journal article·2014-11

A discrete damage zone model for mixed-mode delamination of composites under high-cycle fatigue

Stephen Jimenez, Xia Liu, Ravindra Duddu, Haim Waisman

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 190· Issue 1-2
Publisher page

Abstract

A discrete damage zone model is developed to describe the mode-mix ratio and temperature dependent delamination of laminated composite materials under high cycle fatigue loading within the framework of the finite element method. In this approach, discrete nonlinear spring elements are placed at the finite element nodes of the laminate interface, and a combination of static and fatigue damage growth laws is used to define its constitutive behavior. The model is implemented in the commercial software Abaqus using the user element subroutine. The static damage model parameters are estimated from fracture mechanics principles, whereas the fatigue damage model parameters are calibrated by fitting the numerical results to published experimental data. A quadratic relation is proposed to describe the non-monotonic variation of fatigue damage model parameters with mode-mix ratio. Next, an Arrhenius relation is proposed for the temperature dependence of fatigue damage, in addition to the incorporation of the temperature dependence of critical fracture energy. The model is convergent upon mesh refinement; however, for accurate prediction the mesh size used for model calibration should be sufficiently small. The model predicted fatigue crack growth rates are in agreement with those obtained from a quadratic relation for the Paris law parameters for variable mode mix conditions, thus verifying the approach. While the model captures the temperature effects on delamination for mode I and 50 % mode II, our prediction deviates from experiments for pure mode II, since the corresponding damage mechanism entirely changes with temperature.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (63)

