On crack tip stress fields in pseudoelastic shape memory alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
In a domain of reasonable accuracy around the crack tip, asymptotic equations can provide closed form expressions that can be used in formulation of crack problem. In some studies on shape memory alloys (SMAs), although the pseudoelastic behavior results in a nonlinear stress–strain relation, stress distribution in the vicinity of the crack tip is evaluated using asymptotic equations of linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM). In pseudoelastic (SMAs), upon loading, stress increases around the crack tip and martensitic phase transformation occurs in early stages. In this paper, using the similarity in the loading paths of a pseudoelastic SMA and a strain hardening material, the stress–strain relation is represented by nonlinear Ramberg–Osgood equation which is originally proposed for strain hardening materials, and the stress distribution around the crack tip of a pseudoelastic SMA plate is reworked using the Hutchinson, Rice and Rosengren (HRR) solution, first studied by Hutchinson. The size of the transformation region around the crack tip is calculated in closed form using a thermodynamic force that governs the martensitic transformation together with the asymptotic equations of HRR. A UMAT is written to separately describe the thermo-mechanical behavior of pseudoelastic SMAs. The results of the present study are compared to the results of LEFM, computational results from ABAQUS, and experimental results for the case of an edge cracked NiTi plate. Both set of asymptotic equations are shown to have different dominant zones around the crack tip with HRR equations representing the martensitic transformation zone more accurately.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Elasticity and Material Modeling
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Anderson TL (2005) Fracture mechanics: fundamentals and applications, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton10.1201/9781420058215 ↗
2. ASTM E399 (2013) Standard test method for linear-elastic plane-strain fracture toughness K1C of metallic material. E 399. https://doi.org/10.1520/E0399-12E03.2
3. Baxevanis T, Lagoudas D (2012) A mode i fracture analysis of a center-cracked infinite shape memory alloy plate under plane stress. Int J Fract. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-012-9709-z10.1007/s10704-012-9709-z ↗
4. Baxevanis T, Chemisky Y, Lagoudas DC (2012) Finite element analysis of the plane strain crack-tip mechanical fields in pseudoelastic shape memory alloys. Smart Mater Struct. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/21/9/09401210.1088/0964-1726/21/9/094012 ↗
5. Birman V (1998) On mode I fracture of shape memory alloy plates. Smart Mater Struct 7(4):43310.1088/0964-1726/7/4/001 ↗
6. Daly S, Miller A, Ravichandran G, Bhattacharya K (2007) An experimental investigation of crack initiation in thin sheets of nitinol. Acta Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2007.07.03810.1016/j.actamat.2007.07.038 ↗
7. Daymond MR, Young ML, Almer JD, Dunand DC (2007) Strain and texture evolution during mechanical loading of a crack tip in martensitic shape-memory NiTi. Acta Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2007.03.01310.1016/j.actamat.2007.03.013 ↗
8. Falvo A, Furgiuele F, Leonardi A, Maletta C (2009) Stress-induced martensitic transformation in the crack tip region of a NiTi alloy. J Mater Eng Perform. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-009-9361-610.1007/s11665-009-9361-6 ↗
9. Freed Y, Banks-Sills L (2007) Crack growth resistance of shape memory alloys by means of a cohesive zone model. J Mech Phys Solids. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2007.03.00210.1016/j.jmps.2007.03.002 ↗
10. Gu X, Zaki W, Morin C, Moumni Z, Zhang W (2015) Time integration and assessment of a model for shape memory alloys considering multiaxial nonproportional loading cases. Int J Solids Struct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.11.00510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.11.005 ↗
11. Gu X, Zhang W, Zaki W, Moumni Z (2017) An extended thermomechanically coupled 3D rate-dependent model for pseudoelastic SMAs under cyclic loading. Smart Mater Struct. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/aa7c3610.1088/1361-665X/aa7c36 ↗
