk. In this work, generating fracture profiles in a material with an idealised honeycomb microstructure using a phase field based model of crack propagation, we show that the competition between inter and transgranular fracture manifests in a manner that is more nuanced than what the experiments suggest. While the fracture profile is indeed always anti-persistent, transgranularity resulting from toughening the grains leads to profiles that can have roughness exponents much lower than 0.5. Moreover, in such cases, the overall toughness of the specimen scales with the Hurst exponent. On the other hand, transgranularity resulting from weakening the grain boundaries, without changing the toughness of the grain interior, always lead to fracture profiles close to the random walk. Mathematics Subject Classification (2020) MSC code1 · MSC code2 · more
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Numerical methods in engineering · Composite Material Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Bahar LY (1965) An extension of Hetenyi’s method through the use of Macaulay brackets. AIAA J 3(2):369–37010.2514/3.2866 ↗
2. Barak Y, Srivastava A, Osovski S (2019) Correlating fracture toughness and fracture surface roughness via correlation length scale. Int J Fract 219(1):19–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-019-00377-710.1007/s10704-019-00377-7 ↗
3. Boffa J, Allain C, Hulin J (1998) Experimental analysis of fracture rugosity in granular and compact rocks. Eur. Phys. J.-Appl. Phys. 2(3):281–289. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjap:199819410.1051/epjap:1998194 ↗
4. Boffa J, Allain C, Hulin J (2000) Experimental analysis of self-affine fractured rock surfaces through shadow length measurements. Phys A 278(1–2):65–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(99)00598-110.1016/S0378-4371(99)00598-1 ↗
5. Bonamy D, Bouchaud E (2011) Failure of heterogeneous materials: A dynamic phase transition? Phys Rep 498(1):1–4410.1016/j.physrep.2010.07.006 ↗
6. Bouchaud E, Lapasset G, Planes J (1990) Fractal dimension of fractured surfaces—a universal value. Europhys Lett 13(1):73–79. https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/13/1/01310.1209/0295-5075/13/1/013 ↗
7. Bouchbinder E, Mathiesen J, Procaccia I (2004) Roughening of fracture surfaces: the role of plastic deformation. Phys Rev Lett. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.24550510.1103/PhysRevLett.92.245505 ↗
8. Bouchbinder E, Mathiesen J, Procaccia I (2004) Stress field around arbitrarily shaped cracks in two-dimensional elastic materials. Phys Rev E. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.02612710.1103/PhysRevE.69.026127 ↗
9. Bourdin B, Francfort GA, Marigo JJ (2008) The variational approach to fracture. J Elast 91(1–3):5–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10659-007-9107-310.1007/s10659-007-9107-3 ↗
10. Cambonie T, Bares J, Hattali ML, Bonamy D, Lazarus V, Auradou H (2015) Effect of the porosity on the fracture surface roughness of sintered materials: from anisotropic to isotropic self-affine scaling. Phys Rev E 91:012406. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.91.01240610.1103/PhysRevE.91.012406 ↗
11. Daguier P, Nghiem B, Bouchaud E, Creuzet F (1997) Pinning and depinning of crack fronts in heterogeneous materials. Phys Rev Lett 78(6):1062–1065. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.106210.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1062 ↗
12. Dalmas D, Lelarge A, Vandembroucq D (2008) Crack propagation through phase-separated glasses: effect of the characteristic size of disorder. Phys Rev Lett. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.25550110.1103/PhysRevLett.101.255501 ↗
13. Demery V, Rosso A, Ponson L (2014) From microstructural features to effective toughness in disordered brittle solids. EPL. https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/105/3400310.1209/0295-5075/105/34003 ↗
14. Katzav E, Adda-Bedia M (2013) Stability and roughness of tensile cracks in disordered materials. Phys Rev E. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.88.05240210.1103/PhysRevE.88.052402 ↗
15. Kertesz J, Horvath VK, Weber F (1993) Self-affine rupture lines in paper sheets. Fractals 1(01):67–7410.1142/S0218348X93000101 ↗
16. Konate L, Kondo D, Ponson L (2021) Numerical fracture mechanics based prediction for the roughening of brittle cracks in 2d disordered solids. Int J Fract 230(1–2, SI):225–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-021-00576-110.1007/s10704-021-00576-1 ↗
17. Kraft RH, Molinari JF (2008) A statistical investigation of the effects of grain boundary properties on transgranular fracture. Acta Mater 56(17):4739–4749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2008.05.03610.1016/j.actamat.2008.05.036 ↗
18. Mallick N, Cortet PP, Santucci S, Roux SG, Vanel L (2007) Discrepancy between subcritical and fast rupture roughness: a cumulant analysis. Phys Rev Lett 98(25):25550210.1103/PhysRevLett.98.255502 ↗