Show source-provided references
1. Alfano G, Crisfield MA (2001) Finite element interface models for the delamination analysis of laminated composites: mechanical and computational issues. Int J Numer Methods Eng 50:1701–173610.1002/nme.93 ↗
2. Alfano M, Furgiuele F, Leonardi A, Maletta C, Paulino GH (2009) Mode I fracture of adhesive joints using tailored cohesive zone models. Int J Fract 157:193–20410.1007/s10704-008-9293-4 ↗
3. Asp LE (1998) The effects of moisture and temperature on the interlaminar delamination toughness of a carbon/epoxy composite. J Compos Technol Res 58(6):967–97710.1016/S0266-3538(97)00222-4 ↗
4. Asp LE, Sjögren A, Greenhalgh ES (2001) Delamination growth and thresholds in a carbon/epoxy composites under fatigue loading. J Compos Technol Res 23(2):55–6810.1520/CTR10914J ↗
5. Barenblatt GI (1962) The mathematical theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture. Adv Appl Mech 7:55–12910.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-2 ↗
6. Bazant ZP (1999) Size effect on structural strength: a review. Arch Appl Mech 69(9–10):703–725
7. Blackman B, Dear JP, Kinloch AJ, Osiyemi S (1991) The calculation of adhesive fracture energies from double-cantilever beam test specimens. J Mater Sci Lett 10:253–25610.1007/BF00735649 ↗
8. Blackman BRK, Hadavinia H, Kinloch AJ, Paraschi M, Williams JG (2003a) The calculation of adhesive fracture energies in mode I: revisiting the tapered double cantilever beam (TDCB) test. Eng Fract Mech 70:233–24810.1016/S0013-7944(02)00031-0 ↗
9. Blackman BRK, Hadavinia H, Kinloch AJ, Williams JG (2003b) The use of a cohesive zone model to study the fracture of fibre composites and adhesively-bonded joints. Int J Fract 119:25–4610.1023/A:1023998013255 ↗
10. Blackman BRK, Kinloch AJ, Paraschi M, Teo WS (2003c) Measuring the mode I adhesive fracture energy, $$G\rm IC$$ G IC , of structural adhesive joints: the results of an international round-robin. Int J Adhes Adhes 23:293–30510.1016/S0143-7496(03)00047-2 ↗
11. Blanco N, Gamstedt EK, Asp LE, Costa J (2004) Mixed-mode delamination growth in carbon-fibre composite laminates under cyclic loading. Int J Solids Struct 41(15):4219–423510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.02.040 ↗
12. Camanho PP, Dávila CG, De Moura MF (2003) Numerical simulation of mixed-mode progressive delamination in composite materials. J Compos Mater 37(16):1415–142410.1177/0021998303034505 ↗
13. Chandra N, Li H, Shet C, Ghonem H (2002) Some issues in the application of cohesive zone models for metal-ceramic interfaces. Int J Solids Struct 39:2827–285510.1016/S0020-7683(02)00149-X ↗
14. Cui WC, Wisnom MR (1993) A combined stress-based and fracture-mechanics-based model for predicting delamination in composites. Composites 24(6):467–47410.1016/0010-4361(93)90016-2 ↗
15. de Andres A, Perez JL, Ortiz M (1999) Elastoplastic finite element analysis of three-dimensional fatigue crack growth in aluminium shafts subjected to axial loading. Int J Solids Struct 36(15):2231–225810.1016/S0020-7683(98)00059-6 ↗
16. Do BC, Liu W, Yang QD, Su XY (2013) Improved cohesive stress integration schemes for cohesive zone elements. Eng Fract Mech, 107:14–28, ISSN 0013–7944
17. Dugdale DS (1960) Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J Mech Phys Solids 8(2):100–10410.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 ↗
18. Goyal VK, Johnson ER, Davila CG (2004) Irreversible constitutive law for modeling the delamination process using interfacial surface discontinuities. Compos Struct 65(3–4):434–446
19. Goyal VK, Johnson ER, Goyal VK (2008) Predictive strength-fracture model for composite bonded joints. Compos Struct 82(3):434–44610.1016/j.compstruct.2007.01.029 ↗
20. Harper PW, Hallet SR (2008) Cohesive zone length in numerical simulations of composite delamination. Eng Fract Mech 75(16):4774–479210.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.06.004 ↗
21. Harper PW, Hallet SR (2010) A fatigue degradation law for cohesive interface elements development and application to composite materials. Int J Fatigue 32(11):1774–178710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.04.006 ↗
22. Hillerborg A, Modéer M, Petersson PE (1976) Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements. Cem Concr Res 6:773–78210.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-7 ↗
23. Jiang W-G, Hallet SR, Green BG, Wisnom MR (2007) A concise interface constitutive law for analysis of delamination and splitting in composite materials and its application to scaled notched tensile specimens. Int J Numer Methods Eng 69(9):1982–199510.1002/nme.1842 ↗
24. Juntti M, Asp LE, Olsson R (1999) Assessment of evaluation methods for the mixed-mode bending test. J Compos Technol Res 21(1):37–4810.1520/CTR10611J ↗
25. Kawashita Luiz F, Hallett Stephen R (2012) A crack tip tracking algorithm for cohesive interface element analysis of fatigue delamination propagation in composite materials. Int J Solids Struct 49(21):2898–2913, ISSN 0020–7683
26. Khan R, Khan Z, Al-Sulaiman F, Merah N (2002) Fatigue life estimates in woven carbon fabric/epoxy composites at non-ambient temperatures. J Compos Mater 36(22):2517–253510.1177/002199802761405277 ↗
27. Landry B, LaPlante G (2012) Modeling delamination growth in composites under fatigue loadings of varying amplitudes. Compos Part B Eng 43(2):533–54110.1016/j.compositesb.2011.08.020 ↗
28. Li S, Ghosh S (2006) Multiple cohesive crack growth in brittle materials by the extended Voronoi cell finite element model. Int J Fract 141:373–39310.1007/s10704-006-9000-2 ↗
29. Li S, Thouless MD, Waas AM, Schroeder JA, Zavattieri PD (2006) Mixed-mode cohesive-zone models for fracture of an adhesively bonded polymer–matrix composite. Eng Fract Mech 73(1):64–7810.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.07.004 ↗
30. Liljedahl CDM, Crocombe AD, Wahab MA, Ashcroft IA (2006) Damage modelling of adhesively bonded joints. Int J Fract 141:147–16110.1007/s10704-006-0072-9 ↗
31. Liu X, Duddu R, Waisman H (2012) Discrete damage zone model for fracture initiation and propagation. Eng Fract Mech 92:1–1810.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.04.019 ↗
