On the use of digital image correlation for translaminar fracture of off-axis composite
Source abstract
Abstract
The present study intends to extract mixed-mode stress intensity factors (SIFs) and T-stress in off-axis laminated composites using the digital image correlation (DIC). For the first time, a theoretical framework is developed to calculate SIFs according to change in off-axis fiber angles. The effects of DIC parameters on SIFs are investigated to achieve accurate experimental results. This paper is also set out to optimize the number of terms used in the multiparameter stress function and size of the extraction area. Moreover, T-stress is extracted using the developed formulation, as well as investigation of stability and instability of crack path in particular loading. The initial crack growth angle is determined and compared with its experimental observation. Finally, the finite element simulation is employed to carry out a comparative study, and the respective results are in good agreement.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Optical measurement and interference techniques · Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. ASTM (2013) ASTM D3518 Standard Test Method for In-Plane Shear Response of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials by Tensile Test of a +-45° Laminate. vol 641–642
2. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials D3039. ASTM Stand 2014:1–13.
3. ASTM E399 - 20 Standard Test Method for Linear-Elastic Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness of Metallic Materials n.d. https://www.astm.org/Standards/E399.htm. Accessed 2 Nov 2020a
4. ASTM D5045 - 14 Standard Test Methods for Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness and Strain Energy Release Rate of Plastic Materials n.d. https://www.astm.org/Standards/D5045.htm. Accessed 2 Nov 2020b
5. Ayhan A, Kaya A, Loghin A, Laflen J, McClain R, Slavik D (2006) Fracture analysis of cracks in orthotropic materials using ANSYS®”. Turbo Expo: Power Land Sea Air 42401:873–881
6. Beuth JL Jr, Herakovich CT (1989) Analysis of crack extension in anisotropic materials based on local normal stress. Theor Appl Fract Mech 11(1):27–4610.1016/0167-8442(89)90023-2 ↗
7. Brouzoulis J, Fagerstsröm M, Svenning E (2016) An enriched shell element formulation for modeling of inter- and intralaminar crack propagation in laminates. Compos Struct 136:616–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.10.02810.1016/j.compstruct.2015.10.028 ↗
8. Buczek MB, Herakovich CT (1982) Finite element models for predicting crack growth characteristics in composite materials. Virginia Polytechnic Inst and State Univ Blacksburg Coll of Engineering
9. Bullegas G, Pinho ST, Pimenta S (2016) Engineering the translaminar fracture behaviour of thin-ply composites. Compos Sci Technol 131:110–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.06.00210.1016/j.compscitech.2016.06.002 ↗
10. Cappello R, Pitarresi G, Xavier J, Catalanotti G (2020) Experimental determination of mode I fracture parameters in orthotropic materials by means of Digital Image Correlation. Theor Appl Fract Mech 108:102663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.10266310.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102663 ↗
11. Carter JLW, Uchic MD, Mills MJ (2015) Impact of speckle pattern parameters on DIC strain resolution calculated from in-situ SEM experiments. Conf Proc Soc Exp Mech Ser 66:119–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06977-7_1610.1007/978-3-319-06977-7_16 ↗
12. Catalanotti G, Camanho PP, Xavier J, Dávila CG, Marques AT (2010) Measurement of resistance curves in the longitudinal failure of composites using digital image correlation. Compos Sci Technol 70:1986–1993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.07.02210.1016/j.compscitech.2010.07.022 ↗
13. Chakraborty D, Murthy KSRK, Chakraborty D (2014) A new single strain gage technique for the accurate determination of mode I stress intensity factor in orthotropic composite materials. Eng Fract Mech 124–125:142–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.04.01110.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.04.011 ↗
14. Chakraborty D, Murthy KSRK, Chakraborty D (2017) Experimental determination of mode I stress intensity factor in orthotropic materials using a single strain gage. Eng Fract Mech 173:130–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.01.00210.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.01.002 ↗
15. Costa S, Fagerström M, Olsson R (2020) Development and validation of a finite deformation fibre kinking model for crushing of composites. Compos Sci Technol 197:108236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10823610.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108236 ↗