12. Haghgouyan B, Shafaghi N, Aydner CC, Anlas G (2016) Experimental and computational investigation of the effect of phase transformation on fracture parameters of an SMA. Smart Mater Struct 25(7):075010. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/25/7/07501010.1088/0964-1726/25/7/075010 ↗
13. Hazar S, Anlas G, Moumni Z (2016) Evaluation of transformation region around crack tip in shape memory alloys. Int J Fract. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-015-0069-310.1007/s10704-015-0069-3 ↗
14. Hutchinson JW (1968) Singular behaviour at the end of a tensile crack in a hardening material. J Mech Phys Solids. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(68)90014-810.1016/0022-5096(68)90014-8 ↗
15. Lexcellent C, Laydi MR, Taillebot V (2011) Analytical prediction of the phase transformation onset zone at a crack tip of a shape memory alloy exhibiting asymmetry between tension and compression. Int J Fract. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-010-9577-310.1007/s10704-010-9577-3 ↗
16. Maletta C (2012) A novel fracture mechanics approach for shape memory alloys with trilinear stress–strain behavior. Int J Fract. https://doi.org/10.1007/10704-012-9750-y
17. Maletta C, Furgiuele F (2010) Analytical modeling of stress-induced martensitic transformation in the crack tip region of nickel–titanium alloys. Acta Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.06010.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.060 ↗
18. Maletta C, Furgiuele F (2011) Fracture control parameters for NiTi based shape memory alloys. Int J Solids Struct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.02.01410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.02.014 ↗
19. Maletta C, Furgiuele F (2012) 1D phenomenological modeling of shape memory and pseudoelasticity in NiTi alloys. In: Berselli G (ed) Smart actuation and sensing systems-recent advances and future challenges. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/5128310.5772/51283 ↗
20. Maletta C, Sgambitterra E, Furgiuele F (2013) Crack tip stress distribution and stress intensity factor in shape memory alloys. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.1205510.1111/ffe.12055 ↗
21. Morin C, Moumni Z, Zaki W (2011) A constitutive model for shape memory alloys accounting for thermomechanical coupling. Int J Plast. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.09.00510.1016/j.ijplas.2010.09.005 ↗
22. Mutlu F (2016) Effect of loading rate on fracture of NiTi. PhD thesis, Bogazici University
23. Robertson SW, Mehta A, Pelton AR, Ritchie RO (2007) Evolution of crack-tip transformation zones in superelastic Nitinol subjected to in situ fatigue: a fracture mechanics and synchrotron X-ray microdiffraction analysis. Acta Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2007.07.02810.1016/j.actamat.2007.07.028 ↗
24. Sgambitterra E, Lesci S, Maletta C (2015) Effects of higher order terms in fracture mechanics of shape memory alloys bydigital image correlation. In: Procedia engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.06.26310.1016/j.proeng.2015.06.263 ↗
25. Wang GZ (2007) A finite element analysis of evolution of stress–strain and martensite transformation in front of a notch in shape memory alloy NiTi. Mater Sci Eng A. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2007.01.15410.1016/j.msea.2007.01.154 ↗
26. Williams ML (1957) On the stress distribution at the base of a stationary crack. J Appl Mech 24:109–11410.1115/1.4011454 ↗
27. Yan W, Wang CH, Zhang XP, Mai YW (2002) Effect of transformation volume contraction on the toughness of superelastic shape memory alloys. Smart Mater Struct. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/11/6/31610.1088/0964-1726/11/6/316 ↗
28. Yi S, Gao S (2000) Fracture toughening mechanism of shape memory alloys due to martensite transformation. Int J Solids Struct. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(99)00213-910.1016/S0020-7683(99)00213-9 ↗
29. Zaki W, Moumni Z (2007) A three-dimensional model of the thermomechanical behavior of shape memory alloys. J Mech Phys Solids. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2007.03.01210.1016/j.jmps.2007.03.012 ↗