journal article·2020-03

Limited Input Benzeggagh and Kenane delamination failure criterion for mixed-mode loaded fiber reinforced composite laminates

Sidharth Reddy Karnati, Kunigal Shivakumar

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 222· Issue 1-2
Publisher page

Abstract

Bilinear delamination failure criteria proposed by Reeder for mixed-mode (I–II) fracture of composite laminates has four limitations: require mixed-mode (I–II) fracture data by the more complex MMB test; determination of bilinear constants by two independent curve fits; failure of bilinear equations to intersect at $$\hbox {G}_{\mathrm{I}}^{\mathrm{m}}/\hbox {G}_{\mathrm{II}}^{\mathrm{m}}=1$$; and the data representation by $$\hbox {G}_{\mathrm{I}}^{\mathrm{m}}$$ versus $$\hbox {G}_{\mathrm{II}}^{\mathrm{m}}$$ instead of the conventional $$\hbox {G}_{\mathrm{c}}^{\mathrm{m}}$$ versus $$\hbox {G}_{\mathrm{II}}^{\mathrm{m}}/\hbox {G}_{\mathrm{T}}$$. Some of these limitations were overcome by limited input bilinear criteria (LIBC) proposed by Davidson and Zhao by replacing the MMB test data by DCB, ENF, and SLB (single leg beam) test data. But the LIBC retained the two discontinuous forms of the equations for no specific reason in a continuous material system. This paper eliminates the two equations by a single power law equation that covers the whole domain of fracture as in Benzeggagh and Kenane’s empirical equation. This simplified mixed-mode delamination fracture criterion we call “Limited Input B–K (LIBK) criterion in recognition of the works of Davidson and Zhao, and Benzeggagh and Kenane. The criterion was validated by a large number of test data in the literature.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Adeyemi NB, Shivakumar KN, Avva VS (1999) Delamination fracture toughness of woven-fabric composites under mixed-mode loading. AIAA J 37(4):517–52010.2514/2.747 ↗
2. ASTM D5528-13 (2013) Standard test method for mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites. ASTM International
3. Benzeggagh ML, Kenane M (1996) Measurement of mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites with mixed-mode bending apparatus. Compos Sci Technol 56(4):439–44910.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X ↗
4. Bonhomme J, Viña J, Argüelles A, Viña I, Mollón V (2013) Influence of the matrix toughness in carbon-epoxy composites subjected to delamination under modes I, II, and mixed I/II. Mech Adv Mater Struct 20(4):679–68610.1080/15376494.2012.667866 ↗
5. Boni L, Fanteria D, Lazzeri L, Panettieri E, Mariani U, Rigamonti M (2018) Influence of environment conditioning on the interlaminar fracture toughness of a graphite/epoxy unidirectional material. Compos Part B Eng 153:97–10710.1016/j.compositesb.2018.07.044 ↗
6. Crews Jr JH, Reeder JR (1988) A mixed-mode bending apparatus for delamination testing. NASA-TM-100662
7. D6671/D6671M-19 (2019) Standard test method for mixed mode I–mode II interlaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional fiber reinforced polymer matrix composites. ASTM International
8. D7905M-14 (2014) Standard test method for determination of the mode II interlaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites. ASTM International
9. Daneshjoo Z, Shokrieh M, Fakoor M (2018) A micromechanical model for prediction of mixed mode I/II delamination of laminated composites considering fiber bridging effects. Theor Appl Fract Mech 94:46–5610.1016/j.tafmec.2017.12.002 ↗
10. Davidson BD, Sun X (2005) Effects of friction, geometry, and fixture compliance on the perceived toughness from three-and four-point bend end-notched flexure tests. J Reinf Plast Compos 24(15):1611–162810.1177/0731684405050402 ↗
11. Davidson BD, Zhao W (2006) An accurate mixed-mode delamination failure criterion for laminated fibrous composites requiring limited experimental input. J Compos Mater 41(2):679–702