16. Desai A, Sharanaprabhu CM, Kudari SK (2020) Experimental investigation to evaluate total energy release rate for unidirectional glass/epoxy composite under Mixed mode-I/II load. Sadhana Acad Proc Eng Sci 45:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-020-01482-310.1007/s12046-020-01482-3 ↗
17. Fakoor M, Manafi FH (2019) Mixed-mode I/II fracture criterion for crack initiation assessment of composite materials. Acta Mech 230:281–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-018-2308-y10.1007/s00707-018-2308-y ↗
18. Fakoor M, Rafiee R, Sheikhansari M (2017) The influence of fiber-crack angle on thecrack tip parameters in orthotropic materials. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 231(3):418–43110.1177/0954406215617195 ↗
19. Främby J, Fagerström M, Brouzoulis J (2017) Adaptive modelling of delamination initiation and propagation using an equivalent single-layer shell approach. Int J Numer Methods Eng 112:882–908. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.553610.1002/nme.5536 ↗
20. Ghane E, Mohammadi B (2020) Entropy-damage mechanics for the failure investigation of plain weave fabric composites. Compos Struct 250:112493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11249310.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112493 ↗
21. Gregory MA, Herakovich CT (1984) Prediction of crack extension direction in unidirectional composites. Virginia Polytechnic Inst and State Univ Blacksburg Dept of Engineering Science and Mechanics10.21236/ADA303076 ↗
22. Gregory MA, Herakovich CT (1986) Predicting crack growth direction in unidirectional composites. J Compos Mater 20(1):67–8510.1177/002199838602000105 ↗
23. Heidari-Rarani M, Sayedain M (2019) Finite element modeling strategies for 2D and 3D delamination propagation in composite DCB specimens using VCCT, CZM and XFEM approaches. Theor Appl Fract Mech 103:102246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.10224610.1016/j.tafmec.2019.102246 ↗
24. Hou F, Hong S (2014) Characterization of R-curve behavior of translaminar crack growth in cross-ply composite laminates using digital image correlation. Eng Fract Mech 117:51–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.01.01010.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.01.010 ↗
25. Hyer MW, White SR (2009) Stress analysis of fiber-reinforced composite materials. DEStech Publications Inc, Lancaster
26. Jirandehi AP, Chakherlou TN (2019) A fatigue crack initiation and growth life estimation method in single-bolted connections. J Strain Anal Eng Des 54:79–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/030932471982927410.1177/0309324719829274 ↗
27. Kageyama K (1989) Fracture mechanics of notched carbon/epoxy laminates. Compos Mater Ser 6:327–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-87286-9.50013-910.1016/B978-0-444-87286-9.50013-9 ↗
28. Kim JH, Paulino GH (2003) T-stress, mixed-mode stress intensity factors, and crack initiation angles in functionally graded materials: a unified approach using the interaction integral method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 192:1463–1494. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(02)00652-710.1016/S0045-7825(02)00652-7 ↗
29. Kretschmann D (2010) “Mechanical properties of wood.” Wood handbook: wood as an engineering material: chapter 5. Centennial ed. General technical report FPL; GTR-190. Madison, WI: US Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, pp 5.1–5.46. 190, 5–1
30. Laffan MJ, Pinho ST, Robinson P, Iannucci L (2010) Measurement of the in situ ply fracture toughness associated with mode I fibre tensile failure in FRP. Part I: data reduction. Compos Sci Technol 70:606–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.12.01610.1016/j.compscitech.2009.12.016 ↗
31. Laffan MJ, Pinho ST, Robinson P, McMillan AJ (2012) Translaminar fracture toughness testing of composites: a review. Polym Test 31:481–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.01.00210.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.01.002 ↗
32. Lee D, Tippur H, Bogert P (2010) Quasi-static and dynamic fracture of graphite/epoxy composites: an optical study of loading-rate effects. Compos Part B Eng 41:462–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.05.00710.1016/j.compositesb.2010.05.007 ↗
33. Mai Y, Cotterell B (1988) Introduction I. Fracture of fiber-reinforced materials. J Appl Math 39:0–110.1007/BF00948962 ↗
34. Manafi Farid H, Fakoor M (2019) Mixed mode I/II fracture criterion for arbitrary cracks in orthotropic materials considering T-stress effects. Theor Appl Fract Mech 99:147–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.11.01510.1016/j.tafmec.2018.11.015 ↗
