Fatigue crack growth rate prediction under single peak overload based on WOA-BP neural network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. ASTM (2009) Standard test method for linear-elastic plane-strain fracture toughness KIc of metallic materials. ASTM, West Conshohocken
2. Brighenti R, Carpinteri A (2013) Surface cracks in fatigued structural components: a review. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 36(12):1209–1222. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.1210010.1111/ffe.12100 ↗
3. Chung Y-I, Song J-H (2009) Improvement of ASTM compliance offset method for precise determination of crack opening load. Int J Fatigue 31:809–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.11.00610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.11.006 ↗
4. Gong H, Yang FP, Chen T (2022) An improved prediction model on fatigue crack growth rate under variable amplitude loads for metallic materials. J Mater Eng Perform 31(6):4735–4745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-06562-x10.1007/s11665-021-06562-x ↗
5. Huang XP, Zhang JB, Cui WC et al (2005) Fatigue crack growth with overload under spectrum loading. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 44(2):105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2005.06.00110.1016/j.tafmec.2005.06.001 ↗
6. Kankal M, Uzlu E (2017) Neural network approach with teaching-learning-based optimization for modeling and forecasting long-term electric energy demand in Turkey. Neural Comput Appl 28(S1):737–747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2409-210.1007/s00521-016-2409-2 ↗
7. Li S, Liang W, Yan H et al (2022a) Prediction of fatigue crack propagation behavior of AA2524 after laser shot peening. Eng Fract Mech 268:108477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.10847710.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108477 ↗
8. Li J, Yang Z, Qian G et al (2022b) Machine learning based very-high-cycle fatigue life prediction of Ti-6Al-4V alloy fabricated by selective laser melting. Int J Fatigue 158:106764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10676410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106764 ↗
9. Lu Y, Yang F, Chen T (2019) Effect of single overload on fatigue crack growth in QSTE340TM steel and retardation model modification. Eng Fract Mech 212:81–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.03.02910.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.03.029 ↗
10. Mohanty JR, Verma BB, Ray PK et al (2010) Application of artificial neural network for fatigue life prediction under interspersed mode-I spike overload. J Test Eval. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE10190710.1520/JTE101907 ↗
11. Nguyen CT, Oterkus S, Oterkus E (2021) Implementation of modified Wheeler model in peridynamic fatigue model to predict effects of overload and underload on fatigue crack growth rate. Theor Appl Fract Mech 116:103115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.10311510.1016/j.tafmec.2021.103115 ↗
12. Paris PC, Gomez MP, Anderson WE (1961) A rational analytic theory of fatigue. Trends Eng 13:9–14
13. Qian H, Zheng J, Wang Y et al (2023) Fatigue life prediction method of ceramic matrix composites based on artificial neural network. Appl Compos Mater. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-023-10134-810.1007/s10443-023-10134-8 ↗
14. Ramachandra S, Durodola JF, Fellows NA et al (2019) Experimental validation of an ANN model for random loading fatigue analysis. Int J Fatigue 126:112–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.04.02810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.04.028 ↗
15. Song J, Kang J, Koo J (2005) Proposal of modified (normalized) ASTM offset method for determination of fatigue crack opening load. Int J Fatigue 27:293–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.06.01410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.06.014 ↗
16. Soyer MA, Kalaycı CB, Karakaş Ö (2022) Low-cycle fatigue parameters and fatigue life estimation of high-strength steels with artificial neural networks. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 45(12):3764–3785. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.1384710.1111/ffe.13847 ↗
17. Spriestersbach D, Grad P, Kerscher E (2014) Influence of different non-metallic inclusion types on the crack initiation in high-strength steels in the VHCF regime. Int J Fatigue 64:114–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.03.00310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.03.003 ↗
18. Wang B, Xie L, Song J et al (2021a) Curved fatigue crack growth prediction under variable amplitude loading by artificial neural network. Int J Fatigue 142:105886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10588610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105886 ↗
19. Wang HH, Fang X, Li DJ et al (2021b) Fatigue crack growth prediction method under variable amplitude load based on dynamic Bayesian network. J Zhejiang Univ (Eng Sci) 55(2):280–288
20. Wheeler OE (1972) Spectrum loading and crack growth. J Basic Eng 94(1):181–18610.1115/1.3425362 ↗
21. Younis HB, Kamal K, Sheikh MF et al (2022) Prediction of fatigue crack growth rate in aircraft aluminum alloys using optimized neural networks. Theor Appl Fract Mech 117:103196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.10319610.1016/j.tafmec.2021.103196 ↗
22. Zhan Z, Li H (2021) Machine learning based fatigue life prediction with effects of additive manufacturing process parameters for printed SS 316L. Int J Fatigue 142:105941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10594110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105941 ↗
23. Zou L, Yang Y, Yang X et al (2023) Fatigue life prediction of welded joints based on improved support vector regression model under two-level loading. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 46(5):1864–1880. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.1396910.1111/ffe.13969 ↗