The essential work of fracture in peridynamics
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this work, the essential work of fracture (EWF) method is introduced for a peridynamic (PD) material model to characterize fracture toughness of ductile materials. First, an analytical derivation for the path-independence of the PD J-integral is provided. Thereafter, the classical J-integral and PD J-integral are computed on a number of analytical crack problems, for subsequent investigation on how it performs under large scale yielding of thin sheets. To represent a highly nonlinear elastic behavior, a new adaptive bond stiffness calibration and a modified bond-damage model with gradual softening are proposed. The model is employed for two different materials: a lower-ductility bainitic-martensitic steel and a higher-ductility bainitic steel. Up to the start of the softening phase, the PD model recovers the experimentally obtained stress–strain response of both materials. Due to the high failure sensitivity on the presence of defects for the lower-ductility material, the PD model could not recover the experimentally obtained EWF values. For the higher-ductility bainitic material, the PD model was able to match very well the experimentally obtained EWF values. Moreover, the J-integral value obtained from the PD model, at the absolute maximum specimen load, matched the corresponding EWF value.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Fatigue and fracture mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (74)
Show source-provided references
1. Anderson T (2005) Fracture mechanics: fundamentals and applications, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton10.1201/9781420058215 ↗
2. ASM (1996) ASM handbook, fatigue and fracture, vol 19. ASM International, Materials Park
3. ASTM (2016) E8/E8M–16a, Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. ASTM International, Materials Park
4. Bárány T, Czigány T, Karger-Kocsis J (2010) Application of the essential work of fracture (EWF) concept for polymers, related blends and composites: a review. Prog Polym Sci 35(10):1257–1287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.07.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.07.001 ↗
5. Behzadinasab M, Foster JT (2020) A semi-Lagrangian constitutive correspondence framework for peridynamics. J Mech Phys Solids 137:103862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2019.10386210.1016/j.jmps.2019.103862 ↗
6. Behzadinasab M, Trask N, Bazilevs Y (2021) A unified, stable and accurate meshfree framework for peridynamic correspondence modeling—Part I: core methods. J Peridyn Nonlocal Model 3(1):24–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42102-020-00040-z10.1007/s42102-020-00040-z ↗
7. Bobaru F, Yang M, Alves LF, Silling SA, Askari E, Xu J (2009) Convergence, adaptive refinement, and scaling in 1D peridynamics. Int J Numer Methods Eng 77(6):852–877. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.243910.1002/nme.2439 ↗
8. Breitenfeld M, Geubelle P, Weckner O, Silling S (2014) Non-ordinary state-based peridynamic analysis of stationary crack problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 272:233–25010.1016/j.cma.2014.01.002 ↗
9. Breitzman T, Dayal K (2018) Bond-level deformation gradients and energy averaging in peridynamics. J Mech Phys Solids 110:192–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2017.09.01510.1016/j.jmps.2017.09.015 ↗
10. Broberg KB (1968) Critical review of some theories in fracture mechanics. Int J Fract Mech 4(1):11–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0018913910.1007/BF00189139 ↗
11. Bruck HA (1989) Analysis of 3-D effects near the crack tip on Rice’s 2-D integral using digital image correlation and smoothing techniques. Master’s thesis, University of South Carolina
12. Casellas D, Lara A, Frómeta D, Gutiérrez D, Molas S, Pérez L, Rehrl J, Suppan C (2017) Fracture toughness to understand stretch-flangeability and edge cracking resistance in AHSS. Metall Mater Trans 48(1):86–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-016-3815-x10.1007/s11661-016-3815-x ↗
13. Chen H (2018) Bond-associated deformation gradients for peridynamic correspondence model. Mech Res Commun 90:34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2018.04.00410.1016/j.mechrescom.2018.04.004 ↗
