journal article·2023-07

Uncovering stress fields and defects distributions in graphene using deep neural networks

M. A. N. Dewapriya, R. K. N. D. Rajapakse, W. P. S. Dias

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 242· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Deep learning provides a new route for developing computationally efficient predictive models for some complex engineering problems by eliminating the need for establishing exact governing equations. In this work, we used conditional generative adversarial networks (cGANs) to identify defects in graphene samples and to predict the complex stress fields created by two interacting defective regions in graphene. The required data for developing deep learning models was obtained from molecular dynamics simulations, where the numerical results of the simulations were transformed into image-based data. Our results demonstrate that the neural nets can accurately predict some complex features of the interacting stress fields. Subsequently, we used cGANs to predict defect distributions; this revealed that a cGAN could predict the existence of a crack even though it had never seen a cracked sample during the training stage. This observation clearly demonstrates the remarkable generalizability of cGANs beyond the training samples, suggesting that deep learning can be a powerful tool for solving advanced nanoengineering problems.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (74)

Show source-provided references
1. Ali R, Chuah JH, Talip MSA et al (2022) Structural crack detection using deep convolutional neural networks. Autom Constr 133:103989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.10398910.1016/j.autcon.2021.103989 ↗
2. Alian AR, Dewapriya MAN, Meguid SA (2017) Molecular dynamics study of the reinforcement effect of graphene in multilayered polymer nanocomposites. Mater Des 124:47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.05210.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.052 ↗
3. Banhart F, Kotakoski J, Krasheninnikov AV (2011) Structural defects in graphene. ACS Nano 5:26–41. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn102598m10.1021/nn102598m ↗
4. Bercoff J, Chaffai S, Tanter M et al (2003) In vivo breast tumor detection using transient elastography. Ultrasound Med Biol 29:1387–1396. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-5629(03)00978-510.1016/S0301-5629(03)00978-5 ↗
5. Bhaduri A, Gupta A, Graham-Brady L (2022) Stress field prediction in fiber-reinforced composite materials using a deep learning approach. Compos Part B Eng 238:109879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.10987910.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109879 ↗
6. Bock FE, Aydin RC, Cyron CJ et al (2019) A review of the application of machine learning and data mining approaches in continuum materials mechanics. Front Mater 6:110. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2019.0011010.3389/fmats.2019.00110 ↗
7. Brenner DW (1990) Empirical potential for hydrocarbons for use in simulating the chemical vapor deposition of diamond films. Phys Rev B 42:9458–9471. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.42.945810.1103/PhysRevB.42.9458 ↗
8. Cançado LG, Jorio A, Ferreira EHM et al (2011) Quantifying defects in graphene via Raman spectroscopy at different excitation energies. Nano Lett 11:3190–3196. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl201432g10.1021/nl201432g ↗
9. Cang R, Li H, Yao H et al (2018) Improving direct physical properties prediction of heterogeneous materials from imaging data via convolutional neural network and a morphology-aware generative model. Comput Mater Sci 150:212–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.03.07410.1016/j.commatsci.2018.03.074 ↗
10. Carpenter C, Maroudas D, Ramasubramaniam A (2013) Mechanical properties of irradiated single-layer graphene. Appl Phys Lett 103:013102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.481301010.1063/1.4813010 ↗
11. Chang Z, Wan Z, Xu Y et al (2022) Convolutional neural network for predicting crack pattern and stress-crack width curve of air-void structure in 3D printed concrete. Eng Fract Mech 271:108624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.10862410.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108624 ↗
12. Chen C-T, Gu GX (2021) Learning hidden elasticity with deep neural networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118:e2102721118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.210272111810.1073/pnas.2102721118 ↗