32. Mazars J (1986) A description of micro- and macroscale damage of concrete structures. Eng Fract Mech 25:729–73710.1016/0013-7944(86)90036-6 ↗
33. Mi Y, Crisfield MA, Davies GAO, Hellweg HB (1998) Progressive delamination using interface elements. J Compos Mater 32:1246–127210.1177/002199839803201401 ↗
34. Munoz JJ, Galvanetto U, Robinson P (2006) On the numerical simulation of fatigue-driven delamination using interface elements. Int J Fatigue 28(10):1136–114610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.02.003 ↗
35. Neu RW, Sehitoglu H (1989) Thermomechanical fatigue, oxidation, and creep: II. Life prediction. Metall Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 20(9):1769–178310.1007/BF02663208 ↗
36. Nguyen O, Repetto EA, Ortiz M, Radovitzky RA (2001) A cohesive model of fatigue crack growth. Int J Fract 110(4):351–36910.1023/A:1010839522926 ↗
37. Nilsson K-F, Asp LE, Alpman JE, Nystedt L (2001) Delamination buckling and growth for delaminations at different depths in a slender composite panel. Int J Solids Struct 38(17):3039–307110.1016/S0020-7683(00)00189-X ↗
38. Paas MHJW, Schreurs PJG, Brekelmans WAM (1993) A continuum approach to brittle and fatigue damage: theory and numerical procedures. Int J Solids Struct 30(4):579–59910.1016/0020-7683(93)90189-E ↗
39. Paris P, Erdogan F (1963) Critical analysis of propagation laws. J Basic Eng 85:528–53410.1115/1.3656900 ↗
40. Paris P, Gomez M, Anderson W (1961) A rational analytical theory of fatigue. Trend Eng 13:9–14
41. Park K, Paulino GH, Roesler JR (2009) A unified potential-based cohesive model of mixed-mode fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 57:891–90810.1016/j.jmps.2008.10.003 ↗
42. Payan J, Hochard C (2002) Damage modelling of laminated carbon/epoxy composites under static and fatigue loadings. Int J Fatigue 24(2–4):299–30610.1016/S0142-1123(01)00085-8 ↗
43. Peerlings RHJ, Brekelmans WAM, de Borst R, Geers MGD (2000) Gradient-enhanced damage modelling of high-cyclic fatigue. Int J Numer Methods Eng 49(12):1547–156910.1002/1097-0207(20001230)49:12<1547::AID-NME16>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
44. Pettersson KB, Neumeister JM, Kristofer Gamstedt E, Oberg H (2006) Stiffness reduction, creep, and irreversible strains in fiber composites tested in repeated interlaminar shear. Compos Struct 76(12):151–161, 2006.10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.06.021 ↗
45. Qiu Y, Crisfield MA, Alfano G (2001) An interface element formulation for the simulation of delamination with buckling. Eng Fract Mech 68:1755–177610.1016/S0013-7944(01)00052-2 ↗
46. Reeder JR, Crews JR (1990) Mixed-mode bending method for delamination testing. AIAA J 28(7):1270–127610.2514/3.25204 ↗
47. Robinson P, Besant T, Hitchings D (2000) Delamination growth prediction using a finite element approach. In: 2nd ESIS TC4 conference on fracture of polymers, composites and adhesives, Switzerland, 27:135–14710.1016/S1566-1369(00)80014-X ↗
48. Robinson P, Galvanetto U, Tumino D, Bellucci G, Violeau D (2005) Numerical simulation of fatigue–driven delamination using interface elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 63(13):1824–184810.1002/nme.1338 ↗
49. Roe KL, Siegmund T (2003) An irreversible cohesive zone model for interface fatigue crack growth simulation. Eng Fract Mech 70(2):209–23210.1016/S0013-7944(02)00034-6 ↗
50. Schellenkens JCJ, de Borst R (1993) A non-linear finite element approach for the analysis of mode-i free edge delamination in composites. Int J Solids Struct 30(9):1239–125310.1016/0020-7683(93)90014-X ↗
51. Siegmund T (2004) A numerical study of transient fatigue crack growth by use of an irreversible cohesive zone model. Int J Fatigue 26(9):929–93910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.02.002 ↗
52. Sjogren A, Asp LE (2002) Effects of temperature on delamination growth in a carbon/epoxy composite under fatigue loading. Int J Fatigue 24(2–4):179–18410.1016/S0142-1123(01)00071-8 ↗
53. Skallerud B, Zhang ZL (1997) A 3D numerical study of ductile tearing and fatigue crack growth under nominal cyclic plasticity. Int J Solids Struct 34(24):3141–316110.1016/S0020-7683(96)00137-0 ↗
54. Turon A, Costa J, Camanho PP, Davila CG (2007) Simulation of delamination in composites under high-cycle fatigue. Compos: Part A 38(11):2270–228210.1016/j.compositesa.2006.11.009 ↗
55. van den Bosch MJ, Schreurs PJG, Geers MGD (2006) An improved description of the exponential xu and needleman cohesive zone law for mixed-mode decohesion. Int J Fract 73:1220–1234
56. Walker EK (1970) Analysis of stresses and strains near the end of a crack traversing a plate the effect of stress ratio during crack propagation and fatigue for 2024–T3 and 7076–T6 aluminum. In: Effect of environment and complex load history on fatigue life, ASTM STP 462. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials, 24:1–14
57. Wang Y, Waisman H (2014) Progressive delamination analysis of composite materials using xfem and a discrete damage zone model. Comput Mech. doi: 10.1007/s00466-014-1079-010.1007/s00466-014-1079-0 ↗
58. Williams JG (1988) On the calculation of energy release rates for cracked laminates. Int J Fract 36(2):101–11910.1007/BF00017790 ↗
59. Xie D, Waas AM (2006) Discrete cohesive zone model for mixed-mode fracture using finite element analysis. Eng Fract Mech 73:1783–179610.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.03.006 ↗
60. Xie D, Salvi AG, Sun C, Waas AM (2006) Discrete cohesive zone model to simulate static fracture in 2D triaxially braided carbon fiber composites. J Compos Mater 40(22):2025–204610.1177/0021998306061320 ↗
61. Xu X-P, Needleman A (1994) Numerical simulations of fast crack growth in brittle solids. J Mech Phys Solids 42(9):1397–143410.1016/0022-5096(94)90003-5 ↗
62. Yang B, Ravi-Chandar KA (1998) Antiplane shear crack growth under quasistatic loading in a damaging material. Int J Solids Struct 35(28–29):3695–371510.1016/S0020-7683(97)00236-9 ↗
63. Yang B, Mall S, Ravi-Chandar KA (2001) A cohesive zone model for fatigue crack growth in quasibrittle materials. Int J Solids Struct 38(22–23):3927–439410.1016/S0020-7683(00)00253-5 ↗