14. Chen Z, Bakenhus D, Bobaru F (2016) A constructive peridynamic kernel for elasticity. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 311:356–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2016.08.01210.1016/j.cma.2016.08.012 ↗
15. Cotterell B, Reddel JK (1977) The essential work of plane stress ductile fracture. Int J Fract 13(3):267–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0004014310.1007/BF00040143 ↗
16. Diehl P, Franzelin F, Pflüger D, Ganzenmüller GC (2016) Bond-based peridynamics: a quantitative study of Mode I crack opening. Int J Fract 201(2):157–17010.1007/s10704-016-0119-5 ↗
17. Diehl P, Prudhomme S, Lévesque M (2019) A review of benchmark experiments for the validation of peridynamics models. J Peridyn Nonlocal Model 1(1):14–3510.1007/s42102-018-0004-x ↗
18. Dipasquale D, Sarego G, Zaccariotto M, Galvanetto U (2016) Dependence of crack paths on the orientation of regular 2D peridynamic grids. Eng Fract Mech 160:248–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.03.02210.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.03.022 ↗
19. Du Q, Gunzburger M, Lehoucq R, Zhou K (2012) Analysis and approximation of nonlocal diffusion problems with volume constraints. SIAM Rev 54(4):667–696. https://doi.org/10.1137/11083329410.1137/110833294 ↗
20. Efthymiadis P, Hazra S, Clough A, Lakshmi R, Alamoudi A, Dashwood R, Shollock B (2017) Revealing the mechanical and microstructural performance of multiphase steels during tensile, forming and flanging operations. Mater Sci Eng A 701:174–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.06.05610.1016/j.msea.2017.06.056 ↗
21. Eriksson K, Stenström C (2020a) Homogenization of the 1D peri-static/dynamic bar with constant micromodulus. J Peridyn Nonlocal Model 2(2):205–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42102-019-00028-410.1007/s42102-019-00028-4 ↗
22. Eriksson K, Stenström C (2020b) Homogenization of the 1D peri-static/dynamic bar with triangular micromodulus. J Peridyn Nonlocal Model10.1007/s42102-020-00042-x ↗
23. Fallah AS, Giannakeas IN, Mella R, Wenman MR, Safa Y, Bahai H (2020) On the computational derivation of bond-based peridynamic stress tensor. J Peridyn Nonlocal Model 2(4):352–37810.1007/s42102-020-00036-9 ↗
24. Frómeta D, Parareda S, Lara A, Molas S, Casellas D, Jonsén P, Calvo J (2020) Identification of fracture toughness parameters to understand the fracture resistance of advanced high strength sheet steels. Eng Fract Mech 229:1–1710.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.106949 ↗
25. Frómeta D, Cuadrado N, Rehrl J, Suppan C, Dieudonné T, Dietsch P, Calvo J, Casellas D (2021) Microstructural effects on fracture toughness of ultra-high strength dual phase sheet steels. Mater Sci Eng A 802:140631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.14063110.1016/j.msea.2020.140631 ↗
26. Gerstle WH, Sau N, Silling SA (2005) Peridynamic modeling of plain and reinforced concrete structures. In: 18th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, Beijing, China
27. Golling S, Östlund R, Oldenburg M (2016) A study on homogenization methods for steels with varying content of ferrite, bainite and martensite. J Mater Process Technol 228:88–9710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.07.007 ↗
28. Golling S, Frómeta D, Casellas D, Jonsén P (2019) Influence of microstructure on the fracture toughness of hot stamped boron steel. Mater Sci Eng A 743:529–53910.1016/j.msea.2018.11.080 ↗
29. Gu X, Zhang Q, Madenci E, Xia X (2019) Possible causes of numerical oscillations in non-ordinary state-based peridynamics and a bond-associated higher-order stabilized model. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 357:112592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.11259210.1016/j.cma.2019.112592 ↗
30. Ha Y, Bobaru F (2010) Studies of dynamic crack propagation and crack branching with peridynamics. Int J Fract 162(1–2):229–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-010-9442-410.1007/s10704-010-9442-4 ↗
31. Ha YD, Bobaru F (2011) Characteristics of dynamic brittle fracture captured with peridynamics. Eng Fract Mech 78(6):1156–116810.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.11.020 ↗