12. Davidson BD, Zhao W (2007) An accurate mixed-mode delamination failure criterion for laminated fibrous composites requiring limited experimental input. J Compos Mater 41(2):679–70210.1177/0021998306071031 ↗
13. De Morais A, Pereira A, De Moura M, Silva F, Dourado N (2015) Bilinear approximations to the mixed-mode I–II delamination cohesive law using an inverse method. Compo Struct 122:361–36610.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.058 ↗
14. Ducept F, Davies P, Gamby D (1997) An experimental study to validate tests used to determine mixed mode failure criteria of glass/epoxy composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 28(4):719–72910.1016/S1359-835X(97)00012-2 ↗
15. Ducept F, Davies P, Gamby D (2000) Mixed mode failure criteria for a glass/epoxy composite and an adhesively bonded composite/composite joint. Int J Adhes Adhes 20(3):233–24410.1016/S0143-7496(99)00048-2 ↗
16. Fanteria D, Lazzeri L, Panettieri E, Mariani U, Rigamonti M (2017) Experimental characterization of the interlaminar fracture toughness of a woven and a unidirectional carbon/epoxy composite. Compos Sci Technol 142:20–2910.1016/j.compscitech.2017.01.028 ↗
17. Hansen P, Martin R (1999) DCB, 4ENF and MMB delamination characterisation of S2/8552 and IM7/8552, Material Engineering Research Lab LTD Hertford (United Kingdom)
18. Juntti M, Asp LE, Olsson R (1999) Assessment of evaluation methods for the mixed-mode bending test. J Compos Technol Res 21(1):37–4810.1520/CTR10611J ↗
19. Karnati SR (2014) A mixed-mode (I–II) fracture criterion for AS4/8552 carbon/epoxy composite laminate. North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, North Carolina
20. Liu Y, Zhang C, Xiang Y (2015) A critical plane-based fracture criterion for mixed-mode delamination in composite materials. Compos Part B Eng 82:212–22010.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.017 ↗
21. Mathews MJ, Swanson SR (2007) Characterization of the interlaminar fracture toughness of a laminated carbon/epoxy composite. Compos Sci Technol 67(7–8):1489–149810.1016/j.compscitech.2006.07.035 ↗
22. Naghipour P, Bartsch M, Chernova L, Hausmann J, Voggenreiter H (2010) Effect of fiber angle orientation and stacking sequence on mixed mode fracture toughness of carbon fiber reinforced plastics: numerical and experimental investigations. Mater Sci Eng A 527(3):509–51710.1016/j.msea.2009.07.069 ↗
23. Ozdil F, Carlsson L (1999) Beam analysis of angle-ply laminate mixed-mode bending specimens. Compos Sci Technol 59(2):937–94510.1016/S0266-3538(98)00128-6 ↗
24. Pereira A, De Morais A (2008) Mixed mode I + II interlaminar fracture of carbon/epoxy laminates. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 39(2):322–33310.1016/j.compositesa.2007.10.013 ↗
25. Reeder JR (1992) An evaluation of mixed-mode delamination failure criteria, NASA-TM-104210
26. Reeder JR, Crews Jr JH (1991) Nonlinear analysis and redesign of the mixed-mode bending delamination test. NASA TM-102777
27. Shivakumar KN, Crews JH Jr, Avvat VS (1998) Modified mixed-mode bending test apparatus for measuring delamination fracture toughness of laminated composites. J Compos Mater 32(5):804–82810.1177/002199839803200901 ↗
28. Shokrieh M, Zeinedini A, Ghoreishi SM (2017) On the mixed mode I/II delamination R-curve of E-glass/epoxy laminated composites. Comp Struct 171:19–3110.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.017 ↗
29. Singh S, Partridge I (1995) Mixed-mode fracture in an interleaved carbon-fibre/epoxy composite. Compos Sci Technol 55(4):319–32710.1016/0266-3538(95)00062-3 ↗
30. Treber D, Haspel B, Elsner P, Weidenmann K (2017) Delamination fracture toughness of continuous glass-fiber/epoxy composites for structural applications. Int J Plast Technol 21(1):39–5410.1007/s12588-016-9168-x ↗