35. Mogadpalli GP, Parameswaran V (2008) Determination of stress intensity factor for cracks in orthotropic composite materials using digital image correlation. Strain 44:446–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1305.2007.00391.x10.1111/j.1475-1305.2007.00391.x ↗
36. Mohammadi S (2012) XFEM fracture analysis of composites. Wiley, New York. https://doi.org/10.1002/978111844337810.1002/9781118443378 ↗
37. Mohammadi B, Pakdel H (2018) Experimental and variational-based analytical investigation of multiple cracked angle-ply laminates. Eng Fract Mech 190:198–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.12.00310.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.12.003 ↗
38. Mohammadi B, Pourhosseinshahi M, Sohrabi A, Keshvari Fard AH (2020) A new FE modeling procedure to investigate the effects of toughening mechanisms on the fracture toughness of laminated composites. Theor Appl Fract Mech 107:102507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.10250710.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102507 ↗
39. Pakdel H, Mohammadi B (2017) Experimental observation and energy based analytical investigation of matrix cracking distribution pattern in angle-ply laminates. Theor Appl Fract Mech 92:146–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2017.06.00710.1016/j.tafmec.2017.06.007 ↗
40. Paul P, Murthy KSRK, Chakraborty D (2018) A strain gage technique for mode I notch stress intensity factor of sharp V-notched configurations. Theor Appl Fract Mech 94:57–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.01.00110.1016/j.tafmec.2018.01.001 ↗
41. Pimenta S, Pinho ST (2014) An analytical model for the translaminar fracture toughness of fibre composites with stochastic quasi-fractal fracture surfaces. J Mech Phys Solids 66:78–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2014.02.00110.1016/j.jmps.2014.02.001 ↗
42. Pinho ST, Robinson P, Iannucci L (2006) Fracture toughness of the tensile and compressive fibre failure modes in laminated composites. Compos Sci Technol 66:2069–2079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.12.02310.1016/j.compscitech.2005.12.023 ↗
43. Romanowicz M, Seweryn A (2008) Verification of a non-local stress criterionfor mixed mode fracture in wood. Eng Fract Mech 75(10):3141–316010.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.12.006 ↗
44. Saouma VE, Sikiotis ES (1986) Stress intensity factors in anisotropic bodies using singular isoparametric elements. Eng Fract Mech 25:115–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(86)90209-210.1016/0013-7944(86)90209-2 ↗
45. Shukla A, Agarwal BD, Bhushan B (1989) Determination of stress intensity factor in orthotropic composite materials using strain gages. Eng Fract Mech 32:469–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(89)90318-410.1016/0013-7944(89)90318-4 ↗
46. Subramanyam Reddy M, Ramesh K, Thiyagarajan A (2018) Evaluation of mode-I SIF, T-stress and J-integral using displacement data from digital image correlation—revisited. Theor Appl Fract Mech 96:146–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.04.00610.1016/j.tafmec.2018.04.006 ↗
47. Swolfs Y, Pinho ST (2019) 3D printed continuous fibre-reinforced composites: bio-inspired microstructures for improving the translaminar fracture toughness. Compos Sci Technol 182:107731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.10773110.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107731 ↗
48. Swolfs Y, Verpoest I, Gorbatikh L (2019) Recent advances in fibre-hybrid composites: materials selection, opportunities and applications. Int Mater Rev 64:181–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2018.146736510.1080/09506608.2018.1467365 ↗
49. Teixeira RF, Pinho ST, Robinson P (2016) Thickness-dependence of the translaminar fracture toughness: experimental study using thin-ply composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 90:33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.03110.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.031 ↗
50. Torabi AR, Bahrami B, Ayatollahi MR (2020) On the use of digital image correlation method for determining the stress field at blunt V-notch neighborhood. Eng Fract Mech 223:106768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.10676810.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106768 ↗
51. Zeinedini A, Moradi MH, Taghibeigi H, Jamali J (2020) On the mixed mode I/II/III translaminar fracture toughness of cotton/epoxy laminated composites. Theor Appl Fract Mech 109:102760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.10276010.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102760 ↗