32. Hart DC, Bruck HA (2021) Predicting failure of cracked aluminum plates with one-sided composite patch. To be published10.1007/s10704-020-00509-4 ↗
33. Henke S, Shanbhag S (2014) Mesh sensitivity in peridynamic simulations. Comput Phys Commun 185(1):181–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2013.09.01010.1016/j.cpc.2013.09.010 ↗
34. Hu W, Ha YD, Bobaru F, Silling SA (2012) The formulation and computation of the nonlocal J-integral in bond-based peridynamics. Int J Fract 176(2):195–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-012-9745-810.1007/s10704-012-9745-8 ↗
35. Imachi M, Tanaka S, Bui TQ (2018) Mixed-mode dynamic stress intensity factors evaluation using ordinary state-based peridynamics. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 93:97–10410.1016/j.tafmec.2017.07.008 ↗
36. Isida M (1971) Effect of width and length on stress intensity factors of internally cracked plates under various boundary conditions. Int J Fract Mech 7(3):301–31610.1007/BF00184306 ↗
37. ISO (2019) ISO 6892-1, Metallic materials—tensile testing—Part 1: method of test at room temperature. International Organization for Standardization
38. Javili A, Morasata R, Oterkus E, Oterkus S (2019) Peridynamics review. Math Mech Solids 24(11):3714–3739. https://doi.org/10.1177/108128651880341110.1177/1081286518803411 ↗
39. Jung J, Seok J (2017) Mixed-mode fatigue crack growth analysis using peridynamic approach. Int J Fatigue 103:591–60310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.06.008 ↗
40. Le QV, Bobaru F (2018) Surface corrections for peridynamic models in elasticity and fracture. Comput Mech 61(4):499–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-017-1469-110.1007/s00466-017-1469-1 ↗
41. Lee J, Liu W, Hong JW (2016) Impact fracture analysis enhanced by contact of peridynamic and finite element formulations. Int J Impact Eng 87:108–11910.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.06.012 ↗
42. Littlewood D (2015a) Peridynamics. In: State-of-the-art report on multi-scale modelling of nuclear fuels, OECD
43. Littlewood DJ (2015b) Roadmap for peridynamic software implementation. Tech. rep., SAND2015-9013, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM and Livermore, CA
44. Littlewood D, Foster J, Boyce B (2012) Peridynamic modeling of localization in ductile metals. Rep. no, SAND2012-8102C, presented on IWCMM XXII, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM and Livermore, CA
45. Macek RW, Silling SA (2007) Peridynamics via finite element analysis. Finite Elem Anal Des 43(15):1169–117810.1016/j.finel.2007.08.012 ↗
46. Madenci E, Oterkus E (2014) Peridynamic theory and its applications. Springer, New York10.1007/978-1-4614-8465-3 ↗
47. Marchal Y, Delannay F (1996) Influence of test parameters on the measurement of the essential work of fracture of zinc sheets. Int J Fract 80(4):295–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0001850910.1007/BF00018509 ↗
48. Mitchell JA (2011a) A non-local, ordinary-state-based viscoelasticity model for peridynamics. Tech. rep., SAND2011-8064, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM and Livermore, CA10.2172/1029821 ↗
49. Mitchell JA (2011b) A nonlocal, ordinary, state-based plasticity model for peridynamics. Tech. rep., SAND2011-3166, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM and Livermore, CA10.2172/1018475 ↗
50. Mitchell J, Silling S, Littlewood D (2015) A position-aware linear solid constitutive model for peridynamics. J Mech Mater Struct 10(5):539–55710.2140/jomms.2015.10.539 ↗
51. Niazi S, Chen Z, Bobaru F (2021) Crack nucleation in brittle and quasi-brittle materials: a peridynamic analysis. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 112:102855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.10285510.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102855 ↗
52. Panchadhara R, Gordon PA (2016) Application of peridynamic stress intensity factors to dynamic fracture initiation and propagation. Int J Fract 201(1):81–9610.1007/s10704-016-0124-8 ↗
53. Parks ML, Plimpton SJ, Lehoucq RB, Silling SA (2010) Peridynamics with LAMMPS: a user guide. Tech. rep., 2010-5549, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM and Livermore, CA