13. Croom BP, Berkson M, Mueller RK et al (2022) Deep learning prediction of stress fields in additively manufactured metals with intricate defect networks. Mech Mater 165:104191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2021.10419110.1016/j.mechmat.2021.104191 ↗
14. Crossen E, Gockenbach MS, Jadamba B et al (2014) An equation error approach for the elasticity imaging inverse problem for predicting tumor location. Comput Math Appl 67:122–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2013.10.00610.1016/j.camwa.2013.10.006 ↗
15. Cui Y, Kundalwal SI, Kumar S (2016) Gas barrier performance of graphene/polymer nanocomposites. Carbon 98:313–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.11.01810.1016/j.carbon.2015.11.018 ↗
16. Cuomo S, Di Cola VS, Giampaolo F et al (2022) Scientific machine learning through physics–informed neural networks: where we are and what’s Next. J Sci Comput 92:88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-022-01939-z10.1007/s10915-022-01939-z ↗
17. Curtin WA, Miller RE (2017) A perspective on atomistic-continuum multiscale modeling. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 25:071004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-651X/aa865910.1088/1361-651X/aa8659 ↗
18. Dewapriya MAN, Meguid SA (2017) Atomistic simulations of nanoscale crack-vacancy interaction in graphene. Carbon 125:113–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.09.01510.1016/j.carbon.2017.09.015 ↗
19. Dewapriya MAN, Meguid SA (2018) Tailoring fracture strength of graphene. Comput Mater Sci 141:114–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.09.00510.1016/j.commatsci.2017.09.005 ↗
20. Dewapriya MAN, Rajapakse RKND (2014) Molecular dynamics simulations and continuum modeling of temperature and strain rate dependent fracture strength of graphene with vacancy defects. J Appl Mech-Trans Asme. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.402768110.1115/1.4027681 ↗
21. Dewapriya MAN, Phani AS, Rajapakse RKND (2013) Influence of temperature and free edges on the mechanical properties of graphene. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 21:06501710.1088/0965-0393/21/6/065017 ↗
22. Dewapriya MAN, Rajapakse RKND, Phani AS (2014) Atomistic and continuum modelling of temperature-dependent fracture of graphene. Int J Fract 187:199–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-014-9931-y10.1007/s10704-014-9931-y ↗
23. Dewapriya MAN, Rajapakse RKND, Nigam N (2015) Influence of hydrogen functionalization on the fracture strength of graphene and the interfacial properties of graphene–polymer nanocomposite. Carbon 93:830–842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.05.10110.1016/j.carbon.2015.05.101 ↗
24. Dewapriya MAN, Meguid SA, Rajapakse RKND (2018) Atomistic modelling of crack-inclusion interaction in graphene. Eng Fract Mech 195:92–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.04.00310.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.04.003 ↗
25. Dewapriya MAN, Rajapakse RKND, Dias WPS (2020a) Characterizing fracture stress of defective graphene samples using shallow and deep artificial neural networks. Carbon 163:425–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.03.03810.1016/j.carbon.2020.03.038 ↗
26. Dewapriya MAN, Rajapakse RKND, Meguid SA (2020) Mechanical properties of two-dimensional materials: atomistic modeling and future directions. Synthesis, modeling, and characterization of 2D materials, and their heterostructures. Elsevier, pp 9–3510.1016/B978-0-12-818475-2.00002-7 ↗
27. Dilrukshi KGS, Dewapriya MAN, Puswewala UGA (2015) Size dependency and potential field influence on deriving mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes using molecular dynamics. Theor Appl Mech Lett 5:167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taml.2015.05.00510.1016/j.taml.2015.05.005 ↗
28. Dong Y, Li D, Zhang C et al (2020) Inverse design of two-dimensional graphene/h-BN hybrids by a regressional and conditional GAN. Carbon 169:9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.07.01310.1016/j.carbon.2020.07.013 ↗
29. Doyley MM, Meaney PM, Bamber JC (2000) Evaluation of an iterative reconstruction method for quantitative elastography. Phys Med Biol 45:1521–1540. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/45/6/30910.1088/0031-9155/45/6/309 ↗
30. Eckmann A, Felten A, Mishchenko A et al (2012) Probing the nature of defects in graphene by Raman spectroscopy. Nano Lett 12:3925–3930. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl300901a10.1021/nl300901a ↗