19. Maloy K, Hansen A, Hinrichsen E, Roux S (1992) Experimental measurements of the roughness of brittle cracks. Phys Rev Lett 68(2):213–215. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.21310.1103/PhysRevLett.68.213 ↗
20. Mandelbrot B (1985) Self-affine fractals and fractal dimension. Phys Scr 32(4):257–260. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/32/4/00110.1088/0031-8949/32/4/001 ↗
21. Mandelbrot B, Passoja D, Paullay A (1984) Fractal character of fracture surfaces of metals. Nature 308(5961):721–722. https://doi.org/10.1038/308721a010.1038/308721a0 ↗
22. Miehe C, Hofacker M, Welschinger F (2010) A phase field model for rate-independent crack propagation: robust algorithmic implementation based on operator splits. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(45–48):2765–277810.1016/j.cma.2010.04.011 ↗
23. Miehe C, Welschinger F, Hofacker M (2010) Thermodynamically consistent phase-field models of fracture: variational principles and multi-field fe implementations. Int J Numer Methods Eng 83(10):1273–131110.1002/nme.2861 ↗
24. Molnár G, Gravouil A (2017) 2d and 3d abaqus implementation of a robust staggered phase-field solution for modeling brittle fracture. Finite Elem Anal Des 130:27–3810.1016/j.finel.2017.03.002 ↗
25. Osovski S, Srivastava A, Ponson L, Bouchaud E, Tvergaard V, Ravi-Chandar K, Needleman A (2015) The effect of loading rate on ductile fracture toughness and fracture surface roughness. J Mech Phys Solids 76:20–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2014.11.00710.1016/j.jmps.2014.11.007 ↗
26. Patinet S, Vandembroucq D, Roux S (2013) Quantitative prediction of effective toughness at random heterogeneous interfaces. Phys Rev Lett. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.16550710.1103/PhysRevLett.110.165507 ↗
27. Ponson L, Shabir Z, Abdulmajid M, Van der Giessen E, Simone A (2021) Unified scenario for the morphology of crack paths in two-dimensional disordered solids. Phys Rev E 104(5):05500310.1103/PhysRevE.104.055003 ↗
28. Ponson L, Auradou H, Pessel M, Lazarus V, Hulin JP (2007) Failure mechanisms and surface roughness statistics of fractured Fontainebleau sandstone. Phys Rev E. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.76.03610810.1103/PhysRevE.76.036108 ↗
29. Ponson L, Auradou H, Vie P, Hulin JP (2006) Low self-affine exponents of fractured glass ceramics surfaces. Phys Rev Lett. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.12550110.1103/PhysRevLett.97.125501 ↗
30. Ponson L, Cao Y, Bouchaud E, Tvergaard V, Needleman A (2013) Statistics of ductile fracture surfaces: the effect of material parameters. Int J Fract 184(1–2, SI):137–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-013-9846-z10.1007/s10704-013-9846-z ↗
31. Ramanathan S, Ertaş D, Fisher DS (1997) Quasistatic crack propagation in heterogeneous media. Phys Rev Lett 79(5):87310.1103/PhysRevLett.79.873 ↗
32. Salminen LI, Alava M, Niskanen K (2003) Analysis of long crack lines in paper webs. Eur Phys J B—Condens Matter Complex Syst 32:369–37410.1140/epjb/e2003-00111-x ↗
33. Santucci S, Måløy KJ, Delaplace A, Mathiesen J, Hansen A, Bakke JØH, Schmittbuhl J, Vanel L, Ray P (2007) Statistics of fracture surfaces. Phys Rev E 75(1):01610410.1103/PhysRevE.75.016104 ↗
34. Sayles R, Thomas T (1978) Surface-topography as a nonstationary random process. Nature 271(5644):431–434. https://doi.org/10.1038/271431a010.1038/271431a0 ↗
35. Schmittbuhl J, Schmitt F, Scholz C (1995) Scaling invariance of crack surfaces. J Geophys Res-Solid Earth 100(B4):5953–5973. https://doi.org/10.1029/94JB0288510.1029/94JB02885 ↗
36. Shabir Z, Van der Giessen E, Duarte C, Simone A (2011) The role of cohesive properties on intergranular crack propagation in brittle polycrystals. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 19(3):03500610.1088/0965-0393/19/3/035006 ↗
37. Srivastava A, Ponson L, Osovski S, Bouchaud E, Tvergaard V, Needleman A (2014) Effect of inclusion density on ductile fracture toughness and roughness. J Mech Phys Solids 63:62–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2013.10.00310.1016/j.jmps.2013.10.003 ↗
38. Strobl M, Seelig T (2018) Restrictions in phase field modeling of brittle fracture. PAMM 18(1):e20180015710.1002/pamm.201800157 ↗
39. Vernede S, Ponson L (2019) Method for characterizing the cracking mechanism of a material from the fracture surface thereof. https://patents.justia.com/patent/10254205
40. Vernede S, Ponson L, Bouchaud JP (2015) Turbulent fracture surfaces: a footprint of damage percolation? Phys Rev Lett. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.21550110.1103/PhysRevLett.114.215501 ↗
41. Voss R (1988) Fractals in nature: from characterization to simulation. In: Peitgen H, Saupe D (eds) The science of fractal images, Chap 1. Springer, New York, pp 21–7010.1007/978-1-4612-3784-6_1 ↗