journal article·2020-01Open access

Influence of material heterogeneities on crack propagation statistics using a Fiber Bundle Model

François Villette, Julien Baroth, Frédéric Dufour, Jean-Francis Bloch, Sabine Rolland Du Roscoat

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 221· Issue 1

Abstract

The problem of damage in heterogeneous materials has received particular attention in recent years. The numerical models currently used in the simulation of damage require an internal length that is not currently related to a characteristic length of the material components. However, understanding damage regarding the size of the heterogeneities of the material is of crucial importance, particularly in civil engineering. The Fiber Bundle Model has been widely used to qualitatively address the issue of damage in heterogeneous media by studying the statistics of failure events during damage. The so-called ZIP model derives from Fiber Bundle Model to mimic crack propagation. In this work, a spatial correlation of tensile strength of fibers is added to the ZIP model to highlight the role of heterogeneity size in statistics of failure events during crack propagation. The addition of spatial correlation into the ZIP model modifies the distribution of failure events. Indeed, for a simulated material without spatial correlation, failure events follow two regimes. By adding a spatial correlation to the material, a transitional regime appears. The influence of spatial correlation on fiber rupture avalanche strongly depends on the ratio between the sizes of the shapes of the stress field and of the heterogeneities.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Landslides and related hazards

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Baxevanis T, Dufour F, Pijaudier-Cabot G (2006) Interface crack propagation in porous and time-dependent materials analyzed with discrete models. Int J Fracture 141(3–4):561–57110.1007/s10704-006-9013-x ↗
2. Bazant ZP (1984) Size effect in blunt fracture: concrete, rock, metal. J Eng Mech 110(4):518–53510.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1984)110:4(518) ↗
3. Bazant ZP (1994) Nonlocal damage theory based on micromechanics of crack interactions. J Eng Mech 120(3):593–61710.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1994)120:3(593) ↗
4. Bazant ZP, Pijaudier-Cabot G (1989) Measurement of characteristic length of nonlocal continuum. J Eng Mech 115(4):755–76710.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1989)115:4(755) ↗
5. Bazant ZP, Vořechovský M, Novák D (2007) Asymptotic prediction of energetic-statistical size effect from deterministic finite-element solutions. J Eng Mech 133(2):153–16210.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:2(153) ↗
6. Daniels H (1945) The statistical theory of the strength of bundles of threads. Proc R Soc Lond A183:405435
7. Delaplace A, Roux S (1999) Damage cascade in a softening interface. Int J Solids Struct 36(1972):91–125
8. Delaplace A, Roux S, Pijaudier-Cabot G (2001) Avalanche statistics of interface crack propagation in fiber bundle model: characterization of cohesive crack. J Eng Mech 9399(July):646–65210.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2001)127:7(646) ↗
9. Ghanem RG, Spanos PD (1997) Spectral techniques for stochastic finite elements. Arch Comput Methods Eng 4(1):63–10010.1007/BF02818931 ↗
10. Giry C, Dufour F, Mazars J (2011) Stress-based nonlocal damage model. Int J Solids Struct 48(25–26):3431–344310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.08.012 ↗
11. Harlow D, Phoenix S (1991) Approximations for the strength distribution and size effect in an idealized lattice model of material breakdown. J Mech Phys Solids 39(2):173–20010.1016/0022-5096(91)90002-6 ↗
12. Hemmer PC, Hansen A (1992) The distribution of simultaneous fiber failures in fiber bundles. J Appl Mech 59(4):90910.1115/1.2894060 ↗
