journal article·2020-03Open access

Interfacial toughness: dependence on surface roughness and test temperature

E. D. Reedy, M. E. Stavig

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 222· Issue 1-2

Abstract

Interfacial toughness quantifies resistance to crack growth along an interface and in this investigation the toughness of an aluminum/epoxy interface was measured as a function of surface roughness and test temperature. The large strain response of the relatively ductile epoxy adhesive used in this study was also characterized. This epoxy adhesive exhibits intrinsic strain-softening after initial compressive yield and then deforms plastically at a roughly constant flow stress until it rapidly hardens at large compressive strains. We find that interface toughness scales as the product of the temperature dependent epoxy yield strength and a length scale that characterizes surface roughness. The proposed scaling is based upon dimensional considerations of a model problem that assumes that the characteristic length scale of both the roughness and the crack-tip yield zone is small relative to the region dominated by the linear elastic asymptotic crack-tip stress field. Furthermore, the model assumes that interfacial failure occurs only after the epoxy begins to harden at large strains. The proposed relationship is validated by our interfacial toughness measurements.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Adolf DB, Chambers RS, Caruthers JM (2004) Extensive validation of a thermodynamically consistent, nonlinear viscoelastic model for glassy polymers. Polymer 45(13):4599–462110.1016/j.polymer.2004.04.022 ↗
2. Anderson TL (2005) Fracture mechanics: fundamentals and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton10.1201/9781420058215 ↗
3. Bagheri R, Marouf BT, Pearson RA (2009) Rubber-Toughened Epoxies: a critical review. Polym Rev 49(3):201–22510.1080/15583720903048227 ↗
4. Bao G, Ho S, Suo Z, Fan B (1992) The role of material orthotropy in fracture specimens for composites. Int J Solids Struct 29:1105–111610.1016/0020-7683(92)90138-J ↗
5. Brown HR (1990) Mixed-mode effects on the toughness of polymer interfaces. J Mater Sci 25(6):2791–279410.1007/BF00584881 ↗
6. Buckley CP, Harding J, Hou JP, Ruiz C, Trojanowski A (2001) Deformation of thermosetting resins at impact rates of strain. Part I: experimental study. J Mech Phys Solids 49:1517–153810.1016/S0022-5096(00)00085-5 ↗
7. Hutchinson JW, Suo Z (1992) Mixed mode cracking in layered materials. In: Hutchinson JW, Wu TY (eds) Advances in applied mechanics. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 63–191
8. Jennings CW (1972) Surface-roughness and bond strength of adhesives. J Adhes 4(1):25–3810.1080/00218467208072208 ↗
9. Kinloch AJ (1980) The science of adhesion.1. Surface and interfacial aspects. J Mater Sci 15(9):2141–216610.1007/BF00552302 ↗
10. Kinloch AJ (1982) The science of adhesion.2. Mechanics and mechanisms of failure. J Mater Sci 17(3):617–65110.1007/BF00540361 ↗
11. McClintock FA, Argon AS (1966) Mech Behav Mater. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co, Boston
12. Packham DE (2003) Surface energy, surface topography and adhesion. Int J Adhes Adhes 23:437–44810.1016/S0143-7496(03)00068-X ↗
13. Pocius AV (1997) Adhes Adhes Technol. Hanser Gardner Publications Inc, Cincinnati
14. Reedy ED Jr, Guess TR (1993) Comparison of butt tensile strength data with interface corner stress intensity factor prediction. Int J Solids Struct 30:2929–293610.1016/0020-7683(93)90204-K ↗
15. Reedy ED Jr, Guess TR (1995) Butt joint tensile strength: interface corner stress intensity factor prediction. J Adhes Sci Technol 9:237–25110.1163/156856195X01148 ↗
16. Reedy ED Jr, Guess TR (1999) Additional interface corner toughness data for an adhesively-bonded butt joint. Int J Fract 98:L3–L810.1023/A:1018717508799 ↗
17. Rice JR, Suo Z, Wang JS (1990) Mechanics and thermodynamics of brittle interfacial failure in bimaterial systems. In: Ruhle M, Evans AG, Ashby MF, Hirth JP (eds) Metal-ceramic interfaces. Pergamon Press, New York, pp 269–29410.1016/B978-0-08-040505-6.50036-2 ↗
18. Rider AN, Arnott DR (2001) The influence of adherend topography on the fracture toughness of aluminum-epoxy adhesive joints in humid environments. J Adhes 75:203–22810.1080/00218460108029601 ↗
19. Shahid M, Hashim SA (2002) Effect of surface roughness on the strength of cleavage joints. Int J Adhes Adhes 22(3):235–24410.1016/S0143-7496(01)00059-8 ↗
20. Stevens MJ (2001) Interfacial fracture between highly cross-linked polymer networks and a solid surface: effect of interfacial bond density. Macromolecules 34(8):2710–271810.1021/ma000553u ↗
21. Suo Z, Hutchinson JW (1989) Sandwich test specimens for measuring interface crack toughness. Mater Sci Eng A 107:135–14310.1016/0921-5093(89)90382-1 ↗
22. Tvergaard V, Hutchinson JW (1993) The influence of plasticity on mixed mode interface toughness. J Mech Phys Solids 41:1119–113510.1016/0022-5096(93)90057-M ↗
23. Volinsky AA, Moody NR, Gerberich WW (2002) Interfacial toughness measurements for thin films on substrates. Acta Materialia 50(3):441–46610.1016/S1359-6454(01)00354-8 ↗
24. Zhang YL, Spinks GM (1997) An atomic force microscopy study of the effect of surface roughness on the fracture energy of adhesively bonded aluminium. J Adhes Sci Technol 11(2):207–22310.1163/156856197X00318 ↗
25. Zhang S, Panat R, Hsia KJ (2003) Influence of surface morphology on the adhesion strength of epoxy-aluminum interfaces. J Adhes Sci Technol 17:1685–171110.1163/156856103322396749 ↗