31. Eda G, Fanchini G, Chhowalla M (2008) Large-area ultrathin films of reduced graphene oxide as a transparent and flexible electronic material. Nat Nanotechnol 3:270–274. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.8310.1038/nnano.2008.83 ↗
32. Eichler A, Moser J, Chaste J et al (2011) Nonlinear damping in mechanical resonators made from carbon nanotubes and graphene. Nat Nanotechnol 6:339–342. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2011.7110.1038/nnano.2011.71 ↗
33. Gallet A, Rigby S, Tallman T et al (2021) Structural engineering: the forgotten child of inverse problems? ArXiv210615177 Math
34. Gennisson J-L, Deffieux T, Fink M, Tanter M (2013) Ultrasound elastography: principles and techniques. Diagn Interv Imaging 94:487–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2013.01.02210.1016/j.diii.2013.01.022 ↗
35. Gholizadeh S (2016) A review of non-destructive testing methods of composite materials. Procedia Struct Integr 1:50–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2016.02.00810.1016/j.prostr.2016.02.008 ↗
36. Gokhale NH (2021) Solving an elastic inverse problem using Convolutional Neural Networks. ArXiv210907859 Phys
37. Gokhale NH, Barbone PE, Oberai AA (2008) Solution of the nonlinear elasticity imaging inverse problem: the compressible case. Inverse Probl 24:045010. https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/24/4/04501010.1088/0266-5611/24/4/045010 ↗
38. Goodfellow IJ, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M et al (2014) Generative Adversarial Networks. ArXiv14062661 Cs Stat
39. Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A (2016) Deep learning. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
40. Hinton GE, Salakhutdinov RR (2006) Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science 313:504–507. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.112764710.1126/science.1127647 ↗
41. Hsu Y-C, Yu C-H, Buehler MJ (2020) Using Deep Learning to predict fracture patterns in crystalline solids. Matter 3:197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2020.04.01910.1016/j.matt.2020.04.019 ↗
42. Ioffe S, Szegedy C (2015) Batch normalization: accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. ArXiv150203167 Cs
43. Isola P, Zhu J-Y, Zhou T, Efros AA (2017) Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks. 2017 IEEE conference on computer vision and recognition P (CVPR). IEEE, Honolulu, pp 5967–597610.1109/CVPR.2017.632 ↗
44. Karapiperis K, Stainier L, Ortiz M, Andrade JE (2021) Data-Driven multiscale modeling in mechanics. J Mech Phys Solids 147:104239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2020.10423910.1016/j.jmps.2020.104239 ↗
45. Karniadakis GE, Kevrekidis IG, Lu L et al (2021) Physics-informed machine learning. Nat Rev Phys 3:422–440. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00314-510.1038/s42254-021-00314-5 ↗
46. Kawaguchi K, Kaelbling LP, Bengio Y (2017) Generalization in Deep Learning. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1710.0546810.48550/ARXIV.1710.05468 ↗
47. Kennedy BF, Wijesinghe P, Sampson DD (2017) The emergence of optical elastography in biomedicine. Nat Photonics 11:215–221. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2017.610.1038/nphoton.2017.6 ↗
48. Kim KS, Zhao Y, Jang H et al (2009) Large-scale pattern growth of graphene films for stretchable transparent electrodes. Nature 457:706–710. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature0771910.1038/nature07719 ↗
49. Kim Y, Lee J, Yeom MS et al (2013) Strengthening effect of single-atomic-layer graphene in metal–graphene nanolayered composites. Nat Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms311410.1038/ncomms3114 ↗
50. Kingma DP, Ba J (2014) Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1412.698010.48550/ARXIV.1412.6980 ↗
51. LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G (2015) Deep learning. Nature 521:436–444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature1453910.1038/nature14539 ↗
52. Lee C, Wei X, Kysar JW, Hone J (2008) Measurement of the Elastic Properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 321:385–388. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.115799610.1126/science.1157996 ↗
53. Li M, Zhang T, Chen Y, Smola AJ (2014) Efficient mini-batch training for stochastic optimization. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, New York, 661–67010.1145/2623330.2623612 ↗