54. Rice JR (1968) A path independent integral and the approximate analysis of strain concentration by notches and cracks. J Appl Mech 35(2):379–386. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.360120610.1115/1.3601206 ↗
55. Rink M, Andena L, Marano C (2014) The essential work of fracture in relation to $$J$$-integral. Eng Fract Mech 127:46–5510.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.05.006 ↗
56. Sandin O, Jonsén P, Frómeta D, Casellas D (2021) Stating failure modelling limitations of high strength sheets: implications to sheet metal forming. Materials 14(24):7821. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1424782110.3390/ma14247821 ↗
57. Sarego G, Le QV, Bobaru F, Zaccariotto M, Galvanetto U (2016) Linearized state-based peridynamics for 2-D problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 108(10):1174–119710.1002/nme.5250 ↗
58. Seleson P (2014) Improved one-point quadrature algorithms for two-dimensional peridynamic models based on analytical calculations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 282:184–21710.1016/j.cma.2014.06.016 ↗
59. Seleson P, Littlewood DJ (2018) Numerical tools for improved convergence of meshfree peridynamic discretizations. In: Voyiadjis GZ (ed) Handbook of nonlocal continuum mechanics for materials and structures. Springer, New York, pp 1–27
60. Silling SA (2000) Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces. J Mech Phys Solids 48(1):175–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00029-010.1016/S0022-5096(99)00029-0 ↗
61. Silling SA (2016) Introduction to peridynamics. In: Bobaru F, Foster JT, Geubelle PH, Silling SA (eds) Handbook of peridynamic modeling. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 25–60
62. Silling SA, Askari E (2005) A meshfree method based on the peridynamic model of solid mechanics. Comput Struct 83(17–18):1526–1535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.11.02610.1016/j.compstruc.2004.11.026 ↗
63. Silling SA, Lehoucq RB (2010) Peridynamic theory of solid mechanics, Adv. Appl. Mech., vol 44. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 73–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2156(10)44002-810.1016/S0065-2156(10)44002-8 ↗
64. Silling SA, Epton M, Weckner O, Xu J, Askari E (2007) Peridynamic states and constitutive modeling. J Elast 88(2):151–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10659-007-9125-110.1007/s10659-007-9125-1 ↗
65. Silling SA, Weckner O, Askari E, Bobaru F (2010) Crack nucleation in a peridynamic solid. Int J Fract 162(1–2):219–22710.1007/s10704-010-9447-z ↗
66. Stenström C, Eriksson K (2019) The $$J$$-contour integral in peridynamics via displacements. Int J Fract 216:173–18310.1007/s10704-019-00351-3 ↗
67. Stenström C, Eriksson K (2021) The J-area integral applied in peridynamics. Int J Fract10.1007/s10704-020-00505-8 ↗
68. Unger DJ, Gerberich WW, Aifantis EC (1983) Further remarks on an exact solution for crack problems. Eng Fract Mech 18(3):735–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(83)90065-610.1016/0013-7944(83)90065-6 ↗
69. Vendra SL, Goel S, Kumar N, Jayaganthan R (2017) A study on fracture toughness and strain rate sensitivity of severely deformed al 6063 alloys processed by multiaxial forging and rolling at cryogenic temperature. Mater Sci Eng A 686(Supplement C):82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.01.03510.1016/j.msea.2017.01.035 ↗
70. Wu XR, Carlsson J (1991) Weight functions and stress intensity factor solutions. Pergamon, Oxford
71. Xu Z, Zhang G, Chen Z, Bobaru F (2018) Elastic vortices and thermally-driven cracks in brittle materials with peridynamics. Int J Fract 209(1):203–22210.1007/s10704-017-0256-5 ↗
72. Yang D, Dong W, Liu X, Yi S, He X (2018) Investigation on mode-i crack propagation in concrete using bond-based peridynamics with a new damage model. Eng Fract Mech 199:567–58110.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.06.019 ↗
73. Yolum U, Taştan A, Güler MA (2016) A peridynamic model for ductile fracture of moderately thick plates. Procedia Struct Integrity 2:3713–372010.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.461 ↗
74. Zaccariotto M, Luongo F, Galvanetto U et al (2015) Examples of applications of the peridynamic theory to the solution of static equilibrium problems. Aeronaut J 119(1216):677–70010.1017/S0001924000010770 ↗