Constraint-corrected fracture failure criterion based on CTOD/CTOA
Source abstract
Abstract
In engineering design, a difficulty has always existed in those standard laboratory tests that cannot accurately predict the behavior of large structures like pipelines due to the different constraint levels. At present, extensive work has been done to characterize the constraint effects on fracture toughness by introducing a second parameter, while the systematic research on constrained transformation is inadequate. To address this issue, the ductile fracture process of X65 SENB specimen is simulated through the finite-element method coupled with the Gurson–Tvergaard–Needelman model. The parameters crack tip opening displacement (CTOD) and crack tip opening angle (CTOA) are chosen to characterize the fracture behaviors. The effects of specimen thickness on fracture toughness based on CTOD/CTOA and constraints ahead of crack tips in SENB specimen are studied. The results indicate that the critical values of CTOD/CTOA decrease with the increase of specimen thickness, but the constraint parameters are opposite. Furthermore, it finds that there is a near linear relationship between critical values of CTOD/CTOA and the stress constraint ahead of the crack tip. Thus, a constraint-corrected fracture failure criterion based on CTOD/CTOA is proposed, which can be used for the prediction and simulation of stable tearing crack growth in specimens and structures, made of this steel with any thickness value.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Metallurgy and Material Forming
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Betegon C, Hancock JW (1991) Two-parameter characterization of elastic-plastic crack-tip fields. J Appl Mech 58:104–11010.1115/1.2897135 ↗
2. Bridgman PW (1952) Studies in large plastic flow and fracture. McGraw-Hill, New York
3. Brocks W, Schmitt W (1993) Quantitative assessment of the role of crack tip constraint on ductile tearing. In: Hacket EM, Schwalbe KH, Dodds RH (eds) Constraint effects in fracture, ASTM STP 1171. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, pp 64–78
4. Chen Y, Lambert S (2003) Analysis of ductile tearing of pipeline-steel in single edge notch tension specimens. Int J Fract 124(3):179–19910.1023/B:FRAC.0000018236.36132.36 ↗
5. Dybwad J, Törnqvist R, O/stby E, Thaulow C (2009) Simulations of ductile tearing at large strains of biaxially loaded pipes. In: ASME 2009 28th international conference on Ocean, offshore and arctic engineering (OMAE), Hawaii, pp 115-12210.1115/OMAE2009-79631 ↗
6. Gurson AL (1977) Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth: part I-yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. J Eng Mater Tech 99(1):2–1510.1115/1.3443401 ↗
7. Han K, Shuai J, Deng X, Kong L, Zhao X, Sutton M (2014) The effect of constraint on CTOD fracture toughness of API X65 steel. Eng Fract Mech 124:167–18110.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.04.014 ↗
8. Hashemi SH, Howard IC, Yates JR, Andrews RM, Edwards AM (2004) Experimental study of thickness and fatigue precracking influence on the CTOA toughness values of high grade gas pipeline steel. In: 2004 international pipeline conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp 2753–276010.1115/IPC2004-0681 ↗
9. Liu M, Wang YY (2006) Applying Gurson type of damage models to low constraint tests of high strength steels and welds. In: Proceedings of the 6th international pipeline conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp 511–51810.1115/IPC2006-10416 ↗
10. Mahmoud S, Lease K (2003) The effect of specimen thickness on the experimental characterization of critical crack-tip-opening angle in 2024–T351 aluminum alloy. Eng Fract Mech 70(3):443–45610.1016/S0013-7944(02)00130-3 ↗
11. McClintock FA (1968) A criterion of ductile fracture by the growth of holes. J Appl Mech 35:363–37110.1115/1.3601204 ↗
12. Nonn A, Kalwa C (2012) Simulation of ductile crack propagation in high-strength pipeline steel using damage models. In: IPC2012-90653, proceedings of the 9th international pipeline conference, Calgary10.1115/IPC2012-90653 ↗
13. O’Dowd NP, Shih CF (1992) Family of crack-tip fields characterized by a triaxiality parameter-II. Fracture applications. J Mech Phys Solids 40(5):939–96310.1016/0022-5096(92)90057-9 ↗
14. O’Dowd NP, Shih CF (1994) Two-parameter fracture mechanics: theory and applications. In: Landes JD et al (eds) Fracture mechanics: twenty fourth volume ASTM STP 1207. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, pp 21–4710.1520/STP13698S ↗
15. Oh CK, Kim YJ, Baek JH, Kim YP, Kim W (2007) A phenomenological model of ductile fracture for API X65 steel. Int J Mech Sci 49(12):1399–141210.1016/j.ijmecsci.2007.03.008 ↗
16. Oh CS, Kim NH, Kim YJ, Baek JH, Kim YP, Kim WS (2011) A finite element ductile failure simulation method using stress-modified fracture strain model. Eng Fract Mech 78(1):124–13710.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.10.004 ↗
17. Østby E, Thaulow C, Zhang ZL (2007) Numerical simulations of specimen size and mismatch effects in ductile crack growth—Part I: tearing resistance and crack growth paths. Eng Fract Mech 74:1770–179210.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.09.013 ↗
18. Pavankumar TV, Samal MK, Chattopadhyay J, Dutta BK, Kushwaha HS, Roos E, Seidenfuss M (2005) Transferability of fracture parameters from specimens to component level. Int J Press Vessels Pip 82(5):386–39910.1016/j.ijpvp.2004.10.003 ↗
19. Rudland DL, Wilkowski GM, Feng Z, Wang YY, Horsley D, Glover A (2003) Experimental investigation of CTOA in linepipe steels. Eng Fract Mech 70(3):567–57710.1016/S0013-7944(02)00138-8 ↗
20. Tvergaard V (1981) Influence of voids on shear band instabilities under plane strain conditions. Int J Fract 17(4):389–40710.1007/BF00036191 ↗
21. Wang J, Jian S, Xu X (2010) Study of influence factors on the CTOA toughness values by experiment/simulation method. In: 2010 8th international pipeline conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp 329-34010.1115/IPC2010-31172 ↗
22. Wang Y, Zhou H, Shi Y, Xiong J (2011) Fracture prediction of welded steel connections using traditional fracture mechanics and calibrated micromechanics based models. Int J Steel Struct 11(3):351–36610.1007/s13296-011-3010-2 ↗
23. Xu J, Zhang ZL, Østby E, Nyhus B, Sun DB (2009) Effects of crack depth and specimen size on ductile crack growth of SENT and SENB specimens for fracture mechanics evaluation of pipeline steels. Int J Press Vessels Pip 86(12):787–79710.1016/j.ijpvp.2009.12.004 ↗
24. Yang S, Chao YJ, Sutton MA (1993) Higher order asymptotic crack tip fields in a power-law hardening material. Eng Fract Mech 45(1):1–2010.1016/0013-7944(93)90002-A ↗
25. Zhang ZL, Thaulow C, Ødegård J (2000) A complete Gurson model approach for ductile fracture. Eng Fract Mech 67(2):155–16810.1016/S0013-7944(00)00055-2 ↗
26. Zhu XK, Joyce JA (2012) Review of fracture toughness (G, K, J, CTOD, CTOA) testing and standardization. Eng Fract Mech 85:1–4610.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.02.001 ↗