54. Liu R, Misra S (2022) Machine learning assisted detection and localization of mechanical discontinuity. Int J Fract. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-022-00650-210.1007/s10704-022-00650-2 ↗
55. Ni B, Gao H (2021) A deep learning approach to the inverse problem of modulus identification in elasticity. MRS Bull 46:19–25. https://doi.org/10.1557/s43577-020-00006-y10.1557/s43577-020-00006-y ↗
56. Ohta T (2006) Controlling the Electronic structure of Bilayer Graphene. Science 313:951–954. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.113068110.1126/science.1130681 ↗
57. Parker KJ, Doyley MM, Rubens DJ (2011) Imaging the elastic properties of tissue: the 20 year perspective. Phys Med Biol 56:R1–R29. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/56/1/R0110.1088/0031-9155/56/1/R01 ↗
58. Patel D, Tibrewala R, Vega A et al (2019) Circumventing the solution of inverse problems in mechanics through deep learning: application to elasticity imaging. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 353:448–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.04.04510.1016/j.cma.2019.04.045 ↗
59. Pathak D, Krahenbuhl P, Donahue J et al (2016) Context Encoders: Feature Learning by Inpainting. ArXiv160407379 Cs10.1109/CVPR.2016.278 ↗
60. Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 117:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
61. Ray D, Ramaswamy H, Patel DV, Oberai AA (2022) The efficacy and generalizability of conditional GANs for posterior inference in physics-based inverse problems. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2202.0777310.48550/ARXIV.2202.07773 ↗
62. Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T (2015) U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. ArXiv150504597 Cs10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 ↗
63. Sigrist RMS, Liau J, Kaffas AE et al (2017) Ultrasound Elastography: review of techniques and clinical applications. Theranostics 7:1303–1329. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.1865010.7150/thno.18650 ↗
64. Singh V, Sengupta S, Solanki HS et al (2010) Probing thermal expansion of graphene and modal dispersion at low-temperature using graphene nanoelectromechanical systems resonators. Nanotechnology 21:16520410.1088/0957-4484/21/16/165204 ↗
65. Stuart SJ, Tutein AB, Harrison JA (2000) A reactive potential for hydrocarbons with intermolecular interactions. J Appl Phys 112:6472–6486. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.48120810.1063/1.481208 ↗
66. Thompson AP, Plimpton SJ, Mattson W (2009) General formulation of pressure and stress tensor for arbitrary many-body interaction potentials under periodic boundary conditions. J Chem Phys 131:154107. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.324530310.1063/1.3245303 ↗
67. Thompson AP, Aktulga HM, Berger R et al (2022) LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales. Comput Phys Commun 271:108171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2021.10817110.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 ↗
68. Timoshenko SP, Goodier JN (1970) Theory of elasticity, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
69. Wright WJ, Darville J, Celik N et al (2022) In-situ optimization of thermoset composite additive manufacturing via deep learning and computer vision. Addit Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.10298510.1016/j.addma.2022.102985 ↗
70. Yang Z, Yu C-H, Buehler MJ (2021a) Deep learning model to predict complex stress and strain fields in hierarchical composites. Sci Adv 7:eabd7416. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd741610.1126/sciadv.abd7416 ↗
71. Yang Z, Yu C-H, Guo K, Buehler MJ (2021b) End-to-end deep learning method to predict complete strain and stress tensors for complex hierarchical composite microstructures. J Mech Phys Solids 154:104506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2021.10450610.1016/j.jmps.2021.104506 ↗
72. Zhai L, Lu Y, Zhao X et al (2019) High-throughput screening of laser additive manufactured metallic glass via ultrasonic wave. Sci Rep 9:17660. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54293-w10.1038/s41598-019-54293-w ↗
73. Zhang T, Li X, Gao H (2015) Fracture of graphene: a review. Int J Fract. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-015-0039-910.1007/s10704-015-0039-9 ↗
74. Zhang Z, Hong Y, Hou B et al (2019) Accelerated discoveries of mechanical properties of graphene using machine learning and high-throughput computation. Carbon 148:115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.03.04610.1016/j.carbon.2019.03.046 ↗