13. Krasnoshlyk V, Roscoat SRd, Dumont PJJ, Isaksson P (2018) Influence of the local mass density variation on the fracture behavior of fiber network materials. Int J Solids Struct 138:236–24410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.01.016 ↗
14. Kun F, Nagy S (2008) Damage process of a fiber bundle with a strain gradient. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys 77(1):01660810.1103/PhysRevE.77.016608 ↗
15. La Borderie C, Lawrence C, Menou A (2007) Approche mésoscopique du comportement du béton. Revue Européenne de Génie Civil 11(4):407–42110.1080/17747120.2007.9692939 ↗
16. Loève M (1977) Probability theory, vol 45. Springer, London
17. Lu YL, Elsworth D, Wang LG (2013) Microcrack-based coupled damage and flow modeling of fracturing evolution in permeable brittle rocks. Comput Geotech 49:226–24410.1016/j.compgeo.2012.11.009 ↗
18. Manouchehrian A, Cai M (2016) Influence of material heterogeneity on failure intensity in unstable rock failure. Comput Geotech 71:237–24610.1016/j.compgeo.2015.10.004 ↗
19. Mazars J, Pijaudier-Cabot G, Saouridis C (1991) Size effect and continuous damage in cementitious materials. Int J Fracture 51(2):159–17310.1007/BF00033976 ↗
20. Niskanen K, Alava M, Seppala E, Astrom J (1999) Fracture energy in fibre and bond failure. J Pulp Paper Sci 25(5):167–169
21. Niskanen K, Kettunen H, and Yu Y (2001) Damage width: a measure of the size of fracture process zone. In: The science of papermaking, 12th fundamental research symp, 2(September 2001):1467–148210.15376/frc.2001.2.1467 ↗
22. Peerlings RH, De Borst R, Brekelmans WA, De Vree JH (1996) Gradient enhanced damage for quasi-brittle materials. Int J Numer Methods Eng 39(19):3391–340310.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19961015)39:19<3391::AID-NME7>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
23. Peirce F T (1926) 32X Tensile tests for cotton yarns: V. The weakest link theorems on the strength of long and of composite specimens. J Text Inst Trans 17(7):T355–T36810.1080/19447027.1926.10599953 ↗
24. Phoenix SL (1975) Probabilistic inter-fiber dependence and the asymptotic strength distribution of classic fiber bundles. Int J Eng Sci 13(3):287–30410.1016/0020-7225(75)90036-1 ↗
25. Phoenix S, Taylor HM (1973) The asymptotic strength distribution of a general fiber bundle. Appl Probab Trust 5:200–21610.2307/1426033 ↗
26. Pijaudier CG, Bazant ZP (1987) Non local damage theory. J Eng Mech 113(10):1512–153310.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1987)113:10(1512) ↗
27. Poh LH, Sun G (2017) Localizing gradient damage model with decreasing interactions. Int J Numer Methods Eng 110(6):503–52210.1002/nme.5364 ↗
28. Pradhan S, Hansen A, Hemmer PC (2005) Crossover behavior in burst avalanches: signature of imminent failure. Phys Rev Lett 95(12):12550110.1103/PhysRevLett.95.125501 ↗
29. Riggio M, Sandak J, Franke S (2015) Application of imaging techniques for detection of defects, damage and decay in timber structures on-site. Construct Build Mater 101:1241–125210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.06.065 ↗
30. Smith RL, Phoenix SL (1981) Asymptotic distributions for the failure of fibrous materials under series-parallel structure and equal load-sharing. J Appl Mech Trans ASME 48(1):75–8210.1115/1.3157595 ↗
31. Sudret B, Kiureghian aD (2000) Stochastic finite element methods and reliability: a state-of-the-art report. Technical Report November
32. Tang SB, Huang RQ, Tang CA, Liang ZZ, Heap MJ (2017) The failure processes analysis of rock slope using numerical modelling techniques. Eng Fail Anal 79(June):999–101610.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.06.029 ↗
33. Vandoren B, Simone A (2018) Modeling and simulation of quasi-brittle failure with continuous anisotropic stress-based gradient-enhanced damage models. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 332:644–68510.1016/j.cma.2017.12.027 ↗
34. Zietlow WK, Labuz JF (1998) Measurement of the intrinsic process zone in rock using acoustic emission. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 35(3):291–29910.1016/S0148-9062(97)00323-9 ↗